100% Real Microsoft 70-293 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts
Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate
Microsoft 70-293 Practice Test Questions in VCE Format
| File | Votes | Size | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
File Microsoft.SelfTestEngine.70-293.v2012-08-30.by.Peyton.290q.vce |
Votes 1 |
Size 10.56 MB |
Date Aug 30, 2012 |
Archived VCE files
Microsoft 70-293 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps
Microsoft 70-293 (Planning and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. Microsoft 70-293 Planning and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the Microsoft 70-293 certification exam dumps & Microsoft 70-293 practice test questions in vce format.
The Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) credential on Windows Server 2003 was a benchmark for IT professionals in its time, and the 70-293 Exam, "Planning and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure," was a cornerstone of that certification track. This exam was designed to validate a candidate's ability to plan, implement, and maintain the core networking services of a Windows Server 2003 environment. It covered a wide range of topics, from fundamental TCP/IP configuration to the intricacies of DNS, DHCP, and remote access.
It is crucial to understand that the 70-293 Exam and the Windows Server 2003 platform are long retired. Microsoft ended support for this operating system in July 2015. Therefore, this series of articles is not a direct study guide for a current exam. Instead, it serves as a historical and conceptual review of the foundational networking principles that were tested. We will explore these concepts as they existed in the Server 2003 era and discuss how they have evolved into the technologies we use in modern Windows Server and cloud environments today.
By examining the objectives of the classic 70-293 Exam, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the building blocks of modern networking. Many of the core principles of IP addressing, name resolution, and remote access, while implemented differently today, have their roots in the technologies covered by this certification. This series will provide valuable context for anyone interested in the history and evolution of Microsoft networking.
The planning phase of any network infrastructure is critical, and this was a major focus of the 70-293 Exam. In the Windows Server 2003 era, planning was heavily influenced by the physical limitations of the time. Network bandwidth was often more constrained, and the concept of a highly virtualized, cloud-centric data center was not yet mainstream. Therefore, a significant part of the planning process involved the physical placement of servers to optimize performance and reduce wide area network (WAN) traffic.
Administrators had to carefully plan the deployment of domain controllers, DNS servers, and DHCP servers at each physical location. The goal was to provide local services to users at branch offices to avoid slow authentication and name resolution over expensive and slow WAN links. This involved a deep understanding of the business's geographical layout and the number of users at each site.
Security planning was also paramount. The early 2000s saw a rise in network worms and viruses, so designing a network with proper segmentation and security baselines was a critical skill. The 70-293 Exam would present candidates with business requirements and expect them to design a logical and physical network infrastructure that was secure, scalable, and resilient, based on the technologies available in Windows Server 2003.
The foundation of any Windows network is the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite. For the 70-293 Exam, a candidate was required to have a deep and practical understanding of IPv4 addressing. This included the ability to perform manual subnetting to efficiently divide a larger network address space into smaller, more manageable subnets. This skill was essential for designing networks that minimized broadcast traffic and maximized the use of a limited IP address range.
Candidates were expected to be proficient in configuring TCP/IP settings both manually and through automated means. This included assigning static IP addresses to servers and other critical infrastructure devices, and understanding the role of the default gateway for routing traffic outside the local subnet. You also had to know how to configure client computers to obtain their IP address configuration automatically from a DHCP server.
The exam also covered the use of command-line tools for troubleshooting TCP/IP connectivity. A deep familiarity with utilities like ipconfig for viewing the local IP configuration, ping for testing basic connectivity, and tracert for tracing the path to a remote host was non-negotiable. These fundamental skills remain just as critical for network administrators today.
The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) is a core network service that automates the assignment of IP addresses and other TCP/IP configuration settings to client computers. A deep knowledge of the DHCP server role in Windows Server 2003 was a major objective of the 70-293 Exam. Administrators were required to know how to install the DHCP service and perform the initial authorization of the server in Active Directory, which is a security step to prevent rogue DHCP servers.
The central task in managing DHCP is the configuration of scopes. A scope is a range of IP addresses that the server is authorized to lease to clients on a particular subnet. The exam would test your ability to create a scope, define the IP address range, set the subnet mask, and configure scope options. Common options include the default gateway, DNS servers, and DNS domain name.
You also had to be proficient in managing reservations and exclusions. An exclusion range allows you to prevent the DHCP server from leasing a specific block of addresses within a scope, which you might reserve for devices that require static IP addresses. A reservation, on the other hand, ensures that a specific device, identified by its MAC address, always receives the same IP address from the DHCP server.
While the basic principles of DHCP covered in the 70-293 Exam are timeless, the DHCP server role has evolved significantly in modern versions of Windows Server. One of the most important advancements is the introduction of DHCP Failover. In the Windows Server 2003 era, providing high availability for DHCP was a complex process, often involving split scopes or standby server clusters.
Modern Windows Server includes a built-in DHCP Failover feature that allows two DHCP servers to replicate lease information between them. This can be configured in either a hot standby mode, where one server is active and the other is passive, or in a load-balancing mode, where both servers are actively leasing addresses to clients. This dramatically simplifies the process of making the DHCP service highly available.
Another major enhancement is the introduction of DHCP policies. Policies allow an administrator to assign different IP address settings to clients based on specific criteria, such as their MAC address vendor or other attributes. This provides a much more granular level of control than was possible with the simpler scope options available in the version tested by the 70-293 Exam.
A topic on the 70-293 Exam that highlights the evolution of Windows networking is the Windows Internet Name Service, or WINS. In the era of Windows Server 2003 and its predecessors, many network applications and services relied on the NetBIOS protocol. WINS was a legacy name resolution service that was responsible for mapping NetBIOS names to IP addresses, much like DNS does for host names.
In a routed network, broadcast-based NetBIOS name resolution would not work. WINS solved this problem by providing a centralized, dynamic database of NetBIOS names and their corresponding IP addresses. Client computers would register their names with a WINS server, and other clients could then query the WINS server to resolve those names to IP addresses.
For any network that still had older, NetBIOS-reliant operating systems or applications (such as Windows NT 4.0 or Windows 98), implementing WINS was a necessity. Therefore, the 70-293 Exam required candidates to know how to install, configure, and manage WINS servers and to configure clients to use them for name resolution.
The story of why WINS is no longer a relevant technology is the story of the modernization of Windows networking, a key concept to grasp when looking back at the 70-293 Exam. The primary driver for the obsolescence of WINS was the full-scale adoption of the Domain Name System (DNS) as the primary name resolution service for Windows, starting with the introduction of Active Directory in Windows 2000.
Active Directory is completely dependent on DNS to locate domain controllers and other services. As organizations migrated to Active Directory, DNS became the mandatory and superior name resolution method. Modern versions of Windows and network-aware applications are designed to function exclusively with DNS, making NetBIOS and WINS unnecessary.
Furthermore, NetBIOS was a "chatty" protocol that could generate a lot of broadcast traffic on a local network. Moving to a DNS-only environment resulted in a more efficient and scalable network. Today, WINS is considered a legacy service, and it is a best practice to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP in any modern Windows network. Its inclusion in the 70-293 Exam is a clear marker of the time period in which the technology was relevant.
The Domain Name System (DNS) is arguably the most important network service in a Windows environment, and this was especially true in the era of the 70-293 Exam. With the introduction of Active Directory in Windows 2000, Microsoft transitioned away from the older, NetBIOS-based domain model and fully embraced DNS as the primary locator service. This made a correctly configured DNS infrastructure an absolute prerequisite for a functioning Active Directory.
DNS in Windows Server 2003 was responsible for resolving the friendly hostnames of computers, servers, and services into their corresponding IP addresses. For Active Directory, it played an even more critical role. Domain controllers would dynamically register special DNS records, known as Service (SRV) records, which would advertise the services they offered, such as authentication and the Global Catalog.
When a client computer needed to log on or find a specific service, it would perform a series of DNS queries to locate the nearest and most appropriate domain controller. Without a healthy DNS, clients would be unable to log on, and the entire Active Directory infrastructure would cease to function. Because of this deep integration, a large portion of the 70-293 Exam was dedicated to DNS planning, implementation, and troubleshooting.
A key skill tested in the 70-293 Exam was the ability to plan a DNS namespace. This involves designing the logical structure of your DNS domains. A critical decision that administrators had to make was how to structure their internal Active Directory DNS namespace in relation to their external, public-facing internet namespace.
One common approach was to use a subdomain of the public namespace for the internal Active Directory. For example, if the public company name was 'company.com', the internal Active Directory domain might be named 'https://www.google.com/search?q=corp.company.com'. This provided a clear separation between internal and external resources and prevented potential naming conflicts.
Another approach, though less recommended, was to use a completely different, non-routable namespace for the internal network, such as 'company.local'. While this was simple to implement, it could cause issues with certificate authorities and integration with cloud services in the future. The principles of careful namespace planning, weighing the pros and cons of different naming schemes, are still highly relevant for network architects today.
The 70-293 Exam required a deep understanding of the different types of DNS zones that could be implemented in Windows Server 2003. A zone is a portion of the DNS namespace, such as 'company.com', for which a DNS server has authority. The most basic type of zone is a Standard Primary zone. A server with a primary zone holds the master, read-write copy of all the DNS records for that zone.
To provide fault tolerance and load balancing, you could configure one or more Standard Secondary zones. A secondary zone is a read-only copy of a primary zone. The server with the secondary zone would periodically contact the primary server to request a zone transfer, which is the process of replicating all the zone's records. This ensured that if the primary DNS server failed, name resolution could still be handled by the secondary servers.
Windows Server 2003 also introduced the concept of a Stub zone. A stub zone is a special type of secondary zone that only contains a list of the authoritative name servers for another zone. It was used to improve name resolution efficiency between different DNS namespaces within a forest.
The most powerful and recommended way to implement DNS in a Windows Server 2003 environment, and a major topic on the 70-293 Exam, was to use Active Directory-integrated zones. When you configure a zone to be AD-integrated, the DNS zone data is not stored in a standard text file. Instead, it is stored directly within the Active Directory database itself. This provided several significant advantages.
The first advantage was improved replication. Instead of relying on the traditional, less efficient DNS zone transfer mechanism, an AD-integrated zone's data is replicated to all other domain controllers as part of the normal Active Directory replication process. This was much more efficient and robust, especially over slow WAN links.
The second major advantage was enhanced security. Because the zone data was stored in Active Directory, you could use Active Directory's security features to control who could manage the DNS records. Most importantly, you could configure the zone to allow for "Secure Dynamic Updates." This meant that only authenticated client computers were allowed to dynamically register their DNS records, which prevented unauthorized devices from polluting the DNS zone.
The 70-293 Exam would have expected any candidate to be proficient with the common types of DNS resource records. These records are the actual data entries within a DNS zone that provide the name-to-IP address mappings and other information. The most fundamental record is the Address (A) record, which maps a hostname to an IPv4 address. The reverse of this is the Pointer (PTR) record, used in reverse lookup zones to map an IP address back to a hostname.
Another common record is the Canonical Name (CNAME) record, which is used to create an alias. It allows you to point one hostname to another. The Mail Exchanger (MX) record is essential for email delivery, as it tells mail servers where to send email for a particular domain.
As mentioned earlier, the Service (SRV) record is of critical importance for Active Directory. These records are used to locate services. For example, a client would query for the SRV record for the LDAP service to find a domain controller. A solid understanding of the purpose of each of these record types was essential for both administration and troubleshooting.
An internal DNS server needs a way to resolve names for which it is not authoritative, such as internet hostnames. The 70-293 Exam tested the configuration of DNS forwarding to achieve this. A forwarder is another DNS server, typically one hosted by an ISP or a public DNS service, to which your internal DNS server will send any queries it cannot resolve itself.
This was an efficient way to manage external name resolution. Instead of each internal DNS server having to perform its own recursive lookups on the internet, they could all simply forward their requests to one or more central forwarders. This could improve performance and simplify firewall configurations.
Windows Server 2003 also introduced a more granular feature called Conditional Forwarding. This allowed you to configure your DNS server to forward queries for a specific DNS domain to a specific DNS server. This was particularly useful in company merger scenarios or for managing name resolution between different business partners, as it allowed for efficient resolution without the need for complex secondary or stub zones.
