Pegasystems PEGACRSA80V1 Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions

Question 1:

When working on a project that involves automating several applications, what is the recommended number of developers to assign to each individual application?

A 4
B 1
C 2
D 3

Answer: B

Explanation:

In projects where multiple applications require automation, deciding how many developers should be assigned per application significantly impacts efficiency and quality. Generally, assigning one developer to each application is the optimal approach for most automation projects, especially when applications are small to moderately complex.

Assigning four developers (A) to a single application is usually excessive unless the application is very complex or large-scale. With four developers, the team may face challenges such as increased communication overhead, potential duplication of efforts, and difficulty maintaining a clear, consistent vision for the application. This can slow down progress rather than speed it up.

Conversely, allocating one developer (B) per application promotes clear ownership and accountability. A single developer managing an application can focus deeply on its automation requirements, streamline coding and testing, and make faster decisions. This reduces the need for constant coordination and enables a more agile development process. In automation projects, where applications might not require extensive features or heavy integration, one developer is usually enough to handle development and deployment effectively.

Assigning two developers (C) can sometimes help, especially if the application is more complex or if peer review is needed during development. However, this also introduces a need for careful task division and communication. In many cases, the added complexity is not justified for the typical automation scope.

Assigning three developers (D) falls into the same challenges as four developers but slightly less pronounced. It still risks redundant work and increased communication challenges unless the application demands it.

In summary, for most automation projects involving multiple applications, the best practice is to assign one developer per application to ensure focused, accountable, and efficient development.

Question 2:

What is the proper method to configure credentials for an RPA Robot so that it can authenticate and register with the Pega server?

A selecting RPACredentials from the Runtime menu
B editing and saving the credentials within the RuntimeConfig.xml
C setting the credentials within the solution code at startup
D using the default system credentials

Answer: B

Explanation:

When setting up an RPA Robot to log in and register with a Pega server, securely and correctly configuring its credentials is essential to ensure proper authentication and seamless operation.

Option A, selecting RPACredentials from the Runtime menu, is generally not the correct approach for credential configuration. The runtime menu might allow for some credential management or viewing but is not typically used to set or securely store login credentials. This method lacks the automation and security controls required for production environments.

Option B, editing and saving credentials in the RuntimeConfig.xml file, is the recommended and most secure approach. This configuration file acts as a centralized, secure location to store the robot’s login credentials. When the RPA Robot starts, it reads this file to authenticate with the Pega server automatically. This method facilitates consistent credential management, avoids hardcoding sensitive information, and supports easy updates without modifying the solution’s code.

Option C, embedding credentials directly into the solution code at startup, is discouraged due to security risks. Hardcoding credentials exposes them to anyone who has access to the code repository, potentially leading to unauthorized access. It also complicates updates and credential rotation, making it a poor security practice.

Option D, using default system credentials, is usually inadequate. Default credentials often lack the necessary permissions and introduce security vulnerabilities, as they may be widely known or shared. This practice can lead to access failures or unauthorized system access.

In conclusion, the most secure, manageable, and industry-standard practice is editing and saving the login credentials in the RuntimeConfig.xml file. This method ensures that the RPA Robot can authenticate reliably while maintaining credential security and flexibility.

Question 3:

When conducting application discovery, which two practices are essential to ensure a thorough and accurate understanding of the application’s controls? (Choose two.)

A. Develop automation scripts to perform basic search functions within the application
B. Examine all controls completely for the given use case
C. Assess representatives of each control necessary for the use case
D. Apply test methods to verify interaction with sample controls

Correct answer: C, D

Explanation:

Application discovery aims to gain a deep and accurate understanding of how an application functions, especially its controls relevant to specific use cases. This process is crucial because it lays the foundation for validating the application’s behavior, security, and overall integration within an environment.

The first key practice is to assess representatives of each control required for the use case (C). Instead of exhaustively testing every single control, which can be resource-intensive and time-consuming, it is more effective to select representative samples of each type of control. By interrogating these representative controls, you can infer the behavior of similar controls throughout the application. This approach balances thoroughness and efficiency, ensuring that critical functionalities are tested without unnecessary redundancy.

The second critical practice is to use test methods to validate interaction with these representative controls (D). Testing is not merely about inspecting controls but actively interacting with them to verify they behave as expected. This could involve manual testing, automated scripts, or other validation techniques. Testing confirms that the controls function correctly, that security measures are effective, and that the application performs well under expected conditions. Without this validation, assumptions about the application’s behavior could lead to integration failures or security gaps.

On the other hand, developing automation scripts for basic search functionality (A) is more about enhancing specific application features rather than discovering its overall control landscape, so it’s not central to discovery. Similarly, examining 100% of all controls (B) is often impractical and unnecessary. Since many controls share common behaviors, representative sampling usually suffices to identify issues or confirm functionality.

In summary, successful application discovery involves selecting representative controls and rigorously testing them to ensure you have an accurate and actionable understanding of the application’s capabilities and limitations.

Question 4:

A business requirement states that an automation solution must trigger when a new phone call causes a screen pop-up. Which two factors should you prioritize when developing this solution? (Choose two.)

A. Whether the screen pop-up appears in a Windows or Web application
B. The total time the automation takes to handle the screen pop-up trigger
C. Handling scenarios where a new screen pop-up occurs before the previous call ends and its automation process completes
D. Managing multiple configuration settings for different deployment environments

Correct answer: B, C

Explanation:

When developing an automation solution that triggers from a screen pop-up due to incoming phone calls, understanding the timing and concurrency of these triggers is critical to ensure smooth and reliable operation.

First, the total execution time for the automation process (B) is a crucial consideration. The automation must complete its task quickly enough to keep pace with incoming calls and screen pop-ups. If the execution time is too long, subsequent calls or pop-ups might not be processed promptly, causing delays or missed information. In environments where calls arrive frequently, the automation’s speed directly impacts user experience and operational efficiency.

Second, you must consider the possibility of multiple overlapping screen pop-ups (C). In real-world scenarios, a new call may arrive before the automation for a previous call has finished processing. Your automation must handle such concurrency gracefully, ensuring it can manage simultaneous or queued triggers without conflict or data loss. Failing to do so could lead to errors, missed calls, or corrupted data, reducing the reliability of the solution.

While application type (A) is relevant for how automation interacts with the user interface, it is secondary to these timing and concurrency issues. Whether the pop-up is in a Windows or Web application affects development details but does not impact the fundamental need to manage execution time and overlapping events.

Similarly, handling multiple configuration items for different environments (D) is part of deployment best practices, but it does not directly affect the automation’s ability to manage screen pop-up triggers and concurrency. It is more about setup than runtime behavior.

In conclusion, prioritizing the automation’s execution time and its ability to handle multiple, potentially simultaneous pop-up triggers are essential for building a robust solution that meets the business requirement effectively.

Question 5:

Application Discovery involves examining an application to achieve which two objectives? (Select two.)

A. Identify if the solution requires key management for handling multiple open accounts simultaneously
B. Confirm that the application uses the appropriate version of the .Net Framework
C. Identify any controls that will need translators or extra development effort
D. Verify that necessary controls within the application can be managed according to the use case

Correct answer: C, D

Explanation:

Application Discovery is a foundational step in understanding an application's structure, capabilities, and requirements, particularly before integration or customization. The process focuses on assessing how the application functions and what modifications might be necessary to fit specific business needs or technical environments.

Option C is correct because a crucial part of discovery is identifying any application controls—such as UI elements, APIs, or legacy components—that may require translators (middleware or adapters) or additional development work. Some parts of the application might not directly integrate with target platforms and thus need custom coding or translation layers to function correctly.

Option D is also essential. Ensuring that necessary application controls can be managed (or "controlled") within the business use case means verifying that users or processes can interact with these controls as required. This could include permissions management, workflow adjustments, or security settings. If these controls are not readily manageable, further development or customization will be necessary to meet operational demands.

Option A deals with key management for handling multiple simultaneous accounts, which can be important for some solutions but is generally more specific and not a primary concern in the broad scope of application discovery.

