Microsoft 70-467 (Designing Business Intelligence Solutions with Microsoft SQL Server 2012) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. Microsoft 70-467 Designing Business Intelligence Solutions with Microsoft SQL Server 2012 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the Microsoft MCSE 70-467 certification exam dumps & Microsoft MCSE 70-467 practice test questions in vce format.

Designing BI Solutions: A Guide to the 70-467 Exam

The Microsoft 70-467 Exam, titled "Designing Business Intelligence Solutions with Microsoft SQL Server," was a cornerstone certification for data professionals specializing in the Microsoft BI ecosystem. This exam was one of the requirements for achieving the prestigious Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE): Business Intelligence certification. Passing this exam signified that a candidate possessed the high-level skills needed to design and architect robust, scalable, and effective BI solutions. It went beyond the implementation details of individual tools to focus on the overarching design and planning principles that underpin successful BI projects. The scope of the 70-467 Exam was comprehensive, covering the entire lifecycle of a BI solution design. 

It tested a candidate's ability to plan the BI infrastructure, design data warehouses, architect Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) processes, design analytical cube models, and plan for reporting and data visualization strategies. The exam was not about writing code or clicking through wizards; it was about making critical design decisions. Candidates were expected to evaluate business requirements and translate them into a technical architecture that leveraged the full power of the Microsoft SQL Server BI stack. Success on the 70-467 Exam required a deep and holistic understanding of how the different components of the Microsoft BI suite worked together. This included SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS), SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS), and SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS). A certified professional demonstrated the ability to design solutions that were not only technically sound but also secure, manageable, and capable of delivering actionable insights to the business. It was a true test of a BI architect's expertise.

The Microsoft Business Intelligence Stack

To understand the 70-467 Exam, one must first be familiar with the classic Microsoft Business Intelligence stack, primarily based on SQL Server 2012 and 2014. This stack consisted of three core, tightly integrated services. The first is SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS), which is the data integration and ETL component. SSIS provides a powerful graphical environment for building complex workflows to extract data from various sources, cleanse and transform it according to business rules, and load it into a central data warehouse. The second pillar is SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS). This is the analytical engine that sits on top of the data warehouse. SSAS allows architects to build semantic models, known as cubes, that pre-aggregate data and present it in a business-friendly structure. This enables users to perform complex analysis and explore data with incredibly fast query response times. The 70-467 Exam placed a major emphasis on designing these SSAS models, covering both Multidimensional and Tabular model types. The third component is SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS). This is the enterprise reporting and data visualization platform. SSRS allows for the creation, management, and delivery of a wide range of reports, from traditional, pixel-perfect paginated reports to more interactive dashboards. It connects to the SSAS cubes or directly to the data warehouse to present the insights to end-users. A key part of the 70-467 Exam was designing a comprehensive reporting and delivery strategy using SSRS.

The Critical Role of BI Solution Design

The 70-467 Exam was unique because it focused exclusively on the "design" phase of a project. While other exams tested implementation skills, this one tested the architectural thinking that happens before a single line of code is written or a server is configured. Proper design is arguably the most critical factor in the success of any BI initiative. A poorly designed solution may work initially but will quickly become slow, difficult to maintain, and unable to adapt to new business requirements. A well-designed BI solution, on the other hand, provides a solid foundation for an organization's data culture. It ensures that the data warehouse is structured for optimal query performance and flexibility. It guarantees that the ETL processes are reliable, auditable, and efficient. It confirms that the analytical models are intuitive for business users and that the reporting solution delivers the right information to the right people at the right time. The 70-467 Exam was built around these core tenets of good architectural design. The exam would present candidates with business scenarios and require them to make key design choices. For example, a question might ask for the best data warehouse schema (star or snowflake) for a given reporting need, or the most appropriate SSAS model type (Tabular or Multidimensional) for a specific set of users. These questions tested an architect's ability to analyze trade-offs and select the optimal approach based on requirements for performance, scalability, and usability.