The DNS server role in Windows Server has seen many significant enhancements since the version that was covered in the 70-293 Exam. One of the most important advancements is the introduction of DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC). DNSSEC provides a way to digitally sign the data in a DNS zone, which allows a DNS client to verify that the response it receives is authentic and has not been tampered with. This is a critical feature for preventing DNS spoofing attacks.
Another major feature introduced in later versions of Windows Server is DNS Policies. DNS policies allow an administrator to configure the DNS server to respond to a query differently based on various criteria, such as the client's IP address, the time of day, or other parameters. This enables advanced scenarios like split-brain DNS, traffic management, and load balancing directly from the DNS server.
Other modern enhancements include the DNS Socket Pool for protection against DNS cache poisoning attacks, and support for new record types. While the foundational concepts from the 70-293 Exam era are still valid, the DNS server of today is a much more secure, powerful, and feature-rich platform.
The ability to troubleshoot DNS problems was a critical skill for any Windows Server 2003 administrator and a key part of the 70-293 Exam. The most essential command-line tool for DNS troubleshooting was, and still is, nslookup. This utility allows you to perform manual DNS queries, check which DNS server is being used, and inspect the contents of specific DNS records.
For example, a common first step in troubleshooting a logon issue would be to use nslookup to verify that the client could correctly resolve the SRV records for the domain controllers. If this failed, it would immediately point to a DNS problem as the likely root cause.
Another key troubleshooting technique was to check the event logs on the DNS server itself. The DNS server log in the Event Viewer would record any significant errors or warnings, such as a failed zone transfer or a problem with dynamic updates. A proficient administrator needed to be able to use a combination of nslookup, ipconfig /flushdns to clear the local client cache, and event log analysis to methodically diagnose and resolve DNS issues.
The Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) in Windows Server 2003 was a powerful and versatile component of the operating system, and a major topic area for the 70-293 Exam. RRAS allowed a Windows server to function as a multi-purpose network connectivity device. It could be configured to act as a software-based router, a remote access server for dial-up clients, and, most importantly, as a Virtual Private Network (VPN) server.
For many small and medium-sized businesses, RRAS was a cost-effective alternative to purchasing expensive dedicated hardware routers and VPN concentrators. It provided a way to connect branch offices, allow mobile users to connect to the corporate network securely, and control the flow of traffic between different network segments.
The 70-293 Exam required candidates to have a deep, practical knowledge of how to install, configure, and manage the RRAS role. This included understanding the different services it could provide and how to enable and configure them using the RRAS management console. A solid grasp of RRAS was essential for any administrator responsible for network connectivity.
A common use case for RRAS in the Windows Server 2003 era, and a key skill for the 70-293 Exam, was to configure it as a simple internet gateway using Network Address Translation (NAT). NAT is the process that allows multiple computers on a private network using private IP addresses to share a single public IP address to access the internet.
An administrator could configure a Windows server with two network interfaces: one connected to the internal private network and one connected to the internet with a public IP address. By enabling the NAT/Basic Firewall component of RRAS, the server would act as a router. It would receive requests from the internal clients, translate their private source IP addresses to its own public IP address, and forward the requests to the internet.
When the response came back from the internet, the RRAS server would perform the reverse translation and forward the response to the correct internal client. This was a very common setup for small businesses that needed a simple and inexpensive way to provide internet access to their office network.
The most important function of RRAS for most organizations was its ability to act as a Virtual Private Network (VPN) server. A VPN allows remote users to securely connect to the corporate network over an untrusted public network like the internet. The 70-293 Exam placed a heavy emphasis on the planning and implementation of VPNs.
The two primary VPN protocols supported by Windows Server 2003 were the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) and the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol with IPsec (L2TP/IPsec). PPTP was simpler to configure and worked well behind most firewalls, but it was considered less secure. L2TP/IPsec was much more secure, as it used the robust IPsec protocol suite to encrypt all the data. However, it could be more difficult to configure, especially with firewalls that performed NAT.
