Discussion RDNA4 + CDNA3 Architectures Thread

Page 117 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,659
6,100
136





With the GFX940 patches in full swing since first week of March, it is looking like MI300 is not far in the distant future!
Usually AMD takes around 3Qs to get the support in LLVM and amdgpu. Lately, since RDNA2 the window they push to add support for new devices is much reduced to prevent leaks.
But looking at the flurry of code in LLVM, it is a lot of commits. Maybe because US Govt is starting to prepare the SW environment for El Capitan (Maybe to avoid slow bring up situation like Frontier for example)

See here for the GFX940 specific commits
Or Phoronix

There is a lot more if you know whom to follow in LLVM review chains (before getting merged to github), but I am not going to link AMD employees.

I am starting to think MI300 will launch around the same time like Hopper probably only a couple of months later!
Although I believe Hopper had problems not having a host CPU capable of doing PCIe 5 in the very near future therefore it might have gotten pushed back a bit until SPR and Genoa arrives later in 2022.
If PVC slips again I believe MI300 could launch before it

This is nuts, MI100/200/300 cadence is impressive.



Previous thread on CDNA2 and RDNA3 here

 
Last edited:

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,219
1,591
136
you dropped this banger the day MS actually refreshed it with relevant h/w for once.
Not being x86 makes my argument to buy a mac even more relevant? If I wanted max efficiency at good performance I would buy a mac. No debate they are the best in that regard. Being on Windows and not x86, I don't know. Would only work for me as a secondary device which I'm not paying $2000 for reasonable hardware in terms of RAM and SSD.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
7,977
6,364
136
it is what it is, 5 years and RTRT hasn't left the gimmick stage.

People will stop caring about it when the next gimmick is revealed. I'm guessing that the next console generation will talk about 8K gaming, and suddenly that will be the new thing everyone is talking about. This generation it was RT, last generation was VR, before that was motion controls. Before that it was HD gaming.

I think the next generation could be 8K gaming. By then the consoles will be close to good enough to do native 4K and they can bake in some upsampling hardware for the people who want to show off their shiny new 8K displays.
 

gdansk

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,454
3,316
136
This makes no sense. Most people have Nvidia anyway.

The issue is that Nvidia for the most part is also not good enough with RT.
Not the point. The mere reveal doesn't do much. There's almost always a generation or two before a new gimmick becomes unused (3D displays), is matched (tessellation) or it becomes a dealbreaker (DLSS).

And in the first two cases people stop caring quickly. But people overlook Radeon now because they haven't caught up in RT or upscaling.
 

inquiss

Member
Oct 13, 2010
65
120
106
Not the point. The mere reveal doesn't do much. There's almost always a generation or two before a new gimmick becomes unused (3D displays), is matched (tessellation) or it becomes a dealbreaker (DLSS).

And in the first two cases people stop caring quickly. But people overlook Radeon now because they haven't caught up in RT or upscaling.
Nvidia is always better because of "The Latest Thing". Doesn't matter what it is or if it's usable or any good. It's "The Latest Thing", and AMD doesn't have that even if it doesn't matter. Buy Nvidia.
 

Kepler_L2

Senior member
Sep 6, 2020
445
1,821
106
Nvidia is always better because of "The Latest Thing". Doesn't matter what it is or if it's usable or any good. It's "The Latest Thing", and AMD doesn't have that even if it doesn't matter. Buy Nvidia.
Unless "The Latest Thing" is superior DX12/Vulkan performance, FP16 or real Async Compute hardware. Then it doesn't matter
 

soresu

Platinum Member
Dec 19, 2014
2,880
2,089
136
Current solutions consist of brute-forcing too much which then brings $2500 GPUs to their knees.

But for Nvidia that's okay because that $2500 GPU is brought to its knees a bit less than the competition and Nvidia's previous $2500 GPU
IMHO for nVidia it's more than OK, because the entire point in pushing RTRT was raster graphics weren't enough to strain GPUs enough anymore at 4K in the high end.

Resolution scaling solutions to this problem like 8K were a non starter for people that don't have a sizable room to play with, the alternative being VR which was still extremely niche at the time they made the decisions, even now it's just not high enough volume to save raster gfx.

Effectively nVidia used RTRT to move the performance target goal posts - without which they were likely worried that consumer GPU sales might have cratered by now, if not in the very near future - certainly without putting time into RTRT code development we can expect that an extra 6 years of raster gfx research would have yielded even more features and perf improvements.

Getting to one up AMD who weren't as focused on hardware RT was just a bonus considering nVidia were already the market leader when Turing dropped.

That being said, in order to continue pushing RTRT with a straight face they have had to research their backsides off (and fund academia to help them) to keep game devs interested with more optimised software techniques like ReSTIR + derivatives, and performance enhancing tricks like DLSS.
 
Last edited:

Vattila

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
805
1,386
136
AMD announced yesterday that "Microsoft is using VMs powered by AMD Instinct MI300X and ROCm software to achieve leading price/performance for GPT workloads".

By the way, Microsoft Azure's November 2023 Eagle system, based on 14400 Nvidia H100 GPUs, ranks #3 on the Top500 supercomputer list. Apparently, Microsoft is now able to seamlessly plug AMD Instinct MI300X GPUs into the same system architecture. According to the Azure CTO, their AI system is now "orders of magnitude" bigger. They are currently deploying the equivalent of "5 of those supercomputers every month". Crazy times!

 

Mahboi

Senior member
Apr 4, 2024
741
1,313
96
3.1 was announced at GDC already, 2 months ago.


I lament this situation.
Crazy as it was to just driver hack into the games, it sounded so cool. Anti Lag + everywhere forever without any "implementation", just have it on once in driver and never care.

The Chad Anti Lag+ hack versus the Virgin Anti Lag 2 that requests implementation in a mailing list.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and marees

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
7,032
7,446
136


I lament this situation.
Crazy as it was to just driver hack into the games, it sounded so cool. Anti Lag + everywhere forever without any "implementation", just have it on once in driver and never care.

The Chad Anti Lag+ hack versus the Virgin Anti Lag 2 that requests implementation in a mailing list.

- AMD shoulda just kept AL+ and had a couple click through warnings about using it with games that have Anti-Cheat in addition to AL2.

Would have been a cool driver level feature for older games that are never going to get a in game implementation.
 

Mahboi

Senior member
Apr 4, 2024
741
1,313
96
- AMD shoulda just kept AL+ and had a couple click through warnings about using it with games that have Anti-Cheat in addition to AL2.

Would have been a cool driver level feature for older games that are never going to get a in game implementation.
I also like to play Chaotic Good every time, but they'd have gotten way too many problems from idiots who wouldn't pay attention and then get VACated.

I would love a little dialogue box in Adrenalin that pops when you click AntiLag+:
"This is a driver/kernel level hack that catches your inputs early to lower your latency. It will be detected as a cheat by most online multiplayer games and you will get banned. Do you still wish to proceed?"
Then you just YOLO click it, forget it, and get banned 3 years later when you install Valorant to see what the hype about.
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,219
1,591
136

branch_suggestion

Senior member
Aug 4, 2023
278
599
96
Form the article I get the vibe this "efficiency" increase is merely from using lower accuracy number formats like FP8
Only 2 of the slides are about number formats, and any future gains there are going to be very small.
The summary slide at the end says nothing about number formats being a driver of future efficiency.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |