You have absolutly no idea what you are talking about. You clearly have no concept of how the beta program for Futuremark works.
It is blatantly infantile for you to be suggesting that ATi bought 1,000,000 copies of 3dmark just to get special treatment. No, it is flat out SICKENING that you are...
No, Ati did not admit to Cheating in 3dmark. What ATi did and What Nvidia did are completey Different in their intent and method. This has been addressed at Beyond3d in great detail and Several developers also posted their View on the matter. However, what both did is considered cheating becuase...
More examples..
FALSE. Nvidia Withdrew in December, 13 months after development was started and AFTER everything but Bug hunting was complete. a mere 3 months before 3dmark03 was released. They were Fully 100% behind 3dmark03 until it became clear that the Nv3x was going to have troubble with...
Gstanford. You are simply completey 100% Technically incorrect.
The Audacity you show talking about Fanatics or whatever, when you are sitting here TRying to say that MANUALLY inserting a clip-plane in a set benchmark is LEGIT. thats just for starters. It is just simply absurd and insulting...
No, not "just knock it off already"
It is simply unjustifiable to compare 4x to 16x with no mention of quality or anything.. especially since BOTH cards could have been ran with the SAME SETTINGS! etiher 4x or 8x....
Fairness in reviewing is impoprtant. It does not matter which one was faster...
The thing that NONE of you are considering..
Why the heck did anand use 4x ansio for the gf4 against 16x aniso for the 9700 in ALL his tests.???
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1683&p=18
The 9700 aniso is now trilinear filterd, 4x = 4x, 8x =8x etc... This is one of the most...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.