An administrator needed to be able to install and configure the RRAS role as a VPN server, enable the desired protocols, and configure the IP address assignment for connecting clients, either from a static pool or from a DHCP server.
Looking back from a modern perspective, the VPN protocols focused on in the 70-293 Exam are now largely considered legacy. While L2TP/IPsec is still secure when configured correctly, PPTP has known security vulnerabilities and should not be used in any modern environment. The VPN landscape has evolved significantly since the Windows Server 2003 era.
Modern versions of Windows Server introduced much more secure and user-friendly VPN protocols. The Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP), introduced in Server 2008, tunnels the VPN traffic over SSL/TLS, which makes it much easier to use through firewalls as it uses the same port as standard web traffic. Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2), introduced in Server 2008 R2, offers very high performance and the ability to automatically reconnect if the connection is temporarily lost.
The latest evolution is the concept of the Always On VPN in Windows Server 2016 and later. This provides a seamless and automatic connection for remote users, behaving much more like a direct connection to the office. This is a far cry from the manual, user-initiated connections that were the norm in the era of the 70-293 Exam.
A critical part of managing a remote access solution is controlling who is allowed to connect and under what conditions. In Windows Server 2003, this was accomplished using Remote Access Policies. This was a key topic for the 70-293 Exam. Remote Access Policies were a set of rules that were processed in order. Each policy consisted of a set of conditions, a permission setting, and a profile.
The conditions specified who the policy applied to, for example, members of a specific Windows group or connections coming in at a certain time of day. If a user's connection attempt matched all the conditions of a policy, the system would then check the permission setting for that policy, which could be either "Allow access" or "Deny access."
If access was allowed, the system would then apply the settings defined in the policy's profile. The profile contained detailed settings that would be applied to the connection, such as an idle timeout value, the authentication methods that were allowed, or encryption strength requirements. A deep understanding of how to create and manage these policies was essential for securing the remote access environment.
For larger environments with multiple remote access servers, managing the remote access policies on each server individually was inefficient. The solution, and a key integration topic for the 70-293 Exam, was to use a centralized authentication server. The standard protocol for this is the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS). Windows Server 2003 included a RADIUS server implementation called Internet Authentication Service (IAS).
You could configure your RRAS servers to act as RADIUS clients. When a user tried to connect to a VPN server, the RRAS server would not process the authentication itself. Instead, it would forward the user's credentials to the central IAS server. The IAS server would be responsible for authenticating the user against Active Directory.
The real benefit was that all the remote access policies could now be configured centrally on the IAS server. This ensured that a consistent security policy was applied to all users, regardless of which VPN server they connected to. This centralized model was much more scalable and easier to manage.
The Internet Authentication Service (IAS) that was a key part of the 70-293 Exam curriculum has been replaced and significantly enhanced in modern versions of Windows Server. Starting with Windows Server 2008, IAS was renamed to Network Policy Server (NPS). While it still serves as the core RADIUS server for the platform, its role and capabilities have been greatly expanded.
NPS is a central component of a broader technology called Network Access Protection (NAP), which was a framework for enforcing health requirements on client computers before they were allowed to connect to the network. While NAP itself has since been deprecated, NPS continues to be a critical service.
Today, NPS is not just used for VPN and dial-up authentication. It is also the standard RADIUS server used for authenticating users on 802.1X-capable wireless networks and wired switches. It is also used to provide authentication and policy enforcement for other network services. The evolution from the more narrowly focused IAS to the versatile NPS reflects the increasing need for centralized policy enforcement across all types of network access.
Securing the remote access infrastructure was a top priority for any administrator and a major theme of the 70-293 Exam. A key part of this was choosing strong authentication methods. Windows Server 2003 supported several authentication protocols, with the Microsoft Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol version 2 (MS-CHAP v2) being the most common for username and password authentication.
For higher security, you could implement certificate-based authentication using EAP-TLS. This required a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to issue certificates to both the users and the remote access servers, but it provided a much stronger form of authentication than passwords alone.
Encryption was also a critical component. For L2TP/IPsec connections, the encryption was handled by the IPsec protocol, which was very strong. For PPTP, the encryption was handled by the Microsoft Point-to-Point Encryption (MPPE) protocol. An administrator needed to understand how to configure the remote access policies to enforce the use of strong authentication and encryption methods for all connections, a skill that is still vital for securing modern remote access solutions.
