stock FSB is 200, going to 350 is a big jump for the components - might wanna increase gradually.
Also, what are your other Volts? e4300 should be able to do 2.1Ghz on stock V. But for 350FSB, you would have to increase volts on other stuff like FSB, MCH etc.
I keep referring people to...
For C2D, TAT is more accurate but Coretemp is more practical (sits on the tray).
I like to always monitor my temps so it works better for me.
I think we need a sticky for this one, far too many threads asking for which one is better...including mine ;)
I had the same discrepancy between CoreTemp and Speedfan.
Try Intel TAT (thermal analysis tool) http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/392/mirrors.php
This will prove that CoreTemp is more accurate, within +/- 2c.
Also try aiming for higher a FSB vs. higher multiplier for greater overall...
200 hours, thats good to know. I started ORTHOS and expected to see results in 10 mins - need to work on being patient!
I followed the guide on the AS website for C2D - they now recommend a thin straight line straight down the middle.
If not the eXtreme - is the standard 120 good enough?
OK - the AS5 did not make much of a difference, infact none at all (disappointing!)
Yes I am stock HSF right now - dont mind spending ~ $60 on the Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme but its out-of-stock everywhere!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.