JN0-637 Practice Questions

Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC)

Last Update 4 days ago
Total Questions : 115

Dive into our fully updated and stable JN0-637 practice test platform, featuring all the latest JNCIP-SEC exam questions added this week. Our preparation tool is more than just a Juniper study aid; it's a strategic advantage.

Our JNCIP-SEC practice questions crafted to reflect the domains and difficulty of the actual exam. The detailed rationales explain the 'why' behind each answer, reinforcing key concepts about JN0-637. Use this test to pinpoint which areas you need to focus your study on.

JN0-637 PDF

$43.75
~~$124.99~~

Add to Cart

JN0-637 Testing Engine

$50.75
~~$144.99~~

Add to Cart

JN0-637 PDF + Testing Engine

$63.7
~~$181.99~~

Add to Cart

Question # 1

You are deploying IPsec VPNs to securely connect several enterprise sites with ospf for dynamic

routing. Some of these sites are secured by third-party devices not running Junos.

Which two statements are true for this deployment? (Choose two.)

Options:

OSPF over IPsec can be used for intersite dynamic routing.

Sites with overlapping address spaces can be supported.

OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required to enable intersite dynamic routing

Sites with overlapping address spaces cannot be supported.

Discussion 0

Answer:

B, C

Explanation:

Understanding the Scenario:

Objective: Deploy IPsec VPNs connecting multiple enterprise sites using OSPF for dynamic routing.

Challenge: Some sites use third-party devices not running Junos OS.

Considerations:

Compatibility between Juniper and third-party devices.

Support for dynamic routing protocols (OSPF) over IPsec VPNs.

Handling overlapping IP address spaces.

Option Analysis:

Option A: OSPF over IPsec can be used for intersite dynamic routing.

Explanation:

OSPF Characteristics:

OSPF uses multicast addresses (224.0.0.5 and 224.0.0.6) for neighbor discovery and routing updates.

IPsec Limitations:

Standard IPsec tunnel mode does not support multicast traffic natively.

Multicast traffic cannot traverse IPsec tunnels unless encapsulated.

Juniper Solution:

Juniper devices can use routed VPNs (route-based VPNs) with st0 interfaces, allowing OSPF over IPsec.

However, this requires support from both ends of the VPN tunnel.

Third-Party Devices:

May not support OSPF over IPsec without additional configurations.

Conclusion:

Option A is not universally true in this scenario due to third-party device limitations.

[Reference:, "OSPF can be run over IPsec VPNs using route-based VPNs, but interoperability with third-party devices must be verified.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - OSPF over IPsec VPNs, , Option B: Sites with overlapping address spaces can be supported., Explanation:, Overlapping IP Address Spaces:, Occurs when different sites use the same IP subnets., Can cause routing ambiguities and conflicts., Solution:, NAT over VPN:, Use Network Address Translation (NAT) to translate overlapping IP addresses to unique addresses., Juniper devices support NAT over IPsec VPNs., Third-Party Device Considerations:, Need to ensure third-party devices support NAT over IPsec., Many enterprise-grade devices provide this functionality., Conclusion:, Option B is true; overlapping address spaces can be supported using NAT., Reference:, "When sites have overlapping IP addresses, NAT can be used over IPsec VPNs to resolve address conflicts.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - NAT with IPsec VPNs, , Option C: OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required to enable intersite dynamic routing., Explanation:, GRE Tunnels:, Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) can encapsulate multicast and broadcast traffic., Allows OSPF packets to be transmitted over IPsec VPNs., IPsec Encryption:, GRE tunnels can be encrypted using IPsec for secure communication., Interoperability:, GRE over IPsec is a common method to support OSPF between devices from different vendors., Third-party devices are more likely to support GRE over IPsec than OSPF over IPsec directly., Conclusion:, Option C is true; using OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required in this scenario., Reference:, "To run OSPF between devices that do not support multicast over IPsec, GRE tunnels can be used over IPsec VPNs.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Configuring GRE over IPsec, , Option D: Sites with overlapping address spaces cannot be supported., Explanation:, Contradicts Option

