Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 217 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
683
565
106






As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



Comparison of upcoming Intel's U-series CPU: Core Ultra 100U, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

ModelCode-NameDateTDPNodeTilesMain TileCPULP E-CoreLLCGPUXe-cores
Core Ultra 100UMeteor LakeQ4 202315 - 57 WIntel 4 + N5 + N64tCPU2P + 8E212 MBIntel Graphics4
?Lunar LakeQ4 202417 - 30 WN3B + N62CPU + GPU & IMC4P + 4E08 MBArc8
?Panther LakeQ1 2026 ??Intel 18A + N3E3CPU + MC4P + 8E4?Arc12



Comparison of die size of Each Tile of Meteor Lake, Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake and Panther Lake

Meteor LakeArrow Lake (20A)Arrow Lake (N3B)Arrow Lake Refresh (N3B)Lunar LakePanther Lake
PlatformMobile H/U OnlyDesktop OnlyDesktop & Mobile H&HXDesktop OnlyMobile U OnlyMobile H
Process NodeIntel 4Intel 20ATSMC N3BTSMC N3BTSMC N3BIntel 18A
DateQ4 2023Q1 2025 ?Desktop-Q4-2024
H&HX-Q1-2025
Q4 2025 ?Q4 2024Q1 2026 ?
Full Die6P + 8P6P + 8E ?8P + 16E8P + 32E4P + 4E4P + 8E
LLC24 MB24 MB ?36 MB ??8 MB?
tCPU66.48
tGPU44.45
SoC96.77
IOE44.45
Total252.15



Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake



As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)

 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 23,971
  • LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,443
Last edited:

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
683
565
106
It also clearly says LNL is Intel Next. What is next after 20A for Intel if not 18A? And also LNL is not on Intel node anymore, it's clearly N3B alone. Thats one contradiction.
Intel Next is not yet announced process by Intel. 18A has been announced with 20A, Intel will state 18A if LNL is using 18A. So simple...
Thats why this discussion.

Please check my question and compare Raptor Lake U, why does Intel bump the TDP and why does Intel use 4 Xe graphics since it is so power efficiency...
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,285
12,330
136
Perhaps you should first go thru the thread for the bigger picture before jumping into any conclusion.
The thread is mostly people accusing each-other of being stubborn after reading the little info we have in their own way.

It clearly says LNL is Intel Next?
It does not, it's our interpretation of the info on that slide. The Hot Chips slide can be read two ways depending on what we assume about the people who made the slide. There's a non-zero chance they favored (Intel) branding over symmetry, and put the Intel Next node in front. Also if we assume LNL is on "Intel Next"... then the "Beyond" chips are to be made on TSMC at least partially, which does not fit with the leadership agenda Intel is pushing.

Personally I lent my ear to @Dayman1225 and favor the LNL on N3B and ARL on 20A 18A AND N3B. I'm not 100% convinced, but it does make more sense to me after all things are considered (slides, leaks and speculation).
 
Last edited:

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,072
556
96
Personally I lent my ear to @Dayman1225 and favor the LNL on N3B and ARL on 18A AND N3B. I'm not 100% convinced, but it does make more sense to me after all things are considered (slides, leaks and speculation).
Thats exactly my conclusion as well. LNL on N3B exclusively. And ARL on 20A for sure AND Possibly N3B (not 100% certain of ARL on N3B).

It is just that when people skip sections, they lose context and hence the confusion. Thats the reason I mentioned earlier it's important to go thru the thread first.

Well, I think it's time to let go off this topic. More interesting things are already in.
 
Last edited:

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
5,423
8,333
136
Seems to be some pretty large latency between cores on the same die and a significant increase from ADL/RPL.

Followed the twitter link and here is the original article: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.p...ore-ultra-7-155h-im-asus-zenbook-14-oled.html

And google translated to English: https://www-hardwareluxx-de.transla...l=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

From what I gather, the article is based upon the opportunity they had to get some hands on time with a few MTL laptops at CES. The main one they seem to have gotten time with was the Asus Zenbook but the laptop seems to be having some issues as the performance is much worse than it should be. Someone in the comments said they bought the laptop but had to return it due to it running hot and the fans constantly being annoyingly loud. Seems like it still has some issues. Others have reported the MSI model at CES having some major issues as well. I'm not in the market for a new laptop right now but if I were, I would probably hold off on a MTL model purchase until they get the kinks worked out.


 
Reactions: lightmanek

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,285
12,330
136
And why is he defending it...
I have a lot of respect for Ian Cutress, but he dropped the ball on this one. The marketing game is all about perception (and he knows it better than most). Apart from that, the elitist reaction was uncalled for.

Intel is recommending only Ultra 9 for casual gaming on-the-go, so I guess they're not recommending the brand new MSI Claw with Ultra 7.
 

H433x0n

Senior member
Mar 15, 2023
933
1,032
96
I can see that, but again . . . IF that's true, Intel would have (or should have) leveraged Intel 4 for a number of products instead of just Meteor Lake. Things they didn't release on Intel 4 (announced or otherwise):
You're assuming that Intel's bottleneck is their fabs, to me it's really clear that their bottleneck is their design team.

Ponte Vecchio
Total mess of a product. I've got no clue what happened with it.
Loihi 2 (might have gone to some beta testers but that's it)
Not a real product.
Any desktop CPU
It's clear that MTL would've never outperformed RPL on desktop. It's just not going to work as a desktop product.
Any server CPU

Intel didn't even release an Intel 4 variant of their Ridge CPUs. Instead they farmed out the node to Ericcson for their RAN SoC. Which strikes me as really odd.
Both GNR & SRF are going to be on Intel 3, which is basically Intel 4 with different cell and VT variants.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,155
2,165
136
Personally I lent my ear to @Dayman1225 and favor the LNL on N3B and ARL on 18A AND N3B. I'm not 100% convinced, but it does make more sense to me after all things are considered (slides, leaks and speculation).


You mean 20A which Intel confirmed. ARL is not using 18A, PTL will be the first 18A client chip.


Followed the twitter link and here is the original article: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.p...ore-ultra-7-155h-im-asus-zenbook-14-oled.html

And google translated to English: https://www-hardwareluxx-de.transla...l=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

From what I gather, the article is based upon the opportunity they had to get some hands on time with a few MTL laptops at CES. The main one they seem to have gotten time with was the Asus Zenbook but the laptop seems to be having some issues as the performance is much worse than it should be. Someone in the comments said they bought the laptop but had to return it due to it running hot and the fans constantly being annoyingly loud. Seems like it still has some issues. Others have reported the MSI model at CES having some major issues as well. I'm not in the market for a new laptop right now but if I were, I would probably hold off on a MTL model purchase until they get the kinks worked out.


His 28W score is broken, way too low. Apparently windows update messed up the power settings on the Asus. Testing MTL is a hard task by the looks of it.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,103
3,780
136
His 28W score is broken, way too low. Apparently windows update messed up the power settings on the Asus. Testing MTL is a hard task by the looks of it.

NBC also got access to the hardware, they have a comparable score at 64/55W, although for their comparison they picked a 7840HS Pro that is apparently heavily throttled, seems that they wanted to please Intel as if it was a paid article...

 
Reactions: lightmanek

Geddagod

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2021
1,165
1,049
106
What about this Intel slide? What is unclear on this for you?

Like I said, thats the whole point of this entire discussion. I don't think we should cherry pick. We've considered all the known leaks & sources and have been trying to eliminate all improbabilities. And trying to come to a solid conclusion. Perhaps you should first go thru the thread for the bigger picture before jumping into any conclusion.
This slide is referencing the entire CPU, not just the compute tiles. The other slide is only mentioning the CPU tiles, as it lists out "external N3" under MTL & ARL, and if it was mentioning the entire CPU, it would list out other tiles.
Notice how this slide only says "external" not "external n3/n5/n7" or anything of that sort.
 

Geddagod

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2021
1,165
1,049
106
It also clearly says LNL is Intel Next. What is next after 20A for Intel if not 18A? And also LNL is not on Intel node anymore, it's clearly N3B alone. Thats one contradiction.
No it's not lol. It says LNL & Beyond (what we now know as PTL) and then "External" and "Intel 18A". Let's match this up. What came first from the top of the slide? LNL. What came first on the node side? "External". What came 2nd on the CPU side? "Beyond". What came 2nd on the node side? "18A".
No contradiction.
 

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
3,271
6,755
136
Chips and Cheese has a MTL article out, mostly covering cache latency, cache bandwidth, and core-to-core latencies. Enjoy!
 

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,381
2,879
136
LMAO.
The title of that article is Intel Core Ultra 7 165H Meteor Lake Slower than the 13th Gen Core-13700H in 5/6 Benchmarks
and the one who wrote that article wasn't really impressed with MTL. ->
There isn’t much to say except, “What the hell happened to Meteor Lake.” This is no better than Ice Lake, minus the delays.

There are no 6 different tests, everything is just CB(R15, R20, R23) in nT and 1T.
BTW, 165H won in 4 not 5 of them against 7840HS. Next time double check what you write please.
And of course you didn't mention that power limit was >50W, so It's kinda expected that MTL will win thanks to more cores having higher raw power.

P.S. and those scores are from notebookcheck.

edit: that PRO 7840HS had particularly bad results, the same chip in a different laptop produced better results despite almost the same power limit. Throttling?


Also Ultra 7 165H had inconsistent performance. It was a lot faster in R15, but barely so in the rest and in R23 1T It was 5% slower than 155H.
 
Last edited:

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,072
556
96
LMAO.
The title of that article is Intel Core Ultra 7 165H Meteor Lake Slower than the 13th Gen Core-13700H in 5/6 Benchmarks
and the one who wrote that article wasn't really impressed with MTL. ->


There are no 6 different tests, everything is just CB(R15, R20, R23) in nT and 1T.
BTW, 165H won in 4 not 5 of them against 7840HS. Next time double check what you write please.
And of course you didn't mention that power limit was >50W, so It's kinda expected that MTL will win thanks to more cores having higher raw power.

P.S. and those scores are from notebookcheck.

edit: that PRO 7840HS had particularly bad results, the same chip in a different laptop produced better results despite almost the same power limit. Throttling?
View attachment 91835

Also Ultra 7 165H had inconsistent performance. It was a lot faster in R15, but barely so in the rest and in R23 1T It was 5% slower than 155H.
Well, it's still interesting.
 
Reactions: TESKATLIPOKA
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |