Pass Your Microsoft MCSE 70-744 Exam Easy!

Microsoft 70-744 (Securing Windows Server 2016) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. Microsoft 70-744 Securing Windows Server 2016 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the Microsoft MCSE 70-744 certification exam dumps & Microsoft MCSE 70-744 practice test questions in vce format.

A Guide to the 70-744 Exam: Hardening the Windows Server 2016 OS

The Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE): Core Infrastructure certification was a premier credential for IT professionals, and the 70-744 Exam, "Securing Windows Server 2016," was a critical component of its validation. This exam was designed for administrators and security specialists, testing their ability to secure a Windows Server 2016 infrastructure from a wide range of modern threats. It covered advanced security topics, including hardening the operating system, protecting virtualization environments, managing privileged identities, and detecting and responding to attacks.

It is vital to recognize that the 70-744 Exam has been retired by Microsoft, along with the MCSA and MCSE certifications for Windows Server 2016. Therefore, this series is not a direct study guide for an active exam. Instead, it serves as a conceptual and historical review of the groundbreaking security principles that were introduced and tested. We will explore the "assume breach" philosophy that underpinned Server 2016 security and discuss how those features have evolved into the security paradigms we use in modern server and cloud platforms today.

By examining the objectives of the classic 70-744 Exam, we can gain a deep understanding of the foundations of modern infrastructure security. The principles of least privilege, defense-in-depth, and proactive threat detection are more relevant than ever. This series will provide valuable context for any professional tasked with securing a Microsoft environment.

The "Assume Breach" Mentality of Windows Server 2016

The security features covered in the 70-744 Exam were driven by a significant shift in Microsoft's security philosophy: the "assume breach" mentality. The traditional security model focused heavily on building a strong perimeter, like a castle wall, to keep attackers out. The "assume breach" model, however, operates on the assumption that attackers will eventually find a way past the perimeter, or may already be inside the network.

This change in mindset shifts the focus from purely preventative controls to a more balanced strategy that includes robust detection and rapid response capabilities. It also places a much greater emphasis on securing the internal infrastructure to limit the damage an attacker can do once they are inside. The goal is to make it extremely difficult for an attacker to move laterally across the network, escalate their privileges, and exfiltrate data.

The technologies introduced in Windows Server 2016, such as Shielded VMs, Just Enough Administration, and Advanced Threat Analytics, were all designed with this philosophy in mind. The 70-744 Exam was built to ensure that administrators understood this new paradigm and could implement the tools required to operate effectively within it.

Hardening the Base OS: Server Core and Nano Server

The first step in securing any infrastructure is to harden the base operating system, a core topic of the 70-744 Exam. One of the most effective ways to harden a server is to reduce its attack surface by installing only the necessary components. Windows Server 2016 offered two minimal installation options to achieve this: Server Core and Nano Server.

Server Core was an installation option that installed a minimal version of the operating system without the graphical user interface (GUI). It was managed entirely through the command line and PowerShell. By removing the GUI and other non-essential features, Server Core had a smaller disk footprint, required fewer patches, and presented a much smaller attack surface than the full "Desktop Experience" installation.

Nano Server was a revolutionary new option introduced in Server 2016. It was an even more stripped-down, 64-bit-only installation that was completely headless and designed for cloud-native applications and microservices. It was orders of magnitude smaller than Server Core and was optimized for running in virtual machines and containers. A deep understanding of the use cases and security benefits of both options was required.

The Modern Evolution: The Decline of Nano Server and Rise of Containers

The technology landscape evolves quickly, and a key lesson from the era of the 70-744 Exam is how even promising technologies can be superseded. While Nano Server was a groundbreaking concept, its implementation had some challenges. It required a completely different method of administration and had compatibility issues with many traditional applications. As a result, Microsoft shifted its strategy.

In subsequent versions of Windows Server, Nano Server was deprecated as a general-purpose operating system for virtual machines. Instead, its technology was repurposed and optimized to serve as the base image for Windows Containers. This is where the lightweight, minimal-footprint design of Nano Server truly shines. Today, Nano Server is the ultra-slim base OS for modern, containerized .NET Core applications.

