That to me sounds like a false equivalence. Because you make it sound like only people who buy flagship cards care about longevity. Many people can't afford to buy flagship cards and because of that they have to buy cards from the mid tier. This does not mean that they don't want that card and...
This test is not true! NVIDIA's memory management and compression is so amazing that a 3 GB card can overcome its smaller capacity and become even better than a 4 GB card of the competitor's. People here on this very board tells me so! /s
See, they are afraid that people will get the evil AMD's 470 4 gb card instead of the 1060 6 gb card if they admit that 3 gb might not have much longevity, which is why they are defending the 3 gb.
Baiting is not allowed
Markfw900
I'm attacking your marketing effort on behalf of NVIDIA. It would seem you're just trying to get people buy this 3 gb card now and then have to upgrade quicker than they would have to if they'd put some more money towards the 6 gb card now. There's a difference in saying 'Sure 3 gb is fine'...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.