one must realise
dell 20" lcd = 4:3
this 23" lcd = 16:9
much cheaper to produce the same number of pixels while calling it a larger screen.
then again this one is 23", but uh, it is $1250
could get a pair of 19" 3:4 for this, or close to a pair of 20"
yea not good for 1600x1200
but if you plan on running any lower resolution, the monitor is great.
Doesnt have a shot in hell vs my 1800fp, but its a great value for a CRT.
I do have both, fyi.
LCDs rock, but do cost quite a bit.
I always end up working on some PC that does not have boot up CD support..
I wish USB would replace 3.5, then I could buy a USB drive and use that, but its too late now with all of the older systems....
heh
$20 of cpu/memory and around a $50 hard drive and what does it cost? $270.
i still dont get why these are so good, you drop em, they're dead
wasnt the point of mp3 players - so you can run and blah blah with em without having to worry about them skipping/breaking?
you know when you are playing one of those new games that needs way too much memory, and you pick a new gun and it is kinda hangs for a tiny bit? The hard disk was accessed for the graphics/sounds to that gun, switching back to another gun and then to the new one you do not see the same 'lag'...
agreed
If I am going to spend money on music - then I want it to have NO watermark, no compression, nothing cept the raw beautiful .wav file as I could rip on a CD (ya cds have watermarks...fine...some watermarks..whatever).
Also - why not...
If you buy a CD...it should have a unique code on...
ghosting has nothing to do with video card speed, dvi, vga, cpu speed or anything outside of the physical screen. The screen is only as fast as it was made.
DVI over the analog should show a more 'crisp' picture, but its miminal compared to newer video cards (intergrated cards are horrible)...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.