Citrix 1Y0-403 Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions

Question 1:

A Citrix Architect is designing an expansion for an existing Citrix Apps and Desktops environment. The current environment uses English interfaces. The expansion is in Poland and will onboard 100 new users who require all user interfaces to be in Polish. The architect has identified two key network limitations for connecting Poland to the existing Site: low and unstable network bandwidth, and network latency exceeding 300 ms. 

Considering these constraints, what is the most appropriate deployment strategy for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops for these Polish users?

A. Install a StoreFront server in Poland. 

B. Implement Citrix Cloud Gateway in Europe. 

C. Add a Satellite Zone to the existing Site. 

D. Create a new Site in Poland.

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

This scenario presents a common challenge in geographically dispersed Citrix deployments: overcoming significant network constraints while meeting specific localization requirements. The core problem lies with the high latency (over 300 ms) and unstable bandwidth between the existing Citrix Site and the new Polish location. These conditions are detrimental to the performance and reliability of a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment, severely impacting user experience. 

The additional requirement for full Polish interfaces suggests a need for localized configuration beyond just language settings, potentially involving regional policies and delivery mechanisms.

Why "Create a new Site in Poland" is the optimal solution:

Citrix best practices strongly advocate for deploying a separate, independent Citrix Site when network latency consistently exceeds 250 ms. This recommendation is based on several critical factors:

• Performance Degradation: High latency dramatically slows down control and data plane traffic within a single Citrix Site. This includes crucial operations like user logons, application launching, session brokering, and monitoring. For instance, the communication between Delivery Controllers and the Site database, or between different zones in a single site, becomes highly inefficient and unreliable over high-latency links. 

• Satellite Zone Limitations: While Satellite Zones are designed to extend a Citrix Site to remote locations, they are not suitable for environments with such severe network limitations. A Satellite Zone fundamentally relies on the main zone's infrastructure, including Delivery Controllers and the Site database. All brokering, monitoring, and configuration changes still necessitate communication with the primary zone. 

• Independent Local Infrastructure: Establishing a new Site in Poland allows for the deployment of a complete, independent set of core Citrix infrastructure components locally. This includes Delivery Controllers, StoreFront servers, Citrix Director, and the Site database. By localizing these elements, all critical control plane traffic and database interactions occur within the low-latency, stable network of the Polish data center.

• Enhanced Localization and Management: A new Site provides full autonomy for local configuration. This is crucial for meeting the Polish interface requirement, as it allows for the implementation of specific Group Policy Objects (GPOs), language packs, localized delivery groups, and other regional customizations without affecting or being constrained by the existing English-centric Site. 

In conclusion, given the severe network constraints and the specific localization needs, creating a new, independent Citrix Site in Poland is the only robust and scalable solution that ensures optimal performance, reliability, and manageability for the new users.

Question 2:

A new Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Site is being planned with a single Site encompassing three distinct geographical regions, each configured as a separate zone. The IT team anticipates that each zone will support 825 concurrent user sessions. Furthermore, it is projected that there will be no more than 28 concurrent session launches at any given time within each zone. 

What is the minimum acceptable Site-to-Site bandwidth requirement between the Primary Zone and a Satellite Zone to accommodate these figures?

A. 1 Kbps 

B. 200 Mbps 

C. 2 Mbps 

D. 8 Gbps

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

This question assesses the understanding of inter-zone bandwidth requirements within a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops deployment. Citrix provides specific guidelines for bandwidth allocation between a Primary Zone and Satellite Zones, with a primary focus on the most demanding phase of user activity: session launches.

Citrix Bandwidth Guidelines for Zone-to-Zone Communication:

Citrix documentation highlights that bandwidth planning for communications between zones is primarily driven by the number of concurrent session launches, rather than the total number of active concurrent sessions. Here's why:

• Session Launch Phase: During the session launch phase, significant control and data traffic occurs between the Satellite Zone's components (like VDAs and local controllers, if present) and the Primary Zone's Delivery Controllers and Site database. This traffic includes brokering requests, policy application, profile loading (if not localized), and initial session establishment data. Citrix best practices indicate that each concurrent session launch requires approximately 64 Kbps of dedicated bandwidth for a brief period (typically 3-5 seconds). 

