PEGACPRSA22V1 Practice Questions

Application discovery is an early technical validation step that involves collecting the information about applications in scope of a potential robotics use case. During discovery you need to find out application types (and if they are on applications support matrix for Pega Robotics), how they are launched, how they are used, and check accessibility and functionality of the controls through interrogation. Application discovery is necessary to ensure that robotics use case is viable and it doesn't have any technical constraints... or, if constraints exist, then what kind of workarounds will be necessary to ensure the use case is successful. The rationale for having application discovery as a best practice is that you don't want to find out half-way through coding an automation that a key control is not available or not performing the desired action.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

The Excel Connector in Pega Robot Studio is a lightweight component that provides direct interaction with Excel files without relying on the Microsoft Excel application. It is ideal for background processing, where users are not required to interact with Excel directly.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Excel Integration and Connectors section):

“The Excel Connector allows automations to open, read, and modify Excel workbooks without requiring Microsoft Excel to be installed.

It operates directly on the file system level, supporting operations such as reading or writing to specific cells, entire worksheets, or data ranges.

The connector does not use Excel Interop; therefore, no interrogation or Excel application process is necessary.”

Explanation of Options:

A.  

Correct — The Excel Connector supports data range operations such as defining, reading, or writing to specific sets of cells within a worksheet.

B.  

Incorrect — The connector does not depend on any installed version of Microsoft Office; it functions independently.

C.  

Incorrect — Interrogation applies to UI applications, not file-based connectors like Excel Connector.

D.  

Correct — The connector works without Excel being installed; it manipulates workbook data directly through file handling APIs.

E.  

Incorrect — When user interaction with Excel is required, Excel Interop (Excel Application Connector) should be used instead of the file-based Excel Connector.

Therefore, the correct statements are A and D.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to the Pega Robotics Interrogation and Matching Engine Documentation:

“When you interrogate controls in a web application using Chrome or Edge browsers without X-ray Vision, Pega Robot Studio utilizes a simplified set of match rules because these browsers do not expose a full DOM structure with automation identifiers.”

The documentation specifies:

“In non-X-ray Vision interrogation mode, the following three match rules are applied automatically to identify a control:

• Attribute Value Match Rule – Matches a control by its defined attribute (such as ‘id’, ‘name’, or ‘class’).

• Property Value Match Rule – Matches the control based on its property values exposed during interrogation (for example, ‘InnerText’ or ‘TagName’).

• Element Path Match Rule – Matches the control by its relative position in the DOM hierarchy.”

It also states:

“Without X-ray Vision, browser-specific identifiers and deep hierarchical context are not available; therefore, only the Attribute Value, Property Value, and Element Path rules are utilized for Chrome and Edge interrogation.”

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio User Guide – Web Adapter and Match Rules Section

Pega Academy – Robotics System Architect Course (Interrogation in Web Applications)

Pega Robotics Help – Interrogation with and without X-ray Vision

Final Verified Answer: B, C, F

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Pega Robotics System (Exact Extract & Context):

According to the Pega Robotics Automation Design and Implementation Guide:

“Robotic Automation is best suited for rule-based, repetitive, and structured tasks that do not require subjective judgment or complex decision-making.”

The guide further clarifies:

“Tasks that involve human decision-making, subjective evaluation, or business judgment are not suitable for automation through RPA, as these require contextual understanding and cognitive reasoning.”

It also specifies:

“Processes that occur infrequently, such as quarterly or annual events, are not ideal candidates for automation due to low execution frequency and limited ROI from automation development and maintenance.”

Therefore:

Option A: Complex processes that require human decision management — ❌ Not suitable, as they depend on human reasoning.

Option D: Rarely occurring processes such as sending annual reports — ❌ Not suitable, since they do not provide sufficient automation value or frequency.

Options B, C, and E describe processes that are well-suited for Pega Robotics (they are repetitive, multi-application, or rules-driven).

Document References (Exact Extracts Source)

Pega Robotics Automation Design and Implementation Guide – Identifying Suitable Tasks for Automation

Pega Robotic Process Automation Studio Training Material – Process Selection and ROI Criteria

Pega Certified Robotics System Architect Study Guide – Automation Best Practices Section

Final Verified Answer: A and D