UiPath UiRPA Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions

Question 1:

A developer needs to create a new data table, dt_Result, which should only include records that are present in both dt_PreviousEmployees and dt_NewEmployees. 

Which activity should be used to achieve this result?

A. Sort Data Table
B. Merge Data Table
C. Join Data Table
D. Filter Data Table

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

When working with multiple data tables and the goal is to isolate only those rows that are present in both tables, the correct approach is to use the Join Data Table activity. This method mirrors the functionality of a SQL inner join and allows developers to compare and merge data based on one or more key fields, such as an employee ID or name.

In the case of dt_PreviousEmployees and dt_NewEmployees, the developer is essentially trying to find the intersection of the two tables — that is, rows that appear in both tables based on a shared identifier. The Join Data Table activity allows you to define join keys (such as EmployeeID) and produces a resulting table (dt_Result) that includes only the matching rows from both source tables. This is exactly how an inner join behaves in relational databases.

Let’s consider why the other options are incorrect:

• Option A – Sort Data Table: This activity is used to order the rows in a single table based on one or more column values. It has nothing to do with comparing rows between two tables and cannot be used to extract matching rows from separate data sources.

• Option B – Merge Data Table: This operation combines two data tables by appending all rows from one table to the other, regardless of whether they match. It’s ideal for data consolidation but doesn’t help in filtering down to common rows.

• Option D – Filter Data Table: This is useful when working within a single table and you want to extract rows that meet specific conditions. While powerful for conditional logic, it doesn't support comparing two tables directly unless additional manual logic or code is introduced.

The Join Data Table activity is efficient and purpose-built for this task. It allows for different types of joins (inner, left, right), but for this scenario, an inner join is ideal. It ensures that dt_Result will only contain entries for employees who appear in both the previous and new employee data sets.

Therefore, to meet the requirement of retrieving only the rows that both tables share, the correct and most efficient choice is C. Join Data Table.

Question 2:

A developer is working with a string variable and wants to find out how many characters it contains. What is the correct way to obtain this value?

A. variable.Length
B. variable.Count
C. variable.Max
D. variable.Chars

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

When dealing with string variables, it’s often necessary to determine their length — that is, how many characters they contain. This is particularly useful for validating input length, performing substring operations, or handling string-based data transformations. The standard way to retrieve this value in most modern programming languages, especially in .NET-based environments, is through the .Length property.

Option A, variable.Length, is the correct answer because it returns the total number of characters in the string, including letters, numbers, spaces, and special characters. This property is readily available on all string instances in languages like C#, Java, JavaScript, and Python (though Python uses len() instead of .Length). For example:

This line of code would assign the number 8 to totalChars, representing the number of characters in the string.

The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:

• Option B – variable.Count: Although the Count method is commonly used with collections like arrays, lists, and dictionaries, it does not apply directly to string objects unless the string is first converted to a character array or LINQ is used. Without conversion, variable.Count would raise a syntax or runtime error in most languages.

• Option C – variable.Max: The Max function retrieves the highest value in a numeric collection or character set but is unrelated to counting the number of characters. For instance, it might return the character with the highest ASCII value, not the string’s length.

• Option D – variable.Chars: This property refers to accessing specific characters at given indices (e.g., variable.Chars[0] to get the first character). It is not a method for measuring string length and serves an entirely different purpose.

In conclusion, to determine how many characters a string holds, .Length is the most accurate and universally supported approach across object-oriented languages. It’s simple, efficient, and directly associated with string objects. Hence, A. variable.Length is the correct and most appropriate choice.

Question 3:

In which scenario is the Anchor Base activity the most appropriate choice for automating UI interactions?

A. When every UI element has dependable selectors
B. When the selector is stable but the UI element changes its screen location
C. When the target application provides no element selectors
D. When the selector is unreliable and the UI element’s position is variable

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

The Anchor Base activity is a specialized feature in UI automation, particularly in platforms like UiPath, that helps handle inconsistencies in locating UI elements during automated interactions. It becomes especially valuable when a direct selector for an element is unreliable or when the element frequently moves across the interface, making standard methods ineffective.

The Anchor Base works by combining two components:

1. Anchor: A nearby UI element with a reliable and consistent selector (e.g., a label like “Username”).

2. Action: The actual operation (like click or type) that is to be performed on the unpredictable or shifting element (e.g., the username input box).

This dual-component design helps the automation engine first find the stable anchor, then locate the target element relative to the anchor. For example, if a text field appears at different positions depending on screen resolution or dynamic UI loading, the Anchor Base will still succeed by using the anchor as a reference point.

Let’s analyze each option:

• Option A: If all UI elements have reliable selectors, then simple automation activities like Click or Type Into can handle interactions without needing an anchor. Anchor Base adds complexity and is unnecessary in this stable environment.

• Option B: If the selector is dependable, even if the element moves visually on the screen, the automation will still locate it. Selectors are often independent of screen coordinates and depend on attributes like ID or class. Thus, Anchor Base is not required.

• Option C: If the application exposes no selectors at all, Anchor Base won’t help, as it still relies on having at least one element with a working selector (the anchor). In such cases, image recognition or OCR-based automation is more appropriate.

• Option D: This is the best fit. When the target element’s selector is unreliable and its position changes dynamically, using a nearby reliable anchor helps consistently identify and interact with the element. Anchor Base was built for this kind of unpredictable UI structure.

In summary, Anchor Base is ideal when traditional UI automation struggles due to unreliable selectors and shifting UI positions. It brings stability to automation in dynamic environments, making D the most accurate answer.

Question 4:

While working in a project that uses Git for version control, which option should you use to send your local file changes to the shared remote repository?

A. Push
B. Pull (rebase)
C. Set As Main
D. Show History

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

In Git-based version control systems, collaboration hinges on keeping the local and remote repositories synchronized. After making and committing changes locally, a developer must push those changes to the remote repository to share updates with others. This is where the Push operation comes into play.

Here’s how the typical Git workflow unfolds:

1. Make code changes locally.

2. Use git add to stage the files.

3. Commit them using git commit.

4. Run git push to transmit the commits to the remote server (e.g., GitHub or GitLab).

The Push command updates the remote branch with your local commits. Until this is done, the remote repository remains unaware of your local work. For teams using GUI-based tools, the context menu option labeled “Push” performs this action with a single click.

Let’s review why the other choices are incorrect:

• Option B: Pull (rebase) – This command is used to bring changes from the remote repository into your local one, integrating them into your current branch. It does not send anything from your local machine to the remote repository, which is the requirement in this question.

• Option C: Set As Main – This action changes the active or default branch in your Git interface. It is useful for organizational purposes but has no effect on uploading or sharing file changes to the remote repository.

• Option D: Show History – This is a read-only action that lets users view the commit history, author information, and timestamps. While it is helpful for understanding project evolution, it doesn’t contribute to synchronizing changes.

Therefore, the Push operation is the only one that satisfies the requirement of sending local file updates to the remote repository. It’s a fundamental part of any collaborative development workflow and ensures that everyone on the team has access to the latest changes. Thus, the correct answer is A.

Question 5:

A developer needs to build a process that handles background verification documents from 10 different vendors. Each vendor uses a distinct format that must be processed with a vendor-specific logic. 

According to best practices, which activity should be used to handle different actions for each vendor?

A. Flow Switch
B. Do While
C. Flow Decision
D. For Each

Answer: A

Explanation:

When a workflow needs to execute different sets of actions based on multiple distinct values—such as vendor-specific document formats—the best approach is to implement a Flow Switch activity. This structure enables clear and manageable branching based on a single controlling variable, making it especially suitable when handling multiple predefined cases.

The Flow Switch activity in UiPath functions similarly to the "switch-case" structure found in many programming languages. It evaluates a given expression, such as a vendor name or ID, and then directs the workflow to the appropriate branch that contains the specific logic needed to process that vendor’s documents. This design leads to cleaner and more scalable automation, especially when dealing with several conditions (e.g., 10 vendors), each requiring unique treatment.

In the context of this scenario, each document can be tagged with a vendor identifier. Once identified, the Flow Switch evaluates the identifier and routes the execution to the relevant segment of the workflow that handles that vendor's specific document format and processing rules.

Now, let’s examine the other options:

• Option B: Do While is used for executing a block of steps repeatedly as long as a condition remains true. It is appropriate for loop-based operations but not for decision branching across multiple conditions. Using it here would lead to inefficient and complex design.

• Option C: Flow Decision is a binary branching tool, ideal when there are only two possible paths, such as True/False conditions. While you could technically nest multiple Flow Decisions to handle 10 vendors, this would become messy, hard to maintain, and error-prone.

• Option D: For Each is typically used for iterating over a collection of items, like a list of documents. While useful in many scenarios, it doesn’t offer the conditional branching capability needed to handle distinct logic paths per vendor.

Therefore, following best practices for maintainability and clarity, the Flow Switch activity is the recommended solution when different actions must be performed for multiple known cases, such as processing uniquely formatted documents from multiple vendors.