• Steady-State Traffic: Once a user session is established and running, the inter-zone bandwidth consumption for that active session becomes negligible. This "steady-state" traffic primarily consists of control signals, monitoring data, and heartbeats, usually consuming 1 Kbps or less per session. Therefore, the total number of active concurrent sessions (825 in this case) is not the primary driver for inter-zone bandwidth capacity, as most of the actual session data flow occurs within the VDA's local zone or between the client endpoint and the VDA.

Therefore, based on Citrix's design guidance and the characteristics of session launch traffic, 2 Mbps is the minimum acceptable Site-to-Site bandwidth for 28 concurrent session launches.

Question 3:

In a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops design, users in Chicago need to access printers located on a Citrix Universal Print Server in New York. The overall environment requires optimized bandwidth and performance, full availability, and auto-created default local printer functionality within HDX sessions. 

Which specific configuration set should the architect implement to meet the printing requirements for Chicago users?

A. Enable "Auto-create all client printers," set universal print driver usage to "Use universal printing only," apply to all users, install and configure the Universal Print Server, and set its policy to "Enabled with no fallback." Then create a session printer policy with the correct network printers for Chicago. 

B. Enable "Auto-create all client printers," set universal print driver usage to "Use universal printing only," apply to Chicago users, install and configure the Universal Print Server, and set its policy to "Enabled with fallback." Then create a session printer policy for all users. 

C. Enable "Auto-create client’s default printer only," set universal print driver usage to "Use universal printing only if requested driver is unavailable," apply to all users, install and configure the Universal Print Server, and set its policy to "Enabled with fallback." Then create a session printer policy for all users. 

D. Enable "Auto-create client’s default printer only," set universal print driver usage to "Use universal printing only," apply to all users, install and configure the Universal Print Server, and set its policy to "Enabled with fallback." Then create a session printer policy for Chicago users.

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

This question requires a comprehensive understanding of Citrix printing policies and their interaction, balancing user convenience, performance optimization, and high availability. The scenario outlines specific needs for Chicago users to access network printers in New York via a Universal Print Server (UPS), while all users also need their default local printer to be auto-created within their HDX sessions, with an emphasis on bandwidth optimization and high availability.

Let's break down why Option D is the most appropriate and comprehensive solution:

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

• A. "Auto-create all client printers" & "no fallback":

• "Auto-create all client printers" is inefficient and wastes bandwidth by mapping every local printer, not just the default.

• "Enabled with no fallback" creates a single point of failure. If the UPS becomes unavailable, printing for Chicago users will stop entirely, violating the "full availability" requirement.

• B. "Auto-create all client printers" & "session printer policy for all users":

Again, "Auto-create all client printers" is inefficient.

Applying the session printer policy for New York printers to "all users" is incorrect, as only Chicago users require them. This would lead to unnecessary printer mappings for users in Miami or other locations, complicating the environment and potentially causing confusion.

• C. "universal print driver usage to 'Use universal printing only if requested driver is unavailable'" & "session printer policy for all users":

Use universal printing only if requested driver is unavailable" is a less optimized approach. It allows native drivers to be attempted first, which can be less efficient and reliable over WAN connections compared to forcing UPD usage.

Applying the session printer policy for New York printers to "all users" is incorrect for the same reasons as in Option B.

In summary, Option D strategically combines the precise policy settings for auto-creation, universal printing, UPS configuration with high availability, and targeted session printer mapping to meet all specified requirements for performance, availability, and user experience in this complex printing scenario.

Question 4:

If all Delivery Controllers located exclusively in the Primary Zone become unavailable, how will the Virtual Delivery Agents (VDAs) situated within the Primary Zone behave regarding registration?

A. Satellite Zone 2 will be promoted and the Primary Zone Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines will register within Satellite Zone 2. 

B. Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines in the Primary Zone will NOT register within Satellite Zone 1 or Satellite Zone 2. 

C. Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines in the Primary Zone will register within Satellite Zone 2. 

D. Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines in the Primary Zone will register within Satellite Zone 1.

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

This question delves into the fundamental behavior of VDA registration and zone architecture in a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. Understanding how VDAs discover and register with Delivery Controllers, especially in multi-zone deployments, is crucial for designing resilient systems.

