Salesforce Certified AI Specialist Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions
What is the primary function of Einstein Discovery in the Salesforce ecosystem?
A. Creating email templates using generative AI
B. Predicting outcomes and providing actionable recommendations based on data analysis
C. Managing marketing campaigns across channels
D. Storing historical sales data for future use
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Einstein Discovery is one of the most powerful AI tools in the Salesforce platform. It enables users to build predictive and prescriptive models from data using advanced statistical techniques—such as regression, classification, and time series forecasting—without needing to be a data scientist.
Einstein Discovery’s core value lies in:
Automatically identifying patterns in historical data.
Predicting outcomes, such as customer churn or likelihood to close a deal.
Offering prescriptive recommendations that explain what actions will improve outcomes.
For example, it might tell a sales manager, “Deals are 40% more likely to close if the demo is scheduled within 3 days of lead contact,” making the insights not just predictive but also actionable.
Option A refers more to newer generative AI features like Einstein Copilot or template automation. C, marketing campaign management, is handled by Marketing Cloud, not Einstein Discovery. D, storing sales data, is a general function of the CRM and data warehouse tools, not AI analytics.
Einstein Discovery integrates tightly with Tableau CRM (formerly Einstein Analytics), allowing visualizations of the AI model’s findings. Users can embed predictions directly into Salesforce records (e.g., Leads, Opportunities) and automate decision-making using Flows and Process Builder.
For the Certified AI Specialist – Salesforce exam, expect scenario-based questions requiring you to choose between Prediction Builder, Discovery, Language, Vision, and Tableau CRM. Einstein Discovery is the go-to for complex analysis, forecasts, and recommendations and is often used in more mature data environments where the business wants to not only know what might happen but also what to do about it.
Universal Containers (UC) has recently rolled out Einstein Generative AI to help their customer service agents create summaries of case records more efficiently. A custom prompt template was built to support this task. However, users are now observing that the AI-generated summaries often leave out critical information or misrepresent key elements of the case.
What is the most likely reason for the AI’s failure to produce accurate case summaries?
A. The Einstein Trust Layer is misconfigured and negatively influencing the AI's output
B. The data grounding the AI prompt is either outdated, incomplete, or incorrect
C. The current prompt template version is not compatible with the language model being used
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
For AI-generated content in Salesforce to be reliable—especially in use cases like summarizing case records—it is essential that the AI model be grounded with correct and up-to-date data. Grounding provides the necessary context and factual input the AI needs in order to produce relevant, accurate results.
Option B is the correct answer. Poor-quality or missing grounding data is the most common cause of inaccurate or incomplete AI-generated outputs. If the generative model is not supplied with fields like the case description, latest communication logs, resolution steps, or customer sentiment notes, then its output will naturally lack critical insights. AI models in Salesforce, including Einstein GPT, do not autonomously browse or search through data—they depend entirely on the structured input they receive at the time of execution.
For example, if the data sent to the prompt omits important details about the customer's issue resolution or fails to reflect the most recent updates to the case, the AI summary will likely be vague or misleading. Similarly, if grounding data is outdated (e.g., from a previous case status), the summary may not align with the actual current state of the case.
Option A, involving the Einstein Trust Layer, relates primarily to compliance, data visibility, masking, and security. While a misconfigured Trust Layer could restrict access to certain fields, it would typically result in redacted or missing data—not inaccuracies in logic or summarization. Therefore, unless overly restrictive masking is in place, this wouldn’t be the root cause of the flawed summaries.
Option C concerns compatibility between the prompt template and the large language model (LLM). This is rarely a source of functional issues, especially given Salesforce's backward-compatible infrastructure. Unless the LLM has undergone a significant upgrade or structural change, prompt templates remain functional and usable.
Thus, the most plausible and impactful issue here is data grounding. Ensuring accurate, timely, and comprehensive case data is included in the prompt is fundamental to the success of AI summarization workflows. Without it, the AI can only generate generic or flawed summaries, defeating the purpose of automation.
A. A merge field was not added to the prompt’s text.
B. The prompt has not been linked to a specific Salesforce record.
C. The prompt is unsaved and not yet activated.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
When working with Flex Prompt Templates in Salesforce’s Prompt Builder, the preview functionality enables administrators to test how generative AI responds using real Salesforce data. This tool is crucial for validating how the prompt behaves under different inputs and use-case conditions. However, if the “Preview” button is disabled, this typically indicates that the template is missing a key requirement — the association with an actual Salesforce record.
The most likely reason the preview is unavailable is that the prompt template is not tied to a relevant Salesforce record, which is essential for grounding the AI’s output. Flex prompts depend on real-time data from Salesforce objects such as Accounts, Opportunities, or Cases. The AI needs this data context to produce an intelligent, relevant response. If no record is selected during prompt testing, Salesforce cannot provide the data required for a valid preview. As a result, the system disables the “Preview” button.
While some may assume that leaving out a merge field (Option A) would prevent previewing, this is not the case. You can still preview a prompt without merge fields — the preview might be less personalized, but the button itself will remain enabled if a record is selected.
Similarly, Option C is misleading. The prompt does not need to be activated to use the preview feature. As long as the prompt is saved and connected to a valid Salesforce object and record, previewing becomes available. Activation pertains to making the prompt live or available in production workflows, not to testing within Prompt Builder.
To fix the issue, the admin should open the Prompt Builder interface and use the “Choose Record” feature to associate a specific Salesforce record with the prompt. Once a valid record is linked, the preview functionality will be enabled, and the administrator can see how the prompt performs with real-world data.
Universal Containers wants to upgrade their customer service by offering AI-generated email responses that are both personalized and factually accurate, using information from their Knowledge Base. The company aims to reduce the time agents spend on responding to customer emails while maintaining consistency and quality.
Which Salesforce AI feature best fulfills these requirements?
A. Einstein Email Replies
B. Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email
C. Einstein Service Replies for Email
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
Universal Containers (UC) is aiming for a customer service enhancement that provides automated, full-length, and context-aware responses to customer inquiries over email. The organization seeks a solution that not only reduces agent workload but also ensures the content of the replies is consistent, relevant, and based on accurate data from the company’s Knowledge Base.
The best fit for UC's needs is Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email (Option B). This Salesforce feature uses generative AI to create complete email responses tailored to each customer query. What sets this capability apart is its ability to ground the generated replies in verified content drawn directly from the organization’s Knowledge Base. This ensures that responses are both contextually appropriate and accurate.
The benefits of Einstein Generative Service Replies include:
Efficient response generation: It drafts entire replies, saving time and letting agents focus on more complex tasks.
Consistency and brand alignment: Since replies follow a similar tone and structure, they maintain a professional and unified voice.
Real-time use of updated Knowledge Base content: The AI accesses the latest information to ensure accuracy.
Scalability: Suitable for large volumes of emails with varied customer concerns.
Option A, Einstein Email Replies, is more limited in scope. It provides short, suggested phrases or sentence fragments that can help agents respond quickly but does not generate complete replies. Also, it lacks integration with the Knowledge Base, reducing its utility in complex scenarios.
Option C, Einstein Service Replies for Email, relies on rule-based or template-driven logic. While it is effective for handling repetitive, transactional emails, it does not support dynamic, personalized responses grounded in contextual knowledge — a critical requirement for UC’s vision.
In summary, UC should implement Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email to achieve their goals of delivering high-quality, consistent, and knowledge-backed customer email interactions at scale. This AI-driven approach streamlines operations while enhancing customer satisfaction and trust.
At Universal Containers, an AI Specialist has deployed Data Masking via the Einstein Trust Layer to anonymize or redact sensitive fields such as personal or financial information before that data is processed by an AI model. The specialist now wants to confirm whether the intended fields are being properly masked in line with internal compliance rules and data privacy policies.
Which action should the AI Specialist take to begin verifying the effectiveness of the masking process?
A. Use a Flow-based resource within Prompt Builder and check the field values using Flow Debugger.
B. Enable the logging and storage of Einstein Generative AI Audit Data via the Feedback settings page.
C. Retrieve the Einstein Generative AI Audit Data through the Security section in Salesforce Setup.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
Verifying that sensitive information is adequately masked before being processed by an AI model is crucial for maintaining data privacy and complying with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and internal governance frameworks. Salesforce’s Einstein Trust Layer includes built-in mechanisms to handle Data Masking, ensuring sensitive fields like Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or financial data are not exposed when prompts are sent to a Large Language Model (LLM).
To validate this process, the AI Specialist should access the Einstein Generative AI Audit Data available in the Security section of the Setup menu. This audit data provides granular visibility into how the Trust Layer is operating. Specifically, it shows which fields were masked, what the prompt looked like before and after masking, and how the model responded.
The audit trail includes:
Pre- and post-masking data views
Exact prompts submitted to the AI model
Time-stamped logs of interactions
Context and grounding inputs used for the model
This level of transparency makes it possible to verify compliance with internal policies, perform audits, and prove due diligence to regulators or internal data protection teams.
Option A, using the Flow Debugger, is useful for debugging business automation logic but not suitable for evaluating how data is masked before it reaches the AI model. Flow Debugger cannot inspect prompt-level transformations or visibility at the LLM interface layer.
Option B, enabling audit data collection on the Einstein Feedback settings page, is a necessary precondition—you must turn this on to capture any data. However, enabling this feature alone does not give access to the audit logs; it only begins the logging process. The logs still need to be manually retrieved from the Security section under Setup.
