100% Real Cisco CCIE Collaboration 400-051 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts
Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate
Archived VCE files
File | Votes | Size | Date |
---|---|---|---|
File Cisco.Actualtests.400-051.v2015-09-08.by.Rocky.238q.vce |
Votes 70 |
Size 3.77 MB |
Date Sep 08, 2015 |
File Cisco.Actualtests.400-051.vv2014-11-20.by.Aldrich.261q.vce |
Votes 572 |
Size 3.75 MB |
Date Nov 20, 2014 |
File Cisco.Certkey.400-051.v2014-05-30.by.ERNESTINE.219q.vce |
Votes 25 |
Size 2.86 MB |
Date May 30, 2014 |
File Cisco.Actualtests.400-051.v2014-01-01.by.Luger.150q.vce |
Votes 17 |
Size 1.78 MB |
Date Jan 01, 2014 |
Cisco CCIE Collaboration 400-051 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps
Cisco 400-051 (CCIE Collaboration Written) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. Cisco 400-051 CCIE Collaboration Written exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the Cisco CCIE Collaboration 400-051 certification exam dumps & Cisco CCIE Collaboration 400-051 practice test questions in vce format.
Embarking on the journey to achieve the Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert (CCIE) Service Provider certification is a significant commitment for any network professional. The first major milestone in this path is conquering the 400-051 Exam. This written examination serves as a comprehensive validation of a candidate's expert-level knowledge of service provider technologies and infrastructure. It is designed to test theoretical understanding across a broad spectrum of topics before a candidate can attempt the hands-on lab exam. Passing the 400-051 Exam demonstrates a deep grasp of the concepts that underpin the massive, complex networks that power our modern internet and communication services.
This five-part series will serve as an in-depth guide to navigating the intricate topics covered in the 400-051 Exam blueprint. We will systematically dissect each domain, providing clarity on complex protocols and architectures. The goal is to build a solid foundation of knowledge, moving from core routing and switching principles to advanced services, quality of service, and network management. This initial part focuses specifically on the foundational core routing protocols that form the backbone of any service provider network. A thorough understanding of these technologies is not just recommended; it is absolutely essential for success.
The Core Routing domain of the 400-051 Exam is foundational. It covers the Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) and the Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) that are responsible for all packet forwarding decisions within and between autonomous systems. Mastery of this section requires more than just knowing the definitions; it demands a nuanced understanding of how these protocols are configured, optimized, and troubleshooted in a large-scale service provider environment. This includes a deep dive into Interior Gateway Protocols like IS-IS and OSPF, and an extensive exploration of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is the protocol of the internet itself.
Within this domain, candidates are expected to understand protocol-specific metrics, area or level designs, route filtering, and redistribution techniques. The exam will test knowledge of how these protocols interact with each other and with other technologies like Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS). For the 400-051 Exam, it is critical to move beyond basic configurations and grasp the advanced features and scalability mechanisms that allow these protocols to function effectively in networks comprising thousands of routers and millions of routes. This section lays the groundwork for understanding more complex topics like VPN services and traffic engineering.
Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) is a link-state Interior Gateway Protocol that is widely favored in service provider environments due to its scalability and flexibility. Unlike OSPF, IS-IS was designed by the ISO and operates at Layer 2, encapsulating its Protocol Data Units (PDUs) directly within data link frames. This makes it inherently independent of the IP protocol, allowing it to easily support different network layer protocols, a feature that proved invaluable during the transition to IPv6. For the 400-051 Exam, a candidate must understand the two-level hierarchy of IS-IS, consisting of Level 1 (intra-area) and Level 2 (backbone) routing.
A critical concept within IS-IS is the use of Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples to carry information within its Link State PDUs (LSPs). This extensible design allows new features and capabilities to be added to the protocol without requiring a fundamental change to its core operation. For example, TLVs are used to carry traffic engineering information for MPLS-TE and to support both IPv4 and IPv6 routing information, often referred to as Integrated IS-IS. Understanding how to configure IS-IS areas, metric types (narrow vs. wide), and authentication is paramount for the 400-051 Exam.
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is another link-state IGP that plays a significant, albeit different, role in service provider networks compared to IS-IS. While IS-IS is often the choice for the core network backbone, OSPF is frequently deployed in access or aggregation networks, or as the IGP within a customer's Provider Edge (PE) to Customer Edge (CE) connection in an MPLS VPN environment. The 400-051 Exam requires a detailed understanding of both OSPFv2 for IPv4 and OSPFv3 for IPv6. OSPFv3 is particularly important due to its redesigned structure, which decouples it from the underlying network protocol.