, As established, overlapping address spaces can be supported using NAT over IPsec VPNs., Conclusion:, Option D is false., , Conclusion:, Correct Answers: B and C, Option B: Overlapping address spaces can be supported using NAT over IPsec VPNs., Option C: OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required to enable intersite dynamic routing, especially when third-party devices are involved., , Additional Detailed Explanation:, Why OSPF over IPsec May Not Be Feasible (Option A):, Multicast Traffic:, OSPF relies on multicast for neighbor discovery and updates., IPsec in tunnel mode does not natively support multicast traffic., Third-Party Devices:, May not support proprietary extensions or configurations required to run OSPF directly over IPsec., Workaround:, Encapsulate OSPF multicast packets within GRE tunnels, which can carry multicast traffic over unicast IPsec tunnels., Why OSPF over GRE over IPsec Is Necessary (Option C):, GRE Tunnels:, Encapsulate multicast/broadcast traffic into unicast packets., Allow routing protocols like OSPF to function over IPsec VPNs., Compatibility:, GRE is a widely supported protocol across different vendors., Facilitates interoperability between Juniper and third-party devices., Supporting Overlapping Address Spaces (Option B):, NAT over IPsec:, Translates private IP addresses to unique addresses across the VPN., Prevents routing conflicts and allows communication between sites with overlapping subnets., Considerations:, Requires proper configuration on both ends of the VPN tunnel., Third-party devices must support NAT over IPsec., References to Juniper Security Concepts:, Route-Based VPNs:, "Route-based VPNs use virtual tunnel interfaces (st0) and support dynamic routing protocols over IPsec.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Route-Based VPNs, GRE over IPsec:, "GRE over IPsec allows the transmission of multicast and non-IP protocols over IPsec tunnels.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - GRE over IPsec Overview, NAT with IPsec VPNs:, "NAT can be applied to IPsec VPN traffic to resolve overlapping address issues and facilitate communication between sites.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - NAT with IPsec, Final Notes:, Interoperability:, When working with third-party devices, always verify compatibility for protocols and features., Best Practices:, Use GRE over IPsec for dynamic routing protocols requiring multicast support across IPsec VPNs., Implement NAT over VPN when dealing with overlapping address spaces., , , ]

Question # 2

You are deploying a large-scale VPN spanning six sites. You need to choose a VPN technology that satisfies the following requirements:

All sites must have secure reachability to all other sites.

New spoke sites can be added without explicit configuration on the hub site.

All spoke-to-spoke communication must traverse the hub site.Which VPN technology will satisfy these requirements?

Options:

ADVPN

Group VPN

Secure Connect VPN

AutoVPN

Discussion 0

Question # 3

Referring to the exhibit, you are assigned the tenantSYS1 user credentials on an SRX series

device.

In this scenario, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

Options:

When you log in to the device, you will be located at the operational mode of the main system hierarchy.

When you log in to the device, you will be located at the operational mode of the Tenant.SY51 logical system hierarchy.

When you log in to the device, you will be permitted to view only the routing tables for the Tenant SYS1 logical system.

When you log in to the device, you will be permitted to view all routing tables available on the on an SYS1 Series device.

Discussion 0

Question # 4

What are three core components for enabling advanced policy-based routing? (Choose three.)

Options:

Filter-based forwarding

Routing options

Routing instance

APBR profile

Policies

Discussion 0

Answer:

A, C, D

Explanation:

To enable Advanced Policy-Based Routing (APBR) on SRX Series devices, three key components are necessary: filter-based forwarding, routing instances, and APBR profiles. Filter-based forwarding is utilized to direct specific traffic flows to a routing instance based on criteria set by a policy. Routing instances allow the traffic to be managed independently of the main routing table, and APBR profiles define how and when traffic should be forwarded. These elements ensure that APBR is flexible and tailored to the network’s requirements. Refer to Juniper's APBR Documentation for more details.

Advanced policy-based routing (APBR) in Juniper's SRX devices allows the selection of different paths for traffic based on policies, rather than relying purely on routing tables. To enable APBR, the following core components are required:

Filter-based Forwarding (Answer A): Filter-based forwarding (FBF) is a technique used to forward traffic based on policies rather than the default routing table. It is essential for enabling APBR, as it helps match traffic based on filters and directs it to specific routes.