In summary, to ensure that Data Masking is functioning as expected and is compliant with privacy standards, the AI Specialist must use the most direct method: accessing the audit data from the Security section of Salesforce Setup. This provides both the visibility and documentation needed for comprehensive validation.
An AI Specialist needs to configure a prompt template in Salesforce that will automatically populate a custom field named Latest Opportunities Summary on the Account object. This summary should reflect data from the three most recently opened Opportunities tied to the Account.
What is the most effective way for the specialist to gather this data?
A. Add the Account Opportunity object as a data resource when building the prompt template.
B. Design a Flow to retrieve Opportunity records and pass the data to the prompt.
C. Use the latest Opportunities related list as a merge field within the template.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
To populate a custom field like Latest Opportunities Summary on the Account object with dynamic data from related Opportunity records, the AI Specialist must retrieve and prepare the right data before feeding it into the prompt template. Since the requirement is to include only the three most recently opened Opportunities, the solution must support filtering, sorting, and structured formatting.
The most effective and scalable approach is Option B: Create a Flow to retrieve the Opportunity information. Salesforce Flows are designed to support powerful automation and conditional logic. By leveraging Flow, the AI Specialist can perform the following:
Query the Opportunity object, filtered by the Account ID, and sorted by the "CreatedDate" or "LastModifiedDate" field.
Retrieve only the top three results using limit logic in a Get Records element.
Extract necessary fields from each Opportunity, such as name, stage, amount, or any other relevant detail.
Concatenate the information into a structured text summary.
Pass that data into the Prompt Template using Flow’s ability to map variables.
This method ensures that the summary is both current and context-aware, making the prompt accurate and meaningful.
Option A, choosing the Account Opportunity object as a resource, offers a basic way to access related records. However, it lacks the precision needed to filter, limit, and format data. You cannot specify only the "three most recent" Opportunities through this approach alone.
Option C, using the related list merge field, has even more limitations. Merge fields may bring in all related records and are generally static, meaning they don't support custom filters, ordering, or limiting record count. That makes them unsuitable when dynamic, selective data retrieval is required.
In conclusion, Option B is the best solution because it provides full control over the selection, transformation, and injection of data into the prompt template. This ensures accuracy, consistency, and compliance with the intended business logic behind the custom field.
Question 7:
An AI Specialist at a company wants to use a Field Generation prompt template to automatically populate a particular field in Salesforce using generative AI. Before creating the prompt, the specialist needs to verify whether the field meets specific requirements to support generative AI functionality.
What must the specialist confirm to ensure the selected field is eligible for generative AI Field Generation?
A. Confirm that the Lightning page layout displaying the field has been upgraded to Dynamic Forms
B. Ensure the field is a rich text type with at least 255 characters
C. Verify that the Salesforce org is operating on API version 59 or above
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
Before an AI Specialist can implement Field Generation with generative AI in Salesforce, it’s critical to confirm that the proper infrastructure is in place to support dynamic and automated content generation. One key requirement is that the Lightning page layout hosting the target field must be upgraded to Dynamic Forms. This configuration enables more flexible page customization, allowing fields to be rendered and interacted with based on logic and user behavior.
Dynamic Forms offer a modular and adaptable approach to designing Lightning pages. They allow field-level visibility rules and responsiveness to user actions, which is essential when integrating generative AI functionality. Without Dynamic Forms, standard page layouts cannot dynamically accommodate AI-generated content in a user-friendly or manageable way. This limitation would prevent the proper deployment of Field Generation capabilities, as the system cannot adjust or display content dynamically per the AI-generated results.
Looking at the incorrect options:
Option B is misleading. Although rich text fields may offer enhanced formatting capabilities (e.g., bold, italics), the field doesn’t need to be rich text nor does it require a 255-character minimum for Field Generation to work. Generative AI in Salesforce can populate various field types, including standard text fields, depending on the use case.
Option C refers to API version 59 or above, which may be beneficial for some new features in Salesforce, but it is not a mandatory prerequisite for enabling Field Generation prompts. The core requirement lies in the Lightning layout design, not the API version.
In summary, the most crucial step for enabling generative AI-driven Field Generation in Salesforce is ensuring the Lightning page layout is upgraded to Dynamic Forms. This setup provides the needed structural support to enable field-level content generation and user interaction. Without this, the AI-generated content may not be visible, editable, or actionable on the page.
Question 8:
Universal Containers wants to send tailored marketing emails to customers by evaluating two key attributes: their lifetime value score and market segment. They aim to use AI to decide which of three email templates best fits each customer. Additionally, they want the system to justify why a particular email was chosen for each individual.