Core Principles of VDA Registration in Zones:

1. Zone-Local Preference (Default Behavior): By default, Virtual Delivery Agents (VDAs) are configured to register primarily with Delivery Controllers located within their own specific zone. This is a fundamental design principle to optimize performance by minimizing network latency for VDA-Controller communication and to keep traffic contained within logical boundaries.

2. No Automatic Cross-Zone Failover (Without Explicit Configuration): The critical point here is that VDAs in one zone do not automatically fail over and register with Delivery Controllers in another zone if their local controllers become unavailable. For VDAs to register with controllers in a different zone, an explicit configuration is required. This typically involves:

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

• A. Satellite Zone 2 will be promoted and the Primary Zone Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines will register within Satellite Zone 2.

• Citrix does not have an automatic "promotion" mechanism for Satellite Zones in response to a Primary Zone Controller failure. The concept of zone promotion doesn't exist in this context. Furthermore, as explained, VDAs won't automatically register cross-zone without specific configuration.

• C. Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines in the Primary Zone will register within Satellite Zone 2.

• D. Virtual Delivery Agent (VDA) machines in the Primary Zone will register within Satellite Zone 1.

• Both C and D imply an automatic cross-zone registration. This is incorrect. Without explicit VDA registration policies defining failover to controllers in Satellite Zone 1 or 2, Primary Zone VDAs will not register there. They will remain unregistered and unable to provide resources.

In summary, the default and expected behavior when all local Delivery Controllers fail, and no cross-zone failover is configured, is that the VDAs in that zone will lose registration and consequently will not be able to broker sessions.

Question 5:

When implementing Generic USB redirection for these printers, which two considerations are essential to be aware of?

A. It requires more network bandwidth compared to standard HDX virtual channels. 

B. Local access to printers will be lost until the HDX session is disconnected or ended. 

C. Manufacturer printer drivers will need to be installed on user workstations. 

D. The Citrix Virtual Channel Software Development Kit (VCSDK) will be required. E. It is supported for only USB 3.0 devices and features.

Correct Answers: A and B

Explanation:

Generic USB redirection in Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is a powerful feature that allows almost any USB device to be fully redirected from the user's local endpoint into the virtual session. This is particularly useful for devices that lack optimized virtual channels or for legacy hardware, like the USB printers mentioned here, that don't function correctly with standard HDX printing. However, this method comes with specific implications that an architect must consider.

Let's analyze why options A and B are correct and why the others are not:

Why Option A is Correct: It requires more network bandwidth compared to standard HDX virtual channels.

• Nature of Generic Redirection: Unlike optimized HDX virtual channels (such as HDX Print, which compresses and sends only print job data, or HDX USB for specific device classes like mass storage), Generic USB redirection encapsulates the entire raw USB protocol data. This means all communication between the virtual machine's USB stack and the physical USB device, including enumeration, control transfers, bulk transfers, and interrupt transfers, is sent across the network via the ICA/HDX protocol.

• Bandwidth Consumption: This "raw" redirection generates significantly more network traffic than optimized channels. For example, an optimized HDX print channel sends a highly compressed print job, whereas Generic USB redirection sends all the low-level USB commands and responses. Consequently, Generic USB redirection consumes substantially more bandwidth and can be sensitive to network latency, particularly for devices with high data rates or chatty protocols. This makes it less efficient from a network perspective than purpose-built virtual channels.

Why Option B is Correct: Local access to printers will be lost until the HDX session is disconnected or ended.

• Exclusive Control: When a USB device is redirected using Generic USB redirection, the virtual session gains exclusive control over that device. The local operating system on the user's endpoint essentially "releases" the device, making it unavailable to applications running directly on the local machine.

• User Experience Impact: For the legacy USB printers in this scenario, if a user redirects their local USB printer into an HDX session, they will no longer be able to print to it from applications running on their local desktop (outside the HDX session). The printer will only be accessible from within the virtual session. 

Therefore, an architect implementing Generic USB redirection must be acutely aware of its higher bandwidth consumption and the fact that redirected devices become exclusively tied to the virtual session, making them temporarily unavailable locally.

Question 6:

In an active-passive Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment, the primary (active) data center experiences a complete failure of all Delivery Controllers. The design incorporates Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB), Local Host Cache (LHC), and StoreFront servers in both data centers, with Virtual Delivery Agents (VDAs) registered specifically within their respective zones. 

