Hei guys, long time no see.
Im still keeping a vigilant eye on things.. and i cant help but notice this pattern:
Anandtechs reviews of Nvidia GPUs include 0 referances to "AMD", "Radeon" or any other competitor in the headlines and short note, and neither do they include this in the whole...
The two posts above this one should be deleted as they both are provocative and both are inviting others to go offtopic. Im not gong to bother with reporting as it seems one is treated as a perpetrator if one has strong opinions about opinions.
-armchair moderator Madcat
Hardocp is probably the only site that will include an oc 7970 in their review of 680. Just like they did with an oc 580 when reviewing 7970.
I doubt Ryan Smith would include an oc 7970, even when the regular 7970 are all 1000+ mhz in daily use. Would probably be a nono in nvidias review guide
Thats not the full THG review though, is it?
There will be charts showing x1600, its just that those likely dont show the 680 in such a good light compared to the 7970.
Here is what happened: this is nvidias 680 which in turn is half of nvidias 780 which nvidia hope to release later this year, around december.
Im gambling on this being 5% faster/slower than the 7970 with both being stock. The 7970 will walk all over this when overclocked.
the "problem" is that your current psu does not have the 2x8 pin power input that the Asus 7970 DC2 requires, correct?
Your 295 is actually a bigger power hog than your 7970
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.