Which type of AI model combination should be used to both select the right email and explain the logic behind the choice?
A. Predictive model and generative model
B. Predictive model
C. Generative model
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
To meet Universal Containers' requirement of both selecting the most appropriate email and providing a rationale behind the choice, a combined AI strategy involving both a predictive model and a generative model is necessary.
The predictive model is responsible for making data-driven decisions. It analyzes structured input—such as a customer’s lifetime value score and market segment—to predict which email template out of the three is most relevant. Predictive models use patterns in historical data to make future-oriented decisions. In this context, it evaluates customer attributes and selects the email that is statistically most likely to engage them.
However, predictive models typically return decisions or classifications without offering human-understandable reasons. This is where a generative model becomes vital. The generative component is used to produce natural language explanations that help users understand the underlying decision-making logic. It might generate a personalized message like, “This email was selected because you are part of the High-Value segment and scored in the top 20% of our lifetime value scale.”
Using both models enables Universal Containers to:
Make intelligent, personalized content selections
Increase transparency and customer trust through explainable AI
Automate communication while preserving a human-like tone and relevance
Evaluating the incorrect options:
Option B, using only a predictive model, enables accurate email selection but fails to provide contextual explanations, which is a key part of UC’s requirement.
Option C, a generative model on its own, excels in creating content but lacks the analytical capability to make accurate predictions based on structured data inputs like scores or segmentation.
Ultimately, Option A—integrating both predictive and generative models—is the only strategy that addresses both decision-making and explainability, making it the most effective and complete solution.
Which Salesforce tool enables users to integrate pre-built AI services like sentiment analysis, image recognition, and intent detection without needing to code complex models?
A. Tableau CRM
B. Salesforce Flow
C. Einstein Language and Vision Services
D. Apex Triggers
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Einstein Language and Vision Services are part of Salesforce’s AI capabilities that allow developers and admins to embed AI-driven services into Salesforce applications without building models from scratch. These services provide pre-trained APIs for natural language processing and computer vision tasks such as sentiment analysis, intent detection, and image classification.
Einstein Language includes tools like:
Sentiment: Determines if a message is positive, negative, or neutral.
Intent: Identifies the purpose behind a customer message (e.g., refund request, complaint, question).
Named Entity Recognition (NER): Identifies specific data like product names or locations from text.
Einstein Vision provides APIs for image classification and object detection, useful in domains like retail or field service where analyzing visual input is crucial.
Unlike tools like Salesforce Flow (B) or Apex Triggers (D), which focus more on automation and backend logic, Einstein Language and Vision are specifically built for AI use cases. Tableau CRM (A), formerly known as Einstein Analytics, is a powerful analytics platform but does not provide low-code access to natural language or image recognition models.
These services are accessible via REST APIs and require configuration but not model training, which significantly reduces the technical barrier for AI integration in Salesforce apps.
In the Certified AI Specialist exam, understanding the distinction between various Einstein capabilities—especially low-code/no-code versus custom model development—is crucial. Expect questions on when and how to use Einstein Language and Vision versus more advanced tools like Einstein Discovery, which involves predictive modeling on datasets.
A company wants to predict which leads are most likely to convert based on historical opportunity data. Which Einstein product should they use for this task?
A. Einstein Language
B. Einstein Vision
C. Einstein Prediction Builder
D. Tableau CRM Dashboard
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
The best choice is C, Einstein Prediction Builder. This tool is specifically designed for admins or business analysts to create custom AI models without needing to write code. It helps organizations make predictions about any Salesforce object, such as which leads will convert, which cases may escalate, or which opportunities are likely to close.
Prediction Builder works by:
Allowing users to select a Salesforce object (like Leads or Opportunities).
Choosing a field to predict (such as a binary outcome: converted vs. not converted).
Specifying example records to train the model.
Automatically evaluating feature importance and performance.
Once set up, the model scores new records and provides a probability score, enabling sales teams to prioritize the most promising leads.
Option A, Einstein Language, is more appropriate for interpreting text—like analyzing emails or chat transcripts. B, Einstein Vision, handles image-based tasks, and D, Tableau CRM Dashboard, is a visualization tool that helps explore and visualize data but doesn’t build predictive models itself.
Prediction Builder is part of the low-code Einstein AI suite and ideal for sales and service applications. The Certified AI Specialist – Salesforce exam emphasizes knowing when to use tools like Prediction Builder versus more advanced tools such as Einstein Discovery (which enables multivariate regression, classification, and forecasting with guided modeling).
Understanding how to apply Prediction Builder and interpret its output—like prediction scores and top contributing fields—is essential for passing scenario-based questions on this certification exam.
Top Salesforce Certification Exams
Site Search:
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Use Discount Code:
MIN10OFF
A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.
Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator
Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.