To understand the security topics covered in the 70-293 Exam, it is essential to remember the security landscape of the early 2000s. This period was marked by the emergence of major network worms like Code Red and Nimda, which caused widespread disruption. In response, Microsoft launched its "Trustworthy Computing" initiative, which placed a much greater emphasis on building more secure software. Windows Server 2003 was one of the first products to benefit from this renewed focus on security.
Compared to its predecessors, Windows Server 2003 was designed to be more secure out of the box. It included a built-in, enabled-by-default internet connection firewall and many services were disabled by default to reduce the attack surface. However, securing a network infrastructure still required a proactive and knowledgeable administrator.
The 70-293 Exam was designed to ensure that administrators had the skills to plan and implement a defense-in-depth strategy. This involved not just perimeter security, but also securing the communications between servers on the internal network. The primary tool for this internal security was the IP Security protocol, or IPsec.
IP Security (IPSec) is a suite of protocols that provides security for internet protocol communications by authenticating and encrypting each IP packet in a data stream. A deep understanding of IPSec was a major objective of the 70-293 Exam. IPSec can provide three main security services: authentication, data integrity, and data confidentiality.
Authentication ensures that you are communicating with the intended computer. In a Windows environment, this was typically done using Kerberos, the default authentication protocol for Active Directory. Data integrity ensures that the data has not been modified in transit. This was accomplished by a protocol called the Authentication Header (AH).
Data confidentiality, or encryption, ensures that the data cannot be read by unauthorized parties if it is intercepted. This was provided by a protocol called the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP). An administrator could choose to use just AH for authentication and integrity, or ESP, which could provide encryption as well as authentication and integrity.
In Windows Server 2003, IPSec was not configured on a per-packet basis. Instead, it was managed through IPSec policies. An understanding of how to plan and deploy these policies was a key skill for the 70-293 Exam. An IPSec policy was a collection of rules that determined which network traffic should be secured and how it should be secured.
These policies were typically created and deployed using Group Policy, which allowed an administrator to apply a consistent IPSec configuration to all the computers in a domain or an organizational unit. A policy consisted of one or more rules. Each rule had a filter list, which defined the specific traffic the rule applied to (e.g., all TCP traffic from a specific subnet), and a filter action, which specified what to do with that traffic (e.g., permit it, block it, or negotiate security).
A common use case was to create a policy for "Server Isolation," where a group of servers would be configured to require secure, encrypted communication with each other, effectively creating a secure, logical network within the larger physical network.
IPSec can operate in two different modes, and the 70-293 Exam would have expected candidates to know the difference and the appropriate use case for each. The first mode is Transport Mode. In transport mode, only the payload of the IP packet is encrypted or authenticated. The original IP header, which contains the source and destination IP addresses, remains unchanged and visible.
Transport mode was typically used to secure communications between two endpoints on the same internal network, such as the communication between a client and a server. It provided end-to-end security without adding the complexity of changing the network routing. This was the mode used for the server isolation scenario mentioned earlier.
The second mode is Tunnel Mode. In tunnel mode, the entire original IP packet, including its header, is encapsulated inside a new IP packet. A new IP header is then added. This mode was used to create secure tunnels between two network gateways, such as between two RRAS servers at different branch offices to create a site-to-site VPN. The ability to distinguish between these two modes was a classic exam topic.
The simple Internet Connection Firewall that was included in Windows Server 2003 was a significant step forward at the time, but it was very basic. The network security capabilities of Windows Server have evolved dramatically since the era of the 70-293 Exam. The modern equivalent is the Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security.
The modern Windows Firewall is a much more sophisticated, stateful, and policy-driven firewall. While the old firewall was primarily focused on blocking unsolicited inbound traffic, the new firewall provides granular control over both inbound and outbound traffic. It is also deeply integrated with the IPSec implementation, allowing you to create rules that require both firewall traversal and IPSec authentication and encryption.
