NMLS MLO Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions
Which of the following scenarios is most likely to raise suspicion of fraudulent behavior related to a borrower's closing funds?
A. Unexplained deposits in the borrower’s bank account
B. Disclosure of gifted funds from a family member
C. A disclosed parental loan that has not yet been received
D. A borrower receiving a substantial bonus from their employer
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
Lenders are responsible for validating a borrower’s financial capacity and ensuring that all funds used in the mortgage process—especially for the down payment and closing—come from legitimate, verified sources. This is critical not only for risk management but also for preventing fraud in the lending process.
Option A is the correct answer because unexplained bank deposits that are not supported by any documentation or tied to previously disclosed income sources present a clear fraud risk. Lenders look closely at all recent bank account activity when underwriting a loan. Any large deposit that doesn’t correspond to employment income, documented savings, or known gifts must be fully explained and supported. If a borrower cannot provide documentation—like a pay stub, gift letter, or sales receipt—for the origin of a deposit, it raises a red flag that the funds could be coming from an undisclosed loan or an untraceable source, both of which are serious compliance violations and potential fraud indicators.
Option B, the disclosure of gift funds, is a legitimate and accepted form of financial contribution—provided it is disclosed properly and accompanied by a signed gift letter confirming the funds do not need to be repaid. Gifted funds, when transparent and well-documented, do not suggest fraudulent behavior.
Option C, a disclosed parental loan that has not yet been transferred, might be inconvenient or even problematic for timing the closing, but it is not necessarily fraudulent. It simply indicates that the transaction is still pending. As long as the borrower is transparent about the loan and its source, it doesn't constitute fraud.
Option D, the receipt of a large bonus from an employer, is also legitimate income if it is documented through employment records or pay stubs. Bonuses must be verified just like any other income source, but a well-documented bonus does not suggest any wrongdoing.
In summary, only Option A presents a situation where funds are neither explained nor verified, which directly contradicts the transparency and documentation required in the loan process. Unverified deposits are often a key signal for mortgage fraud, making this the most concerning circumstance for lenders.
If a mortgage loan file contains multiple inconsistencies in the borrower’s Social Security number, what is this a strong indicator of?
A. Fair lending issues
B. Mortgage fraud
C. A borrower with poor memory
D. Discrepancies in loan pricing
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
In the mortgage industry, one of the most critical identifiers used to verify a borrower’s identity is the Social Security number (SSN). The SSN ties directly into credit reports, tax records, income verification, and other documentation required during the loan application process. Any inconsistency or irregularity with the SSN is taken very seriously.
Option B is correct because multiple SSN discrepancies within the same loan file are considered a major red flag for mortgage fraud. Mortgage fraud typically involves misrepresentation, misstatement, or omission of key information for the purpose of deceiving the lender. When a borrower presents different SSNs in various parts of the application, it suggests possible identity fraud, the use of synthetic identities, or intentional concealment of credit history. These are classic tactics used to obtain financing fraudulently.
Mortgage originators and underwriters are trained to identify such red flags. They are bound by laws like the Red Flags Rule, which is part of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). This regulation requires financial institutions to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs. Discrepancies in SSNs are listed among the key triggers that warrant deeper investigation.
Now let’s assess the incorrect options:
Option A, fair lending, refers to compliance with laws that prevent discrimination in lending based on race, gender, age, and other protected characteristics. While a misused SSN might lead to disparate impacts, the SSN itself is not related to fair lending unless paired with discriminatory behavior, which is not suggested here.
Option C, attributing the issue to a forgetful borrower, is highly unlikely. While minor clerical errors happen, entering entirely different SSNs on official documents cannot be explained away by forgetfulness and instead strongly points to intentional deception.
Option D, pricing discrepancies, relate to loan interest rates or fees. While fraudulent identity use could potentially lead to misleading pricing (e.g., by manipulating the borrower’s credit score), SSN mismatches themselves are not direct indicators of pricing errors.
In conclusion, multiple SSNs for the same borrower signal a possible attempt to mislead the lender or conceal vital information, which is a textbook sign of mortgage fraud. Therefore, the most appropriate answer is B.
When an appraiser evaluates a rental property, which of the following valuation methods is most commonly applied to determine its market value?
A. Cost approach
B. Income approach
C. Annual approach
D. Sales comparison approach
Correct Answer: B
When it comes to valuing rental or investment properties, the income approach is the most appropriate and widely used method by appraisers. This approach directly considers the income-producing potential of the property, which is a key driver of its market value for investors and financial institutions alike.
