Microsoft 70-297 (Designing a Windows Server 2003 Active Directory and Network Infrastructure) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. Microsoft 70-297 Designing a Windows Server 2003 Active Directory and Network Infrastructure exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the Microsoft 70-297 certification exam dumps & Microsoft 70-297 practice test questions in vce format.

The 70-297 Exam in Context: From Server 2003 to Modern Infrastructure

The Microsoft 70-297 exam was a cornerstone certification for IT professionals during the Windows Server 2003 era. Titled "Designing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Active Directory and Network Infrastructure," it was a high-level exam that validated an engineer's ability to plan and design a complex enterprise environment. Unlike administration-focused exams, this test centered on the "why" behind infrastructure choices. It required a deep understanding of business requirements and the ability to translate them into a technical design for a secure, scalable, and resilient Active Directory and network.

Passing the 70-297 exam was a significant step toward achieving the prestigious Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) credential for Windows Server 2003. The questions were typically scenario-based, presenting candidates with a fictional company's needs and constraints. The candidate would then have to make critical design decisions regarding forest structure, domain layout, site topology, and the placement of network services. While the specific product is long obsolete, the thought process it taught remains incredibly valuable for architects working with today's complex hybrid systems.

The IT Landscape of the Windows Server 2003 Era

To appreciate the context of the 70-297 exam, it is essential to remember the technological landscape of the early to mid-2000s. This was a time dominated by physical servers. Virtualization was in its infancy and not yet the standard for enterprise data centers. This physical reality heavily influenced design decisions. For instance, deploying a new domain controller meant purchasing, racking, and configuring a new physical machine. This made the placement of services a decision with significant financial and logistical implications, a factor often explored in the 70-297 exam scenarios.

Furthermore, network connectivity was vastly different. Wide Area Network (WAN) links between office locations were often slow and unreliable compared to today's standards. Bandwidth was a precious commodity that had to be carefully managed. A major part of the 70-297 exam was dedicated to designing an Active Directory site topology that would control and optimize replication traffic over these constrained links. Concepts like site link scheduling and costs were not just theoretical; they were critical for maintaining a functional multi-site directory service without overwhelming the network.

Core Concepts: Active Directory Logical Design

The heart of the 70-297 exam was the logical design of Active Directory. This began with the forest, the outermost security and administrative boundary. Candidates had to decide whether a single forest was sufficient or if business requirements, such as complete administrative autonomy or schema isolation, necessitated multiple forests. This decision had long-lasting implications for the organization's IT structure. Inside the forest, the design of one or more domains was the next critical step. Domains served as partitions for managing objects and defining replication boundaries.

Trust relationships were another key logical design element. The 70-297 exam required a deep understanding of how trusts worked, including the automatic two-way transitive trusts within a forest and the manual, non-transitive trusts that could be created between forests. This knowledge was essential for designing solutions that allowed for secure resource sharing and authentication between different business units or partner organizations. Organizational Units (OUs) were the final piece, used within domains to delegate administrative control and apply group policies, a topic that required careful planning.

Core Concepts: Active Directory Physical Design

Once the logical structure was planned, the 70-297 exam moved to the physical design. This revolved around the concept of Active Directory sites. A site was defined as a collection of well-connected IP subnets, typically corresponding to a physical location like an office or a data center. The primary purpose of sites was to control replication traffic. By correctly defining sites and the site links between them, an administrator could ensure that domain controller replication happened efficiently, preventing a minor change in one office from congesting a slow link to another.

The placement of domain controllers (DCs) within these sites was a critical decision. Each site with users needed a local DC to ensure fast authentication and query responses. The 70-297 exam would present scenarios where you had to justify the number and placement of DCs. Furthermore, the placement of Global Catalog servers was a major consideration. A Global Catalog server holds a partial copy of all objects in the forest and is essential for user logons and object searches in a multi-domain environment. Proper placement was key to performance.

Core Concepts: Network Services Design

Active Directory is deeply dependent on a properly functioning Domain Name System (DNS). The 70-297 exam dedicated a significant portion of its objectives to DNS design. Candidates needed to understand how to design a DNS namespace that integrated seamlessly with their Active Directory domain names. They also had to master the concepts of Active Directory-Integrated DNS zones, which store DNS data within the directory itself, allowing for secure and efficient replication of DNS information along with other AD data.

Beyond DNS, the exam covered other essential network services. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) design was important for automating the assignment of IP addresses to client computers. The 70-297 exam tested on designing a DHCP service that was resilient, often using methods like the split-scope model to provide a degree of fault tolerance. Finally, the exam included Windows Internet Name Service (WINS), a legacy service for NetBIOS name resolution. While WINS is now obsolete, at the time it was a necessary component for compatibility with older applications and operating systems.

Why This Foundational Knowledge Still Matters

While the 70-297 exam and Windows Server 2003 are relics of the past, the principles they taught are surprisingly durable. The logical concepts of forests, domains, OUs, and trusts are still at the core of on-premises Active Directory, which remains the primary identity system for the vast majority of large organizations. Understanding how to design a proper OU structure for Group Policy application and delegation is as relevant today as it was then. The fundamental need to separate administrative boundaries has not changed.

Similarly, the interplay between Active Directory and DNS is a timeless concept. A solid understanding of how AD uses SRV records for service location is critical for troubleshooting authentication issues in any environment, on-premises or hybrid. The thought process involved in planning for replication, even if the tools have changed, is directly applicable to designing modern hybrid identity solutions that sync data to the cloud. The 70-297 exam taught a discipline of design-before-build that is an invaluable skill for any senior IT professional.

The Evolution to Modern Hybrid Certifications

The IT world has undergone a seismic shift since the days of the 70-297 exam. The rise of virtualization, cloud computing, and mobile workforces has completely changed infrastructure design. Microsoft's certification program has evolved to reflect this new reality. The old MCSE credential has been replaced by a series of role-based certifications that are focused on job skills in areas like Azure administration, security, and development. The direct successor to the skills tested in the 70-297 exam can be found in today's hybrid identity and infrastructure certifications.

For professionals working with Windows Server and Active Directory, the modern equivalents are certifications like the "Windows Server Hybrid Administrator Associate." These new certifications validate skills in managing core on-premises workloads as well as integrating them with cloud services like Azure Active Directory, Azure networking, and Azure virtual machines. They acknowledge that the modern infrastructure engineer must be an expert not just in on-premises servers, but in the seamless integration of on-premises and cloud environments, a concept far beyond the scope of the original 70-297 exam.

Designing the Forest: A 70-297 Exam Perspective

In the era of the 70-297 exam, designing the Active Directory forest was the most critical first step. The forest represented the ultimate security boundary. Once established, it was incredibly difficult to change. A key decision was whether to implement a single forest or multiple forests. A single forest model was simpler to manage and provided a unified global address list, but it meant that all domains shared a common configuration and schema. A compromised forest root domain could potentially impact the entire organization.

The alternative, a multi-forest design, was chosen for specific reasons tested in the 70-297 exam. These included political reasons, where different divisions of a company demanded complete administrative autonomy, or technical reasons, such as the need for schema isolation. An application that required significant schema extensions might be placed in its own dedicated forest to avoid impacting the main corporate forest. This design provided strong isolation but at the cost of increased complexity, requiring manual trusts and more difficult cross-forest resource sharing.

The Modern Approach: Azure AD and Hybrid Identity

Today, the concept of the identity boundary has expanded beyond the on-premises forest. The modern equivalent of this design decision involves how an organization integrates its on-premises Active Directory with Azure Active Directory (Azure AD). For most companies, the goal is a hybrid identity model. This is typically achieved using Azure AD Connect, a tool that synchronizes user accounts and other identity objects from the on-premises AD to the Azure AD tenant. This provides users with a single identity for accessing both on-premises and cloud resources.

The decision is no longer just about single vs. multiple on-premises forests. It is about how to connect those forests to a single Azure AD tenant. While it is possible to connect multiple forests to one tenant, it requires careful planning around user matching and potential attribute conflicts. The concept of the "source of authority" becomes paramount. The design must clearly define whether identity is mastered on-premises and synced to the cloud, or if identities will be managed directly in the cloud, a complexity far beyond the scope of the original 70-297 exam.

