Main purpose is to increase MT peformance on the cheap, that is, you get more MT performance in the same area. Not necessarily just in benchmarks, it's just that most people don't actually use apps that leverage all that many cores where that extra MT performance is useful.
Exception would be in...
It also looks much better, this is a reality. One can argue that the enormous performance impact makes it not worth it, but that it makes a visual difference is evident.
I think the main reason AMD didn't try with the top die is because of the RT deficit against Nvidia. Think about it, what's the point in "raster parity" or even slightly winning, if then there are like 3 examples (that I have seen: Alan Wake, Black Myth Wukong, Indiana Jones) where in RT AMD is...
Ryzen moment happened mainly because Intel stayed on 14nm for so long, people forget that all the time. Let's see Nvidia stay at 4nm (well, technically even slightly worse with 4N custom node) until 2029 and see AMD with "Radeon moment" 2 years from now.
I expected a bit more out of 9070 XT to be honest.
AMD lied about 9070 XT performance relative to 7900 GRE, it is much lower than the performance increase they gave. Then in RT, looks good in some games but terrible in others when using transformative settings. While it is much better than...
That's why Medusa Point is still RDNA 3.5 I suppose? in an even worse memory bandwidth scenario, we make things more difficult for the iGPU? it's the magic juice that AMD won't give to the masses?
Disappointing that there seems to have been a good deal of focus on the media engine but still no 4:4:4 support (otherwise I think they would've mentioned it in the slide?).
The price is decent, but not aggressive enough for what 357 mm2 really cost.
Still, it is much better compared to how uncompetitive RDNA3 really was, it seems RDNA4 will be much closer in terms of features.
Because there is too much focus on the improvement between DLSS 3 vs DLSS 4 and the different modes.
When in reality, for many people, DLSS 4 Quality will be better than native rendering in most aspects while improving performance by a good margin. TAA blurriness is a major paint point, if that...
What you are missing is that Strix Halo will only be used on very expensive devices.
So it will be put on 2000$+ laptops that will compete against 1000-1300$ 4070 laptops.
This chip is expensive, or at least AMD will sell it very expensive + the motherboard needed and all that stuff. There is no...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.