Candidates must be intimately familiar with OSPF's hierarchical design, including different area types like stub areas, totally stubby areas, and Not-So-Stubby Areas (NSSAs). Understanding the function of various Link-State Advertisement (LSA) types is crucial, as they are the building blocks of the OSPF link-state database. For the 400-051 Exam, topics such as LSA filtering, route summarization at Area Border Routers (ABRs) and Autonomous System Boundary Routers (ASBRs), and path selection logic are essential. Advanced OSPF features, such as graceful restart and Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) integration, are also key areas of study.
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is arguably the most important protocol covered in the 400-051 Exam. As the de facto routing protocol of the global internet, BGP is responsible for exchanging routing information between different autonomous systems (AS). Its primary function is not just to find a path, but to enforce routing policies. A deep understanding of BGP is non-negotiable for any service provider engineer. The exam covers both External BGP (eBGP), used between different ASes, and Internal BGP (iBGP), used within a single AS to carry external routes.
A core component of BGP is its rich set of path attributes, which are used in the best-path selection algorithm. Candidates must master attributes such as AS_PATH, NEXT_HOP, LOCAL_PREF, MED (Multi-Exit Discriminator), and communities. The 400-051 Exam will test your ability to manipulate these attributes using route maps and prefix lists to influence traffic flow and implement specific routing policies. Understanding the iBGP split-horizon rule and the solutions to it, namely full-mesh peering, route reflectors, and confederations, is fundamental to designing scalable and stable BGP deployments within a service provider network.
Beyond the fundamentals, the 400-051 Exam delves into advanced BGP features that are critical for modern service provider operations. These features are designed to enhance scalability, improve convergence, and provide more granular control over routing policies. One such feature is BGP Multipath, which allows a router to install multiple BGP paths to the same destination in the routing table, enabling load balancing across different links. Understanding the conditions that must be met for a path to be considered for multipathing is a key exam topic.
Another critical area is the use of BGP communities, including standard, extended, and large communities. These attributes act as tags that can be attached to routes to signal specific policies or actions to other routers within or outside the local AS. For example, communities are heavily used in traffic engineering and for signaling DDoS mitigation actions. Furthermore, knowledge of BGP route dampening, a mechanism to reduce the propagation of unstable (flapping) routes, and features like Add-Paths, which allows BGP to advertise multiple paths for the same prefix, are essential concepts for the 400-051 Exam.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a core technology in nearly every service provider network. It provides a mechanism for engineering traffic paths and creating virtual private networks, decoupling the forwarding decision from the IP header lookup process. The 400-051 Exam requires a solid understanding of the fundamental architecture of MPLS. This includes the roles of the Label Edge Router (LER), which pushes or pops labels at the edge of the MPLS cloud, and the Label Switch Router (LSR), which performs fast label swapping in the core.
The primary protocol for distributing labels within an MPLS network is the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP). LDP works in conjunction with an underlying IGP like IS-IS or OSPF. The IGP provides the IP reachability information, and LDP then establishes Label Switched Paths (LSPs) along the paths determined by the IGP. Candidates must understand the LDP discovery process, session establishment, and label distribution methods (e.g., Downstream Unsolicited). The relationship between the Forwarding Information Base (FIB) and the Label Forwarding Information Base (LFIB) is a critical concept to grasp for the 400-051 Exam.
The global exhaustion of IPv4 addresses has made IPv6 a first-class citizen in service provider networks. The 400-051 Exam reflects this reality, requiring candidates to have expert-level knowledge of IPv6 addressing, routing, and transition mechanisms. This begins with a thorough understanding of the IPv6 address format, including global unicast, unique local, link-local addresses, and the concept of the interface identifier (EUI-64). Efficient IPv6 address planning and subnetting are critical skills for designing scalable networks.
Routing in an IPv6 environment is handled by IPv6-enabled versions of the standard protocols. For the IGPs, this means OSPFv3 and Integrated IS-IS. For inter-AS routing, Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) is used, which extends BGP to carry routing information for multiple network layer protocols using Address Family Identifiers (AFIs) and Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFIs). The 400-051 Exam will test knowledge of configuring and troubleshooting these protocols in a dual-stack (IPv4 and IPv6) environment, which is the most common deployment scenario in service provider networks today.