Question 6:

In UiPath Orchestrator version 2020.10, under what scenario will a transaction item be marked with the status "Abandoned"?

A. When the transaction fails to meet business or application criteria
B. When the item is retrieved using the Get Transaction Item activity
C. When a transaction is "In Progress" but not marked as "Successful" or "Failed"
D. When a user manually deletes the transaction item from the Transactions page

Answer: C

Explanation:

In UiPath Orchestrator, transaction items—typically pulled from queues—go through several lifecycle statuses such as New, In Progress, Successful, Failed, and Abandoned. Each status provides critical insight into the automation process's reliability and efficiency.

A transaction item is labeled as "Abandoned" under a very specific set of circumstances. This occurs when a robot retrieves an item using the Get Transaction Item activity, which sets its status to In Progress, but then fails to update that transaction’s status to either "Successful" or "Failed" within the system-defined timeframe. The default timeout period is 24 hours, but it can be configured in Orchestrator settings.

This condition commonly arises in scenarios such as:

• The robot crashes or is forcibly stopped after fetching the transaction item.

• A fatal error in the workflow causes the process to exit without reaching the Set Transaction Status activity.

• Infrastructure issues, like connectivity loss, result in a robot session being interrupted before completion.

Let’s evaluate the other choices:

• Option A is incorrect. A transaction that doesn’t meet certain business rules or application logic would typically be marked Failed, not Abandoned. Failure status is explicitly set by the developer within the process to reflect such conditions.

• Option B is partially true. Retrieving an item with Get Transaction Item does mark it as In Progress, but that alone doesn’t cause it to be Abandoned. The key issue arises only when no follow-up status update occurs within the timeout window.

• Option D refers to user-initiated deletion, which results in a "Deleted" status—not Abandoned. "Deleted" transactions are removed from active processing but don’t reflect a failure or timeout in execution.

In conclusion, Option C correctly identifies the condition under which a transaction becomes Abandoned: when it is marked In Progress but never completed or properly closed. This system safeguard helps administrators and developers detect incomplete processing, ensuring transparency and reliability in unattended automation.

Question 7:

Which of the following activities returns a Boolean result to indicate whether a specific image is present on the screen during automation execution?

A. Find Image
B. Wait Element Vanish
C. Element Scope
D. Image Exists

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

In UI automation, determining the presence of visual elements is a frequent requirement — especially when controlling flow based on whether something appears or disappears on the screen. UiPath provides specialized activities for these kinds of visual validations, and Image Exists is one such activity that directly returns a Boolean value.

The Image Exists activity is designed to verify whether a provided image is currently visible on the screen or within a specified UI container. When this activity runs, it checks the current screen for an exact visual match to the given image. If it finds the image, it returns True; if the image is not found, it returns False. This output is immediately usable in decision-making structures such as If conditions or Flow Decisions in the workflow.

This makes it extremely useful in scenarios where execution must adapt based on the UI's state — for example, checking if an error message appeared, a confirmation dialog is visible, or a specific icon is present before proceeding.

Now, let’s examine the other options to understand why they’re incorrect:

• A. Find Image is used to locate a specific image on the screen and returns a UIElement, not a Boolean. This is useful when the developer wants to interact with the located image (e.g., click or extract properties), but it’s not meant to return a true/false answer based on presence.

• B. Wait Element Vanish is a synchronization activity. It pauses execution until a particular UI element disappears. Although it may appear to have Boolean behavior due to its success/failure nature, it doesn’t return a Boolean directly and is used for timing purposes, not decision evaluation.

• C. Element Scope is a container activity that limits the scope for other UI interactions to a specific part of the interface. It doesn’t evaluate or return any values; rather, it simply defines a boundary for where contained activities should act.

In summary, if your goal is to verify the presence of a specific image and take action based on whether it is found, Image Exists is the correct and only activity among the options that returns a Boolean value, making D the right answer.

Question 8:

When developing a background automation using Excel Application Scope in UiPath, which property must be configured to ensure Excel remains hidden from the user during execution?

A. Read-only
B. Private
C. Save Changes
D. Visible

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

In UiPath, the Excel Application Scope activity is frequently used to automate interactions with Excel files when Microsoft Excel is installed on the local machine. While this activity offers deep integration with Excel, developers often want to avoid displaying the Excel UI during execution—especially in unattended robots or background automations where user distraction must be minimized.

