- Mar 11, 2000
- 23,870
- 1,438
- 126
You are about to get a glimpse of the future tomorrow. Stay tuned.
Nice narative, but not true.
Just the last 4 years Intel spent more than $12 Bn p.a. in R&D.
They are not cheap, they are inefficient.
Apple's announcements tomorrow have nothing to do directly with AMD. Sure, both AMD and Apple use TSMC, but there's nothing stopping Intel from using TSMC as well, when push comes to shove.You are about to get a glimpse of the future tomorrow. Stay tuned.
IOW, it isn't necessarily that AMD has suddenly bested Intel in everything related to the latter.
No, but my gut feeling is M1 is roughly A14X/Z with tweaks.So I missed the event, and have not had time to backtrack and watch the original thing or a summary.
Thus I ask, did Apple release any useful numbers?
So I missed the event, and have not had time to backtrack and watch the original thing or a summary.
Thus I ask, did Apple release any useful numbers?
So I missed the event, and have not had time to backtrack and watch the original thing or a summary.
Thus I ask, did Apple release any useful numbers?
The A12Z in the iPad Pro apparently runs right around 9-10w in sustained load, which is precisely the sustained thermal budget for the MBA. But as we all know that's because the iPad throttles, and all the cores engaged at once must be closer to 16-18w.
How did you get those numbers? If its the system power consumption the SoC is going to be lower.
25W Intel/AMD systems get load power consumption of 45W in the ultrabook form factor. The non-CPU part takes a significant portion in both light and heavy load.
@insertcarehere is correct, and I goofed. That 9-10w was, as you suggested, the total power draw of the iPad Pro while playing an intensive game per the Anandtech review.How did you get those numbers? If its the system power consumption the SoC is going to be lower.
25W Intel/AMD systems get load power consumption of 45W in the ultrabook form factor. The non-CPU part takes a significant portion in both light and heavy load.