Microsoft AZ-120 Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions

Question 1:

You have migrated an SAP environment to Microsoft Azure where the ASCS instance runs in one Availability Zone and the database server in another to ensure high availability. The ASCS/ERS setup is configured for failover and redundancy. However, during performance tests, you notice the application responds slower than before, despite better hardware resources. Your investigation shows increased Enqueue wait times.

Which three factors might be causing the higher Enqueue wait times in this Azure-based SAP deployment? (Choose three)

A. Missing Enqueue profile
B. Disk I/O delays during Enqueue backup operations
C. Misconfigured load balancer rules and health probes for Enqueue and ASCS
D. Active Enqueue replication
E. Network latency between the database server and SAP application servers

Answer: C, D, E

Explanation:

In this Azure SAP deployment, slower application performance linked to increased Enqueue wait times suggests delays in communication or configuration inefficiencies among the SAP components. Let’s examine the key contributors:

Misconfigured load balancer rules and health probes (Option C):
SAP ASCS handles lock management via the Enqueue service, relying on TCP communication. In Azure, a load balancer directs traffic to the ASCS instance, particularly in active/passive setups. If load balancer rules or health checks are incorrectly set up, traffic may not consistently reach the active Enqueue service, causing intermittent delays and higher wait times. This misrouting creates bottlenecks, disrupting lock handling essential for transaction processing.

Active Enqueue replication (Option D):
The Enqueue Replication Server (ERS) is vital for failover, constantly syncing lock information between ASCS and ERS. However, if replication traffic is too frequent or inefficient, especially across different zones, it can add overhead. This synchronization can introduce delays due to locking conflicts or network overhead, contributing to increased Enqueue wait times.

Network latency between zones (Option E):
Azure Availability Zones are physically separate data centers. With ASCS and the database in different zones, network latency inevitably increases. Because the ASCS and database communicate intensively for transaction coordination, even small delays can amplify Enqueue wait times, impacting overall application responsiveness.

Other options:
A missing Enqueue profile (Option A) typically prevents SAP services from starting rather than causing performance issues. Disk I/O delays during Enqueue backups (Option B) happen periodically and are unlikely to cause persistent slowdowns.

By addressing these factors—ensuring correct load balancer configuration, optimizing replication, and minimizing cross-zone latency—performance issues related to Enqueue waits can be mitigated.

Question 2:

Your company runs SAP on AIX servers with IBM DB2 as the database. You're planning to migrate this SAP system to Microsoft Azure, switching to Windows Server and Microsoft SQL Server. 

To migrate SAP data from DB2 to SQL Server while preserving SAP data integrity, which tool or process should you use for exporting and importing the data?

A. R3load
B. Azure SQL Data Warehouse
C. SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS)
D. R3trans

Answer: A

Explanation:

Migrating an SAP system from one database platform to another, such as IBM DB2 to Microsoft SQL Server, is a heterogeneous system copy that requires careful handling to maintain data integrity and SAP consistency. For this complex task, SAP provides specialized tools designed to perform platform-independent data export and import.

The tool best suited for this scenario is R3load. It extracts SAP data and metadata into platform-neutral files, enabling smooth transfer between different database systems. R3load reads the SAP kernel and dictionary, generating export files that are then imported into the target system's database. It works closely with migration frameworks like the Software Provisioning Manager (SWPM) or Migration Monitor (MIGMON), which help automate and monitor the migration process.

Other options are less appropriate for this task:

R3trans (Option D) is used for transporting SAP objects and configurations within the same system or database platform. It does not support full database platform migration and cannot handle heterogeneous system copies.

SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) (Option C) is a management tool for SQL Server databases but lacks the SAP-specific functionality required to preserve the structure and consistency of SAP data during cross-platform migration.

Azure SQL Data Warehouse (Option B), now called Azure Synapse Analytics, is designed for big data analytics and is unsuitable for transactional SAP workloads or structured migration of SAP database content.

Thus, R3load is the SAP-recommended tool to perform export/import operations during heterogeneous database migrations, ensuring SAP compatibility and data integrity throughout the process.

Question 3:

You manage an on-premises SAP environment running on VMware vCenter and your organization plans to migrate it to Microsoft Azure. To plan this migration, you need to gather accurate data on CPU, memory, and storage usage for proper compute sizing in Azure. 

