Info Alder Lake Pentiums/Celerons

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Insert_Nickname

Diamond Member
May 6, 2012
4,971
1,693
136
Just noticed the new AL Pentium and Celeron have finally gotten AVX2. About time.

Combined with the AL media block, these should make excellent cheap little video and browsing boxes.

Only downside would be that the H610 chipset only allows a single memory channel. So you'll want B660 minimum.

Anyway, anybody have views or opinions on these? Might be worth buying one to check out.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and NTMBK

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,141
6,838
136
Considering that the top bin for these chips is 5.5Ghz (the KS), and pretty much all of the celerons will do 4.4Ghz (maybe?), I guess I don't buy that excuse.

There's probably some truth to that, but there are probably a few that are the exact opposite of a golden sample and have abysmal performance. There may also be some types of defects that really do limit the number of cores that can be active or which cores can be active. For example, anything related to problems with the ring bus may mean that even if all of the cores function fine independently, many have to be disabled because the cross core communication isn't there to allow the chip to function.

The bottom bin has to be there as a catch-all and given all of the different problems that could arise it truly does turn in to a lowest common denominator. If they didn't do, they'd charge more (say $89) for any 2-core CPUs that could clock closer to 5 GHz.
 
Jul 27, 2020
20,419
14,087
146
The bottom bin has to be there as a catch-all and given all of the different problems that could arise it truly does turn in to a lowest common denominator. If they didn't do, they'd charge more (say $89) for any 2-core CPUs that could clock closer to 5 GHz.
Why aren't we seeing this approach with Zen 3? Are their yields that good or are they discarding slightly defective dies to avoid QA/QC and validation costs? I'm not sure if AMD has a Zen 3 equivalent of Pentium/Celeron.
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,727
14,497
136
Why aren't we seeing this approach with Zen 3? Are their yields that good or are they discarding slightly defective dies to avoid QA/QC and validation costs? I'm not sure if AMD has a Zen 3 equivalent of Pentium/Celeron.
Why aren't we seeing the same degree of yield management with AMD's ~80mm2 die on TSMC N7 as we are seeing with Intel's ~163mm2 die on a competing node with known bumpy history?

There's a reason the 3300X was so hard to find for DYI consumers. Not enough defects for everybody.
 
Reactions: Tlh97

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,141
6,838
136
Why aren't we seeing this approach with Zen 3? Are their yields that good or are they discarding slightly defective dies to avoid QA/QC and validation costs? I'm not sure if AMD has a Zen 3 equivalent of Pentium/Celeron.

The heavily binned chiplets that only have 2 cores active are being used in Milan. They have parts that use 8 CCDs, but only have 16 active cores. That particular part has a ~$3,000 MSRP.

AMD doesn't have the low-end part of the Zen 3 product stack available for consumers and there's a good possibility they never will. There's just not enough supply and the chiplets that might normally end up there are being used for products with far better profit margins. During prior generations AMD was mainly using 7nm wafers for chiplets. With Zen 3 there were also console SoCs and a complete line of GPUs needing wafers as well.

I think that even the truly dead chiplets that can't function at all are still used in those server chips that have 6 CCDs just to fill the unused spots and stabilize the IHS so even those aren't really thrown out. Intel doesn't have the same degree of flexibility so the most profitable thing they can do with those highly defective chips is sell them as a Celeron or Pentium Gold.
 

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
5,962
456
126
Looks like the story is being picked up by several outlets:


But the caveat is important: "The clock speeds were rated at 4.40 GHz which means that the user might have enabled BFB or Base Frequency Boost technology to drive up the clock speeds by +1 GHz by raising the power limit. "

Mind you, this is all based on a single sample. Not much in terms of statistical significance...
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |