From the reviews, the Marvell chip does seem to have trouble catching up with intel's SATA 6Gbps controller.
Now, a few questions;
Is the performance issue a matter of a performance cap, i.e. that's the max throughput it can reach... OR... is it more akin to poorer efficiency?
Would it...
Well, I have found a perfect use for the Marvell SATA ports; use them for optical drives!
That leaves me with 4 SATA2 and 2 SATA3.
Overkill? Yes. But I won't have to worry about issues that might hurt SSD performance, if that is even possible. But lack of trim support is definitely a major...
That is correct. I am using Windows 7/64!
The current deals on Newegg make 12GB quite affordable. For a 4x4GB kit, you would have to pay $100 more for a mere 4GB more, but the advantage is that these just that, a kit and are all specified to run at CL9. Is it worth $100 though?
My main would...
After reading this - http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2138151- a few questions came up.
I have a 2x2GB on the way. And since Newegg was having that great discount on memory I thought, why the heck not?
They credited me with %15 credit for the first order, but since it's so...
What I like about the case is that the motherboard tray appears to give you access to the back of it, once the motherboard is mounted. A bonus, IMO, if you want to use an aftermarket cooler.
The PSU appears to be solid as well. Not flashy, but reliable. As you can see from the reviews. I have...
Hmmm.... Note to self: Start new overclocking thread tomorrow.
If this thread appears like an anti-o'clocking thread to you, well... what can I say? Is it due to lack of sleep?
And you appear to take this hobby way to seriously... I mean we're way past obsession here, to the point of being...
@ tigerbait;
Found it.... it's in dutch, but it's all diagrams.
http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/1948/27/11-intel-p67-moederborden-review-geluidskwaliteit
BTW, the another downside of the Extreme4 is the ONE year warranty.
But with the money you save, you might as well just go to Squaretrade and get yourself an extended warranty for a relatively low price.
Truth be told, I cannot remember with certainty.
Let me try to find it.
And when I say worst, it rather means it didn't perform as well as other P67 boards.
For the record, I ordered the Extreme 4, and didn't intend on dissuading anybody on getting it when I wrote about it's lesser audio...
I thought I had emphasized the use of games in my initial post, how it was the main reason why I am upgrading, etc. and I came with not statistics in hand.
If there are any uses where a 500 o'clock will amount to a considerable increase in computing power, then I wouldn't mine anyone chiming in...
The Asrock P67 Extreme 6, the Extreme 4 and the UD4 were my main choices (4th choice was the Biostar TXP67) and after doing a lot of going back and forth, I finally decided going with the Extreme 4. It has a decent set of features, and probably the most competitive price.
The only significant...
Did the crew over at Hardocp not conduct a test to measure the performance difference between x16x/16x and 8x/8x? [Edit] and even x16/x16 and x4/x4.
[Edit:] Ah here it is; http://hardocp.com/article/2010/08/23/gtx_480_sli_pcie_bandwidth_perf_x16/x16_vs_x8x8/
And as it turns out the performance...
No, I am not. But I assume there are a lot of gamers in these forums.
It's a good question you raise though.
Could you, as an admin conduct a poll on what primary use their o'clocked system is for?
Why not adding a secondary use category for that poll?
I am curious to find out.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.