Preparing for a test as comprehensive as the 400-051 Exam requires a structured and disciplined approach. The first step for any candidate should be to thoroughly review the official exam blueprint. This document is the definitive guide to what you are expected to know. Break down each topic and create a detailed study plan, allocating sufficient time to each domain based on your existing knowledge and the weight of the section on the exam. Use a variety of resources, including official certification guides, white papers, and relevant IETF RFCs to gain a deep understanding of the technologies.
While the 400-051 Exam is a written test, theoretical knowledge alone is often insufficient. It is highly recommended to supplement your reading with hands-on practice. Building a virtual lab using platforms like EVE-NG or GNS3 allows you to configure and experiment with the protocols and features you are studying. This practical application reinforces theoretical concepts and helps expose the nuances of command-line syntax and protocol behavior. Finally, utilize practice exams to gauge your readiness and identify weak areas that require further study. A consistent and methodical approach is the key to success.
Building upon the foundational knowledge of core routing protocols covered in the first part, this section focuses on the services that service providers offer to their customers. Passing the 400-051 Exam requires a deep and practical understanding of how core technologies like MPLS and BGP are leveraged to create complex, value-added services. These services are the primary revenue generators for service providers and represent a significant portion of the exam blueprint. They range from basic internet connectivity to highly sophisticated Layer 2 and Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) that are critical for enterprise customers.
This part of our series will explore the architecture and implementation of these key services. We will delve into the mechanics of MPLS Layer 3 VPNs, which allow for the creation of private IP routing domains over a shared public infrastructure. We will also examine various Layer 2 VPN technologies, which extend a customer's Layer 2 broadcast domain across the service provider network. Understanding the intricate control plane and data plane operations for each of these services is essential for success on the 400-051 Exam, as is the ability to differentiate between their use cases and operational models.
MPLS Layer 3 VPNs (L3VPNs), often specified by RFC 4364, are one of the most important technologies tested on the 400-051 Exam. This service allows a service provider to offer private IP networking to its customers, where each customer has their own isolated routing table and address space, even if they use overlapping (private) IP addresses. The architecture relies on several key components. The Provider Edge (PE) router interfaces with the customer network, and the Provider (P) router forms the high-speed core of the SP network, performing only label switching and having no knowledge of customer routes.
The magic of L3VPNs lies in the control plane, which uses Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) to distribute customer routes between PE routers. To keep customer address spaces separate, a unique 64-bit Route Distinguisher (RD) is prepended to each customer prefix, creating a globally unique 96-bit VPN-IPv4 address. Additionally, Route Targets (RTs), which are extended BGP communities, are used to control the import and export of routes into and out of each customer's Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instance on the PE routers. A thorough grasp of the interaction between RDs, RTs, and MP-BGP is critical for the 400-051 Exam.
A Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instance is a fundamental component of an MPLS L3VPN. A VRF is essentially a virtual router within a physical router, complete with its own independent routing table, forwarding table, and set of interfaces. On a PE router, a separate VRF is created for each connected VPN customer, ensuring that their traffic and routing information remain completely isolated from all other customers. The 400-051 Exam requires candidates to know how to configure and verify VRFs and associate them with the correct interfaces and routing policies.
The routing exchange between the Provider Edge (PE) and the Customer Edge (CE) router is another critical topic. Service providers can support various routing protocols for this link, including static routing, OSPF, EIGRP, and eBGP. Each protocol has its own configuration nuances and considerations within the VRF context. For instance, when using OSPF as the PE-CE protocol, the PE router appears as a standard OSPF neighbor to the CE, but special mechanisms are needed to prevent routing loops and handle LSA propagation. Understanding these PE-CE interactions is essential for designing and troubleshooting customer VPN connections.
While L3VPNs provide routed connectivity, many enterprise customers require Layer 2 connectivity to extend their VLANs or broadcast domains between geographically separate sites. The 400-051 Exam covers several technologies that address this need. The two primary approaches are Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS) and Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS). VPWS provides a point-to-point Layer 2 circuit, essentially creating a virtual ethernet wire across the MPLS backbone. This is often referred to as Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) or AToM (Any Transport over MPLS).
