Crystal ball? I thought it was a secret red phone that only Conservative judges have, that is a direct connection to the founding father's spirits, and they have lengthy discussions with those spirits before they rule. My bad!That's because you don't possess the magical Founding Fathers Crystal Ball™ that comes with every SCOTUS robe and grants the power of twisted perception. Silly poster, thinking that words have plain and obvious meanings. /s
That's because you don't possess the magical Founding Fathers Crystal Ball™ that comes with every SCOTUS robe and grants the power of twisted perception. Silly poster, thinking that words have plain and obvious meanings. /s
That's not in the constitution...Soon to be joined by life, liberty and pursuit of happiness!
Damn! I can feel your pain, fskimo. One of these days you'll be right. Keep on trying champ.
Obama should run for a third term. States can't stop him from being on the ballot, even though we have the 22nd amendment.
Correct me if I'm wrong but did this right wing SCOTUS the very people who allegedly don't legislate from the bench and create law just nullified part of the US Constitution?
How was this guy ever married to Kellyanne.I guess originalism was just bull shit all along. LOL
How was this guy ever married to Kellyanne.
"Fundamentally incoherent": George Conway says "you can see the terror" from SCOTUS in Trump ruling | Salon.com
Award-winning news and culture, features breaking news, in-depth reporting and criticism on politics, science, food and entertainment.www.salon.com
You lost 9-0 chump, but keep on lying, you do it so well.lol - I was right in this case you ridiculous moron.
Hahaha. Excellent self ownage.
You lost 9-0 chump, but keep on lying, you do it so well.
I truly hope it hurts to be this willfully ignorant, you bloviating twatwaffle.You lost 9-0 chump, but keep on lying, you do it so well.
Based on this Supreme Court ruling, which under-35 and/or foreign celebrity should now run for President?
As far as I am aware, Congress has passed no laws on how to implement the age or citizenship requirement for President, so those too are null and void until such legislation passes, exactly per this Supreme Court ruling.
I literally predicted the court would rule this way, in this thread. You can go back and read it!You lost 9-0 chump, but keep on lying, you do it so well.
You are right until SCOTUS Calvinballs it.Based on this Supreme Court ruling, which under-35 and/or foreign celebrity should now run for President?
As far as I am aware, Congress has passed no laws on how to implement the age or citizenship requirement for President, so those too are null and void until such legislation passes, exactly per this Supreme Court ruling.
He can’t help it. Still gargling the orange from his throat. It clearly effect brain matterI literally predicted the court would rule this way, in this thread. You can go back and read it!
You are so comically stupid. Keep going!
If a blue state had decided to allow Muslims into the country in defiance of Trump's Muslim ban SCOTUS would have struck that down in 30 seconds, and rightly so, as it is long, long, long established that immigration is an area of plenary federal authority.LOL no states laws for thee. Only for me. Along party lines, SCOTUS ruled Texas is allowed to enforce their immigration policies they passed in December. But yet election is a constitutional state issue can’t enforce which candidates allowed on the ballot. Come on Newsom, ban guns. Let’s see the outrage from this clown court.
Blue states really need to pull these kinds of stunts. Either the court continues to ruin its legacy and legitimacy, or it actually begins acting in a consistent manner (and of course, pack the court in the meantime)LOL no states laws for thee. Only for me. Along party lines, SCOTUS ruled Texas is allowed to enforce their immigration policies they passed in December. But yet election is a constitutional state issue can’t enforce which candidates allowed on the ballot. Come on Newsom, ban guns. Let’s see the outrage from this clown court.
The way to reconcile it is to recognize that SCOTUS is made up of politicians in robes, but now they have given up the appearance of being nonpartisan and sticking with prior rulings for continuity in favor of just doing whatever they feel like.Really difficult to reconcile this decision allowing states to usurp federal powers while comparing it to the case where CO removed Trump from the ballot ...
Once again the SCOTUS is making up their own laws, ignoring the actual laws, previous SCOTUS rulings, and set presidence that this authority falls on the federal goverment, not the states.. But now, due to the SCOTUS legislating from the bench, It now falls on the states... of course, the clause that is written in invisible ink says this only applies to red states, where in blue states, this authority will still fall under the federal government.LOL no states laws for thee. Only for me. Along party lines, SCOTUS ruled Texas is allowed to enforce their immigration policies they passed in December. But yet election is a constitutional state issue can’t enforce which candidates allowed on the ballot. Come on Newsom, ban guns. Let’s see the outrage from this clown court.
It’s called CalvinballReally difficult to reconcile this decision allowing states to usurp federal powers while comparing it to the case where CO removed Trump from the ballot ...