Configuration Example:

bash

set firewall family inet filter FBF match-term source-address 192.168.1.0/24

set firewall family inet filter FBF then routing-instance custom-routing-instance

Routing Instance (Answer C): A routing instance is required to define the separate routing table used by APBR. You can create multiple routing instances and assign traffic to these instances based on policies. The traffic will then use the routes defined within the specific routing instance.

Configuration Example:

bash

set routing-instances custom-routing-instance instance-type forwarding

set routing-instances custom-routing-instance routing-options static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.10.10.1

APBR Profile (Answer D): The APBR profile defines the rules and policies for advanced policy-based routing. It allows you to set up conditions such as traffic type, source/destination address, and port, and then assign actions such as redirecting traffic to specific routing instances.

Configuration Example:

bash

set security forwarding-options advanced-policy-based-routing profile apbr-profile match application http

set security forwarding-options advanced-policy-based-routing profile apbr-profile then routing-instance custom-routing-instance

Other Components:

Routing Options (Answer B) are not a core component of APBR, as routing options define the general behavior of the routing table and protocols. However, APBR works by overriding these default routing behaviors using policies.

Policies (Answer E) are crucial in many network configurations but are not a core component of enabling APBR. APBR specifically relies on profiles rather than standard security policies.

Juniper Security Reference:

Advanced Policy-Based Routing (APBR): Juniper’s APBR is a powerful tool that allows routing based on specific traffic characteristics rather than relying on static routing tables. APBR ensures that specific types of traffic can take alternate paths based on business or network needs. Reference: Juniper Networks APBR Documentation.

==========

Question # 5

You want to bypass IDP for traffic destined to social media sites using APBR, but it is not working and IDP is dropping the session.

What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)

Options:

IDP disable is not configured on the APBR rule.

The application services bypass is not configured on the APBR rule.

The APBR rule does a match on the first packet.

The session did not properly reclassify midstream to the correct APBR rule.

Discussion 0

Answer:

A, D

Explanation:

Comprehensive Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation with All Juniper Security References

Understanding the Problem:

The goal is to bypass IDP for traffic destined to social media sites using Application-Based Policy Routing (APBR).

Despite the configuration, IDP is still dropping the sessions.

Need to identify two reasons why this is happening.

Key Concepts:

Application-Based Policy Routing (APBR): Allows routing decisions based on the application identified in the traffic.

IDP (Intrusion Detection and Prevention): Monitors network traffic for malicious activity and can drop suspicious packets.

Bypassing IDP: To bypass IDP for certain traffic, specific configurations are required within the APBR rule.

Option A: IDP disable is not configured on the APBR rule.

Explanation:

To bypass IDP for specific traffic using APBR, you must explicitly configure the idp-disable option within the APBR rule.

Without this configuration, even if APBR redirects the traffic, IDP will still inspect and potentially drop the traffic.

[Reference:, Juniper Networks Documentation:, "To bypass IDP processing for traffic matching an APBR rule, include the idp-disable statement in the rule configuration.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Configuring APBR to Bypass IDP, , Option D: The session did not properly reclassify midstream to the correct APBR rule., Explanation:, Midstream Reclassification: APBR relies on application identification, which may occur after several packets have been exchanged (not just the first packet)., When the application is identified mid-session, the session should be reclassified according to the correct APBR rule., If midstream reclassification does not occur properly, the session continues under the initial policy, and IDP continues to inspect and potentially drop the traffic., Possible Causes:, Session Setup Issues: If the session was established before the application was identified, and reclassification is not enabled or not functioning, the session won't switch to the APBR rule that bypasses IDP., Configuration Errors: Incorrect or missing configuration for midstream reclassification., Reference:, Juniper Networks Documentation:, "For APBR to reclassify sessions after the application is identified, ensure that midstream reclassification is enabled.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Understanding APBR and Midstream Reclassification, , Why Options B and C are Incorrect:, Option B: The application services bypass is not configured on the APBR rule., Explanation:, There is no specific application-services bypass option within APBR rules for bypassing IDP., To bypass IDP, the idp-disable option must be used., Application services bypass generally refers to bypassing other services like UTM, not specifically IDP within APBR., Reference:, Juniper Networks Documentation:, "APBR rules can include the idp-disable statement to bypass IDP. There is no application-services bypass statement for APBR.", Option C: The APBR rule does a match on the first packet., Explanation:, By default, APBR can match on the first packet, but for applications that require deeper inspection, you can configure the rule to not match on the first packet., Matching on the first packet is generally beneficial for routing decisions., In this scenario, matching on the first packet is not the reason why IDP is dropping the session., Reference:, Juniper Networks Documentation:, "If you configure APBR to match on the first packet, the routing decision is made immediately. If the application is not identified on the first packet, the default routing is used until the application is identified.", , Conclusion:, Correct Answers:,

IDP disable is not configured on the APBR rule., Without idp-disable, IDP will continue to inspect and possibly drop the traffic matching the APBR rule.,

The session did not properly reclassify midstream to the correct APBR rule., If midstream reclassification fails, the session remains under the initial policy, and IDP processing continues., Resolution Steps:, Configure idp-disable: Ensure that the APBR rule includes the idp-disable statement to bypass IDP for the specified traffic., arduino, Copy code, set security application-path-routing rule then idp-disable, Enable Midstream Reclassification: Verify that midstream reclassification is enabled and functioning correctly to reclassify sessions once the application is identified., Note: Midstream reclassification is enabled by default, but verify that no configuration is preventing it., , Additional References:, Juniper TechLibrary:, "Application-Based Policy Routing Overview" - Provides an overview of APBR features and configurations., Source: Juniper TechLibrary - APBR Overview, "Configuring IDP Policy Bypass" - Discusses how to bypass IDP for specific traffic., Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Configuring IDP Bypass, Juniper Networks Day One Book:, "Advanced Security Policies" - Offers insights into configuring advanced security policies, including APBR and IDP interactions., ]

Question # 6

Exhibit:

Your company uses SRX Series devices to establish an IPsec VPN that connects Site-1 and the HQ networks. You want VoIP traffic to receive priority over data traffic when it is forwarded across the VPN.

Which three actions should you perform in this scenario? (Choose three.)

Options:

Enable next-hop tunnel binding.

Create a firewall filter that identifies VoIP traffic and associates it with the correct forwarding class.

Configure CoS forwarding classes and scheduling parameters.

Enable the copy-outer-dscp parameter so that DSCP header values are copied to the tunneled packets.

Enable the multi-sa parameter to enable two separate IPsec SAs for the VoIP and data traffic.

Discussion 0

Question # 7

Exhibit:

Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true?

Options:

SRG1 is configured in hybrid mode.

The ICL is encrypted.

If SRG1 moves to peer 2, peer 1 will drop packets sent to the SRG1 interfaces.

If SRG1 moves to peer 2, peer 1 will forward packets sent to the SRG1 interfaces.

Discussion 0

Question # 8

Your customer needs embedded security in an EVPN-VXLAN solution.

What are two benefits of adding an SRX Series device in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Options:

It enhances tunnel inspection for VXLAN encapsulated traffic with Layer 4-7 security services.

It adds extra security with the capabilities of an enterprise-grade firewall in the EVPN-VXLAN underlay.

It adds extra security with the capabilities of an enterprise-grade firewall in the EVPN-VXLAN overlay.

It enhances tunnel inspection for VXLAN encapsulated traffic with only Layer 4 security services.

Discussion 0

Question # 9

Which two statements are correct about advanced policy-based routing?

Options:

It can use the application system cache to route traffic.

The associated routing instance should be configured as a virtual router instance.

It cannot use the application system cache to route traffic.

The associated routing instance should be configured as a forwarding instance.

Discussion 0

Question # 10

Exhibit:

You are having problems configuring advanced policy-based routing.

What should you do to solve the problem?

Options:

Apply a policy to the APBR RIB group to only allow the exact routes you need.

Change the routing instance to a forwarding instance.

Change the routing instance to a virtual router instance.

Remove the default static route from the main instance configuration.

Discussion 0

Get JN0-637 dumps and pass your exam in 24 hours!

Cyber Monday Sale Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: 65pass65

JN0-637 Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) is now Stable and With Pass Result | Test Your Knowledge for Free

JN0-637 Practice Questions

JN0-637 PDF

JN0-637 Testing Engine

JN0-637 PDF + Testing Engine

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Options:

Answer:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Options:

Free Exams Sample Questions

We Accept

Secure Site

Customer Review

Money Back Guarantee