Understanding the Exam's Retired Status

It is essential to recognize that the 70-467 Exam, along with the entire MCSE: Business Intelligence certification track, has been officially retired by Microsoft. This retirement is a reflection of the rapid evolution of the data and analytics landscape. The technologies that the exam was based on, primarily SQL Server 2012/2014, have been superseded by more modern, cloud-centric platforms. Microsoft's focus has decisively shifted towards its Azure cloud services and the Power BI platform. The retirement of the exam does not invalidate the skills and principles it covered. The fundamental concepts of data warehousing, ETL design, and semantic modeling are timeless and remain highly relevant today. An architect who understood how to design a star schema or build an SSAS cube has a strong conceptual foundation for working with modern tools like Azure Synapse Analytics and Power BI datasets. The underlying design patterns for organizing and analyzing data persist, even as the specific tools change. For professionals looking for certification today, Microsoft offers a new portfolio of role-based certifications. Instead of the broad MCSE, there are now more focused credentials such as "Power BI Data Analyst Associate" or "Azure Data Engineer Associate." These modern certifications validate skills on the latest cloud platforms. While studying materials for the 70-467 Exam can provide valuable foundational knowledge, they are not sufficient for preparing for these new exams.

Core Design Principles Covered by the Exam

The 70-467 Exam was structured around several core design domains. The first major area was planning the overall BI infrastructure. This involved making decisions about the physical and logical architecture, including considerations for hardware sizing, server topology for high availability and disaster recovery, and software licensing. Candidates needed to understand how to design an infrastructure that could support the entire BI workload, from ETL processing to interactive user queries, while meeting performance and availability requirements. Another fundamental domain was the design of the logical and physical data warehouse. This is where the principles of dimensional modeling came into play. The 70-467 Exam required a deep understanding of how to design fact tables, dimension tables, and the relationships between them to create a clean, understandable, and high-performing data model. This included designing slowly changing dimensions to handle historical data and creating surrogate keys to ensure data integrity. Finally, the exam covered the design of the analytical and reporting layers. This involved architecting the SSAS semantic models that would sit on top of the data warehouse, defining calculations and key performance indicators (KPIs), and planning the security model to control data access. It also included designing the strategy for how reports and dashboards would be created, managed, and distributed to business users across the organization. These principles form the blueprint for any successful BI implementation.

The Target Audience for the 70-467 Exam

The primary audience for the 70-467 Exam was experienced BI professionals who were transitioning into or already in a BI architect role. This included senior BI developers, data warehouse managers, and consultants who were responsible for leading the design of enterprise-scale data solutions. The exam was not intended for junior developers or database administrators; it assumed a significant level of hands-on experience with the entire Microsoft BI stack and a solid understanding of data warehousing concepts. These individuals are the technical leaders on BI projects. They are responsible for interfacing with business stakeholders to gather requirements, translating those requirements into a technical specification, and then guiding the development team through the implementation process. The 70-467 Exam was designed to validate the specific set of skills that this role requires, focusing on strategic decision-making, planning, and architectural best practices rather than on low-level implementation details. For organizations, having employees with this certification provided assurance that their BI initiatives were being built on a solid architectural foundation. For the individual, passing the 70-467 Exam was a major career milestone. It certified them as an expert in their field, capable of designing complex solutions and leading technical teams, which often led to more senior roles and greater professional opportunities in the data and analytics space.

From On-Premises to the Cloud: The BI Evolution

The world in which the 70-467 Exam existed was predominantly an on-premises one. Organizations would procure their own servers, install and manage SQL Server, and build their BI solutions within their own data centers. This required significant capital investment and a deep skill set in infrastructure management, capacity planning, and system administration. The exam's focus on planning hardware and designing for high availability reflected this on-premises reality. Today, the paradigm has shifted dramatically towards the cloud. Microsoft's investment in Azure has created a powerful suite of Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings that have modernized every component of the traditional BI stack. SSIS has evolved into Azure Data Factory for cloud-scale data integration. SSAS has a cloud counterpart in Azure Analysis Services. And most significantly, the combination of SSRS, Power View, and Power Pivot has been consolidated and vastly expanded into the market-leading Power BI service. This evolution has changed the role of the BI architect. Instead of sizing physical servers, today's architect designs solutions using cloud services, making decisions about service tiers, scalability settings, and regional distribution. While the tools have changed, the fundamental need for good design has not. The principles of dimensional modeling and creating user-friendly semantic models, which were so central to the 70-467 Exam, are just as critical when designing a solution in Power BI or Azure Synapse Analytics.