The income approach calculates the property’s value by estimating its net operating income (NOI) and then dividing that figure by a capitalization rate (cap rate). The formula is:
Property Value = Net Operating Income ÷ Capitalization Rate
Here, NOI is derived from the gross rental income minus operating expenses (such as property management, insurance, taxes, and maintenance). The cap rate is typically determined based on market conditions and reflects the return an investor expects from the property. This methodology aligns the valuation directly with the property's financial performance, making it ideal for rental apartments, office buildings, and commercial real estate.
Let’s briefly evaluate the other methods:
A. Cost approach: This method estimates how much it would cost to rebuild the property today, accounting for depreciation. It’s typically reserved for new, unique, or rarely sold structures, such as government buildings or custom-built homes. It does not reflect a property's income potential, making it unsuitable for rental valuations.
C. Annual approach: This is not a recognized appraisal methodology in real estate. The term doesn’t appear in professional valuation standards or regulatory frameworks, and is likely included only as a distractor.
D. Sales comparison approach: This approach involves comparing the subject property with recently sold, similar properties. It is widely used for owner-occupied residences, such as single-family homes. While it can sometimes provide insight for income properties, it doesn't consider actual or potential rental income, and thus may not reflect investment value accurately.
In conclusion, when an appraiser needs to evaluate a property whose primary purpose is to generate rental income, the income approach provides the most accurate and relevant assessment. It aligns the property’s value with its ability to produce returns for the owner.
What is the minimum number of continuing education hours that a mortgage loan originator must complete each year to maintain their license?
A. 3 hours
B. 8 hours
C. 16 hours
D. 20 hours
Correct Answer: B
Under the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (SAFE Act), all Mortgage Loan Originators (MLOs) are required to complete a specific amount of continuing education (CE) each year to renew their license. This federal mandate is enforced through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System & Registry (NMLS).
The standard requirement is 8 hours of continuing education annually, and this must be completed through NMLS-approved courses. The 8 hours are not arbitrary; they are divided into specific instructional categories to ensure that MLOs maintain a well-rounded understanding of industry regulations and ethical practices. These include:
3 hours focused on Federal law and regulations, ensuring compliance with legal standards
2 hours dedicated to ethics, including issues like fraud prevention, consumer protection, and fair lending
2 hours on lending standards related to nontraditional mortgage products, such as adjustable-rate mortgages or interest-only loans
1 hour of general elective education related to mortgage origination
While this is the national standard, it’s worth noting that some states impose additional state-specific CE requirements. For example, a few jurisdictions may mandate an extra hour or more on state laws or unique lending practices. For instance, California and Washington both add additional hours to the federal minimum.
However, unless specified otherwise by a state regulator, the federal requirement of 8 hours remains the baseline that every MLO must meet to stay in good standing and continue operating legally.
Let’s now evaluate the incorrect options:
A. 3 hours: This is only part of the full requirement—specifically the federal law portion of the curriculum. It does not fulfill the total CE requirement.
C. 16 hours and D. 20 hours: These exceed the minimum required by federal law. These options may be confused with pre-licensure education (which does require 20 hours), but not for annual renewal.
In summary, all licensed MLOs must complete 8 hours of CE each year, making B the correct and most accurate choice.
Which scenario best exemplifies the discriminatory practice of redlining in the mortgage industry?
A. Offering equal opportunities to all financially qualified applicants seeking mortgage approval
B. A loan officer pushing a file ahead of others by flagging it with a "redline" for urgency
C. Marking a borrower’s name in red to signify poor creditworthiness in internal documentation
D. Denying services or inflating prices for residents of particular areas, typically based on racial demographics
Correct Answer: D
Redlining refers to a historical and illegal practice in the mortgage and financial services industry where services such as loans, insurance, and credit were denied to residents of specific neighborhoods, often based on the racial or ethnic composition of those areas. The term originated from the practice of drawing red lines on maps to delineate neighborhoods deemed "too risky" for investment—not due to credit scores or financial metrics, but because of who lived there.
Option D accurately reflects this definition. Redlining involves either the outright denial of financial services or making such services deliberately less accessible—for example, by increasing interest rates or requiring stricter terms—for communities that are predominantly occupied by racial or ethnic minorities. This systemic discrimination created lasting consequences, including housing segregation, underinvestment in public infrastructure, and intergenerational poverty.
Option A represents the exact opposite of redlining. Providing equal access to credit based on financial qualifications aligns with anti-discrimination laws such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and the Fair Housing Act, both designed to combat redlining and ensure fairness in lending practices.
Option B misuses the term. Moving a loan application to the front of a queue for quicker processing is not associated with redlining. The term has nothing to do with prioritizing loans based on urgency or internal favoritism.
Option C also misrepresents the concept. Internally marking a borrower’s file due to risk or credit issues might be part of underwriting but doesn’t constitute redlining unless that marking leads to discriminatory treatment based on non-financial characteristics like race or zip code.
Redlining was especially prevalent in the mid-20th century, but its effects linger today in the form of wealth disparities and limited access to credit in certain neighborhoods. Regulators now monitor banks and lending institutions for compliance, ensuring that lending patterns don’t disproportionately disadvantage protected groups.
Thus, Option D is the only choice that correctly defines redlining, making it the appropriate answer.
If a property is being purchased for $249,955.00 and the buyer is making an 18% down payment, what is the resulting mortgage loan amount?
A. $204,693.10
B. $204,936.10
C. $204,963.10
D. $204,966.10
Correct Answer: C
To calculate the loan amount for a property purchase, you subtract the down payment from the purchase price. In this case, the buyer is contributing 18% of the purchase price as a down payment. The rest—82%—will be financed through a mortgage.
Let’s break it down step by step:
Use the formula:
Down Payment = Purchase Price × Down Payment Percentage
= $249,955.00 × 0.18
= $44,991.90
Loan Amount = Purchase Price – Down Payment
= $249,955.00 – $44,991.90
= $204,963.10
Rather than subtracting, you could directly calculate 82% of the purchase price:
Loan Amount = Purchase Price × 0.82
= $249,955.00 × 0.82
= $204,963.10
A. $204,693.10 — Incorrect. This is too low.
B. $204,936.10 — Incorrect. Close but slightly off.
C. $204,963.10 — Correct. Matches our exact calculation.
D. $204,966.10 — Incorrect. Slightly too high.
Mortgage professionals and borrowers must be able to calculate financing accurately. A small miscalculation can lead to delays in closing, errors in loan documents, and confusion during underwriting. In real-world transactions, accuracy is critical, especially for compliance, disclosures, and determining monthly payments and escrow amounts.
This question reflects a realistic scenario that mortgage professionals might encounter. Understanding the relationship between purchase price, down payment percentage, and loan amount is foundational knowledge for passing licensing exams and for daily operations in lending, real estate, and financial advising.
The correct answer is C, representing the accurate loan amount of $204,963.10 after applying an 18% down payment to a $249,955.00 purchase.
When a borrower takes out an FHA loan, which specific payment is required to safeguard the lender in the event the borrower defaults and the home enters foreclosure?
A. Down payment
B. Hazard insurance premium
C. Mortgage insurance premium
D. Homeowners association dues
Correct Answer: C
Explanation:
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans are designed to make homeownership more accessible, especially for first-time and low- to moderate-income buyers. One unique aspect of FHA loans is the requirement for borrowers to pay Mortgage Insurance Premiums (MIP). This form of insurance is not for the borrower’s protection—it exists solely to reduce the lender’s financial risk if the borrower defaults on the loan and the property ends up in foreclosure.
When a lender issues an FHA-backed mortgage, it assumes a level of risk, particularly because these loans often feature lower down payments and more flexible credit requirements. To offset this risk, the FHA mandates that borrowers pay MIP, which acts as a financial safety net for the lender. If foreclosure becomes necessary, the insurance can reimburse the lender for a portion of the unpaid principal balance.
Here's a closer look at each option:
Option A: Down payment
FHA loans typically require a modest down payment—often just 3.5% of the purchase price—but this payment goes toward reducing the loan balance, not insuring the lender. While it does demonstrate the borrower’s commitment to the property, it provides no direct protection in case of default.
Option B: Hazard insurance premium
Also known as homeowner’s insurance, this policy protects the structure and contents of the home from events like fire, storms, or theft. While essential, it does not cover mortgage payments or foreclosure losses, and thus doesn’t protect the lender from loan default.
Option C: Mortgage insurance premium
This is the correct choice. FHA loans require both an upfront MIP—usually financed into the loan amount—and an annual MIP, paid monthly. These premiums are mandatory and remain in place for either a specific period or the life of the loan, depending on the loan-to-value ratio and term.
Option D: Homeowners association dues
HOA fees are applicable only in certain communities and are used to maintain communal property or services. These dues are not related to loan risk or foreclosure protection.
In conclusion, Mortgage Insurance Premium (C) is the only payment among the options that is specifically designed to protect the lender in the event of foreclosure.
If a licensed mortgage loan originator (MLO) legally shares part of their earned commission with another licensed MLO in the same company for services genuinely rendered on a loan file, what is this practice called?
A. Tip sharing
B. Fee splitting
C. Single fee method
D. Double fee method
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
In the world of mortgage lending, compensation practices are strictly regulated to prevent unethical behavior, protect consumers, and ensure transparency. One legitimate and regulatory-compliant compensation structure is known as fee splitting.
Fee splitting occurs when a licensed mortgage loan originator (MLO) shares part of their earned commission with another licensed MLO—typically within the same organization or company—for actual, substantive services performed in connection with a loan transaction. This practice is completely legal, provided it adheres to guidelines set by governing bodies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and is compliant with the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).