VPLS, on the other hand, provides a multipoint-to-multipoint service, creating a virtual Layer 2 switch across the provider's network. All customer sites connected to the same VPLS instance appear to be on the same Ethernet LAN segment, allowing them to share a single broadcast domain. For the 400-051 Exam, it is crucial to understand the signaling mechanisms for these services. Both VPWS and VPLS can use LDP or BGP for signaling. Understanding the configuration, differences, and use cases for LDP-signaled versus BGP-signaled L2VPNs is a key area of study.
Ethernet VPN (EVPN) represents the next generation of Layer 2 VPN technology and is a major topic on the 400-051 Exam. EVPN addresses many of the limitations of traditional VPLS, particularly in the areas of scalability, multihoming, and integration with L3VPNs. EVPN uses a new BGP address family (the EVPN address family) to distribute Layer 2 MAC address and Layer 3 IP address information through the control plane. This MAC address learning via BGP is a significant departure from VPLS, which relies on data plane learning and can lead to unknown unicast flooding.
EVPN introduces several new route types to handle different functions, such as MAC/IP advertisement, inclusive multicast routes for BUM (Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, Multicast) traffic, and Ethernet segment routes for multihoming. One of the most powerful features of EVPN is its ability to provide active-active multihoming, where a customer site can be connected to two or more PE routers that are both actively forwarding traffic. This provides superior redundancy and load balancing compared to older technologies. Understanding the various EVPN route types and their functions is essential for the exam.
Carrier Supporting Carrier (CSC) is an architectural model that allows one service provider (the "customer carrier") to use the MPLS backbone of another service provider (the "backbone carrier") to connect its own points of presence (POPs). This is a common scenario when a smaller, regional provider needs to expand its reach without building out a national or global backbone. The 400-051 Exam requires knowledge of how this is accomplished, which essentially involves running an MPLS VPN for the customer carrier.
In a CSC model, the customer carrier's routers exchange labeled packets with the backbone carrier's PE routers. The backbone carrier treats the customer carrier's entire network as a single VPN customer. This requires a nested MPLS model, where labels are stacked. The backbone carrier uses an outer label to get the packet across its core, and the customer carrier uses an inner label to direct the packet to its final destination. Understanding the label stack operations and the necessary BGP and IGP configurations to support this architecture is a key competency tested in the 400-051 Exam.
Enterprise customers often have sites that are served by different service providers, or a single service provider may have grown through mergers and acquisitions, resulting in multiple autonomous systems. To provide seamless VPN connectivity across these different administrative domains, Inter-AS VPN solutions are required. The 400-051 Exam covers the three primary models for achieving this: Inter-AS Option A, Option B, and Option C. Each option represents a different trade-off between scalability, security, and configuration complexity.
Inter-AS Option A involves a back-to-back VRF connection on the Autonomous System Boundary Routers (ASBRs) of the two providers. It is simple to configure but scales poorly as it requires a separate sub-interface for each VPN. Option B uses eBGP to exchange labeled VPN-IPv4 routes between the ASBRs, offering better scalability. Option C, the most scalable and complex model, involves extending MP-BGP from the PE routers of one provider directly to the PE routers or route reflectors of the other provider, allowing for end-to-end LSP establishment. Understanding the data plane and control plane for each option is vital.
Quality of Service (QoS) is the mechanism that allows a service provider to offer differentiated services and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to its customers. In a congested network, QoS provides the tools to prioritize critical traffic (like voice and video) over less time-sensitive traffic (like email or file transfers). The 400-051 Exam requires a comprehensive understanding of the entire QoS toolkit, including classification, marking, queuing, congestion avoidance, and policing/shaping. A key model to understand is Differentiated Services (DiffServ), which uses the DSCP field in the IP header to mark packets for specific per-hop behaviors.
Candidates must be familiar with various queuing mechanisms like Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) for real-time traffic and Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ) for guaranteeing bandwidth to different classes of traffic. Congestion avoidance techniques, primarily Weighted Random Early Detection (WRED), are also important. For the 400-051 Exam, it is crucial to understand how to apply these QoS policies consistently across the service provider core, especially within an MPLS environment where QoS markings need to be propagated from the IP header to the MPLS label's EXP (Experimental) bits.
After establishing a strong understanding of core routing and value-added services, the next critical area of focus for the 400-051 Exam is the access and aggregation layer of the service provider network. This is the part of the network that directly connects end customers and aggregates their traffic before feeding it into the high-speed core. The design and technologies implemented here are crucial for scalability, resiliency, and the efficient delivery of services. A failure in the access or aggregation layer can impact thousands of customers, making its robust design a top priority for any service provider.