Laying the Foundation for a Deeper Dive

This first part of our series has provided a comprehensive overview of the Microsoft 70-467 Exam. We have explored its purpose as a capstone certification for BI architects, reviewed the classic on-premises Microsoft BI stack it was based on, and discussed the critical importance of solution design. We have also placed the exam in its historical context, acknowledging its retired status and outlining the evolution of Microsoft BI into the modern cloud era. This sets the stage for a more detailed examination of the specific technical domains it covered. In the parts that follow, we will delve into the specifics of each major section of the 70-467 Exam. We will explore the nuances of designing a BI infrastructure and a robust data warehouse. We will take a deep dive into the architectural decisions involved in building powerful analytical models with SQL Server Analysis Services. We will also cover the design of effective reporting and visualization strategies that deliver real business value. This series will serve as a detailed guide to the body of knowledge that the 70-467 Exam represented. By breaking down these complex design topics, we will illustrate the timeless principles of good BI architecture. For anyone working in the data field, whether using on-premises SQL Server or the latest Azure services, understanding these foundational concepts is essential for building solutions that are successful, scalable, and sustainable.

Planning the BI Infrastructure

A significant portion of the 70-467 Exam was dedicated to the critical task of planning the infrastructure that would support a business intelligence solution. Before any data modeling or report development could begin, an architect had to design the server environment. This involved a careful analysis of the expected workload, including the volume of data to be processed by ETL, the complexity of the analytical queries, and the number of concurrent reporting users. Based on this analysis, the architect would make recommendations for server hardware, focusing on CPU, memory, and disk I/O capacity. For the ETL workload (SSIS), the primary considerations were CPU power for transformations and fast disk I/O for reading from sources and writing to destinations. For the analytical database (SSAS), memory was the most critical resource, as SSAS cubes are designed to be held in RAM for fast query performance. For the reporting database (SSRS), the resource needs would vary based on the number of users and the complexity of the reports being rendered. The 70-467 Exam required candidates to understand these distinct workload patterns and design a balanced hardware strategy. Beyond individual server sizing, the exam also covered the design of the overall server topology. This included deciding whether to host the different SQL Server services on a single consolidated server or to scale out onto multiple dedicated servers. A scaled-out approach, with separate servers for the relational database engine, SSAS, and SSRS, typically offers better performance and scalability but at a higher cost and with increased management complexity. A candidate for the 70-467 Exam needed to be able to weigh these trade-offs and recommend the appropriate topology for a given business scenario.

Designing for High Availability and Disaster Recovery

For any enterprise BI solution, ensuring high availability (HA) and having a solid disaster recovery (DR) plan is non-negotiable. The BI platform is often mission-critical, providing the data that drives daily operational decisions. The 70-467 Exam tested an architect's ability to design a solution that was resilient to failures. This involved leveraging the HA and DR features built into Microsoft SQL Server to minimize downtime and prevent data loss. For the underlying data warehouse, common HA technologies included Failover Clustering and AlwaysOn Availability Groups. Failover Clustering provides instance-level protection by allowing a passive server to take over if the active server fails. AlwaysOn Availability Groups, introduced in SQL Server 2012, offer more granular database-level protection and provide the ability to have readable secondary replicas, which can be used to offload reporting queries. The 70-467 Exam required knowing which technology to use based on the required recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO). For the Analysis Services and Reporting Services components, the strategies for HA were different. SSAS could be made highly available by deploying it on a failover cluster or by building multiple, load-balanced servers that an application could query. SSRS could be deployed in a scale-out configuration, where multiple report servers share a common database, providing both scalability and redundancy. An architect needed to design a comprehensive HA/DR strategy that covered every component of the BI stack, a key skill for the 70-467 Exam.