The key to ensuring Excel runs silently in the background is the Visible property of the Excel Application Scope. When this property is unchecked or explicitly set to False, UiPath opens Excel in hidden mode, meaning the Excel window will not appear on the screen during the automation process. This is critical for smooth background execution and maintaining a clean desktop, especially in environments where the robot is working without human supervision.

Let’s break down the incorrect options:

• A. Read-only: This option allows Excel files to be opened in read-only mode, which is helpful when you want to avoid unintended modifications to the file. However, this setting has no influence on whether Excel is visible or not during execution.

• B. Private: The Private property is used for suppressing activity details in logs to protect sensitive information such as passwords or business data. While important for compliance and privacy, it has no bearing on the visual behavior of the Excel window.

• C. Save Changes: This controls whether changes made to the workbook are saved at the end of the automation. Again, while crucial for data integrity, it does not control visibility and would not prevent the Excel interface from appearing.

• D. Visible: This is the correct answer. By default, this property may be checked (True), which causes Excel to open visibly. To run Excel in the background, the developer must ensure this box is unchecked or that the value is programmatically set to False. This suppresses the Excel UI and enables seamless background automation.

In conclusion, when designing a background process that interacts with Excel through UiPath, setting the Visible property to False in Excel Application Scope is essential. It ensures a cleaner, faster, and more professional automation experience — particularly useful in unattended robot environments or when user interaction with Excel is not needed.

Question 9:

When an argument is renamed using the Arguments panel in UiPath Studio, what is the result?

A. Only UI Automation activities must be manually updated to use the new name
B. The argument direction is automatically changed to "In/Out"
C. All activities using the argument must be updated manually
D. All references to the argument are automatically updated

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

In UiPath Studio, arguments are essential for transferring data between workflows and components. When working in modular projects where workflows are invoked as separate entities, arguments help pass data into or out of those workflows. These arguments are managed through the Arguments panel within a workflow.

When an argument is renamed from the Arguments panel, UiPath automatically propagates that change throughout the entire workflow where the argument is referenced. This is due to UiPath Studio’s refactoring capability, which detects the usage of the argument in different activities and updates those references accordingly. This feature improves development efficiency and ensures that the logic remains consistent and error-free after renaming.

Option D is the correct answer because it accurately describes UiPath’s behavior: all references to the argument are automatically updated, eliminating the need for manual changes.

Option A is incorrect because the auto-update applies not just to UI Automation activities but to all activities in which the argument is used.

Option B is incorrect because renaming an argument does not affect its direction. The direction (In, Out, or In/Out) must be set manually and remains the same regardless of renaming.

Option C is also incorrect. In older development environments or simpler editors, renaming variables or arguments might require manual updates, but UiPath has matured to offer full automatic refactoring support.

This auto-refactor behavior is particularly helpful in large-scale automations where an argument may be used across many activities and expressions. Without this feature, a simple renaming task could become tedious and error-prone.

To summarize, when you rename an argument using the Arguments panel, UiPath ensures that all instances of that argument are automatically renamed across the workflow, preserving functionality and maintaining code integrity.

Question 10:

Which approach will create a static selector for a UI Automation activity in UiPath?

A. Selecting an element using the “Indicate on Screen” option
B. Adding variables into the selector string
C. Replacing attributes with wildcard symbols
D. Using an Anchor Base activity

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

In UiPath, selectors are XML-like strings that allow automation activities to uniquely identify and interact with user interface (UI) elements. A static selector is a fixed path to a UI element with no dynamic behavior or runtime variability. It remains constant unless manually edited.

Option A, Indicating a UI element, is the correct method for generating a static selector. When a user selects an element using the “Indicate on Screen” feature in UiPath Studio, the system generates a fixed selector based on the exact UI hierarchy and attributes at the time of selection. This selector does not include variables or wildcards and is ideal when interacting with consistent and predictable UI elements.

An example of a static selector generated this way might look like:This will work only if the window title and other attributes remain unchanged.

Option B, using variables in the selector, makes the selector dynamic. While this approach is powerful for handling variable UI elements (e.g., windows with different names), it disqualifies the selector from being considered static.

Option C, inserting wildcards like * or ?, also creates a dynamic selector. Wildcards allow more flexible matching, which is useful in fluctuating environments, but again, the result is not static.

Option D, the Anchor Base activity, is not related to selector generation itself. It is used to locate elements based on a nearby fixed reference element. While it enhances reliability in identifying UI elements, it doesn’t determine whether the selector is static or dynamic.

To conclude, the only method that guarantees the creation of a true static selector is using the "Indicate on Screen" feature. This approach ensures a hard-coded reference that remains stable across automation runs, making it a foundational tool for beginner RPA developers.