Not really, no, lmao.You re hitting 100% on several cores when just downloading a page with a 100-300Mb internet connection
You're not doing full 30W there over the full workload and most LNL SKUs are 17W anyhow.so a transient but at full 30W on such a laptop.
Very true.
View attachment 123853
This is idle activity on my main laptop. Just tons of browser tabs in Chrome, Firefox and Brave.
Yeah. Only time it makes me angry is when the 32GB RAM gets to 95% and then the crazy paging starts.im sure it still does basic browsing etc snappy
That's pL2 and that's transient on LNL.
Irrelevant metric.
LNL was never built around maximizing nT perf@20W.
It handily wins over KRK1 at actually doing Laptop Things (at a price. pretty steep price mind you).
Plainly speaking, you're dumb. As bricks.
Wow an irrelevant metric. next.the CB R23 scores dont lie.
Quite the contrary, CB R23 scores are proportional to power, you can see that the delta is quite low between all models, at 37W it does about 11k, comparatively the AI 350 does at best 17.9k at 65W, we can infer that at 15W it does about 10k.Wow an irrelevant metric. next.
We can also try the 2024 cinememe, it hates AMD cores with passion.
Who the hell cares about cinememe scores on ultrathin laptop parts?Quite the contrary, CB R23 scores are proportional to power, you can see that the delta is quite low between all models, at 37W it does about 11k, comparatively the AI 350 does at best 17.9k at 65W, we can infer that at 15W it does about 10k.
LNL has lower 1t power and is generally more efficient at doing laptop stuff on both SOC and platform level.
But it ain't free.
It's literally forever.As already said the era of 1T is long gone
Indeed. That's why LNL wins at doing Laptop Things.and with bursty loads the CPU wont reach its thermal limit
That's not how bursty workloads work.if a single core can reach 15-17W then in any bursty workload the CPU will reach 30-34W for two cores
As already said the era of 1T is long gone, and with bursty loads the CPU wont reach its thermal limit, hence all bursts will reach the max TDP or close, if a single core can reach 15-17W then in any bursty workload the CPU will reach 30-34W for two cores, if there s 3 cores loaded then each will use 11W, and if there s 4 it will be 8W/core.
This isn't relevant anymore since AAPL is creeping closer and closer to node Vmax.watch this, start from 5:20 and watch till 8:30
yeah, ghetto is good.however Zen6 LP cores should help a lot if the right threads are allocated to the LP cores.
Lol, it does better in advertisement and gullibility of the general public, wich you seems to be part of, same Asus Vivobook laptops and about the same wifi websurfing time as a HX370 :It's literally forever.
Indeed. That's why LNL wins at doing Laptop Things.
That's not how bursty workloads work.
I almost miss Andrei and his AT SPEC runs that had total workload energy in joules.
It just does better.it does better in advertisement and gullibility of the general public
well yeah it's defined by the OLED turd here.same Asus Vivobook laptops and about the same wifi websurfing time as a HX370 :
It just does better.
well yeah it's defined by the OLED turd here.
Try something like X1c LNL.
Both have an OLED, that s the same ASUS Vivobooks 14" laptops set apart for the CPU, and if you look at the battery life at full load, both 75Wh, it will be exhausted while having processed only 50-60% of the work done by the HX370 using the same energy.
View attachment 123868
View attachment 123874
I wouldn't take that battery chart as gospel, if you actually read what they tested LNL will get battery life for real world tasks while also being up to 10 degrees cooler which is a huge difference.
The HX 370 is not tuned for ultrathin laptops as LNL is.
If only we lived in a timeline where any man on the street could pre-order a halo Threadripper!Now don’t all rush for preorders!