Given this design, what is the expected outcome regarding user access and session brokering?

A. VDA machines from the primary data center would register with the Delivery Controllers in the passive data center. 

B. StoreFront in the primary data center would still be able to launch sessions. 

C. GSLB will start redirecting connections to the secondary data center. 

D. GSLB will NOT identify that the Delivery Controllers are down and sessions CANNOT launch.

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

This question tests the understanding of how various components in an active-passive Citrix disaster recovery (DR) solution work together during a primary data center failure. The key elements are GSLB for traffic redirection, the role of Delivery Controllers and StoreFront in session brokering, and VDA registration behavior.

Let's break down the expected outcome:

1. Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) Role:
   
   

• GSLB is designed for disaster recovery and multi-data center deployments. Its primary function is to intelligently direct user connections to the most appropriate or available data center.

• Crucially, GSLB solutions (like Citrix ADC's GSLB) are configured with health monitors. These monitors actively probe the health of services in each data center, such as the StoreFront servers and, indirectly, the underlying Delivery Controllers.

• When the GSLB's health monitors detect that the Delivery Controllers (and by extension, the StoreFront services that depend on them) in the primary data center are unresponsive or failed, GSLB will automatically update its DNS records (or similar redirection mechanisms) to steer new incoming user connections away from the failed primary data center and towards the healthy, secondary (passive) data center.

2. Impact of Delivery Controller Failure in Primary Data Center:
   
   

• If all Delivery Controllers in the primary data center fail, they can no longer perform their essential functions: brokering sessions, managing VDAs, applying policies, or communicating with the Site database.

3. Local Host Cache (LHC) Consideration:
   
   

• While the Local Host Cache (LHC) is crucial for VDA and brokering resilience within a zone during a database outage or controller restart, it does not help if all controllers in that zone are completely down. LHC ensures that VDAs can continue to register and sessions can be brokered locally if the database or some controllers are unavailable, but it requires at least one healthy controller to be operating in the zone. If all primary zone controllers fail, LHC cannot operate for that zone.

In summary, the GSLB is the pivotal component that ensures failover by intelligently redirecting new user connections to the secondary data center when the primary data center's Delivery Controllers become unavailable.

Question 7:

When performing a command-line installation of Citrix Workspace app for Windows, which parameter should the architect include to fulfill this specific requirement?

A. /AutoUpdateStream=current 

B. /AutoUpdateCheck=auto 

C. /AutoUpdateStream=disabled 

D. /AutoUpdateCheck=disabled

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

In enterprise environments, maintaining control over software versions is paramount for compatibility, stability, and regulatory compliance. Automatic updates, while convenient for individual users, can disrupt IT operations if not managed centrally. Citrix Workspace app for Windows provides command-line parameters during installation to allow administrators to precisely control its update behavior, aligning with the requirement for ESD-only deployments.

Let's examine the relevant command-line parameters for managing Citrix Workspace app updates:

1. /AutoUpdateCheck Parameter:
   
   

• This parameter directly controls whether the Citrix Workspace app performs automatic checks for new updates.

• Valid values:

• auto: This is the default behavior. It enables the automatic update check feature, allowing the Workspace app to periodically check for, download, and prompt for (or automatically install, depending on other settings) available updates.

• disabled: This is the crucial setting for this scenario. It completely disables the automatic update checking mechanism. When set to disabled, the Workspace app will not attempt to check for, download, or install any updates on its own. This ensures that all updates must be pushed manually via the organization's ESD system.

2. /AutoUpdateStream Parameter:
   
   

• This parameter determines which update channel the Workspace app should subscribe to if automatic updates are enabled. It defines the type of releases (e.g., current releases for the latest features or Long-Term Service Releases for stability) the app will look for.

• Valid values: current, ltsr.

• Crucial distinction: This parameter is only relevant if automatic updates are enabled. If AutoUpdateCheck is set to disabled, the AutoUpdateStream parameter has no practical effect, as the app won't be checking for updates regardless of the stream.

Why Option D is Correct:

• D. /AutoUpdateCheck=disabled: This parameter directly and unequivocally addresses the business requirement to "disable automatic updates for the Citrix Workspace app." By setting this, the Workspace app will never initiate an automatic check for updates, thereby ensuring that all updates must come through the central ESD system.