The Core of BI: Designing a Data Warehouse

At the heart of every traditional BI solution is the data warehouse. This is a specialized database designed specifically for querying and analysis. Unlike a transactional (OLTP) database, which is optimized for fast data entry and updates, a data warehouse is optimized for fast data retrieval and aggregation. The design of this data warehouse was a central topic in the 70-467 Exam. The most widely adopted methodology for data warehouse design is dimensional modeling, developed by Ralph Kimball. Dimensional modeling organizes data into two primary types of tables: fact tables and dimension tables. Fact tables store the numerical measurements of a business process, such as "Sales Amount" or "Quantity Sold." These are the quantitative metrics that the business wants to analyze. Dimension tables store the business context that gives meaning to the facts, such as "Product," "Customer," "Date," and "Store." They contain the descriptive attributes that users will use to slice, dice, and filter the data. The goal of dimensional modeling is to create a database structure that is both high-performing for queries and, just as importantly, easy for business users to understand and navigate. The structure should mirror the way business users think about their operations. The 70-467 Exam required candidates to demonstrate a deep mastery of these principles, tasking them with designing a dimensional model based on a set of business requirements.

Star Schemas vs. Snowflake Schemas

Within dimensional modeling, there are two common design patterns for arranging fact and dimension tables: the star schema and the snowflake schema. The ability to choose the correct pattern for a given situation was a fundamental skill tested on the 70-467 Exam. The star schema is the simplest and most common design. It features a central fact table directly connected to a set of dimension tables. When visualized, this structure resembles a star, hence the name. The key characteristic of a star schema is that the dimension tables are denormalized. This means that a dimension, such as "Product," contains all of its descriptive attributes (e.g., product name, category, subcategory, brand) in a single, wide table. This denormalization reduces the number of joins required for a query, which generally leads to simpler queries and faster performance. The star schema is highly recommended as the starting point for most data warehouse designs. The snowflake schema is an extension of the star schema where the dimension tables are normalized. In a snowflake schema, a dimension like "Product" might be broken down into multiple tables: a product table, a product subcategory table, and a product category table, all linked by foreign keys. This reduces data redundancy and can save some disk space, but it comes at the cost of more complex queries with more joins, which can negatively impact performance. The 70-467 Exam would test a candidate's ability to justify when the added complexity of a snowflake schema might be warranted.

Designing Dimension Tables and Hierarchies

The quality of a data warehouse is largely determined by the quality of its dimension tables. These tables provide the rich, descriptive context for analysis. Designing effective dimension tables was a key focus of the 70-467 Exam. A well-designed dimension table should have a single primary key, often called a surrogate key, which is a simple integer that has no business meaning but serves to uniquely identify each row. This key is used to join the dimension table to the fact table. The table should also contain a set of descriptive attributes. For a "Customer" dimension, this would include attributes like "Full Name," "City," "State," "Country," and "Age Bracket." These attributes become the filters and row headers in user reports. It is important to create attributes that are business-friendly and discrete. An architect must also design natural hierarchies within the dimensions, such as a "Product" hierarchy that rolls up from Product to Subcategory to Category, which allows users to drill up and down in their analysis. One of the most important dimensions in any data warehouse is the "Date" dimension. This is a pre-populated table that contains one row for every day over a specified period (e.g., ten years). Each row contains numerous attributes for that date, such as "Day of Week," "Month Name," "Fiscal Quarter," and "Holiday Indicator." This allows for powerful time-based analysis without having to perform complex date calculations in every query. Designing a comprehensive date dimension was a standard requirement for the 70-467 Exam.

