I was thinking the same thing. Personally I never got into UV filters. Had a 70-200mm role off a table (it wasn't on my camera), the hood took the hit and the lens survived.
Easy: 24-70mm f/2.8 IMO is one of the MUST have lenses in your camera bag. This is my 80% to go to lens. Including for landscape photography as you were questioning. Matter of fact, you'll find this lens will be very versatile for you, including city scapes.
Good luck with your selection!
Yep, and "It's only $48,000, too - without any lenses." - https://www.photographytalk.com/photography-articles/8216-hasselblad-s-newest-camera-is-a-400-megapixel-monster
With no lenses. I suspect for Hasselblad, this is a bargain. LOL. I'll stick with my D810.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.