Domain Design and Functional Levels in Server 2003

Within the forest, the 70-297 exam required careful planning of the domain structure. A key decision was whether to use a single domain or to partition the directory into multiple domains. A single domain was easier to manage, but multiple domains might be used to create distinct replication boundaries or to enforce different password policies for different user populations (a feature that is now possible within a single domain using Fine-Grained Password Policies). The design of the domain that served as the forest root was especially critical.

Another important concept was the domain and forest functional level. By raising the functional level, you could enable new Active Directory features, but at the cost of preventing older versions of Windows Server from being used as domain controllers. For the 70-297 exam, this meant deciding between Windows 2000 native mode or the Windows Server 2003 functional level. This decision impacted features like domain controller rename and more efficient group membership replication, and required a careful inventory of the existing server infrastructure.

Domains and Identity in the Cloud Era

In a modern hybrid environment, the on-premises domain structure is still relevant, but its role has evolved. The primary function of the on-premises domains is often to serve as the master source of identity that is synchronized to Azure AD. The complexity of the on-premises domain structure is something that organizations often seek to simplify. The reasons for creating multiple domains in the past, such as policy separation, can now often be handled more elegantly using other tools, including cloud-based policy engines.

The concept of a trust relationship, a key topic in the 70-297 exam, has also been modernized. While traditional AD trusts are still used for on-premises resource sharing, access to cloud applications is typically governed by federation services, like Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS), or through the seamless single sign-on (SSO) capabilities provided by Azure AD Connect. These technologies allow users to authenticate against their on-premises domain controllers and get secure access to cloud services without re-entering their credentials.

Understanding Operations Masters (FSMO Roles)

A timeless concept, and a critical part of the 70-297 exam, is the set of Flexible Single Master Operations (FSMO) roles. Because Active Directory uses a multi-master replication model, certain critical operations must be restricted to a single domain controller to prevent conflicts. There are five of these roles. Two are unique to the forest: the Schema Master, which controls all updates to the AD schema, and the Domain Naming Master, which manages the addition and removal of domains in the forest.

The other three roles are unique to each domain in the forest. The RID Master is responsible for allocating pools of Relative IDs to other domain controllers for creating new security principals like users and groups. The PDC Emulator is a critical role that acts as the primary time source and processes password changes. The Infrastructure Master is responsible for updating cross-domain object references. The 70-297 exam required candidates to understand the function of each role and to design a plan for their optimal placement.

FSMO Roles in a Virtualized and Hybrid World

The fundamental purpose of the FSMO roles has not changed since the days of the 70-297 exam. They are still a critical part of any on-premises Active Directory. However, the best practices for their placement have evolved with technology. In the era of physical servers, FSMO roles were placed on the most reliable hardware. Today, with virtualization being the standard, all domain controllers are typically virtual machines. The best practice is now to ensure that FSMO role holders do not share the same virtualization host to provide hardware-level redundancy.

Furthermore, in a hybrid identity model, the PDC Emulator role takes on even greater importance. Because it is the authoritative source for password changes and time synchronization in the domain, it is critical for ensuring that password hash synchronization to Azure AD works correctly and that Kerberos authentication, which is time-sensitive, functions reliably. The skills learned for the 70-297 exam in understanding these roles are directly transferable to troubleshooting some of the most common and critical issues in a modern hybrid environment.

Active Directory Sites and Subnets: A 70-297 Exam Staple

One of the most practical and important skills tested in the 70-297 exam was the design of the physical Active Directory topology using sites and subnets. This design did not happen automatically; it had to be meticulously planned and configured by an administrator. A site in Active Directory represents a physical location with high-speed network connectivity, like a single office building or a data center. Each site is defined by one or more IP subnets. This mapping is what allows client computers to locate their nearest domain controller for authentication.

When a user logs in, their computer checks its own IP address to determine which AD site it belongs to. It then queries DNS for the service records of domain controllers registered in that specific site. This ensures that authentication traffic stays local and does not needlessly cross a slow and expensive WAN link. The 70-297 exam required candidates to analyze a company's network diagram and create an optimal site and subnet configuration to ensure efficient client-to-server communication, a principle that is still fundamental today.