Option B addresses confirming the correct .Net Framework version, which relates more to deployment environment validation rather than understanding the application's internal functionality and control management.

In summary, Application Discovery centers on understanding which parts of the application need additional development or translation and confirming that essential controls align with business requirements and can be effectively managed.

Question 6:

Given a business requirement where a user must perform a search within a web application, what is the correct sequence of automation steps to execute this search?

A. Check the adapter status, navigate to a known location, then perform the search
B. Verify adapter status, perform the search, then navigate to a known location
C. Navigate to a known location, then perform the search
D. Stop the adapter, start the adapter, and then perform the search

Correct answer: C

Explanation:

When automating a search operation within a web application, the logical workflow must ensure that the system is in the correct state before executing the search. This involves first navigating to the correct page or section where the search functionality exists and then performing the search itself.

Option C correctly reflects this logical order. The process starts by navigating to a known location within the application — this could be a search page or a section of the app where the search input field is available. Once positioned correctly, the search action is performed. This sequence ensures the search operation has the correct context and environment to succeed.

Option A includes checking the adapter status before navigation and searching. While verifying the adapter might be relevant in some automation scenarios where adapter health is uncertain, it is not strictly necessary for the basic flow unless an adapter problem is suspected.

Option B places the search action before navigating to the proper location, which is ineffective because a search cannot be executed if the system isn’t on the appropriate page.

Option D involves restarting the adapter before performing the search, which adds unnecessary steps and complexity unless there's a known issue with the adapter. This would introduce delays and is not aligned with typical automation best practices for executing straightforward search tasks.

In conclusion, the most efficient and correct sequence is to first navigate to the intended location and then perform the search, ensuring the automation flow operates within the correct application context.

Question 7:

When conducting application discovery, what is the most important action to take?

A. Add prefixes to the controls being analyzed.
B. Test at least one control of each type involved in the use case.
C. Utilize the interaction framework to test necessary activities.
D. Adhere to solution development best practices.

Correct answer: B

Explanation:

During application discovery—the process where you identify and understand the various elements and controls within an application—the key objective is to ensure that every type of control the application uses is properly tested at least once. This step is essential because it validates that your automation or integration solution can interact correctly with each control type, such as buttons, text fields, dropdown menus, and others, that are part of the use case.

Testing a representative control from each category confirms that the solution will handle the full range of user interactions needed. Without this, some control types might behave unexpectedly or cause failures later in the development or deployment phases, leading to costly rework.

Breaking down the options:

• Option A (prefixing controls) is more about organizing or naming conventions rather than verifying functionality. While helpful for maintainability, it does not guarantee the controls themselves work as intended.

• Option B is correct because testing at least one control of each type confirms your solution’s ability to interact properly with the application’s key components. This proactive step prevents missed interactions and supports thorough coverage during automation.

• Option C refers to using the interaction framework, which is useful for automating sequences but assumes the controls themselves have already been validated. It is more focused on execution than discovery.

• Option D involves following best practices in solution development, which is a broad guideline rather than a specific action for discovery. While important overall, it doesn’t substitute for testing controls during discovery.

In summary, by testing at least one control of every type involved in the use case, you ensure your solution can reliably interact with the application’s full interface. This foundational step minimizes errors and sets the stage for successful automation development, making B the best answer.

Question 8:

What key factor should you understand when performing application discovery?

A. Users may run multiple instances of the application.
B. The application is supported by local IT staff.
C. Users switch computers frequently.
D. Users have the option to customize the application's color scheme.

Correct answer: A

Explanation:

When performing application discovery, it is vital to grasp how the application is deployed and used across the organization. The most significant detail in this process is whether users run multiple instances of the application simultaneously. This knowledge is crucial because multiple running copies can affect resource consumption such as CPU, memory, and network bandwidth, and it can influence licensing compliance and monitoring strategies.

If users launch several copies of the application, you may need to factor this into your analysis of performance impact and usage tracking. Properly accounting for multiple instances ensures more accurate monitoring and better resource management, which ultimately improves IT planning and cost control.

Considering the other options:

• Option B (application maintained by local IT) pertains to support responsibilities rather than discovery. While it matters for troubleshooting, it doesn’t directly affect identifying how the application is used or its operational footprint.

• Option C (users changing computers daily) can complicate tracking but is a secondary concern. Discovery focuses on what is running and how, regardless of device changes, though frequent device switching might affect how you track usage historically or geographically.

• Option D (color scheme changes) relates to user interface preferences and does not impact application usage, performance, or discovery efforts. It is an aesthetic choice and irrelevant to operational considerations.

In conclusion, understanding if users run multiple copies of an application is fundamental during discovery because it influences system resource planning, license management, and usage monitoring. This makes A the correct and most important consideration in the application discovery process.

Question 9:

In a Pega Robotics solution, which component is responsible for managing and executing the sequence of automation steps during runtime?

A. Automation Studio
B. Runtime Engine
C. Robot Manager
D. Control Room

Correct answer: B

Explanation:

In Pega Robotics architecture, the Runtime Engine plays a critical role during the actual execution of robotic automation processes. It is the component responsible for interpreting and executing the automation sequences defined during development in Automation Studio. When you design an automation solution in Automation Studio, you build sequences or workflows, and the Runtime Engine runs these sequences on the user’s machine or server.

Here’s why the other options are less appropriate:

• Automation Studio (Option A) is the integrated development environment (IDE) where you create, debug, and test robotic automation projects. It does not execute the automation itself in production; instead, it’s the design-time tool.

• Robot Manager (Option C) refers to the component responsible for managing robot deployments, scheduling, and monitoring, often used in conjunction with Pega’s Control Room or orchestration tools. It does not execute automation sequences directly.

• Control Room (Option D) is a centralized management console that provides monitoring, analytics, scheduling, and governance for robotic automations across an enterprise. While important for oversight and control, it is not the execution engine itself.

The Runtime Engine receives the instructions created in Automation Studio and processes them in real-time, interacting with target applications, systems, and user interfaces. It handles logic flow, data manipulation, error handling, and integration tasks according to the automation design.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for the PEGACRSA80V1 exam because candidates must clearly grasp the roles of development, execution, and management components in the Pega Robotics ecosystem. Misunderstanding which component executes the automation could lead to incorrect design or troubleshooting approaches.

Question 10:

Which of the following is the best practice for handling exceptions in a Pega Robotics automation to ensure the bot recovers gracefully and logs errors effectively?

A. Use global exception handling and avoid logging to improve performance.
B. Handle exceptions locally within each automation sequence and log error details for diagnostics.
C. Ignore exceptions during runtime and retry the automation from the beginning.
D. Use try-catch blocks only during development and remove them before deployment.

Correct answer: B

Explanation:

Proper exception handling is essential to build resilient and maintainable robotic automation solutions in Pega Robotics. The best practice involves handling exceptions locally within each automation sequence or subroutine, and logging detailed error information to facilitate troubleshooting and improve stability.

Local exception handling allows the automation to manage specific errors contextually, deciding how to respond — whether to retry a step, skip a non-critical failure, or escalate the error. This granularity helps prevent a total automation failure caused by a single exception and enables the robot to continue processing when appropriate.

Additionally, logging the error details—such as error messages, stack traces, or the state of key variables—into a centralized log file or monitoring system is critical for diagnosing issues post-failure. This information is valuable to developers and operators to quickly identify root causes and implement fixes.

The other options are less effective:

• Avoiding logging (Option A) may improve performance slightly but sacrifices visibility and accountability, making issue resolution difficult.

• Ignoring exceptions and simply restarting the entire automation (Option C) can lead to inefficient processing, potential infinite loops, and resource wastage.

• Removing try-catch blocks before deployment (Option D) is a poor practice, as it leaves the automation vulnerable to unhandled exceptions that may cause crashes or unpredictable behavior.

In summary, handling exceptions locally and logging error information aligns with industry best practices for robust automation development, which is a critical concept tested in the PEGACRSA80V1 exam. This approach ensures that robotic processes can handle unexpected conditions gracefully while providing valuable insights for continuous improvement.