Instead of the separate IPSec policy management console, all of this is now configured in a single, unified interface. You can create firewall rules based on a wide range of criteria, including the application, the service, the user or computer account, and other parameters. This provides a level of granular control that was unimaginable with the basic tools available in the version covered by the 70-293 Exam.
To help administrators apply consistent security settings, Windows Server 2003 provided a feature called Security Templates. This was a key topic for the 70-293 Exam. A security template was a file that contained a pre-defined set of security configurations, covering everything from password policies and user rights assignments to registry permissions and system service settings.
An administrator could choose one of the predefined templates (e.g., for a domain controller or a file server) or create a custom template. This template could then be imported and applied to a server or deployed via Group Policy to an entire group of servers. This was a powerful tool for establishing a security baseline and ensuring that all servers were configured to a consistent security standard.
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 also introduced the Security Configuration Wizard (SCW). This was a guided tool that would analyze the roles a server was performing and then generate a security policy that disabled any unnecessary services and ports. This wizard simplified the process of hardening a server based on its specific function.
Maintaining network security is not just about configuration; it is also about keeping systems patched against known vulnerabilities. A critical part of the 70-293 Exam curriculum was understanding how to plan and manage a software update infrastructure. In the early days of Windows Server 2003, the tool for this was Software Update Services (SUS).
SUS was a relatively simple product that allowed an administrator to download Microsoft patches to a local server. Client computers could then be configured to get their updates from the local SUS server instead of going directly to the internet. This saved bandwidth and gave the administrator control over which updates were approved for deployment.
SUS was later replaced by a much more powerful and feature-rich product called Windows Server Update Services (WSUS). WSUS provided much more granular control, better reporting, and the ability to manage updates for a wider range of Microsoft products. Planning a deployment of SUS, and later WSUS, including the placement of servers and the creation of computer groups for targeted updates, was a key security maintenance skill.
The final major topic area for the 70-293 Exam was planning and maintaining server availability. For a network to be useful, its core services must be online and accessible to users. High availability is the practice of designing systems to minimize downtime, whether it is planned for maintenance or unplanned due to a failure. In the Windows Server 2003 era, ensuring the availability of critical services like DNS, DHCP, and file shares was a key responsibility for an administrator.
The 70-293 Exam would test a candidate's knowledge of the native technologies that Windows Server 2003 provided to achieve high availability. This required an understanding of the difference between availability solutions for stateless applications, like web services, and stateful applications, like databases or DHCP, which have constantly changing data that needs to be protected.
The two primary technologies that were available to address these needs were Network Load Balancing (NLB) and Microsoft Cluster Service (MSCS). A well-rounded administrator needed to know the purpose of each of these technologies, their specific use cases, and the high-level steps involved in their implementation.
Network Load Balancing (NLB) was a feature of Windows Server 2003 designed to provide high availability and scalability for stateless, TCP/IP-based applications. This was a key technology to understand for the 70-293 Exam. The most common use case for NLB was for web servers running Internet Information Services (IIS).
NLB allowed you to group up to 32 servers into a single cluster. The cluster would be assigned a single virtual IP address. When clients sent requests to this virtual IP address, the NLB service would distribute the traffic among the different servers in the cluster. This provided scalability, as the load was shared across multiple machines.
It also provided high availability. NLB periodically checked the health of all the servers in the cluster. If one server failed, NLB would automatically detect this and stop sending traffic to it, redirecting all new requests to the remaining healthy servers. This ensured that the web service remained available to users even if a single server went down.
While NLB was excellent for stateless applications, it was not suitable for stateful services that had data that needed to be kept consistent, such as a file server or a DHCP server. For these types of services, the high availability solution in Windows Server 2003 was Microsoft Cluster Service (MSCS). This was a more complex but more powerful technology covered in the 70-293 Exam.
MSCS used a shared-nothing cluster model, where two or more servers, called nodes, were connected to a shared storage device. The clustered service, such as a file share, would be active on only one node at a time. This active node would own the shared disk resource where the file data resided. The other node would be passive, waiting in standby.
If the active node failed, the cluster service would detect the failure and initiate a failover. The passive node would take ownership of the shared disk resource and start the file share service, making it available to users again. This ensured that the service could survive a complete server hardware failure with minimal downtime.
The clustering technology tested in the 70-293 Exam was powerful for its time, but it has evolved almost beyond recognition in modern versions of Windows Server. The old Microsoft Cluster Service has been replaced by what is now called Failover Clustering, and it is a much more robust, scalable, and feature-rich platform.
One of the biggest advancements was the introduction of Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV). In the old MSCS model, a single shared disk could only be owned by one node at a time. CSV allows all nodes in a cluster to have simultaneous read-write access to the same shared disk. This was a critical enabler for the Hyper-V virtualization role, as it allows multiple virtual machines to run on different hosts while their disk files reside on the same shared LUN.
The most recent evolution is the introduction of Storage Spaces Direct (S2D). S2D allows you to build a highly available storage system using only the local disks inside the cluster nodes, eliminating the need for an expensive, external shared storage array. This is a core technology in Microsoft's modern hyper-converged infrastructure offerings, like Azure Stack HCI.
As we conclude our historical journey, let's perform a final review of the core concepts covered by the 70-293 Exam. At the foundation, we had TCP/IP addressing and the automated management of IP configuration with DHCP. For name resolution, we had the critical Active Directory-integrated DNS service and the legacy WINS service for NetBIOS compatibility.
For network connectivity, we used the Routing and Remote Access Service to provide VPN and NAT capabilities, with access controlled by Remote Access Policies and centralized by the Internet Authentication Service (IAS). For internal network security, we used the powerful IPsec protocol to create secure communication channels between servers, with security baselines deployed via Security Templates.
Finally, for high availability, we used Network Load Balancing for stateless web services and Microsoft Cluster Service for stateful services like file shares. A comprehensive understanding of how all these pieces fit together was the key to success.
To bring these concepts together, imagine a typical troubleshooting scenario from the 70-293 Exam era. A user in a branch office reports that they cannot access a file share on a server at the main office. As the administrator, your methodical troubleshooting process would touch on many of the exam's topics.
First, you would check their local TCP/IP settings with ipconfig. Is their DHCP-assigned address correct? Can they ping their default gateway? Next, you would check name resolution. Can they resolve the file server's name using nslookup? This would test the DNS configuration, including any forwarders. Then, you would check the network path. A tracert would show if the traffic is being correctly routed through the site-to-site VPN tunnel managed by the RRAS servers.
If all of that was working, you might suspect a security issue. You would check the IPSec policies to ensure they were not incorrectly blocking the traffic. Finally, you would check the high availability status of the file server itself to ensure the cluster resource was online. This demonstrates how all the different infrastructure components had to work together.
While the specific products and command syntax have changed, the fundamental principles tested in the 70-293 Exam are timeless. Every network administrator today still needs to have a deep understanding of IP subnetting. DNS is more critical than ever in our highly connected world of on-premises, cloud, and hybrid services. The need for secure remote access has exploded with the rise of remote work.
The concepts of defense-in-depth, security baselining, and proactive patching are the bedrock of modern cybersecurity. And the business requirement for high availability has only grown, with today's users expecting services to be available 24x7.
By studying the technologies of a past era, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the problems they were designed to solve. This historical context helps us to better understand why modern technologies are designed the way they are. The 70-293 Exam, in its time, was a certification that truly validated these foundational and enduring skills.
The 70-293 Exam and the MCSE on Windows Server 2003 represent a classic era of IT certification. It was a time when the role of the system administrator was rapidly professionalizing, and this certification was a clear and respected way to validate one's skills. It certified a deep and broad knowledge of the technologies that powered the majority of business networks at the time.
While the technologies have been superseded, the legacy of this exam lives on in the foundational knowledge that it imparted to a generation of IT professionals. The principles of sound network design, robust name resolution, secure communications, and high availability are as relevant today as they were then. This historical review serves as a tribute to a challenging but rewarding milestone in the history of IT education.
Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use Microsoft 70-293 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. Microsoft 70-293 Planning and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using Microsoft 70-293 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.
Top Microsoft Certification Exams
Site Search:
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Use Discount Code:
MIN10OFF
A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.
Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator
Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.