well if that's the case, then the speeds are definitely not what these companies claim. xD
And also, that is just sad. I mean, paying that much and not getting the benefits they claim to have is just a plain disappointment.
Yeah alright, That explains the 50-60MB/s. But then why would it sit at less than 9MB/s. I don't know but I find that quite unbelievable. I mean this is less than 10MB/s. Do you have an explanation for that? 😅 I am not quite convinced small files can decrease the performance of the SSD to such...
But all the files I used here were all above 50GB. So technically that shouldn't be the case here right? And the high transfer speeds can be visible easily when transferring larger files. That's why I did this with large files.
Here is a snippet of my Task manager, Resource Monitor when a 90GB file is being copied. It again stayed at 8-9 MB/s and the active time was spiking here and there with only an average of 20%. So there isn't 100% disk utilization.
Thanks for the reply! I understand that QLC is much slower but don't you think 8MB/s is a little too much? Also, I bought this one not more than 5 months back. I don't think it's a hardware issue. But again, I'm not quite sure what's gone wrong here. And interesting that you mention...
Hello guys! This is my first question here as I really want to find out the reason for this. Please bear with the amount of stuff I've put up.
I have a Razer Blade 15 (Basic edition - Intel Core i7-9750H, RTX 2060, 16GB RAM & a 512GB M.2 SSD). The 512GB SSD Razer gave was a "SAMSUNG...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.