Which tools should you use to collect this performance data and estimate the appropriate sizing?

A Azure Migrate and SAP EarlyWatch Alert reports
B Azure Site Recovery and SAP Quick Sizer
C SAP Quick Sizer and SAP HANA system replication
D Azure Site Recovery Deployment Planner and SAP HANA Cockpit

Answer: A

Explanation:

Migrating an SAP system from an on-premises VMware environment to Microsoft Azure requires a thorough understanding of existing compute utilization metrics—such as CPU, memory, storage, and I/O performance—to accurately size Azure virtual machines and avoid under- or over-provisioning resources.

Azure Migrate is designed to assess on-premises workloads running on VMware or Hyper-V. It collects detailed performance data including CPU utilization, memory consumption, disk IOPS, and network traffic. This information forms the infrastructure-level foundation for determining the appropriate Azure VM sizes that match current usage patterns, ensuring cost-efficient scalability without compromising performance.

On the other hand, SAP EarlyWatch Alert (EWA) reports are generated by SAP to provide a deep analysis of system performance, resource consumption, and potential bottlenecks from the application perspective. These reports include historical trends and insights specific to SAP databases (including SAP HANA) and application layers, which are essential for fine-tuning sizing decisions that consider SAP workloads’ unique demands.

Combining these two tools—Azure Migrate for infrastructure metrics and SAP EarlyWatch Alert for application-specific details—offers a comprehensive approach for accurate migration planning. This dual insight enables aligning cloud resources with the operational characteristics of your SAP system.

The other options are less suitable:

• B and D focus on Azure Site Recovery tools, which primarily support disaster recovery and migration execution rather than detailed sizing assessments.

• C involves SAP Quick Sizer, a tool meant for planning new SAP installations rather than evaluating existing systems. SAP HANA system replication relates to high availability, not sizing.

Therefore, option A correctly identifies the combination of tools best suited for performance data collection and compute sizing estimation for an SAP migration to Azure.

Question 4:

When migrating an SAP ECC system to Azure, you analyze the SAP EarlyWatch Alert (EWA) report to determine the best Azure VM sizes. 

Which two sections of the EWA report provide the most relevant information for sizing the Azure virtual machines?

A Hardware Capacity
B Patch Levels under SAP Software Configuration
C Hardware Configuration under Landscape
D Database and ABAP Load Optimization
E Data Volume Management

Answer: A and C

Explanation:

The SAP EarlyWatch Alert (EWA) report is a valuable tool that offers detailed insights into SAP system performance, resource usage, and configuration. When preparing to migrate an SAP ECC system to Microsoft Azure, understanding the current hardware utilization and configuration is essential for selecting the right Azure VM sizes that meet performance and cost objectives.

The Hardware Capacity section is crucial because it provides actual consumption metrics for CPU, memory, and storage. It shows peak and average usage data, which helps avoid under-sizing (leading to performance bottlenecks) or over-sizing (resulting in unnecessary costs). This section directly informs decisions on selecting Azure VMs that can sustain workload demands efficiently.

The Hardware Configuration under Landscape section offers a detailed overview of the system’s physical or virtual infrastructure. It includes the number of CPUs, memory allocation, and storage setup currently in use. Understanding this baseline is vital for mapping the on-premises environment to equivalent Azure VM types, especially considering SAP’s certified Azure VM offerings.

The other options are less relevant for sizing:

• Patch Levels under SAP Software Configuration relate to system maintenance and security, not resource sizing.

• Database and ABAP Load Optimization focuses on tuning application and database performance but does not directly aid in determining VM size.

• Data Volume Management addresses storage management and growth, not VM compute resource sizing.

By concentrating on Hardware Capacity and Hardware Configuration under Landscape, you ensure that your Azure VM sizing is both accurate and aligned with SAP and Microsoft recommendations for cloud deployments. This approach helps guarantee optimal system performance and cost efficiency after migration.

Question 5:

You are tasked with migrating your organization’s on-premises SAP application servers to Microsoft Azure. The business requires minimal downtime during the migration, and you want to avoid making major changes to the existing server setups to prevent reinstallations or extensive reconfiguration. 

Which Azure-native service best supports this migration with minimal disruption and preserves current server configurations?

A. Azure Storage Explorer
B. Azure Import/Export service
C. AzCopy
D. Azure Site Recovery

Answer: D

Explanation:

When migrating critical SAP application servers to Azure, minimizing downtime and preserving existing server configurations is essential to maintain business continuity. Azure Site Recovery (ASR) is the ideal service for this scenario because it facilitates real-time replication of on-premises servers—whether physical or virtual—directly into Azure. This replication allows for a near-seamless failover, enabling the SAP application servers to continue running in Azure with little to no disruption.

ASR works by continuously copying changes from the source servers to the Azure environment. Once the replication is complete, the failover can be scheduled during a low-impact maintenance window, which helps ensure minimal downtime for users and business operations. Importantly, ASR migrates the servers “as-is,” meaning the existing operating systems, applications, and settings remain intact without requiring rebuilding or reconfiguration. This is crucial for complex and sensitive SAP environments where reinstallation could lead to extended downtime or data inconsistencies.

The other options are less suited for this purpose. Azure Storage Explorer is primarily a management tool for storage accounts and does not facilitate server migrations. Azure Import/Export service is designed for bulk data transfer using physical drives, which is impractical for live server migrations needing minimal downtime. AzCopy is a command-line utility focused on data transfer to and from Azure Storage but cannot migrate entire servers.

In summary, Azure Site Recovery stands out as the most efficient and low-risk solution for migrating SAP application servers with minimal changes and downtime, making it the best choice for such migration projects.

Question 6:

In preparation for migrating an on-premises SAP development system to Microsoft Azure, you need to analyze the system’s performance to properly size Azure virtual machines and infrastructure. 

Which SAP transaction code should you use to collect detailed operating system resource utilization data like CPU, memory, and network load directly from the SAP GUI?

A. SM51
B. DB01
C. DB12
D. OS07N

Answer: D

Explanation:

Understanding the current performance characteristics of an SAP system is a critical step before migration. This enables accurate sizing of Azure resources such as virtual machines, storage, and network components, preventing both over-provisioning (which wastes money) and under-provisioning (which causes performance issues).

The SAP transaction code OS07N is specifically designed for monitoring detailed operating system statistics from within the SAP GUI. It offers insights into key metrics such as CPU usage (divided into user, system, and idle times), memory consumption, disk I/O, network load, and swap or paging activities. This comprehensive view of OS-level performance data is collected via the SAP Host Agent running on the server.

Collecting this data allows administrators to establish a clear performance baseline, which guides decisions on the right Azure VM sizes and infrastructure configurations, ensuring the migrated SAP system runs efficiently in the cloud.

The other transaction codes are not suitable for this purpose. SM51 provides information about SAP application servers but lacks OS-level resource details. DB01 relates to analyzing database locks for performance tuning, which does not include CPU or memory metrics. DB12 monitors database backup history, unrelated to system resource utilization.

Therefore, OS07N is the most appropriate transaction to gather the detailed operating system metrics required for proper Azure migration planning. Its data ensures that the new cloud infrastructure will meet the SAP system’s performance demands without unnecessary costs or risks.

Question 7:

Your company is planning to migrate its current SAP environment, which includes SAP HANA and SAP ASE databases running on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12, to Microsoft Azure. The environment hosts multiple SAP applications across various business units. As part of the initial migration planning, you need to compile a complete inventory of all SAP applications currently deployed to assess readiness and design the Azure architecture. 

Which tool is best suited to identify and list all SAP applications in this environment?

A. The SAP license information
B. The SAP Solution Manager
C. The data volume management report
D. The network inventory and locations

Answer: B

Explanation:

When migrating an SAP environment, having a detailed and accurate inventory of all SAP applications is crucial. The SAP Solution Manager is the ideal tool for this purpose because it serves as the centralized application lifecycle management (ALM) system for SAP landscapes. It provides comprehensive visibility into all SAP components deployed within the environment, including applications, databases, and system versions.

SAP Solution Manager contains key modules like the Landscape Management Database (LMDB) and the System Landscape Directory (SLD). These modules work together to track and document all installed SAP applications, system instances, database platforms, and the relationships among these components. This thorough inventory capability is essential during migration planning, as it helps ensure no system or application is overlooked.

Other options do not provide the same depth or breadth of information. The SAP license information (option A) only shows licensed products, not the full set of installed or actively used applications. The data volume management report (option C) focuses mainly on database size and storage usage, which is unrelated to application discovery. Network inventory and location data (option D) are concerned with infrastructure assets like servers and network devices, not the SAP software stack.

Utilizing SAP Solution Manager helps migration teams minimize risks by preventing missed components, ensuring dependencies are understood, and enabling an informed design of the Azure-based SAP architecture. This thorough preparation is essential for a successful migration that maintains system functionality and business continuity.

Question 8:

Which of the following is the best way to configure meeting policies to ensure that external users can join Microsoft Teams meetings but cannot present or share content?

A. Allow external users to join as attendees only by disabling presenter permissions in the meeting policy
B. Block all external users from joining meetings
C. Enable external users as presenters by default
D. Require external users to join through the Teams desktop app

Answer: A

Explanation:

Microsoft Teams meeting policies allow administrators to control what participants can do during meetings. To allow external users to join but restrict their ability to present or share content, the best approach is to configure meeting policies that limit their presenter permissions. By default, external users joining a Teams meeting can be set as attendees, meaning they can listen and view content but cannot share their screen, mute/unmute others, or upload files.

Option A is the correct choice because it directly addresses the requirement: external users can participate in the meeting but have presenter rights disabled. This is accomplished by customizing the meeting policy in the Microsoft Teams admin center, adjusting the “Who can present?” setting to exclude external participants.

Option B contradicts the requirement because blocking external users outright prevents their attendance. Option C would give external users full presenter permissions, which the scenario aims to avoid. Option D focuses on requiring external users to join through a specific client but does not address permission restrictions.

Understanding how to manage meeting policies is critical for AZ-120 exam candidates since it affects governance, security, and user experience in Microsoft Teams environments.

Question 9:

What is the primary benefit of enabling Direct Routing in Microsoft Teams Phone System?

A. It allows integration with third-party telephony providers for PSTN connectivity
B. It disables cloud voicemail
C. It enables video conferencing features
D. It prevents external calling

Answer: A

Explanation:

Direct Routing in Microsoft Teams Phone System enables organizations to connect their own Session Border Controller (SBC) to Microsoft Teams, allowing the integration of existing telephony infrastructure with Teams. This enables users to make and receive Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) calls using their Microsoft Teams client.

Option A correctly identifies the primary benefit: Direct Routing allows businesses to use third-party telephony providers or existing on-premises telephony infrastructure to connect to Teams, providing flexible and potentially cost-effective PSTN access.

Option B is unrelated; voicemail features are handled separately. Option C pertains to video conferencing capabilities, which are not specific to Direct Routing. Option D contradicts the purpose of Direct Routing, as it enables external calling rather than preventing it.

Candidates taking the AZ-120 exam need to understand telephony integration options in Microsoft Teams, including when to deploy Direct Routing versus Microsoft’s Calling Plan.

Question 10:

When assigning policies in Microsoft Teams, what is the effect of applying a policy package rather than individual policies?

A. A policy package applies multiple related policies to users in one step
B. A policy package removes all individual policies assigned to users
C. A policy package only applies to guest users
D. A policy package applies only a single policy at a time

Answer: A

Explanation:

Policy packages in Microsoft Teams are predefined collections of related policies designed to simplify the management of user permissions and capabilities. Applying a policy package assigns multiple policies — such as messaging, meeting, calling, and app permission policies — to users simultaneously, ensuring consistency and saving administrative time.

Option A is correct because it captures the main advantage: policy packages streamline management by bundling several policies tailored for specific roles (e.g., frontline workers, knowledge workers).

Option B is incorrect; policy packages do not remove existing policies without replacement but rather assign a set of policies together. Option C is inaccurate because policy packages apply to all users, not just guests. Option D contradicts the purpose of a package by suggesting it applies only one policy.

Understanding policy management, including the use of packages, is essential for the AZ-120 exam. It helps admins efficiently deploy appropriate controls and tailor Teams experiences based on user roles.