Site Links and the Replication Topology

Once sites were defined, the 70-297 exam focused on controlling the replication traffic between them. This was achieved by creating site links. A site link is a configurable object that represents a connection between two or more sites. Each site link is assigned a cost and a schedule. The cost is an arbitrary number that represents the bandwidth of the link; lower costs are preferred. The schedule defines the times during which replication is allowed to occur over that link.

This system allowed administrators to create a highly customized replication topology. For example, you could configure a low-cost link between two data centers to replicate every 15 minutes, 24/7. Meanwhile, a high-cost link to a remote office over a satellite connection could be scheduled to replicate only once a day in the middle of the night. The 70-297 exam tested the ability to design a topology that balanced the need for data currency with the reality of network limitations, a skill that requires a deep understanding of the Knowledge Consistency Checker (KCC).

Modern Replication: From Intersite to the Cloud

While the concepts of sites and site links are still fully supported and necessary for organizations with multiple on-premises locations, the focus of replication design has broadened considerably since the 70-297 exam. The most significant change is the introduction of cloud synchronization. For a hybrid organization, the most critical replication path is often the one between the on-premises domain controllers and the Azure AD tenant. This is managed by the Azure AD Connect synchronization engine.

This tool replicates identity objects and attributes to the cloud on a configurable schedule, typically every 30 minutes. The replication happens over a secure HTTPS connection and is highly optimized. While the underlying technology is completely different from the RPC-based replication used between on-premises domain controllers, the design goal is the same: to ensure that identity information is consistent across the entire enterprise, which now spans from the local data center to the global cloud.

Global Catalog and Universal Group Caching

In a multi-domain forest, finding objects in other domains can be a challenge. The solution to this, and a key topic in the 70-297 exam, is the Global Catalog (GC). A domain controller designated as a GC holds a full, writable copy of all objects in its own domain, plus a partial, read-only copy of all objects from every other domain in the forest. This allows users to search for any object in the forest and is essential for determining Universal Group memberships during logon.

The 70-297 exam required careful planning for the placement of GC servers. The best practice was to have at least one GC in every site that contained users, to avoid sending logon and query traffic across WAN links. For branch offices where a full GC might not be feasible, Windows Server 2003 introduced Universal Group Membership Caching. This feature allowed a standard domain controller to cache the universal group memberships of users who logged on at that site, providing most of the benefits of a local GC without the associated replication overhead.

The Role of the Global Catalog and RODCs Today

The Global Catalog remains just as critical today as it was in the days of the 70-297 exam. It is a mandatory component for the functioning of Microsoft Exchange Server and is still the primary mechanism for resolving user principal names (UPNs) at logon in complex environments. The principle of placing a GC in every major location to optimize authentication performance has not changed. The design skills tested in the 70-297 exam regarding GC placement are still directly applicable.

However, the solution for branch offices has improved significantly since Windows Server 2003. Starting with Server 2008, Microsoft introduced the Read-Only Domain Controller (RODC). An RODC is a special type of domain controller that holds a read-only copy of the Active Directory database. It can service authentication requests for the branch office users but does not allow any changes to be made. This provides a much more secure and robust solution for physically insecure locations than the options available at the time of the 70-297 exam.

Designing a DNS Strategy for Active Directory

The absolute reliance of Active Directory on a properly configured DNS infrastructure was a central theme of the 70-297 exam. Designing the DNS namespace was the first critical step. The best practice was to create a dedicated subdomain for Active Directory, such as "https://www.google.com/search?q=ad.company.com," rather than using the public-facing domain name directly. This created a clear separation between internal and external resources and simplified management. The core of the design was using Active Directory-Integrated DNS zones.

By storing the DNS zone data within Active Directory, the zone information would replicate automatically and securely to all domain controllers. This eliminated the need for manual zone transfer configurations and provided a fault-tolerant DNS service. The 70-297 exam also required a deep understanding of DNS forwarders, which are used to resolve external names, and stub zones or conditional forwarders, which are used to efficiently resolve names in other trusted forests or DNS namespaces. These design elements were key to creating a reliable name resolution system.

Modern DNS: Cloud Integration and Security

While the fundamentals of AD-integrated DNS are still best practice for on-premises networks, modern DNS design has expanded to encompass cloud services. Azure DNS provides a globally distributed, highly available DNS service for hosting public domains. For internal name resolution, Azure DNS Private Zones allow you to use your own custom domain names within your Azure virtual networks without needing to deploy and manage your own DNS servers. This is a significant evolution from the server-centric model of the 70-297 exam era.

Security has also become a much larger focus. Modern DNS designs incorporate technologies like DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) to protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks. In a hybrid environment, the design must account for how on-premises clients will resolve the names of Azure services, and how Azure services will resolve the names of on-premises resources. This often involves a complex configuration of DNS forwarders and virtual network links, creating a seamless name resolution experience across the hybrid cloud.

DHCP Design and Availability in the 2003 Era

The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) automates the process of assigning IP addresses and other network configuration settings to clients. For the 70-297 exam, designing a resilient DHCP service was a key objective. In the Windows Server 2003 era, there was no built-in mechanism for true DHCP failover. Administrators had to rely on workarounds to provide high availability. The most common of these was the split-scope model.

In a split-scope design, two DHCP servers were configured to serve the same subnet. The address pool was divided between them, with one server controlling 80% of the addresses and the other controlling 20%. If the primary server failed, the secondary server could continue to lease the addresses from its smaller pool, providing a limited degree of fault tolerance until the primary server was restored. The 70-297 exam required candidates to understand how to design and implement this model to meet business requirements for network availability.

Modern DHCP: Failover and IP Address Management (IPAM)

The landscape for DHCP has improved dramatically since the time of the 70-297 exam. Starting with Windows Server 2012, Microsoft introduced a true, built-in DHCP Failover feature. This allows two DHCP servers to be configured in either a hot-standby or a load-balancing mode, providing seamless, stateful failover. If one server goes down, the other can take over the full responsibilities of the IP address lease process without any loss of service. This is a far more robust and elegant solution than the old split-scope workaround.

Furthermore, managing a large IP address space is now much easier with the introduction of IP Address Management (IPAM) tools. IPAM, included as a feature in Windows Server, provides a centralized framework for discovering, monitoring, auditing, and managing the IP address infrastructure on a corporate network. It can integrate with and manage all the Microsoft DNS and DHCP servers, providing a single pane of glass for administration that was simply not available when the 70-297 exam was developed.

The Ghost of NetBIOS: Understanding WINS

For many candidates taking the 70-297 exam, Windows Internet Name Service (WINS) was a necessary but confusing topic. WINS is a legacy name resolution service for NetBIOS names. NetBIOS was the original naming protocol used in early Microsoft networks, before the industry fully embraced DNS. In the Windows Server 2003 era, many older applications and even some features of the operating system still relied on NetBIOS name resolution to function correctly.

Therefore, designing a WINS infrastructure was often a requirement for ensuring backward compatibility. This involved deploying WINS servers and configuring WINS replication between them to create a distributed database of NetBIOS names and their corresponding IP addresses. The 70-297 exam would present scenarios where an application had a dependency on NetBIOS, requiring the candidate to include WINS in their overall network services design. It was a bridge between the old networking world and the new DNS-centric one.

Why WINS is Obsolete and the Move to DNS-Only

Today, WINS is considered completely obsolete. Modern networks and applications are built exclusively on DNS for name resolution. There is no longer a need for a separate NetBIOS name resolution infrastructure. One of the common tasks for a modern infrastructure engineer is to decommission the last remaining WINS servers from legacy environments. This involves identifying any lingering applications that might still be using NetBIOS and reconfiguring them to use DNS instead.

The move to a DNS-only environment simplifies the network infrastructure, reduces the number of services that need to be managed and secured, and eliminates a protocol that was notoriously "chatty" on the network. The inclusion of WINS on the 70-297 exam serves as a powerful reminder of how technology evolves and the importance of migrating away from legacy systems. The skills have shifted from designing WINS replication to planning and executing a successful WINS decommissioning project.

Recap: The Enduring Principles of the 70-297 Exam

Throughout this series, we have explored the concepts of the long-retired 70-297 exam and traced their evolution. The enduring lesson is that while specific technologies change, the core principles of good infrastructure design remain constant. The need to understand business requirements before building a technical solution is timeless. The discipline of planning a logical identity structure, designing a physical topology to optimize traffic, and providing resilient core network services are as critical today as they were in the era of Windows Server 2003.

The 70-297 exam taught a generation of engineers to think like architects. It forced them to consider scalability, security, and availability in every decision. It emphasized that a stable house can only be built on a solid foundation. While the tools have changed from physical servers and split-scope DHCP to cloud services and true failover, the fundamental "why" behind these technologies is remarkably similar. This foundational knowledge is the key to understanding and mastering the complex hybrid environments of today.

The Microsoft Certification Path Today

The world of Microsoft certifications has been completely transformed since the days of the MCSE and the 70-297 exam. The modern certification program is role-based, designed to validate the specific skills required for a particular job in the cloud-centric world. Instead of a single, broad certification, there are now specialized paths for roles like Azure Administrator, DevOps Engineer, Security Engineer, and Solutions Architect. This allows professionals to validate the precise skills that are in high demand in the market.

For those whose careers are rooted in the on-premises server world, the certification path has shifted to reflect the hybrid nature of modern IT. The focus is no longer just on managing Windows Server in isolation but on administering a hybrid core infrastructure that seamlessly integrates on-premises systems with Azure services. This shift acknowledges that the future of enterprise IT is not purely on-premises or purely cloud, but a strategic combination of both, a reality that the current certifications are built to address.

Spotlight on AZ-800: Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure

The modern exam that most closely aligns with the foundational skills of the 70-297 exam is the AZ-800. This exam is one of two required for the Windows Server Hybrid Administrator Associate certification. Its objectives clearly show the evolution of the role. It covers deploying and managing Active Directory Domain Services in on-premises and hybrid environments. This includes the timeless skills of managing domain controllers, OUs, and Group Policy, but adds the modern requirement of integrating with Azure AD.

The AZ-800 exam also covers core infrastructure services. It tests on managing DNS and DHCP, but with a modern focus on IPAM and DNS security. It includes managing file servers and storage, with an emphasis on modern technologies like Storage Spaces Direct and the Azure File Sync service. It validates skills in managing virtual machines, but within the context of Hyper-V and Azure IaaS. It is a perfect example of how the core administrative tasks have evolved to fit the new hybrid paradigm.

Spotlight on AZ-801: Configuring Windows Server Hybrid Advanced Services

The second exam in the series, AZ-801, builds upon the foundation of AZ-800 and covers more advanced topics, much like the 70-297 exam was a design-level test that built on administrative knowledge. The AZ-801 exam focuses on securing the Windows Server environment, both on-premises and in the cloud. It covers implementing security for Active Directory and using advanced threat protection tools. It also covers implementing high availability, a concept that has evolved significantly since the days of Windows Server 2003.

This exam delves into disaster recovery, testing on skills like implementing Hyper-V Replica and using Azure Site Recovery to protect on-premises workloads. It also covers migrating servers and workloads, a common task in any modernization project. Finally, it tests on monitoring and troubleshooting, using modern tools like Azure Monitor to gain insights into the health and performance of the entire hybrid environment. Together, the AZ-800 and AZ-801 exams provide a comprehensive validation of the skills needed by a modern Windows Server administrator.

Skills for the Modern Infrastructure Engineer

To succeed today, an engineer needs a much broader skill set than what was required for the 70-297 exam. While Active Directory and networking knowledge remain crucial, they are now just part of a larger picture. Expertise in virtualization, particularly Hyper-V and VMware, is a baseline expectation. A deep understanding of cloud computing concepts and experience with a major cloud platform like Microsoft Azure is mandatory for most senior roles. The ability to manage Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is a core competency.

Furthermore, the way infrastructure is managed has changed. Automation is key. Proficiency in PowerShell is no longer optional; it is the primary tool for managing Windows Server and Azure at scale. An understanding of Infrastructure as Code (IaC) principles and tools like Azure Resource Manager (ARM) templates or Terraform is becoming increasingly important. The modern engineer must be able to write scripts and templates to deploy and manage infrastructure in a repeatable, automated fashion, a skill set far removed from the GUI-based management of the past.

Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use Microsoft 70-297 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. Microsoft 70-297 Designing a Windows Server 2003 Active Directory and Network Infrastructure certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using Microsoft 70-297 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.