JP was mentioned in another thread and I didn't want to de-rail that thread hence I created this one.
In that thread someone suggested that he produced insightful content in 2017, so I did a bit of browsing around and finally came to the conclusion that he's always been a bit of a nut.
I scan-read an article by The Guardian then decided that the best thing to do was to go straight to the source:
Parenting premieres May 25th, only on DailyWire+. Jordan B. Peterson is a Canadian professor of psychology, clinical psychologist, YouTube personality, best-selling author and host of the #1 Education Podcast, "The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast." Watch the entirety of Dr. Peterson's catalog on...
www.youtube.com
I sorted the videos by oldest first, and watched the first which mercifully is only 13 minutes long:
I didn't get far into it to be honest.
And you don't see that as a problem? Look, I can fully understand closing the door on people coming to your door selling some religion or other. We have limited time and attention and discriminate as to where we want to put our resources. You know from past experiences what was rewarding to you and what was a waste of time and bases on that you have formed judgments based on a consistency of stereotypes. You could say you have a bullshit meter. Well so do I. What you have done here and in my opinion, according to my bullshit meter is concluded on a brief exposure to Peterson judgments about him you had prior to listening to him. So you didn't hear what he was saying but were listening to your past experience. This is also what bigots do. When a white racist looks at a person of color, they are not looking at that person as an individual to to all the shit ass beliefs of the bigots who told them what to believe. And every white racist bigot is of the opinion that what they believe about people of people of color is the absolute truth.
So, while you are free to think as you wish, the certainty with which you state what are just opinions are worthless to me. Why would I want to buy into someone expressing opinions as if they were fact while making no effort whatsoever to back them up with example. You look to me to be both intellectually lazy and egotistically opinionated.
The warning signs were "I'm an ex-atheist", "God created man and woman so everything divides into masculine and feminine and one needs the other to make a whole", "the patriarchy isn't a thing", "modern people don't think like this", and "women make men self-conscious" then I more or less gave up there. It comes across as a long ramble along the lines of "I found God, now I'm going to mash everything else I can think of into that belief", rather like the fear/love scale in the film 'Donnie Darko'.
Please mount a defense of everything Peterson said to which you disagree. Take his side in a way the indicates you understand where he was coming from. Start stating the positives of arguing as an ex-atheist.
More warning signs IMO are vague topic titles and immensely long video clips like this gem here:
More indications that your stereotyping were triggered.
The Guardian summarised this clip as:
So he does not mind laws that prevent hate speech but will object to forced speech being ordered to use what he believes are not proper gender terms. Surely you would not mind being forced to say I am right.
To which my response is "diddums", and you know when someone is full of shit when they start unleashing terms like "the radical left".
Oh my God you just used the term radical left diddums to you.
JP's style very much reminds me of other cranks I've seen on the Internet. One in particular was on a newsgroup or forum over twenty years ago and their signature said something like "Who is I?" followed by some apparently-random characters like "** QO RP I GB ZX** " as if inviting other users to explore the deep inner meaning to their pseudointellectual bullshit.
Is that so. And why would I give a shit. I notice that whenever an argument requires a modicum of brain power to engage in many start screaming pseudo-intellectual bull shit. Every time I see somebody use the term pseudo-intellectual bullshit. Diddums to that.
I'm open to a persuasive argument but one thing I refuse to do is to watch a ~hour long YT clip with only vague justification for why I should potentially waste my time with it. The only time I'll watch hour-long video clips when the topic very much interests me. By all means quote a bit, or cite a few minutes of a clip.
Yes yes, I am also open to persuasive argument and naturally I'm a world authority on what one should look like, I have 429 precise rules you will have to meet before you can qualify and being able to engage in one.
Try watching a few clips where is is reported that Peterson takes down this and that number of liberals, all as much bull shit as the ones that portray him as triggered or being handed his ass.