Recent content by RFJ

R
opinions re iPAQ hx2495 versus iPAQ hx2795 B choice re value of memory features and Biometric Fingerprint Reader ?

I was doing a search for the ipaq 2495 and came across this thread. Anyone got some viewpoints about this ? I would like to know also. Also, and significantly, the activity of web browsing on an ipaq (that has wifi capability) does really work on that small screen, with Internet...
- RFJ
- Post #3
- Nov 26, 2006
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Hopefully finally nail down preferableness of DVD-R OR DVD+R

NightCrawler, permit me to enter in with you and Jerry... I note your reference to "a $50 DVD burner is all you need." Might that apply to my post, immediately above re the Plextor ? And that the Plextor's presumed or supposed higher quality might not be worth the extra expense when things...
- RFJ
- Post #22
- Oct 12, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Hopefully finally nail down preferableness of DVD-R OR DVD+R

Terry, A sincere thanks, AGAIN. I am quite satisfied to go with the NEC 3500, particularly if the programs that Plextor includes, namely : GigaRec, PoweRec, SecuRec, Q-Check, Silent Mode, and VariRec. PlexWriter Premium, are not, in practicality, all that necessary. But I am not sufficiently...
- RFJ
- Post #20
- Oct 12, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Hopefully finally nail down preferableness of DVD-R OR DVD+R

Terry, ?You pretty much always want to select DVD-ROM as your booktype if your burner supports it. There is never an advantage to selecting DVD+R as your booktype.? How long would it have taken me to learn that without you mentioning it here ? Thanks. As to the type of writer, it seems a...
- RFJ
- Post #18
- Oct 11, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Hopefully finally nail down preferableness of DVD-R OR DVD+R

But I would say, warcrow , that this is an interesting and valuable posting/contribution. Perhaps ?R disks are still being sold to service the earlier DVD writers. And there seems to be an almost political tug of war on the two formats, about which I have not yet found full clarity. I have...
- RFJ
- Post #15
- Oct 11, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Hopefully finally nail down preferableness of DVD-R OR DVD+R

Terry, do you mean that by using +R disks in the widely available multiple format DVD writers, that one could achieve greater compatibility with stand alone DVD players ?
- RFJ
- Post #10
- Oct 11, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Hopefully finally nail down preferableness of DVD-R OR DVD+R

It is a curiosity, at the least, that one format has not emerged over the other in terms of usage. Who has what to gain in seeing one of the two formats ?conquer? the other ? http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/3575.cfm http://www.afterdawn.com/glossary/terms/dvdplusr.cfm BTW, I do...
- RFJ
- Post #8
- Oct 11, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
LiteOn 1213S DVD R - resolved its error problems with newer firmware ?

I have something of the same question, since I can pick up this LiteOn 1213S drive locally. Any observations and or opinions regarding firmware improvements ?
- RFJ
- Post #2
- Oct 4, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Is there any reason that Windows 2000 could not be dual booted with Windows 2000 ?

I happened to do a search with the word "Ghost" and boom, up comes this thread which, I am pretty sure, references back to my personal agony. How kind of you to reference my thread, perhaps this might be a way to relieve or resolve the matter. Thanks
- RFJ
- Post #3
- Apr 1, 2004
- Forum: Computer Building
R
Black hole - Ghost to permit a drive copy cloning OR an image file to create a Win2K partition ?

I did the full steps of introducing the KeepPageFile= line into the 3 INF files and even into the Word (DOC) unattended.txt file. No go. Same error message. Perhaps the above was only meant for WIn2K Server, and not Pro. I will persist. Thanks.
- RFJ
- Post #8
- Mar 30, 2004
- Forum: Windows
R
Black hole - Ghost to permit a drive copy cloning OR an image file to create a Win2K partition ?

LiLithTecH, that is the next venture. I will report back. I have to give it a go with that approach tonight. The disincentive is that the page, URL?d above, specifically states WinXP and Win2K SERVER, but not Win2K PRO. I actually found that : ?KeepPageFile= ? Line almost by accident and...
- RFJ
- Post #7
- Mar 29, 2004
- Forum: Windows
R
Black hole - Ghost to permit a drive copy cloning OR an image file to create a Win2K partition ?

Further and significant note - these are FAT partitions, so Ghost defaults to NOT including the needed pagefile.sys. Apparently in NTFS Ghost includes and empty pagefile.sys, which would presumably make it work with the Ghost image process. The need to protect the viewing capability with Win98...
- RFJ
- Post #5
- Mar 29, 2004
- Forum: Windows
R
Black hole - Ghost to permit a drive copy cloning OR an image file to create a Win2K partition ?

Thank you LiLithTecH, These are definitely basic disk configurations. In fact, in this case, just One primary and one extended logical partition of one old plus one new IDE disk. The configuration is kept deliberately simple, in this case. http://www.tweakxp.com/tweak1522.aspx And supposedly...
- RFJ
- Post #4
- Mar 29, 2004
- Forum: Windows
R
Black hole - Ghost to permit a drive copy cloning OR an image file to create a Win2K partition ?

I have not found a way to for Ghost to permit a drive copy cloning OR an image file to create a Win2K partition to be fully launched. What comes up it the Limited Virtual Memory error message saying there is no paging file or it is too small. Ghost will NOT copy the paging file when doing the...
- RFJ
- Thread
- Mar 28, 2004
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Windows
R
IWILL KK266 and M7VIG capable of BIOS upgrades to LBA 48 address ?

It would seem that for about the cost of the add on card and the prospect of USB 2.0 and or firewire, one could get pretty much get a new motherboard, with the newest chipsets. But this is good for myself and my students. The Syba seems good enough. Thanks, again, Zepper. RFJ PS - without...
- RFJ
- Post #5
- Mar 6, 2004
- Forum: Motherboards

RESOURCES

Top Bottom