Your bleeding heart for those who violently broke into that building Jan 6th, tells us more than your words of denial ever will.
You have chosen your side in the civil war. And I think you know this. No further words will suffice.
Your bleeding heart for those who violently broke into that building Jan 6th, tells us more than your words of denial ever will.Can you name one person who has ever said "thank you" for such a reward? Would you say yes if you were offered 30 million to get shot to death today?
It say's that shooting an unarmed woman isn't a good idea. She was absolutely part of a riot, and deserved to be punished for that. Would you prefer that all rioters be treated the same way? Just have the police line up and open fire?
Back on topic, Babbit wasn't rewarded, she was killed.
Also, not that it matters in terms of her criminal activities on 1/6, for which she 100% deserved to be shot, but she was a real piece of shit in the Air Force too. After TWELVE YEARS she was an E-4. As a point of comparison I was an E-5 after about two years. I made rank fast, but 12 year E-4 is a joke. I suspect she got busted down for misconduct as otherwise I don't know how you make it that long without getting the boot.Babbit was shot trying to enter the Speaker's Lobby through a broken window in a door. She was warned. If she had made it through the door and approached those inside the inner chamber she would have been warned and shot. What do people like you think Babbit and the many insurrectionists would do in that chamber if they breached it? Sit around with their hands in their pockets shooting the breeze. The insurrectionists were violent and calling for the hanging of Mike Pence. This shoot was justified and the Babbit family should not receive anything. I would have supported other violent insurrectionists being warned and shot. And the final disgrace, trump giving them all pardons. It's amazing to me how MAGAs have little to no critical thinking skills.
"Ashli Babbitt was fatally shot on January 6, 2021, by a U.S. Capitol Police officer during the Capitol riot. She was attempting to climb through a broken window in the Speaker's Lobby, where rioters had breached a security perimeter. The officer, Lt. Michael Byrd, fired his weapon after yelling for the rioters to retreat. Babbitt was a 35-year-old Air Force veteran and QAnon supporter, according to a news report. "
It say's that shooting an unarmed woman isn't a good idea. She was absolutely part of a riot, and deserved to be punished for that. Would you prefer that all rioters be treated the same way? Just have the police line up and open fire?
Back on topic, Babbit wasn't rewarded, she was killed.
That's the stupidest shit I read today ))))))))))It say's that shooting an unarmed woman isn't a good idea.
You inconsistencies are stunningWhy do we have to go to the childish personal insults?
You made the foolish statement that Babbit was rewarded, I pointed out that she wasn't rewarded and was in fact killed. There isn't anything arguable about that statement, Babbit is absolutely dead. So it's my position that being shot to death is never a reward for the person being shot. I've been reliably informed that it's often very uncomfortable.
I mean no. On the grounds of them being dead and everything.Can you name one person who has ever said "thank you" for such a reward?
Why am I paying taxes if it’s just getting squandered by sending the money to families of violent traitors? Seems like an easy target for the fake department of government efficiency.
Don’t worry greenman might still have more to say.That's the stupidest shit I read today ))))))))))
That's pretty much my issue in a nutshell. Dead isn't a reward. Getting thirty million for being dead doesn't help. If there was a price to be paid for her actions, she paid it. The dead part just ruins everything after that.I mean no. On the grounds of them being dead and everything.
If she hadn't committed a crime would 30M have been paid out?That's pretty much my issue in a nutshell. Dead isn't a reward. Getting thirty million for being dead doesn't help. If there was a price to be paid for her actions, she paid it. The dead part just ruins everything after that.
I think my statement stands on it's own, Babbit wasn't given a 30 million dollar reward for her actions. The headline to this thread is false.
IThat's pretty much my issue in a nutshell. Dead isn't a reward. Getting thirty million for being dead doesn't help. If there was a price to be paid for her actions, she paid it. The dead part just ruins everything after that.
I think my statement stands on it's own, Babbit wasn't given a 30 million dollar reward for her actions. The headline to this thread is false.
It doesn't seem like a reward since she's dead.
That's close, but Babbit wasn't actually given the award, her family was. Dead people can't file a lawsuit, someone has to do it on their behalf on account of them being dead and all.I
mean thats a pretty semantic argument! She was given $30m. You can call it a reward or an award or compensation but that doesn't change the facts.
That's close, but Babbit wasn't actually given the award, her family was. Dead people can't file a lawsuit, someone has to do it on their behalf on account of them being dead and all.
It is all semantics, and semantics matter. The thread tittle is inaccurate and misleading.
Trump didn't award Ashleigh Babbit anything. This statement is both semantically and factually correct.
Such an odd hill to choose to die on….That's close, but Babbit wasn't actually given the award, her family was. Dead people can't file a lawsuit, someone has to do it on their behalf on account of them being dead and all.
It is all semantics, and semantics matter. The thread tittle is inaccurate and misleading.
Trump didn't award Ashleigh Babbit anything. This statement is both semantically and factually correct.
The settlement came from DOJ. You are an idiot if you think Trump didn’t approve that.That's close, but Babbit wasn't actually given the award, her family was. Dead people can't file a lawsuit, someone has to do it on their behalf on account of them being dead and all.
It is all semantics, and semantics matter. The thread tittle is inaccurate and misleading.
Trump didn't award Ashleigh Babbit anything. This statement is both semantically and factually correct.
There is a reason he thinks thatcolored man
What were her family given the the reward for?That's close, but Babbit wasn't actually given the award, her family was. Dead people can't file a lawsuit, someone has to do it on their behalf on account of them being dead and all.
It is all semantics, and semantics matter. The thread tittle is inaccurate and misleading.
Trump didn't award Ashleigh Babbit anything. This statement is both semantically and factually correct.
What was the settlement for if it wasn't an award for her ILLEGAL actions, that ultimately caused her death because she chose to be there, she chose to join the insurrection in their violant attempt to enter and harm congressional members, she chose to not head the warnings to stop, and continued to attempt to enter thru the broken window? Before answering, keep in mind, Her death was 100% her doing, as she CHOSE to be a part of a violant group of poeple with the intentions of harming congressional members and the Vice President, and chose to not head the warnings.That's pretty much my issue in a nutshell. Dead isn't a reward. Getting thirty million for being dead doesn't help. If there was a price to be paid for her actions, she paid it. The dead part just ruins everything after that.
I think my statement stands on it's own, Babbit wasn't given a 30 million dollar reward for her actions. The headline to this thread is false.