Question 8:

A Citrix Architect is tasked with designing a small production environment that will reside within a single data center. The design must incorporate the ability to perform maintenance activities without causing an outage for users. Furthermore, the overall management effort for the environment should be minimized. 

Based on these specific criteria, what is the most appropriate hardware configuration for the Citrix Hypervisor hosts?

A. N+1 Citrix Hypervisor hosts in a single cluster/pool 

B. Separate Citrix Hypervisor cluster/pool in an alternate data center 

C. Multiple individual Citrix Hypervisor hosts in the same data center 

D. Separate Citrix Hypervisor clusters/pools in the same data center

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

This question evaluates the architect's understanding of hypervisor design principles, particularly concerning high availability and manageability within a single data center for a small production environment. Three key requirements guide the optimal solution:

1. Single Data Center Deployment: This immediately rules out solutions involving multiple or alternate data centers.

2. Maintenance Without Outage: This implies a need for redundancy and the ability to migrate workloads seamlessly during host maintenance or failure.

3. Low Management Effort: The chosen configuration should be straightforward to deploy, manage, and scale, avoiding unnecessary complexity.

Let's assess each option against these criteria:

Why Option A is the Correct Choice: N+1 Citrix Hypervisor hosts in a single cluster/pool

• N+1 Redundancy: The "N+1" concept means that the environment has 'N' hosts required to run the maximum production workload, plus one additional (spare) host. This extra host provides immediate failover capacity. If one host needs to be taken down for maintenance (e.g., patching, hardware upgrades) or experiences an unplanned failure, its virtual machines (VMs) can be seamlessly migrated (e.g., using XenMotion or Live Migration) to the spare capacity on the remaining N hosts. This ensures that user services continue without interruption, fulfilling the "maintenance without outage" requirement.

• Single Cluster/Pool: Consolidating all hosts into a single Citrix Hypervisor (or XenServer) resource pool simplifies management significantly.

• Centralized Management: All hosts, storage, and networking can be managed from a single console (e.g., XenCenter).

• Shared Resources: VMs can be easily moved between hosts within the same pool, sharing network and storage resources (e.g., shared SAN/NAS).

• Automated Features: Features like High Availability (HA) and Workload Balancing (WLB) are most effectively utilized within a single pool, further reducing manual intervention and management effort.

This configuration perfectly aligns with all stated requirements: it's within a single data center, provides redundancy for maintenance without outage, and offers streamlined, low-effort management.

Question 9:

A Citrix Architect is setting up a new Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment for a company with 1,000 Advanced licenses. A critical business requirement is for the IT team to generate reports on all unsuccessful Citrix Virtual Apps connections spanning the past 12 months. 

Which two specific steps must the architect take to successfully meet these reporting requirements?

A. Configure ‘GroomSessionsRetentionDays’ to 365 days 

B. Upgrade to Citrix Virtual Desktops Premium licenses 

C. Configure ‘GroomFailuresRetentionDays’ to 365 days 

D. Upgrade to Citrix Gateway Universal licenses E. Implement Citrix Application Delivery Management

Correct Answers: B and C

Explanation:

This question addresses two crucial aspects of Citrix monitoring and reporting: data retention capabilities and licensing tiers. The core requirement is to report on "unsuccessful Citrix Virtual Apps connections over the past 12 months." This directly points to two specific areas that need to be addressed simultaneously.

Understanding Citrix Director and Data Retention:

Citrix Director is the primary monitoring and troubleshooting console for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops. It collects and stores various types of historical data, including session activity, connection failures, logon performance, and more. The duration for which this historical data is retained is governed by specific database settings and, critically, by the Citrix licensing tier.

1. Licensing Tier Impact on Data Retention:
   
   

• Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Advanced Edition: This license tier offers basic monitoring capabilities through Director, but it typically has a very limited retention period for historical data—usually 7 days or less. It is designed for operational monitoring but not for long-term historical analysis or trend reporting.

• Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Premium Edition (or higher): This license tier unlocks extended historical data retention in Director. With Premium licenses, administrators can configure data retention for up to 365 days (or even longer, depending on the database size and specific version features) for various data points, including failures. 

2. Database Retention Settings for Failures:
   
   

• Citrix Director stores data in a monitoring database. The retention period for specific data types is controlled by SQL-level configurations, often exposed through PowerShell commands or SQL queries.

• GroomFailuresRetentionDays: This specific setting (configured on the monitoring database) dictates how long "failure" events are retained. Unsuccessful connection attempts are classified as failure events. To retain this data for 12 months (365 days), this parameter must be set to 365.

Why Option B is Correct: Upgrade to Citrix Virtual Desktops Premium licenses

• This is a fundamental prerequisite. The 1,000 Advanced licenses currently held by the company will NOT support a 12-month data retention period for any type of historical data in Director. To enable long-term historical reporting (including unsuccessful connection attempts for 365 days), the licensing tier MUST be upgraded to Premium Edition. Without this upgrade, configuring the database setting alone will be ineffective.

Why Option C is Correct: Configure ‘GroomFailuresRetentionDays’ to 365 days

• Once the Premium license is in place (or planned), this is the specific database setting that needs to be modified. To ensure that unsuccessful connection attempts (which are classified as failures) are retained for 12 months, the GroomFailuresRetentionDays parameter in the Citrix monitoring database must be explicitly set to 365. This tells the database to keep this type of data for the specified duration.

In conclusion, to fulfill the requirement of reporting on 12 months of unsuccessful Citrix Virtual Apps connections, the architect must perform two distinct but interdependent actions: upgrade the Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops licenses to Premium and configure the GroomFailuresRetentionDays setting in the monitoring database to 365 days.

Question 10:

A Citrix Architect is designing a Virtual Desktops environment specifically for an Engineer Group. This group requires NVIDIA GPU virtualization (vGPU) to support their graphics-intensive applications. The architect's proposed setup includes: NVIDIA GRID Tesla P40 GPUs, Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 R2, Windows 10 VMs, and Citrix Virtual Desktops 7. 

Which specific component in this proposed setup must be changed to enable the shared GPU (vGPU) functionality?

A. Windows 10 virtual machines 

B. Citrix Virtual Desktops 7 

C. NVIDIA GRID Tesla P40 GPUs 

D. Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 R2

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

This question focuses on the compatibility requirements for implementing NVIDIA vGPU (virtual GPU) technology within a Citrix Virtual Desktops environment. vGPU allows multiple virtual machines to share a single physical GPU, providing accelerated graphics capabilities to virtual desktops while optimizing hardware utilization. For vGPU to function correctly, all components in the virtualization stack—from the physical hardware to the hypervisor, guest operating system, and the VDI brokering software—must be compatible.

Let's analyze each component in the proposed setup for its vGPU compatibility:

1. NVIDIA GRID Tesla P40 GPUs:
   
   

• Compatibility: The NVIDIA GRID Tesla P40 is a high-performance GPU specifically designed for data center virtualization, including support for NVIDIA vGPU technology. It is a suitable and common choice for graphics-intensive virtual desktop environments.

• Conclusion: This component is compatible and does NOT need to be changed.

2. Windows 10 VMs:
   
   

• Compatibility: Windows 10 is a fully supported guest operating system for NVIDIA vGPU solutions. It is widely used in Citrix Virtual Desktops deployments that leverage vGPU for demanding graphical applications.

• Conclusion: This component is compatible and does NOT need to be changed.

3. Citrix Virtual Desktops 7:
   
   

• Compatibility: Citrix Virtual Desktops (formerly XenDesktop) has long supported various GPU virtualization methods, including NVIDIA vGPU. Version 7 (and subsequent releases like 7.x, or the current Citrix DaaS/CVAD) provides the necessary integration and brokering capabilities for vGPU-enabled virtual desktops. While newer features might exist in later versions, Citrix Virtual Desktops 7 itself is fundamentally compatible with vGPU.

• Conclusion: This component is compatible and does NOT need to be changed.

Conclusion: 

This component is INCOMPATIBLE and MUST be changed. To implement NVIDIA vGPU, the architect would need to replace Hyper-V 2012 R2 with a supported hypervisor, such as a more recent version of VMware ESXi, Citrix Hypervisor, or a sufficiently new version of Microsoft Hyper-V (Windows Server 2016 or newer) that explicitly supports NVIDIA vGPU via DDA.

Therefore, the Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 is the component that must be changed to enable shared GPU (vGPU) functionality for the Engineer Group.