This part of the series will examine the technologies and protocols that govern this network domain. We will explore various Layer 2 access technologies, including carrier Ethernet and passive optical networks. We will also delve into the protocols that prevent loops and provide redundancy, such as the Spanning Tree Protocol and its modern alternatives. Furthermore, a significant portion of the 400-051 Exam blueprint is dedicated to high availability and fast convergence mechanisms. We will cover technologies designed to ensure that the network can recover from failures in milliseconds, maintaining seamless service delivery for customers.
Carrier Ethernet refers to the use of high-bandwidth Ethernet technology to deliver services to enterprise and residential customers. It has become the dominant access technology due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility. The 400-051 Exam requires a thorough understanding of the standards and services defined by the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF). These include E-Line services, which provide point-to-point Ethernet Private Lines (EPL) and Ethernet Virtual Private Lines (EVPL), and E-LAN services, which provide multipoint-to-multipoint connectivity similar to a traditional VLAN.
Beyond Carrier Ethernet, candidates should be familiar with other access technologies. For residential broadband, this includes Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) and Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) using Passive Optical Network (PON) technologies like GPON. While the exam may not require deep configuration knowledge of the physical layer components, understanding how these access methods are aggregated and integrated into the MPLS core is essential. This often involves protocols like PPPoE (Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet) for session management and authentication using RADIUS or Diameter servers.
One of the fundamental challenges in switched, Layer 2 networks is the prevention of broadcast storms and MAC address table instability caused by loops. The traditional solution for this is the Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) and its variants, Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) and Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP). For the 400-051 Exam, it is not enough to know that STP blocks ports to prevent loops. Candidates must understand the detailed operation, including the election of the root bridge, root ports, and designated ports, as well as the different port states and timers.
While STP is effective, its convergence time can be slow, and it leads to inefficient use of network links since some paths are actively blocked. Modern service provider networks often use alternative technologies to achieve a loop-free, active-active topology. One such technology is Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation (MC-LAG), which allows a downstream device to form a single logical link aggregation group (LAG) with two separate upstream switches. Another key technology is Shortest Path Bridging (SPB), an IEEE standard that uses IS-IS to calculate a loop-free path for Layer 2 traffic, providing much faster convergence and better scalability than STP.
High availability is a cornerstone of service provider network design. Customers expect uninterrupted service, and even a few minutes of downtime can violate Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and damage a provider's reputation. The 400-051 Exam extensively tests the concepts and technologies used to build resilient networks. This begins at the device level with features like redundant power supplies, supervisor engines, and Non-Stop Forwarding (NSF) with Stateful Switchover (SSO). NSF/SSO allows a router to maintain its forwarding plane and continue sending traffic even during a control plane failure, such as a supervisor engine switchover.
Beyond individual device redundancy, network-level redundancy is critical. This involves designing paths that have no single point of failure and implementing protocols that can detect failures and reroute traffic almost instantaneously. This is where fast convergence technologies come into play. The goal is to achieve sub-second, and ideally sub-50 millisecond, convergence time to ensure that real-time applications like voice and video are not impacted by a network failure. The 400-051 Exam requires a deep understanding of the mechanisms that enable this level of performance.
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is a lightweight, protocol-independent mechanism designed to provide very fast detection of forwarding path failures. Traditional routing protocol hello timers can take several seconds or even minutes to detect a lost neighbor, which is far too slow for modern service requirements. BFD addresses this by establishing a separate session between two routers and sending rapid, low-overhead control packets. If a certain number of these packets are missed, BFD immediately declares the session down and notifies the client routing protocols (like OSPF, BGP, or IS-IS) of the failure.
For the 400-051 Exam, candidates must understand how to configure BFD and integrate it with various routing protocols. This includes tuning BFD timers (transmit interval, receive interval, and multiplier) to achieve the desired failure detection time, while being mindful of the potential CPU overhead on the routers. BFD can operate in different modes, such as asynchronous mode and demand mode, and can be used over virtually any media type. Its ability to quickly detect failures on links, even when the physical interface remains up, makes it an indispensable tool for high availability.
Once a failure has been detected (often by BFD), the network must be able to reroute traffic onto a pre-calculated backup path immediately. This is the role of Fast Reroute (FRR) mechanisms. Waiting for the IGP to reconverge globally can take hundreds of milliseconds or longer. IP FRR, specifically Loop-Free Alternate (LFA), allows a router to pre-calculate a backup next-hop for each destination that is guaranteed not to loop back to the failed link. When a primary link fails, the router can instantly switch traffic to the LFA path in the forwarding plane without waiting for a control plane update.
In an MPLS environment, MPLS Traffic Engineering Fast Reroute (MPLS-TE FRR) provides an even more robust solution. With MPLS-TE FRR, a backup Label Switched Path (LSP), known as a detour or bypass tunnel, can be pre-established to protect a primary LSP. When a link or node on the primary path fails, the router immediately switches traffic into the bypass tunnel, providing protection in under 50 milliseconds. The 400-051 Exam requires a detailed understanding of both LFA and MPLS-TE FRR, including their configuration, verification, and the conditions under which they can provide protection.
While NSF/SSO provides hardware-level redundancy within a single device, Graceful Restart (GR) and Non-Stop Routing (NSR) are protocol-level mechanisms that enhance network stability during a control plane event, such as a router restart or a process crash. Graceful Restart allows a router that is undergoing a restart to signal its neighbors, asking them to temporarily preserve the routing information associated with it. The restarting router can then re-establish its adjacencies and rebuild its routing table without causing a network-wide reconvergence event, which would otherwise cause traffic to be black-holed.
Non-Stop Routing (NSR) is a Cisco-specific technology that takes this concept a step further. In a router with dual supervisor engines, NSR fully synchronizes the routing protocol state between the active and standby supervisors. If the active supervisor fails, the standby can take over instantly without having to re-establish any neighbor adjacencies, as it already has all the necessary state information. This provides an even more seamless failover than Graceful Restart. The 400-051 Exam tests the operational theory behind both GR and NSR and their interaction with various routing protocols.
Security in a service provider environment is a multifaceted and critically important discipline. The sheer scale and public-facing nature of these networks make them constant targets for a wide variety of attacks. A security breach can not only disrupt service for millions of customers but can also have significant financial and reputational consequences. The 400-051 Exam dedicates a significant domain to security, operation, and management, reflecting the real-world importance of these topics. A CCIE-level engineer is expected to design and implement robust security measures to protect both the provider's infrastructure and its customers.
This part of the series will focus on the key security principles and technologies relevant to the 400-051 Exam. We will cover methods for securing the control plane, which is responsible for routing and signaling, and the management plane, which provides administrative access to network devices. We will also explore techniques for mitigating common attacks, such as Denial of Service (DoS). Furthermore, we will delve into the operational and management tools and protocols that are essential for monitoring, troubleshooting, and maintaining the health of a large-scale service provider network.
The control plane is the brain of the network. It consists of the routing protocols (BGP, OSPF, IS-IS) and signaling protocols (LDP, RSVP) that make intelligent decisions about where to forward traffic. If the control plane is compromised, an attacker could redirect, intercept, or black-hole traffic. Therefore, securing it is paramount. A primary method for this is routing protocol authentication. For IGPs like OSPF and IS-IS, this involves configuring MD5 or HMAC-SHA authentication to ensure that routers only accept routing updates from trusted neighbors. The 400-051 Exam requires knowledge of how to configure and troubleshoot these authentication mechanisms.
For BGP, which is often used over untrusted public links, security is even more critical. BGP authentication using MD5 or TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) is a baseline requirement. Beyond simple authentication, technologies like Route Policy Limiting and prefix filtering are essential. These techniques, implemented using prefix lists and route maps, ensure that a service provider only accepts and advertises valid routes, preventing route leaks or hijacks. Control Plane Policing (CoPP) is another vital tool that rate-limits traffic destined for the router's CPU, protecting it from being overwhelmed by a flood of control packets.
The management plane provides the interfaces for network administrators to configure, monitor, and manage network devices. This includes protocols like SSH for command-line access, SNMP for monitoring, and protocols like TACACS+ and RADIUS for centralized Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA). Securing this plane is crucial to prevent unauthorized access that could lead to malicious configuration changes. The 400-051 Exam expects candidates to understand best practices for management plane security. This starts with disabling insecure protocols like Telnet and using strong, encrypted protocols like SSHv2.
Implementing a robust AAA framework is a core requirement. Using TACACS+ or RADIUS allows for centralized control over user access, enabling granular command authorization (specifying which commands a particular user can execute) and detailed accounting logs of all configuration changes. Access Control Lists (ACLs) should also be applied to the management interfaces (such as the VTY lines) to restrict access to only trusted management IP addresses or subnets. These layers of security work together to create a defense-in-depth strategy for the management plane, a key concept for the 400-051 Exam.
Service provider networks are prime targets for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, which aim to overwhelm a target with a massive volume of traffic, rendering it unavailable. The 400-051 Exam covers several techniques for mitigating these attacks. One of the most fundamental is Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF). uRPF checks the source IP address of incoming packets. If the router does not have a route back to that source address through the same interface the packet arrived on, it is likely spoofed and can be dropped. This helps to prevent attackers from using forged source addresses.
For large-scale volumetric attacks, more advanced techniques are needed. Remotely Triggered Black Hole (RTBH) routing is a common method where, upon detecting an attack, a provider can advertise a specific route for the victim's IP address to a null interface, effectively dropping all attack traffic at the network edge before it can consume core resources. Flow-based analysis tools, like NetFlow, are used to detect the attack traffic, and BGP is often used to signal the black-holing policy to edge routers. Understanding the mechanics of NetFlow, uRPF, and RTBH is essential for the security portion of the 400-051 Exam.
Operating a large service provider network is impossible without robust management and monitoring tools. The 400-051 Exam tests knowledge of the key protocols and technologies used for this purpose. The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) is a cornerstone of network monitoring. Candidates should understand the different versions of SNMP (v2c and v3), the function of Management Information Bases (MIBs), and the different types of SNMP messages (GET, SET, TRAP). SNMPv3 is particularly important as it adds crucial encryption and authentication features that are lacking in older versions.
Another critical technology is network telemetry. While SNMP relies on polling devices for information, modern telemetry systems use a push model, where network devices stream real-time operational data to a central collector. This provides much more granular and timely insight into network performance. Logging is also vital for troubleshooting and security forensics. The Syslog protocol is used to send log messages from network devices to a central logging server. Understanding how to configure different logging severity levels and correlate logs from multiple devices is a key operational skill tested on the 400-051 Exam.
Accurate and synchronized time across all network devices is not just a matter of convenience; it is a critical operational requirement. Timestamps in log files, telemetry data, and troubleshooting outputs must be consistent for events to be correlated accurately across the network. A few seconds of difference between router clocks can make it impossible to determine the root cause of an issue. The Network Time Protocol (NTP) is the standard protocol used to achieve this time synchronization. The 400-051 Exam requires an understanding of the hierarchical structure of NTP, based on stratum levels.
A stratum 0 device is a high-precision time source like a GPS clock. Stratum 1 servers synchronize directly with stratum 0, stratum 2 servers synchronize with stratum 1, and so on. In a service provider network, it is best practice to have a few internal, authoritative NTP servers (e.g., stratum 2) that synchronize with public stratum 1 servers. All other network devices would then synchronize with these internal servers. Candidates should know how to configure NTP authentication to ensure that devices only accept time updates from trusted sources, preventing malicious time manipulation.
As we reach the final part of this series, the focus shifts to advanced and emerging technologies that are crucial for modern service provider networks. Success in the 400-051 Exam requires not only a mastery of foundational concepts but also a strong grasp of the technologies that enable greater automation, efficiency, and service flexibility. These topics represent the cutting edge of network engineering and are increasingly important in a world driven by cloud computing, 5G mobility, and the Internet of Things. A CCIE-level candidate must be prepared to design, implement, and manage these sophisticated solutions.
This concluding part will cover several advanced domains from the 400-051 Exam blueprint. We will explore MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE), which provides granular control over how traffic flows through the network core. We will also delve into Segment Routing, a modern traffic engineering paradigm that simplifies network operations. Furthermore, we will touch upon multicast VPNs for efficient content delivery and the critical role of network automation and programmability. Finally, we will consolidate all the knowledge from this series into a cohesive strategy for your final exam preparation.
While standard MPLS uses the IGP's shortest path to forward traffic, MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) allows a network operator to explicitly define the path that traffic should take. This is essential for optimizing network resource utilization, avoiding congestion, and meeting strict Service Level Agreements (SLAs). The 400-051 Exam requires a deep understanding of the components that enable MPLS-TE. This starts with enabling TE extensions in the IGP (IS-IS or OSPF) to flood link attribute information, such as available bandwidth and administrative costs, throughout the network.
The Resource Reservation Protocol with Traffic Engineering extensions (RSVP-TE) is then used as the signaling protocol to establish the Traffic Engineered Label Switched Paths (LSPs), also known as TE tunnels. A headend router calculates a path based on specific constraints (e.g., a path with at least 1 Gbps of available bandwidth) using a Constrained Shortest Path First (CSPF) algorithm. RSVP-TE then signals this path hop-by-hop, reserving the necessary resources. Understanding the entire process, from IGP extensions to CSPF calculation and RSVP signaling, is critical for the 400-051 Exam.
Segment Routing (SR) is a modern source-routing paradigm that is gaining significant traction in service provider networks as an alternative to LDP and RSVP-TE. It simplifies the network by removing the need for a separate signaling protocol, embedding path information directly into the packet header as an ordered list of segments. Each segment represents an instruction, such as "go to this specific router" or "go across this specific link." The 400-051 Exam expects candidates to be familiar with the fundamentals of Segment Routing, particularly SR-MPLS, which uses the existing MPLS data plane.
In SR, segments are advertised by the IGP (IS-IS or OSPF). There are two main types of segments: prefix segments, which steer traffic along the IGP shortest path to a prefix, and adjacency segments, which force traffic over a specific link. By stacking a series of segments, a headend router can explicitly define a path through the network, achieving the goals of traffic engineering with significantly less protocol overhead and state in the core compared to RSVP-TE. Understanding the concept of the Segment Routing Global Block (SRGB) and how segments are advertised and used is a key exam topic.
Many services, such as IPTV and financial market data distribution, rely on the efficient delivery of a single stream of traffic to multiple receivers. Multicast is the technology that enables this, and Multicast VPNs (MVPNs) extend this capability to customers within an MPLS L3VPN environment. The 400-051 Exam covers the architecture and protocols used to build MVPNs. This involves PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast) as the multicast routing protocol running between the PE and CE routers and within the service provider core.
To transport multicast traffic across the MPLS backbone, Multicast Distribution Trees (MDTs) are built between the PE routers that are part of the same VPN. The control plane for MVPNs is complex, using MP-BGP to advertise multicast source and receiver information between PE routers. Several different MVPN profiles have been developed over the years, and a candidate for the 400-051 Exam should understand the evolution and general operation of these models. Key concepts include the Default MDT for low-volume traffic and Data MDTs for high-volume sources to optimize resource usage in the core.
The traditional method of managing network devices via the command-line interface (CLI) does not scale in modern, large-scale networks. Network programmability and automation are now essential skills for any senior network engineer. The 400-051 Exam includes topics related to this shift. This involves understanding data models, such as YANG, which provide a standardized and programmatic way to represent the configuration and operational state of a network device. It also involves understanding network configuration protocols like NETCONF and RESTCONF, which are used to manipulate these data models.
While the exam is not a programming test, it requires an understanding of the concepts. Candidates should be familiar with the role of APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) in network management and the benefits of using automation tools and scripting languages (like Python) to perform repetitive tasks, deploy configurations consistently, and gather operational data. This knowledge reflects the evolution of the network engineer's role from a manual operator to a developer who manages the network as a programmable system, a key trend tested in the 400-051 Exam.
As you approach your scheduled date for the 400-051 Exam, your focus should shift from learning new material to consolidation and review. Revisit the official exam blueprint one last time and honestly assess your confidence level in each topic. Use this assessment to guide your final review sessions, spending more time on your weaker areas. Practice exams are an invaluable tool at this stage. They help you get accustomed to the question formats, manage your time effectively, and identify any remaining knowledge gaps under exam-like conditions. Analyze your incorrect answers thoroughly to understand why you went wrong.
On the day of the 400-051 Exam, it is important to be well-rested and calm. Read each question carefully, paying close attention to keywords like "not," "best," or "most likely." If you encounter a difficult question, don't spend too much time on it. Mark it for review and move on. You can always come back to it later if time permits. Time management is crucial; ensure you are pacing yourself appropriately to answer all questions. Trust in the preparation you have done. A methodical study plan, a deep understanding of the core principles, and consistent practice are the keys to successfully passing the 400-051 Exam and taking a major step toward your CCIE certification.
Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use Cisco CCIE Collaboration 400-051 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. Cisco 400-051 CCIE Collaboration Written certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using Cisco CCIE Collaboration 400-051 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.
Top Cisco Certification Exams
Site Search:
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Use Discount Code:
MIN10OFF
A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.
Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator
Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.