ok my bad, i ran cpu burn-in for only about 15 minutes and then i would quit myself and started having problems. For the sake of it i ran it again for 1 hour 45 minutes, let it complete the test, and ran prime95 for 2 hours. look like it is back to normal, will continue testing prime95 for 24...
well, i ran prime95 for 12 hours like usual and been using my rig for over a week overclocked without no problems. The moment i used CPU Burn-in i started having problems, checked prime95 and it is having errors on the first minutes, i underclocked the fsb back to 220 and checked prime95 and...
:( I tried the utility CPu Burn-in at http://users.bigpond.net.au/cpuburn/ . My rig was stable at 240 fbs 11 multipler with 1.55V, now i dont seem to be able to pass prime95 even with 1.65V. Also i noticed that even tho i set my voltage for 1.55, it is been supplied with 1.58-1.59V. Tried...
it worked, thansk a bunch man, i am running stable @ 240 multiplier 11, memory 1:1 by using 1.6V to vcore. Was able to lower my memory to 2.5-4-4-8. Going to try and lower it more later.
good idea, i am pretty sure at 240 1:1 memory will give me more and at the same time i can have really nice stable 2.6GHz. All the ignredients for an nice performance boost.
running at fsb 260, multiplier 10, memory at 2.6V 3-4-4-8 1T, memory divider 166Mhz, running prime95 while at work, lets see what happens, looks like the limit would be 260 fsb with mutiplier 10.
well, i set it up to 1.6V to cpu, memory at 166Mhz divider, Right now got the FSB at 263. So the cpu is now 2634.98 MHz with memory at 218 MHz.....
just ran prime 95 for a couple of minutes to see if i had it wrong, plan on running 12 hours tonight. It looks like at 264 prime 95 on small...
lhmm hyper x from kingston is usually good, but if you are able to boot by setting a memory divider, looks like the problem is the memory. Someone correct me if i am wrong, but looks like you memory doesnt like running at anything higher that 200MHz. Check the voltage, it might be low for the...
for me, screw the silence, let there be noise, i play the games loud enough anyways, so running the fans at max speed thru the radiator is no problem:D
I am trying to get the best performance, maybe i will try and squeeze some more voltage into cpu, about .025 at a time until i get past...
11x250=2750 => Oh, oh... ???
is this bad???
also my current voltage is 2.7V for 3-4-4-8 1T memory, this is hyper X kingston DDR500, those are the stock timmings, i wonder how can i adjust them to squeeze more performance out of the ram. I am pretty sure this ram can stand a higher...
:confused: ok now i wonder:
what would yield more performance:
multiplier 8 X 312 fsb
multiplier 9 X 278 fsb
multiplier 10 X 250 fsb
i wonder if i could go multiplier 11 X fsb 250, cant wait to go home to try and see, stuck at work now.
Thanks to you all for your help, i was able to complete my first AMD 64 overclock sucessfully :D Keep up the good help, hopefully one day i can get as knowlegable so i can help other out there.
My system specs:
Antec Trupower 500W
AMD 64 3500+ (winnie) @ 2.5 Ghz with multiplier 10 @ 1.5V...
:) so far i am using 1:! memory divider, running at fsb 250 1.5V, ram volt 2.6, multiplier at 10 and everything stable. I ran prime 95 for 6 hours in blend test, then i played starwars galaxies for another 3 hours and a half and downloaded some stuff. Evrything seems good. Except when i connect...
:) may or may not be your case, but my giga-byte sli mobo has a problem form factory in which you cannot overclock from the BIOS itself over 214Mhz, the only way i am able to overclock is thru windows using an utility. Even downloaded the lastest bios, even beta bioses, then i read on a site...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.