Given your posting history, I cannot tell if you are serious.
Do you feel Republicans benefit when they directly tell voters to !@#$ off and die?
I am starting to think this Elon guy isn’t really a free speech absolutist.I just got a week off Twitter for asking Joni why she wasn't dead yet.
Go figure..🤔
Are you forgetting that GQP voters repeatedly vote for leopards to eat their faces?Given your posting history, I cannot tell if you are serious.
Do you feel Republicans benefit when they directly tell voters to !@#$ off and die?
Are you forgetting that GQP voters repeatedly vote for leopards to eat their faces?
Unless Ernst gets primaried, her seat is pretty safe in Iowa. It's not a ruby red state (Obama actually won it twice) but it would take a LOT for a Democrat to win state-wide.
Hopefully some before others.Why even bother to have healthcare anyway? We're all going to die regardless!
If you eliminate democracy and arm very well like North Korea leadership, why not?Given your posting history, I cannot tell if you are serious.
Do you feel Republicans benefit when they directly tell voters to !@#$ off and die?
He is, so long as you are attacking brown peopleI am starting to think this Elon guy isn’t really a free speech absolutist.
True, what is even the point of making murder illegal we all die anyways.Why do we need private gun ownership? We're all going to die anyway.
That's a pretty safe bet considering who their leader is lol.Lying?
You base this on the ones saying it are in the GOP.
Trump voters still think they hold some sort of moral high ground, amusing but not funnyThat's a pretty safe bet considering who their leader is lol.
Why do we need private gun ownership? We're all going to die anyway.
Trump: We must do more to save our American victims for our Great American KillersWhy are we scared of all these brown people that might kill us (not really, they commit less crimes per capita than native citizens), we're all gonna die anyway.
Evidence that millions don’t qualify under current rules?
But they already do that. Do you suspect that with budgetary cuts, they'll be able to do it harder?
How many organizations are you aware of that function better with less funding?
Who, in your estimation, should be denied medical care?
Too many variables to answer this broad question....
But if you are asking who should be denied medicare and medicaid the answer is simple. Anyone that does not meet the requirements to draw medicare and medicaid should be denied coverage under these programs. That being said I think life threatening medical services have to be given regardless of any insurance coverage.
I was reading just a few days ago about how the California Medi-Cal program is failed / failing.Too many poor people not enough money...
He would be willing to displace 100,000 people just to catch 10 cheaters. Even if those 10 don't exist he'll just parrot the Trump claim anyway.Define “given”
Medi-cal failing? Obvious answer is to cut funding. Thatll teach those poors not to be poor anymore.
Define “given”
Medi-cal failing? Obvious answer is to cut funding. Thatll teach those poors not to be poor anymore.
No, I asked you that question. Since we're now engaged in the discussion, do you think your answer is actually appropriate? That the organization whos budget is being cut is going to be expected to do more work on top of their existing work? Would that work in any other circumstance, industry, etc?HE asked me who was doing it and I answered him.