Recent content by Skunk

S
VLAN question

The 1910 didnt have anything with regards to negotiation. It just sets, trunk, access or hybrid. If it does negotiate its not mentioned anywhere, in the config settings. I havent dug into the man. My problem was the 1810 definition of trunk. They define trunk on that one as an aggregation of...
- Skunk
- Post #34
- Aug 7, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

Just to update this and close it out.. HP has a different definition of "trunking" between their switches. We are using some v1910 and v1810. The 1910 uses the standard cisco version of trunking, and the 1810 just defines them as tagged or untagged. Once i sorted that out everything worked...
- Skunk
- Post #32
- Aug 7, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

I had thought of that initially too. The server had rebooted serveral times during my testing.
- Skunk
- Post #30
- May 2, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

I have not abandoned the thread. We had an extended power outage, needed some time to verify everything came back up and there were no issues. Good news/bad news. Once i brought everything up, DHCP started working correctly for the vlan. Bad news, I didn't change anything and can't explain...
- Skunk
- Post #28
- May 2, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

Nothing in the event logs. I've been sniffing with netmon, and that interface isn't seeing any dhcp requests. It does show the pings back and forth. I did add another switch with a trunk and traffic does pass across successfully. So it appears I was right in the first place with my setup...
- Skunk
- Post #24
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

Both scopes are enabled. The ip does match the scope. Ip is set to 192.168.100.2 scope assigns 192.168.100.35-192.168.100.250
- Skunk
- Post #22
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

Its a server 2008 machine. You can't assign a scope to a specific nic. The dhcp server is listening on both though. It is authorized. It's not handing them out on the other subnet either, i checked that. That is, the machines connected to the vlan ports are not pulling from either scope...
- Skunk
- Post #20
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

DHCP has a scope for both ranges, and the vlan100 nic has an ip address assigned for the subnet i want. If i set the IP manually, i can ping another lab machine on the the vlan100, as well as the ip set on the server. It can not ping anything on the same vlan on another switch. I have not...
- Skunk
- Post #18
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

Its sinking in. I've gone back to my original setup of untagged for vlan100. So i have the first 24 untagged in vlan1 and excluded from vlan100. Computers connected here can pull an ip and access the internet. The second 24 are configured as untagged in vlan100 and excluded from vlan1...
- Skunk
- Post #16
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

No offense taken at all. I understand I'm not getting it. Everything I thought I knew isn't working. I did start with the untagged approach for the vlan i was trying to work with, but that wasn't working either, so I started second guessing myself and testing things i knew shouldn't work but...
- Skunk
- Post #14
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

Im using tagged in the HP sense, which seems to be defined a little different than the Cisco term. (our switches are all procurves) E exclude all ports from this VLAN. T participate in the selected VLAN and tag all frames. U participate in the selected VLAN and leave all outgoing frames...
- Skunk
- Post #12
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

The network as it stands is flat. The new division requires connectivity to remote client networks. The client is insisting on a site to site vpn. (we deploy equipment for them, they are configured on-site but we download secure images via the site to site.) The server is dual homed simply...
- Skunk
- Post #9
- Apr 30, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

We have a division that's being brought in-house and I'm attempting to segregate their traffic from the regular lan traffic. All their traffic should be tagged as vlan100. The server has a nic on that vlan so they can pull their email, access files etc but everything else should be separate...
- Skunk
- Post #4
- Apr 29, 2012
- Forum: Networking
S
VLAN question

I have a vlan setup here that I'm trying to get working. My current network is setup across a couple of switches and 2 wlan switches. My server is configured with 2 nics. Nic 1 configured as 10.0.0.x and nic 2 configured as 192.168.100.x and set to vlan 100. I'm trying to configure this...
- Skunk
- Thread
- Apr 29, 2012
- Replies: 35
- Forum: Networking
S
Best Linux Server uptime?

Backup MX. OS is Gentoo. mailer ~ # uptime 19:19:03 up 1245 days, 12:04
- Skunk
- Post #76
- Dec 8, 2011
- Forum: Open Source

RESOURCES

Top Bottom