RESPA specifically prohibits "kickbacks" or unearned fees—payments made for mere referrals or nominal participation. However, it does allow fee sharing when both parties contribute to the completion of the transaction. That means if both MLOs assist with pre-qualification, loan counseling, gathering documentation, or other key activities, they may share the commission without legal issues.
Here’s a breakdown of the options:
Option A: Tip sharing
This is not a recognized term within the mortgage or real estate industry. Tip sharing is associated with the hospitality sector, where service staff pool gratuities. It has no place in regulated mortgage compensation practices.
Option B: Fee splitting
This is the correct and legally recognized term. It refers to dividing commission between licensed individuals who both provided legitimate services during the loan process. Fee splitting, when done properly, ensures that all parties are compensated fairly for their work and complies with legal and ethical standards.
Option C: Single fee method
This term implies that one person receives the entire commission without sharing, which is the opposite of what the question describes. It’s not applicable to scenarios involving compensation division.
Option D: Double fee method
This would imply charging the borrower or lender twice for the same service—something that would be considered unethical and potentially illegal under RESPA. It suggests an unjust enrichment and is strictly prohibited.
In summary, the act of sharing commission between two licensed MLOs based on real services provided is known as fee splitting (B)—a lawful practice when done transparently and in compliance with all regulatory standards.
Which group of borrowers is most likely to benefit from the flexibility offered by non-qualified mortgage (non-QM) loans?
A. Individuals who are currently unemployed
B. Self-employed individuals
C. Borrowers without a down payment
D. People living with their parents
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
Non-qualified mortgages (non-QM) are loan products that fall outside the standard guidelines of qualified mortgages as defined by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). These loans are designed for borrowers who cannot meet the typical underwriting standards required by traditional mortgage products, which often include rigid documentation and debt-to-income (DTI) requirements.
One of the key groups that non-QM loans aim to support is self-employed borrowers. Unlike salaried employees who can easily provide W-2s and pay stubs, self-employed individuals may have irregular or hard-to-verify income. Their earnings might fluctuate throughout the year or be tied up in business accounts, which makes it difficult to qualify under traditional income verification methods. Non-QM lenders often accommodate such borrowers by accepting alternative forms of income documentation, including:
Bank statements that show consistent deposits
1099 forms for contract workers
Asset-based documentation where sufficient reserves demonstrate repayment ability
In contrast:
A (Unemployed individuals): While non-QM loans are flexible, lenders still require proof of repayment ability. Unemployed individuals with no income or assets generally do not qualify.
C (No down payment): Non-QM loans typically require a larger down payment to offset the increased risk, not eliminate it.
D (Living with parents): This may affect housing history but doesn’t directly influence eligibility for non-QM loans.
To summarize, self-employed borrowers often do not meet conventional income verification requirements and therefore benefit most from the flexible documentation and underwriting standards that non-qualified mortgages offer.
Under which type of mortgage loan are lenders specifically required to provide detailed disclosures explaining how the interest rate can change over time?
A. Adjustable-Rate Mortgage (ARM)
B. FHA Loan
C. Fixed-Rate Mortgage
D. Construction Loan
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
When a consumer considers taking out a variable-rate mortgage, such as an Adjustable-Rate Mortgage (ARM), the lender is legally obligated to provide specific and detailed disclosures. These disclosures are mandated by the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and are designed to inform borrowers of how and when their interest rates may adjust, as well as the possible financial consequences of those adjustments.
For an ARM, the interest rate is not fixed and may vary after an initial period. Lenders must provide a clear explanation of:
The index or benchmark used to determine rate changes
How the margin is added to the index to calculate new rates
The frequency of adjustments (e.g., annually, every 5 years)
Any caps on rate increases (per adjustment and lifetime)
Worst-case scenarios, such as the highest possible monthly payment
This level of disclosure ensures that borrowers understand the risks of potential payment increases, allowing them to make informed decisions.
Looking at the other options:
B (FHA Loans): These are government-insured loans with their own set of rules, but the requirement for ARM disclosures still comes from TILA, not the FHA guidelines specifically.
C (Fixed-Rate Mortgages): These loans have a constant interest rate over the loan term, so rate adjustment disclosures are not applicable.
D (Construction Loans): These are often short-term and may include variable rates, but ARM-specific disclosures are tied directly to ARM products, not the construction loan category in general.
In conclusion, lenders are required by law to give comprehensive ARM disclosures under TILA, making A the correct and most accurate answer.
Top NMLS Certification Exams
Site Search:
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!
SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF
Use Discount Code:
MIN10OFF
A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.
Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator
Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.