I went from a 3570k@4.6ghz with a GTX970 to a 12600k with 970 (same GPU for now).
As was posted above it really depends on a lot of things and the games you play. what res do you play is the monitor 60, 120, 144hz ? all these thing will matter as to the performance.
I will give one brief...
something is wrong with his Wprime scores, I ran 1024M one and I get 79.911 sec with 12600k.
The program default to only 4 core count in its settings, not sure if that was from my old 3570k or not as this second drive is from old system.
I also ran it with only the 4 core count and got 223.058...
For sure, probably needs more patching unless it is something on my end. It is a VM setup I had running on my old 3570k, I used to set 4 cores and get 4 cores in VM.
Maybe the Pro version has better support I didn't spend much time with it, I just wanted to up core count.
It sounds like that Vegas Pro and Render+ are using dynamic cpu priority, next time see if priority changes when it goes to the background.
Either that or do you use Processlasso, that can have the same effect, but you can configure it however you want.
Some programs run below normal priority...
I use VMware player (free version), with latest version on my 12600k setting VM to use 4 cores got me 1 core in use, after playing with all core counts in setting the highest i could get in the windows VM was 3 cores.
I had to hack the VMX file and I was able to get 10 cores to show in VM.
I forgot to mention, I have VMware player but it isn't working right as far as the core count setting that it uses. I think it needs a update for alder lake.
I can not get higher than 3 cores for it to use no matter my setting.
Those using Processlasso make sure you are on the latest version as it adds support for Alder-lake and also has CPUsets, though I don't know if that would change outcome of your tests.
On my end with 12600k I get with E cores only CM-r15 602 and 1834 with just P cores. though it takes a few...
I think this test likes fresh boot my score went up too (time lower 254.442)
comparing the memory test from your DDR5 to my DDR4 we can see big changes in the first few memory tests.
File memory - DDR5 =25.805, DDR4 = 38.418
Copy memory- DDR5 =16.752, DDR4 =22.326
memory cache performance -...
I ran the test another time, this time with Asus default "optimized" limits setting before I had it set to Intel limits 150w. even though it never passed 125w (well below the Intel 150w) the score increased (clocks all same as before)
Maybe we can compare specific memory tests. I pasted those below with memory in the test name.
Also, remember I am still using fresh Win10 but looking at core utilization all looks good with this test.
Test Type: Fill Memory 256 MB
Iterations: 60K | Performance: 1,552 it/s (16th) | Time...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.