Based on some new Leaks! =)
Ryzen SR7 @ 3.4 Ghz No Turbo
CB R15 Score : 1188
Core i7-7700K @ 4.2 Ghz on all cores
CB R15 Score : 966
Core i7-6900k @ 3.5 Ghz on all cores
CB R15 Score : 1500
How do you compare?
Read more...
Ryzen 8c/16t @ 3.4 ghz no turbo
Score : 54 seconds
Intel i7 6900k @ 3.7 turbo (3.5 on all 8c)
Score : 59 seconds
Instructions as per AMD James
"AMD_jamesProduct Manager 4 points 4 days ago
The statement for download yourself was for the blender file. However you can test the handbrake one...
Theoretically,
If a 3.4 ghz flat Ryzen SR7 scores 36 seconds @ 150 Samples in the Blender test
A 4.5 Ghz overclock will yield ~27.2 seconds
A 4.7 overclock will yield ~26.0 seconds
A 4.8 Ghz overclock will yield ~25.5 seconds
A 5.0 Ghz overclock will yield ~24.4 seconds
4.125 Ghz stable...
The SR7 scores are not clarified directly by AMD
Its 25 second score at 100 samples
and 36 seconds at 150 samples
There are two different test settings, dont confuse them!
Post your Ryzen Blender Demo Scores with your setup!
Ryzen SR7 - 3.4 Ghz (No Turbo) : 25 seconds - Samples 100
Ryzen Sr7 - 3.4 Ghz (No Turbo) : 36 Seconds- Samples 150
EDIT: Make sure to set to 100 or 150 samples to compare !
EDIT: To Compare to the presentation score of 36 seconds, set...
Its 20 dollars a year difference AmD vs intel! Teksyndicate already proved how negligibile this is. Power consumption is only really a factor in mobile and server.
Get a 9370/9590 if you want the highest chances at getting 5.0-5.1 Ghz stable with a good Air or closed water cooling solution. They are basically better binned chips than the 8320 which typically will hit 4.5/4.6 Ghz Stable even with an H100i. Regardless, the FX 8320 is the price to performance...
this was already confirmed not to be the problem for why ivy bridge over heats.
http://www.eteknix.com/news/ivy-bridge-heat-problems-remain-even-after-ihs-removal/
This looks like great news to me!
Look at the results carefully
IPC of trinity BEATS IPC of LLano (K 10.5) because both the A10-4655m AND the A6-3400m turbo to the exact same 2.3 ghz clock. This just implies the IPC jump from current bulldozer will be huge! If the math is correct, and IPC is...
I will be in the third part of my review. I laugh at any one who thinks my results are BS because you simply have no concrete evidence to make such a idiotic claim. My results are mostly CPU based so do some basic first grade math with OC scaling by % from stock results and voila my results are...
Unless you have an FX 8150 that overclocks to 4.9 Ghz and a 6990 that overclocks to 990/1500 you are not qualified to judge whether my results are "made up". Any one with an FX 8150, or with common sense (36.1% clock scaled up from reviews at stock on CPU) can confirm my results within error.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.