Recent content by DavidC1

The chips with mont cores only also happen to be very low TDP, which would limit the clocks as well. Lunarlake's E cores clock only at 3.7GHz, which is not very high either.

Wildcat Lake is 2P+4LPE of the next generation cores. The "LPE" cores are likely arranged in a similar way to Lunarlake, where it actually adds significant multi-threaded performance while still being able to scale to very low power, unlike Meteorlake's useless LPE which could barely power local...

And I repeat, it should have been new instructions with the same 256-bit width. It doesn't need 512-bit. I bet you if AVX-512 was instead AVX-256, Skymont would have supported it with double pumping and there would have been no fragmentation. Fragmentation exists because the Skymont team is...

Gaming DOES drive DIY, in the sense the top product is the decision maker for which company's products that consumers decide to buy. That's why Nvidia can sell RTX 3050 over AMD's RX 6600, even at similar prices. Endless variations of "gaming" chairs, mouse, and other accessories is another...

May not even have a dedicated version at all. The successor seems to be "Wildcat Lake" which is essentially the smallest version of the Panther Lake mainstream platform: https://www.techpowerup.com/330068/intels-wildcat-lake-emerges-as-new-entry-level-processor-series That's 2P + 4...

Yes, but Intel 3 is 18% performance over Intel 4, which is basically a full node improvement. Modern CPUs are power limited. Whatever, the E cores should replace the P cores like yesterday.

http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/leading-edge-foundry-node-advances-tsmc-samsung-foundry-intel-2020-2025.2579857/post-41344644 I said TSMC will have 10% density advantage in A16 vs 14A comparisons with Intel claiming 20% density over 18A. Now they are saying 30%. So compared with 14A...

In addition to what others have said there's also the factor of not being able to price it at premium when it becomes a common part.

It's architecture + process + circuit design. On the same 0.13u process Pentium M reached 1.7GHz, while Pentium III tapped out at 1.4GHz. Original Itanium was 800MHz with a 10 stage pipeline. Itanium 2 cut it down to 8 stages and clocked 25% higher at 1GHz, all on the same 0.18u process, while...

That's just one of them though. Where's the "multiple non-critical" cuts going to come from?

Gracemont is way better than Tremont, because of the much better architecture. AVX supports new instructions that SSE doesn't and in certain cases it will be better. The thing is though vast majority of applications are complex and won't benefit immensely even if it had support and took...

Now a new CEO is here, I will reiterate that Intel should NOT abandon their client dGPU efforts. All the progress they are making with serving customers and rapidly improving drivers? I guarantee if they do iGPU-only it'll disappear again, back to being a mediocre, HD Audio like irrelevance. I...

There's not much to cut anymore. -Embedded -dGPU -OpenSource efforts: Like OneAPI -FPGA -WiFi -Ethernet and IPU Other than maybe FPGA, it will impact core business too. I guess if they really want to cut it, they can cut all connectivity, so no WiFi, Ethernet, and IPU. Embedded sells...

Yes, but most of the gains come from having the necessary instructions. Like an article from HPCWire promoting AVX512 said it allows vectorizing instructions that weren't previous vectorizable. So do that, and keep it at 256-bit, not 512. My whole point is that AVX512 was created because of...

That IS the bottleneck, because performance increase doesn't come free. The investment in area and transistors for that is probably 5% at the most, so getting a gain much greater than that would be actually an outlier, not the norm. Note in comparison how many things they needed to beef up to...