For minimal server installations in virtual machines, Server Core has become the standard. It provides the right balance of a reduced attack surface and compatibility with the full range of server roles and features. The journey of Nano Server is a classic example of how technology evolves and finds its ideal niche.

Implementing Desired State Configuration (DSC)

A key technology for hardening servers at scale, and a topic covered in the 70-744 Exam, is PowerShell Desired State Configuration (DSC). DSC is a declarative management platform that allows an administrator to define the desired configuration of a server as a simple, human-readable script. This script specifies the state that the server should be in, for example, which Windows features should be installed or which services should be running.

Once the configuration is defined, the Local Configuration Manager (LCM) on the target server is responsible for making it so. The LCM can operate in a "push" mode, where an administrator manually pushes the configuration to the server, or in a "pull" mode. In pull mode, the server is configured to periodically check in with a central pull server to retrieve its latest configuration.

The LCM not only applies the configuration initially but also continuously monitors the server for any configuration drift. If a setting is changed from its desired state, the LCM can be configured to automatically correct it. DSC is a powerful tool for ensuring that all servers in an environment adhere to a consistent and secure baseline.

Secure Boot, Device Guard, and Credential Guard

Windows Server 2016 introduced a suite of powerful, hardware-based security features that were a major topic for the 70-744 Exam. These features leverage virtualization-based security (VBS) to create an isolated region of memory that is protected from the main operating system. This provides a new level of defense against advanced malware and credential theft attacks.

Secure Boot is a UEFI firmware feature that ensures that the server only boots using software that is trusted by the hardware manufacturer. This helps to prevent malicious rootkits from loading during the boot process. Device Guard takes this a step further by using configurable code integrity policies to ensure that only authorized and trusted applications are allowed to run on the server, even after it has booted.

Credential Guard is another critical feature. It uses VBS to isolate and protect the secrets that are used for user authentication, such as NTLM password hashes and Kerberos tickets. This makes it extremely difficult for an attacker who has compromised the server to steal these credentials and use them in "pass-the-hash" attacks to move laterally across the network.

The Evolution to Azure Security Center and Azure Policy

The principles of configuration management and policy enforcement, which were key to the 70-744 Exam, have been massively scaled and enhanced in the cloud with Microsoft Azure. The modern successors to on-premises tools like DSC are cloud-native services like Azure Policy and Azure Security Center (now part of Microsoft Defender for Cloud).

Azure Policy allows you to define and enforce governance policies across your entire Azure environment. For example, you can create a policy that ensures all new virtual machines are deployed with disk encryption enabled, or that they can only be deployed in specific geographic regions. Azure Policy can audit for non-compliance and can even automatically remediate some issues.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a unified security posture management solution. It continuously assesses the security of your cloud, on-premises, and hybrid resources against best practice frameworks. It provides a secure score and detailed recommendations for hardening your environment, providing a much broader and more intelligent view of your security posture than was possible with the on-premises tools of the Server 2016 era.

The Need for Fabric Security in a Virtualized Data Center

In a modern data center, the virtualization platform itself has become a high-value target for attackers. If an attacker can compromise a Hyper-V host or a virtualization administrator's account, they could potentially gain access to every single virtual machine running on that host. The 70-744 Exam recognized this shift and placed a major emphasis on securing the "fabric," which is the collection of virtualization hosts, storage, and networking that underpins the virtual machines.

Traditional security measures were often focused on protecting the guest operating systems within the VMs. However, the "assume breach" mentality required a new approach that also protected the VMs from a compromised fabric. A malicious administrator or an attacker who has gained control of a host could potentially copy a VM's virtual disk, mount it on another machine, and extract its sensitive data.

Windows Server 2016 introduced a revolutionary new set of technologies to address this specific threat. These technologies, collectively known as a Guarded Fabric, were designed to protect virtual machines from compromised or malicious fabric administrators, a scenario that previous security models did not adequately address.

Introduction to Guarded Fabric and Shielded VMs

The flagship security feature of Windows Server 2016 Hyper-V, and a central topic of the 70-744 Exam, was the introduction of the Guarded Fabric and Shielded Virtual Machines. A Guarded Fabric is a special type of Hyper-V environment that provides a highly secure platform for running sensitive virtual machines. The fabric is "guarded" in the sense that it can protect its tenant VMs from inspection, theft, and tampering by the fabric administrators themselves.

The virtual machines that run on this protected fabric are called Shielded VMs. A Shielded VM is a special type of Generation 2 virtual machine that has several enhanced security features. Its virtual disk is automatically encrypted using BitLocker, so that even if an administrator copies the VHDX file, they cannot read its contents.

Furthermore, a Shielded VM's console access and PowerShell Direct capabilities are blocked, preventing an administrator from directly interacting with the running VM from the host. These protections ensure that only the authorized tenant administrator of the VM can access its data and its running state.

The Role of the Host Guardian Service (HGS)

The orchestrator and gatekeeper of a Guarded Fabric is a new server role called the Host Guardian Service (HGS). A deep understanding of the purpose and architecture of the HGS was a core requirement for the 70-744 Exam. The HGS has two primary responsibilities: attestation and key protection.

Attestation is the process by which the HGS verifies that a Hyper-V host is healthy and is configured to a known, trusted security baseline before it is allowed to be part of the guarded fabric. A host must prove its identity and its health to the HGS.

Once a host has been successfully attested, the HGS will then perform its second function: key protection and release. The HGS is responsible for securely releasing the encryption keys that are needed for a Shielded VM to power on and to live migrate to another guarded host. This ensures that the keys are only ever released to healthy, trusted hosts.

Understanding Attestation Modes: AD-based vs. TPM-based

The 70-744 Exam required a candidate to know the two different attestation modes that the Host Guardian Service could use to verify the health of a Hyper-V host. The first and simpler mode was Admin-trusted attestation, also known as Active Directory-based attestation. In this mode, attestation was based simply on a Hyper-V host's membership in a designated Active Directory group.

While this was easy to set up, it provided a lower level of assurance, as it did not verify the actual hardware and software state of the host. The second and much more secure mode was TPM-trusted attestation. This mode leveraged the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) version 2.0 hardware chip that is present in most modern servers.

In TPM-trusted mode, the HGS captures several hardware and software measurements from a known good "golden" host, including its TPM endorsement key and its code integrity policy. A host that wants to join the fabric must prove to the HGS that its own hardware and software configuration matches this trusted baseline. This provides a much stronger guarantee that the host has not been tampered with.

Creating and Deploying Shielded Virtual Machines

The process of creating and deploying a Shielded VM was another key practical skill for the 70-744 Exam. The process is different from creating a standard VM. It begins with the creation of a special, signed template disk. The tenant creates a standard VHDX file with an operating system installed and then uses a wizard to create a signature for this disk. This ensures that only trusted, unmodified template disks can be used to create new Shielded VMs.

Next, the tenant creates a shielding data file. This file contains the secrets needed to deploy the VM, such as the administrator password. This file is encrypted in such a way that only the guarded fabric's HGS can decrypt it.

Finally, the tenant administrator provides these two files—the signed template disk and the encrypted shielding data file—to the fabric administrator. The fabric administrator can then use these files to deploy a new Shielded VM, but they have no ability to inspect or modify the contents of these files. The deployment process is "blind" to the fabric administrator, ensuring the tenant's privacy and security.

The Modern Perspective: Securing VMs in Azure

The principles of protecting virtual machines from the underlying fabric, which were pioneered by the Guarded Fabric and Shielded VMs in the 70-744 Exam era, have been adopted and greatly expanded in the Microsoft Azure cloud. The modern equivalent is a suite of technologies often referred to as Azure Confidential Computing.

Azure Confidential Computing aims to protect data "while in use" by running it within a hardware-based Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). This provides an even stronger level of isolation than the virtualization-based security used by Shielded VMs.

More directly, Azure now offers features like Trusted Launch for virtual machines. Trusted Launch, similar to TPM-based attestation, uses Secure Boot and a virtual TPM (vTPM) to ensure that a VM boots with a verified and signed bootloader and OS kernel. This protects the VM against advanced and persistent attack techniques like bootkits and rootkits, applying the same core security principles from the 70-744 Exam era to the public cloud.

Securing Hyper-V Networking

In addition to protecting the VM itself, the 70-744 Exam also covered the security features of the Hyper-V virtual switch. A virtual switch can be a target for attacks, such as a malicious VM attempting to spoof the identity of another VM or trying to intercept its traffic. Hyper-V in Windows Server 2016 included several features to mitigate these risks.

One key feature was DHCP Guard. When enabled on a virtual network adapter, DHCP Guard would prevent that VM from acting as a DHCP server. This is a crucial protection against a rogue VM that tries to hand out incorrect IP address information to other clients on the virtual network.

Another important feature was Port Access Control Lists (ACLs). Port ACLs acted as a simple, stateful firewall on the virtual switch. An administrator could create rules to permit or deny traffic for a specific VM based on its source and destination IP address and port. This provided a basic level of micro-segmentation, allowing you to isolate VMs from each other at the network layer.

The Principle of Least Privilege in Server Administration

One of the most significant sources of security risk in any IT environment is the overuse of administrative privileges. Attackers know that if they can compromise an account that has high-level permissions, such as a Domain Admin, they can gain control of the entire network. The 70-744 Exam placed a very strong emphasis on the principle of least privilege, which dictates that a user should only be given the absolute minimum level of permission they need to perform their job function.

In traditional environments, it was common to grant IT staff full administrator rights to servers, even if they only needed to perform a few specific tasks, such as restarting a service or checking a log file. This created a massive attack surface. If any of these highly privileged accounts were compromised, the entire server was at risk.

Windows Server 2016 introduced a suite of powerful technologies designed to help organizations implement a true least-privilege administrative model. These technologies, such as Just Enough Administration and Just-In-Time administration, were at the core of the identity management section of the 70-744 Exam.

Implementing Just Enough Administration (JEA)

Just Enough Administration (JEA) was a groundbreaking new security feature in Windows PowerShell 5.0, and a major topic for the 70-744 Exam. JEA is a technology that allows you to delegate specific administrative tasks to users without making them full administrators on the server. It works by creating a constrained, role-based endpoint for PowerShell Remoting.

With JEA, you can define a role that specifies exactly which PowerShell cmdlets, functions, and external commands a user is allowed to run on a server. When a user connects to the server through this JEA endpoint, they are running under a temporary, low-privilege virtual account, but they can run the specific high-privilege commands that have been delegated to them.

For example, you could create a JEA role for a web administrator that only allows them to run the commands needed to restart the IIS web server. This allows them to do their job without giving them the ability to change firewall rules, install software, or perform any other administrative task. JEA is a powerful tool for implementing the principle of least privilege.

Implementing Just-In-Time (JIT) Administration

While Just Enough Administration limits what an administrator can do, Just-In-Time (JIT) administration limits when they can do it. The concept of JIT, a key part of the security philosophy behind the 70-744 Exam, is to eliminate standing administrative privileges. Instead of having accounts that are permanent members of a high-privilege group like Domain Admins, JIT provides a mechanism for a user to elevate their privileges to that group for a temporary and limited period of time.

In the Windows Server 2016 era, this was often implemented using a bastion host solution with a product like Microsoft Identity Manager (MIM). An administrator would have a standard, low-privilege user account for their daily work. When they needed to perform an administrative task, they would go to a portal, provide a justification, and request temporary membership in an administrative group.

This request would often require multi-factor authentication and manager approval. If approved, the user's account would be added to the group for a short, pre-defined period, for example, for four hours. After the time expired, their privileges would be automatically revoked. This dramatically reduced the window of opportunity for an attacker to compromise a privileged account.

The Evolution to Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

The JIT and JEA principles that were a key focus of the 70-744 Exam have been fully embraced and greatly simplified in the Microsoft cloud with Azure Active Directory Privileged Identity Management (PIM). PIM is a cloud-native service that provides a rich and comprehensive solution for managing, controlling, and monitoring access to important resources in Azure AD, Azure, and other Microsoft Online Services.

PIM provides a seamless experience for both Just-In-Time and Just-Enough administration. It allows you to make users "eligible" for a privileged role instead of making them permanent members. When an eligible user needs to use their privileges, they go to the Azure portal and activate their role. The activation can be configured to require justification, multi-factor authentication, and an approval workflow.

The role is then activated for a pre-configured time period, after which it is automatically revoked. PIM also provides detailed auditing and access reviews to ensure that privileged access is being managed correctly. It is the modern, cloud-native successor to the concepts pioneered by MIM in the on-premises world.

The Privileged Access Workstation (PAW) Concept

Another critical strategy for protecting privileged credentials, and a topic you should understand in the context of the 70-744 Exam, is the use of a Privileged Access Workstation (PAW). A PAW is a dedicated, highly secured, and hardened computer that is used exclusively for performing sensitive administrative tasks. The principle is simple: you should never perform administrative tasks and daily, high-risk activities like browsing the web and checking email on the same machine.

A standard user workstation is constantly exposed to threats from the internet and email. If an administrator uses their privileged credentials on such a machine, they are at high risk of being stolen by malware like a keylogger.

A PAW is a clean, locked-down machine that is not used for any other purpose. It has strict security policies, application whitelisting, and no access to the internet. By physically separating the administrative environment from the general-purpose computing environment, you can significantly reduce the risk of credential theft. This concept is a cornerstone of a secure administrative model.

Protecting Credentials with Credential Guard

We introduced Credential Guard in Part 1 as a way to harden the operating system, but it is also a central component of a privileged access strategy, and it was a key technology for the 70-744 Exam. Credential Guard uses virtualization-based security (VBS) to protect the secrets that are stored in the memory of the operating system, specifically the credentials managed by the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSA).

With Credential Guard enabled, the LSA process is split into two parts. The sensitive part, which stores the credential hashes and Kerberos tickets, is moved into a new, isolated virtual machine that is protected by the Hyper-V hypervisor. The normal operating system can no longer directly access this protected memory space.

This provides a powerful defense against "pass-the-hash" and "pass-the-ticket" attacks. Even if an attacker gains administrator-level control of the operating system, they cannot access the VBS-protected memory to extract the credential secrets. This makes it much harder for them to use a compromised machine to move laterally to other systems on the network.

Implementing the Enhanced Security Administrative Environment (ESAE) Red Forest

For organizations with the highest security requirements, the 70-744 Exam curriculum touched upon an advanced architectural concept known as the Enhanced Security Administrative Environment (ESAE), often referred to as a "Red Forest" or an "Admin Forest." This is an architectural approach that provides the maximum level of protection for Active Directory administrative credentials.

The ESAE model involves creating a completely separate, dedicated Active Directory forest just for administration. All the highly privileged administrative accounts (for Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, etc.) are created in this dedicated admin forest. The production user forest and the admin forest have a one-way trust, where the admin forest trusts the production forest, but not the other way around.

Administrators use their standard user account in the production forest for daily tasks. When they need to perform an administrative function, they use a Privileged Access Workstation to log on with their separate, privileged account from the admin forest. This provides a very strong isolation boundary that protects the administrative credentials even if the entire production forest is compromised.

Securing DNS with DNS Policies and DNSSEC

The Domain Name System (DNS) is a critical piece of network infrastructure, but it can also be a vector for attacks. The 70-744 Exam covered the advanced security features in Windows Server 2016 that were designed to harden the DNS service. One of the key features was the introduction of DNS Policies.

DNS Policies allow an administrator to configure the DNS server to respond differently to queries based on a wide range of criteria. For security, one of the most important use cases is Response Rate Limiting (RRL). RRL helps to mitigate DNS amplification attacks, where an attacker uses your open DNS server to flood a victim with a large amount of traffic. RRL detects when you are receiving a high volume of queries for the same name and can be configured to stop responding to them.

Another critical security feature was the improved support for DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC). DNSSEC provides a way to digitally sign the data in a DNS zone. This allows a DNS client to verify that the response it received from a DNS server is authentic and has not been modified in transit by a man-in-the-middle attack.

Implementing the Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security

The Windows Firewall in Windows Server 2016 was a much more powerful and sophisticated tool than its predecessors, and its configuration was a key topic for the 70-744 Exam. Now named the Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security, it is a host-based, stateful firewall that provides filtering for both inbound and outbound traffic.

An administrator could create highly granular firewall rules based on a wide range of parameters. A rule could be defined based on the application, a specific port or protocol, a predefined service, or an IP address scope. The firewall also had different profiles (Domain, Private, and Public), which allowed it to automatically apply a different set of rules depending on the type of network the server was connected to.

The ability to create and manage these firewall rules, typically through Group Policy to ensure a consistent configuration across all servers, was an essential skill. A properly configured host firewall is a critical component of a defense-in-depth strategy, providing a last line of defense if an attacker gets past the network perimeter.

Leveraging IPsec for Server and Domain Isolation

The Windows Defender Firewall in Windows Server 2016 was deeply integrated with the IP Security (IPsec) protocol. This integration, a key concept for the 70-744 Exam, was managed through a special type of firewall rule called a Connection Security Rule. These rules allowed an administrator to enforce secure, authenticated, and encrypted communication between servers.

A common security architecture built on this technology is Domain Isolation. In this model, you use Group Policy to deploy connection security rules to all the member computers in your Active Directory domain. These rules are configured to require that all inbound connections are authenticated using IPsec and the computer's domain credentials (Kerberos).

This effectively creates a logical boundary around your domain-joined computers. Any computer that is not part of the domain, and therefore cannot authenticate with Kerberos, will be unable to communicate with the protected servers. This is a powerful way to prevent unauthorized devices that may have been connected to your network from accessing your critical server resources.

Securing SMB Traffic with SMB Encryption and Signing

The Server Message Block (SMB) protocol is the foundation of file sharing in a Windows environment. However, by default, older versions of SMB traffic were not encrypted, which meant that a sophisticated attacker on the network could potentially intercept and read sensitive file data. The 70-744 Exam covered the features introduced to secure this traffic.

Windows Server 2012 introduced SMB 3.0, which included a new feature for SMB Encryption. This feature provides end-to-end encryption for all SMB traffic between a client and a server. It can be enabled on a per-share basis or for the entire file server. With SMB Encryption enabled, all file data is encrypted in transit, protecting it from eavesdropping attacks.

Another related feature is SMB Signing. SMB Signing provides data integrity. It digitally signs every SMB packet to ensure that it has not been tampered with in transit. While this has a small performance overhead, it is a critical protection against man-in-the-middle attacks where an attacker might try to modify the traffic. A secure configuration requires both signing and encryption to be enabled.

The Modern Perspective: Network Security in Azure

The principles of network isolation and traffic filtering, which were central to the 70-744 Exam, are even more critical in the public cloud. Microsoft Azure provides a rich set of tools for securing the network infrastructure that is far more powerful and flexible than what was available on-premises in the Server 2016 era.

The foundational tool for network security in Azure is the Network Security Group (NSG). An NSG is a stateful firewall that allows you to create inbound and outbound rules to filter traffic to and from Azure resources, such as virtual machines, based on IP address, port, and protocol. NSGs are the primary tool for creating basic network segmentation.

For more advanced security, Azure provides the Azure Firewall, which is a fully managed, cloud-native firewall-as-a-service. It provides features like threat intelligence-based filtering, centralized policy management, and deep integration with the rest of the Azure platform. These cloud-native tools enable powerful security architectures like hub-spoke models and the concept of micro-segmentation, where workloads are isolated in their own secure virtual networks.

Hardening the Network Time Protocol (NTP)

While often overlooked, a secure and reliable time source is a critical component of a secure network infrastructure. This was a concept you needed to be aware of for the 70-744 Exam. The Kerberos authentication protocol, which is the heart of Active Directory security, is highly dependent on accurate and synchronized time. If the clocks on a client and a domain controller are skewed by more than a few minutes, Kerberos authentication will fail.

By default, all computers in an Active Directory domain synchronize their time with the domain controllers. The domain controller that holds the PDC Emulator FSMO role is responsible for synchronizing its time with an external, reliable time source on the internet.

It is a security best practice to ensure that this external time source is an authentic and trusted one. An administrator should configure the PDC Emulator to use a well-known and reliable NTP server. It is also important to configure the Windows Firewall to allow the necessary inbound and outbound NTP traffic to ensure that time synchronization can occur correctly.

Introduction to Threat Detection in Windows Server 2016

The final domain of the 70-744 Exam focused on the "detect and respond" aspect of the "assume breach" philosophy. While preventative controls are essential, a mature security strategy must include tools and processes for detecting malicious activity that is already occurring within the network and for responding to it quickly. The security features in Windows Server 2016 and its associated products provided a new generation of tools to help with this challenge.

This represented a shift from a purely signature-based approach to security, which is good at catching known threats, to a more behavioral-based approach. The new tools were designed to look for anomalous activity and the tell-tale signs of advanced attack techniques, such as credential theft and lateral movement.

The goal was to provide administrators with the visibility they needed to identify a compromise in its early stages, before the attacker could achieve their ultimate objective. The 70-744 Exam required candidates to be familiar with these new threat detection and auditing capabilities.

Implementing Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA)

The flagship threat detection product in the Windows Server 2016 era, and a key topic for the 70-744 Exam, was Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA). ATA was an on-premises platform that was designed to help protect an organization from advanced targeted attacks by detecting the tactics, techniques, and procedures that modern attackers use.

ATA worked by analyzing the network traffic that was flowing to and from the domain controllers. It used a combination of deep packet inspection, security event log analysis, and machine learning to build a behavioral profile of the users and devices on the network. It would then look for deviations from this normal baseline.

The ATA architecture consisted of a central ATA Center and one or more ATA Gateways. The gateways were responsible for capturing the network traffic via port mirroring on a switch and forwarding the relevant data to the ATA Center for analysis. This on-premises solution provided a powerful new capability for detecting suspicious activity inside the network perimeter.

Understanding ATA's Detection Capabilities

The real value of Advanced Threat Analytics, and a key knowledge area for the 70-744 Exam, was its ability to detect specific, advanced attack techniques. ATA was specifically designed to identify the methods that attackers use to steal credentials and move laterally within an Active Directory environment after they have initially compromised a single machine.

For example, ATA could detect common credential theft attacks like "pass-the-hash," where an attacker steals a user's password hash, and "pass-the-ticket," where they steal a Kerberos ticket. It could also detect more sophisticated attacks, such as a "golden ticket" attack, where an attacker compromises the Kerberos Key Distribution Service account to create forged Kerberos tickets that give them perpetual administrative access.

In addition to these credential-based attacks, ATA could also detect abnormal behavior, such as a user logging on from an unusual location or at an unusual time, or an attempt to run a remote command on a domain controller. This behavioral analysis was a major step forward from traditional, signature-based intrusion detection systems.

The Evolution from ATA to Azure Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

The powerful on-premises detection capabilities of ATA, which were a focus of the 70-744 Exam, have since evolved and moved to the cloud. The successor to ATA was a cloud service called Azure Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Azure ATP took the same core detection engine from ATA and delivered it as a cloud-based service, which provided several significant advantages.

Instead of deploying a dedicated ATA Center on-premises, administrators could now simply deploy lightweight sensors on their domain controllers. These sensors would collect the necessary data and send it to the Azure ATP cloud service for analysis. This greatly simplified the deployment and maintenance of the infrastructure.

Being a cloud service also meant that the detection algorithms could be updated much more rapidly by Microsoft's security research teams. Azure ATP has since been renamed and is now part of a broader suite of products. It is currently known as Microsoft Defender for Identity and is a core component of the Microsoft Defender XDR platform.

Configuring Advanced Auditing Policies

In addition to dedicated threat detection tools, a fundamental part of any detection and response strategy is a robust auditing policy. The 70-744 Exam required a candidate to know how to configure the advanced auditing capabilities of Windows Server. Standard auditing provided very broad categories of events, which could generate a lot of noise.

Advanced Audit Policy Configuration, which was managed through Group Policy, provided a much more granular set of subcategories. This allowed an administrator to be very specific about what they wanted to audit. For example, instead of just auditing all "Object Access," you could choose to audit only "File System" access or even more specifically, "Detailed File Share" access.

This granular control allowed an administrator to enable the high-value auditing that was needed to detect suspicious activity, such as changes to critical files or failed logon attempts, without overwhelming the security logs with a large volume of low-value events. A properly configured audit policy is the foundation for any security information and event management (SIEM) solution.

Implementing and Managing Windows Defender

While threat detection focuses on advanced attacks, it is still essential to have protection against common malware. The 70-744 Exam covered the built-in anti-malware solution in Windows Server 2016, which was named Windows Defender. This was a significant change, as previous versions of Windows Server did not include a built-in anti-malware product.

Windows Defender provided real-time protection against known viruses, spyware, and other malicious software. It could be managed locally on the server, but for enterprise environments, it was typically managed centrally using Group Policy, System Center Configuration Manager, or Microsoft Intune.

An administrator could use these central tools to enforce consistent policies, such as scheduling regular scans, configuring exclusions for specific files or processes (like database files), and managing the deployment of definition updates. The inclusion of a capable, built-in anti-malware solution was a major step forward in the out-of-the-box security of the platform.

The Modern Security Stack: Microsoft Defender and Sentinel

The security toolset available to administrators today is vastly more powerful and integrated than what was covered in the 70-744 Exam. The modern Microsoft security stack is a cloud-powered, integrated suite of products often referred to as Microsoft Defender XDR (Extended Detection and Response).

This suite includes Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (the successor to Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection), which provides advanced endpoint protection and response capabilities. It also includes Microsoft Defender for Identity (the successor to ATA/Azure ATP) for protecting identities, and other products for protecting email and cloud applications.

All the signals from these different products are correlated and analyzed in a central platform. For even broader visibility, organizations can use Microsoft Sentinel, which is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) solution. This provides a single pane of glass for threat detection and response across the entire hybrid enterprise.

A Final Review of Key 70-744 Exam Topics

As we conclude our retrospective, let's perform a final, high-level review of the key security domains of the 70-744 Exam. We started with hardening the base operating system using minimal server installations and declarative configuration with DSC. We then moved to securing the virtualization fabric with the groundbreaking Guarded Fabric and Shielded VM technologies.

Next, we focused on protecting identities with the principles of least privilege, implemented through Just Enough Administration and Just-In-Time administration. We then covered securing the network infrastructure with the advanced firewall and DNSSEC. Finally, we explored the world of threat detection, using Advanced Threat Analytics and advanced auditing to identify and respond to attacks.

The MCSE to Modern Role-Based Security Certifications Path

The certification path for security professionals has changed significantly since the MCSE credential associated with the 70-744 Exam. Microsoft's modern certification program is role-based, with several tracks dedicated to security.

A common starting point is the "Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals" certification. From there, a professional might pursue the "Azure Security Engineer Associate" certification, which focuses on implementing security controls and threat protection in the Azure cloud. This is perhaps the most direct successor to the skills tested in the 70-744 Exam, but applied to the cloud.

For those with more experience, there is the "Cybersecurity Architect Expert" certification, which focuses on designing end-to-end security strategies for complex hybrid environments. This new, role-based approach reflects the modern reality that security is a specialized and multifaceted discipline.

Final Words

The 70-744 Exam and the Windows Server 2016 platform marked a major turning point in Microsoft's security story. It was the release that fully embraced the "assume breach" philosophy and introduced a host of innovative, built-in security features that were years ahead of their time. Technologies like Shielded VMs and Just Enough Administration fundamentally changed the way we think about securing a data center.

While the specific exam is now a part of history, its legacy is profound. The principles and technologies it introduced are the direct ancestors of the advanced, cloud-powered security services that protect Microsoft's customers today in Azure and Microsoft 365. The 70-744 Exam certified a set of skills that were not just about securing a server, but about adopting a modern, resilient security mindset.

Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use Microsoft MCSE 70-744 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. Microsoft 70-744 Securing Windows Server 2016 certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using Microsoft MCSE 70-744 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.