I missed that there were two in the thread. I guess it is more of the encrypt/decrypt and other tests that favour the architecture. Under 100 is a Port Royal Hall of Fame score.
I also just upgrade my 5800x server to a 7950x - also upgraded to Windows Server 2025 from 2019. I should have run before.
Had to get the 7950x as a bundle to get my 5090. I am so poor now. lol.
That looks good. My original encoding was to MKV instead of MP4 which is slightly slower. I re-ran for P54E46 for MP4 to get 47.19s.
My tuning and voltages are still off for my overclocks - redoing.
My 285K P54E46
900 frames/19.07fps = 47.19s
My Ryzen 5 3600
900 frames/4.11fps = 218.98s
The 3600 is a media server with services running 16GB DDR4 - not optimal for test.
I have a Windows server with a 5700x and 64GB DDR4, but it has issues with Handbrake.
Igor's 245KF
6P+8E 900...
It's like a beta test platform. If they do the same on Nova, and it succeeds with a better performance gains than we see here, it was successful. If Nova Lake is done differently, then we know this was a failure - or rather a satisfactory test.
900 Frames / 16.28 fps = 55.28
Their chart shows 58. Your 13900k is performing better than stock.
So- yes way.
(also use output format MKV - as MP4 is slightly faster -- my scores are MKV - and yes, we dont know which they used but the difference is small )
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.