All CPUs perform better on 4090 in this test, which is surprising, because it may be one of a very few DX12 CPU tests that show nvidia perform better than amd. Intel cpus are almost at the same performance on nvidia and radeon, but all Ryzen chips are worse on Radeon. 7700X is also losing, not...
13:40 - 18:00
Nothing more needs to be said. Right now it's almost impossible to make somebody buy Radeon gpus. People just buy 4060 and 4070. I mean non-tech savy people.
I think they should go 20% cheaper than now.
yeeeaa but... RDNA2 is priced perfectly between RDNA3 RX7600 <-> RX7900XT. That means, RDNA2 cards still carry price premium of new generation products, and have room to go down. I think we will see real price cuts after 7700/7800 cards arrive. Right now we are seeing RX6800/6900/6950xt at...
No DLSS in Starfield, whole internet cries. No RT on AMD cards in Ratchet (RTX technology masterpiece), removed last second, whole internet stays quiet.
I had a friend who bought fx5200 and was disgusted, so I had a real experience with a victim :joycat: I had 4200Ti at the time and don't really remember MX series. I was just a small kid.
I've been thinking and I've decided to put 4060 on the podium of the worst cards in hostory, in second place next to legendary GeForce FX5200. It's because FX5200 was the last time I remember when next gen card was worse than previous 4200Ti. But FX5200 case was extreme one, with worse DirectX...
I'm shocked that going 50-100MB over 8GB can result in dropping from 100fps to 10-30fps!! (calisto protocol / 700MB in plague tale). That puts to rest the mythical "nvidia vram management superiority" fairy tales. More vram is always the answer.
Which one is it ? :joycat:
No reviews because price too high.
No reviews because 16GB is what should be in all 4060/4060ti/4070 cards and it's embarrassing.
No reviews because it's the same performance as 8GB model so nothing to see here, all cards have adequate specs and 16GB is overkill.
Huh, I didn't think about it this way.
http://www.displaywars.com/34-inch-21x9-vs-43-inch-16x9
It's like you can display 34 inch ultrawide inside 43 inch 4K.
I'm terrified by the GPU requirements for gaming on 4K though. That resolution means I would need 6800XT as bare minimum or 7900XT/RTX...
As for productivity. on 3440x1440 34 inch I can put 2 windows side by side (internet browsers, or excel, or programming tools), and it's super natural - I mean it acts virtually like two 1080p screens.
Is it possible to use 3840x2160 43 inch screen with 4 windows side by side, or not really...
TextureWorks™ - texture upscaling only for 6GB rtx5000 (and up) owners . And NpcWorks™ - AI generated in-game characters exclusive to RTX owners. Imagine even more crowded towns, like in AC Unity but with characters that you can have random conversation with.
This really is rtx4050 in disguise, so it performs like a 4050 :) 50 series was never running Ultra presets. Die size 146mm2... maybe its actually RTX4040Ti. Doesn't matter. People are lining up to buy it already.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.