Strategies for Slowly Changing Dimensions

Business context is not static; it changes over time. A customer moves to a new city, a product is reassigned to a different category, or a sales region is reorganized. A critical design challenge in data warehousing is how to handle these changes to dimension attributes. This is known as managing Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCDs), a topic that was thoroughly tested in the 70-467 Exam. There are several standard techniques, or "types," for handling these changes. The simplest approach is Type 1, where the old attribute value is simply overwritten with the new value. This approach does not preserve any history of the change. It is suitable for correcting errors but is generally not recommended for changes that need to be tracked. The most common and powerful approach is Type 2. In this method, when an attribute changes, a new row is added to the dimension table for that entity, capturing the new attribute value. The old row is preserved but marked as no longer current, often using effective date columns or a "current flag." A Type 2 SCD allows for accurate historical reporting. A business can analyze sales based on the customer's address at the time of the sale, even if that customer has moved since. The 70-467 Exam required candidates to not only understand the difference between the SCD types but also to design the ETL processes needed to implement them, which can be quite complex.

Designing Fact Tables and Measures

Fact tables are the heart of the data warehouse, containing the performance measurements of the business. The design of these tables was a critical skill for the 70-467 Exam. A fact table consists of foreign keys that link to the surrounding dimension tables and a set of numeric, additive measures. Additive measures are values that can be summed up across all dimensions, such as "Sales Amount" or "Units Sold." The granularity of the fact table is the most important design decision an architect must make. The grain defines what a single row in the fact table represents. For a retail sales fact table, the grain might be "one line item on a customer receipt." This means every row will represent the sale of a specific product to a specific customer at a specific time in a specific store. Defining the grain at the lowest possible level of detail provides the greatest flexibility for analysis. Fact tables can also contain different types of measures. Semi-additive measures, like "Inventory Balance," can be summed across some dimensions (like Product) but not across others (like Time). Non-additive measures, such as ratios or percentages, generally cannot be summed at all. The 70-467 Exam required candidates to be able to identify the correct type of fact table (e.g., transactional, periodic snapshot, or accumulating snapshot) and design its structure to accurately model a given business process.

Architecting the ETL Solution with SSIS

Once the data warehouse schema is designed, the architect must design the Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) processes to populate it. In the Microsoft BI stack, this is the role of SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS). The 70-467 Exam did not focus on building individual SSIS packages but rather on the high-level architecture of the overall ETL solution. This includes planning for data extraction from various source systems, which could be anything from relational databases to flat files or web services. The design must include a strategy for data cleansing and conforming. This is often the most challenging part of ETL. Data from different source systems must be standardized to a common format. For example, product codes from two different systems might need to be mapped to a single master product code. The architect must design a process for managing these data quality issues and for conforming dimension attributes from multiple sources into a single, clean dimension table. The ETL architecture must also be designed for performance, reliability, and manageability. This includes designing a framework for logging, error handling, and package restartability. For large data volumes, the architect must design data flows that are optimized for performance, using techniques like parallel processing and efficient in-memory transformations. The 70-467 Exam tested the ability to create a holistic ETL design that was robust and scalable enough for an enterprise environment.

Introduction to SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS)

After designing the data warehouse, the next logical step in a BI architecture, and a major focus of the 70-467 Exam, is to design the semantic model. In the Microsoft BI stack, this is the role of SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS). SSAS sits on top of the data warehouse and provides a business-friendly layer for analysis. It takes the normalized data from the star schema and reorganizes it into a model, often called a cube, that is optimized for high-speed querying, slicing, and dicing. The primary purpose of SSAS is to deliver "speed-of-thought" analysis to business users. By pre-calculating and storing aggregations, an SSAS model can answer complex queries over billions of rows of data in seconds. This performance is what enables truly interactive data exploration. Instead of waiting minutes or hours for a report to run against the relational data warehouse, a user connected to an SSAS cube can get near-instantaneous feedback as they drag and drop attributes and measures in a tool like Excel. Furthermore, SSAS provides a single version of the truth. All business logic, calculations, and key performance indicators (KPIs) are defined once within the model. This ensures that when different users across the organization run a report on "Total Sales," they all get the same number, calculated in the same way. The 70-467 Exam required architects to be able to design these models to accurately represent business logic and provide this consistent, high-performance analytical experience.

Choosing the Right Model: Tabular vs. Multidimensional

With the release of SQL Server 2012, BI architects were presented with a significant design choice, a topic heavily tested on the 70-467 Exam: which type of SSAS model to build. SSAS offers two distinct modeling experiences: the traditional Multidimensional model and the newer Tabular model. These two models have different architectures, use different query languages, and are suited for different types of projects. Choosing the right one is a critical architectural decision. The Multidimensional model is the classic OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) engine that SSAS has had for years. It is based on a cube structure with dimensions and measures, queried using the MDX (Multidimensional Expressions) language. It is known for its ability to handle very large data volumes and support complex business logic and calculations. The Multidimensional model uses disk-based storage (MOLAP) or relational storage (ROLAP) to manage its data. The Tabular model, on the other hand, is an in-memory database based on the xVelocity engine, which was formerly known as VertiPaq. It uses a relational structure of tables and relationships, similar to a standard database, and is queried using the DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) language. The Tabular model is known for its exceptional performance, high data compression, and relative simplicity, making it faster to develop with. A candidate for the 70-467 Exam needed to understand the pros and cons of each model to make an informed recommendation.

Designing a Multidimensional Model (The BISM)

Designing a Multidimensional model, also known as a Business Intelligence Semantic Model (BISM), was a deep and complex topic on the 70-467 Exam. The design process begins in SQL Server Data Tools (SSDT) and involves creating several key objects. The first is the Data Source View (DSV), which is a logical view of the underlying data warehouse schema. The architect selects the fact and dimension tables from the data warehouse that will be used in the cube. Once the DSV is defined, the architect creates the cube itself. This involves identifying the fact table that contains the measures and the dimension tables that provide the context. The cube wizard in SSDT helps to automatically create the initial measure groups and dimensions based on the foreign key relationships in the DSV. After the initial creation, the architect must then spend significant time refining and enhancing the model to meet the business requirements. This refinement process includes configuring the properties of the cube, measure groups, and dimensions. For example, an architect must define the aggregation design, which tells SSAS which aggregations to pre-calculate and store on disk to improve query performance. Designing an effective aggregation strategy requires a deep understanding of the expected query patterns. The 70-467 Exam would test this ability to design and configure a cube for optimal performance and usability.

Designing Dimensions, Attributes, and Hierarchies

In a Multidimensional model, the dimensions are the heart of the user experience. A significant part of the design effort, and a key area of study for the 70-467 Exam, is in crafting well-designed cube dimensions. Each dimension in the cube is based on one or more tables from the DSV. The architect must define the key attribute that uniquely identifies each member of the dimension, such as "Product Key." The next step is to define the other attributes that describe the dimension members. For a "Product" dimension, this would include attributes like "Product Name," "Color," "Size," and "Brand." For each attribute, the architect must configure its properties, such as its name, data type, and how it is related to the key attribute. These attributes are what the user will see in their reporting tools, so they must be named in a business-friendly way. Most importantly, the architect must design the attribute relationships and user hierarchies. Attribute relationships define the one-to-many links between attributes (e.g., one Category contains many Subcategories). Defining these relationships allows the query engine to work more efficiently. User hierarchies, such as a "Product Category" hierarchy that rolls from Category to Subcategory to Product Name, provide a natural drill-down path for users to explore the data. Designing these hierarchies correctly is fundamental to creating an intuitive user experience.

Designing Measures and Measure Groups

While dimensions provide the context, measures provide the quantitative data for analysis. The design of measures and measure groups was another critical topic for the 70-467 Exam. A measure group in a cube is a collection of measures that all share the same granularity and are typically based on a single fact table. For example, a cube might have a "Sales" measure group based on the sales fact table and an "Inventory" measure group based on the inventory snapshot fact table. Within each measure group, the architect defines the individual measures. Each measure is based on a numeric column in the fact table, such as "SalesAmount." The architect must define the aggregation function for each measure, which is most commonly "Sum" but can also be "Count," "Min," "Max," or "Distinct Count." They must also configure the display format for the measure, such as formatting it as a currency with two decimal places. Beyond simple measures based on a single column, an architect must also design calculated measures. These are measures that are defined using an MDX expression rather than being directly tied to a column in the fact table. For example, a "Gross Margin" calculated measure might be defined as ([Sales Amount] - [Total Product Cost]). The 70-467 Exam required the ability to identify the need for such calculations and design them as part of the cube.

Introduction to MDX for Calculations

While the 70-467 Exam was a design exam, not a development exam, a conceptual understanding of Multidimensional Expressions (MDX) was necessary. MDX is the primary query and calculation language for Multidimensional models. It is a powerful but complex language that is used to retrieve data from cubes and to define calculations within the cube's script. An architect would not be expected to write complex MDX from scratch, but they needed to understand its role and capabilities. MDX is used to create calculated members and named sets. As mentioned, a calculated member is a measure that is defined by a formula, such as "Year-over-Year Growth." These calculations are a core part of the business logic that is embedded in the cube. A named set is a predefined set of dimension members that is given a friendly name. For example, an architect might create a named set called "Top 10 Products" that is dynamically calculated based on sales revenue. The cube's MDX script is where these calculations are stored. An architect designing the cube would be responsible for specifying the required calculations and working with a developer to implement them in the script. They would also need to consider the performance implications of complex MDX calculations. The 70-467 Exam would test a candidate's ability to design a solution that incorporated these advanced calculations to meet business reporting requirements.

Designing a Tabular Model

Designing a Tabular model, while conceptually simpler than a Multidimensional model, has its own set of design principles that were covered in the 70-467 Exam. A Tabular model project also starts in SSDT. Instead of a DSV, the architect imports tables directly from a source database into the in-memory engine. The model consists of these tables, the relationships between them, and the calculations that are added on top. The core of Tabular model design is creating a clean set of tables and defining the relationships between them. The design should follow the same star schema principles as a data warehouse, with dimension-style tables (called lookup tables) and fact-style tables (called data tables). The architect creates one-to-many relationships between these tables by dragging and dropping columns in the diagram view, which is a much more intuitive process than in Multidimensional models. The in-memory, columnar nature of the Tabular model's xVelocity engine means that it can achieve incredible performance and data compression. However, an architect must still design the model with performance in mind. This includes decisions like hiding unnecessary columns from the client tools, choosing appropriate data types to maximize compression, and partitioning large tables to speed up data processing. The 70-467 Exam required an understanding of these Tabular-specific design patterns.

Designing Security in Analysis Services

Securing the data in the analytical model is a critical responsibility for a BI architect. A comprehensive security plan was a key design requirement for the 70-467 Exam. Both Multidimensional and Tabular models in SSAS use a role-based security model. The architect designs security by creating roles and then assigning Windows users or groups to those roles. Each role is granted a specific set of permissions. Basic permissions include whether a role has administrative access to the database or just read access for querying. The real power of SSAS security lies in its ability to implement row-level and cell-level security. In a Multidimensional model, an architect can use dimension data security to restrict which dimension members a user is allowed to see. For example, a sales manager for the West region can be restricted to only seeing data for customers in that region. In a Tabular model, this is achieved using row filters, which are DAX expressions that define which rows in a table a user is allowed to see. The 70-467 Exam would often present complex security requirements, and the candidate would have to design a role-based security model to implement them. This included designing dynamic security, where the security rules are driven by data in a table rather than being hard-coded into the roles.

Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use Microsoft MCSE 70-467 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. Microsoft 70-467 Designing Business Intelligence Solutions with Microsoft SQL Server 2012 certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using Microsoft MCSE 70-467 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.