That must be why they've suffered a million casualties attempting to defeat a country with a GDP about half that of Connecticut.In case you all needed another reminder on which country has the best defense industry in the world, the NATO head is telling you it’s Russia.
Has to be 1 or 2:Orban of all people calling out Russia's military as a piece of shit.
'Russians are too weak' — Orban questions Moscow's ability to attack NATO
"The Russians are too weak for that," Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said.kyivindependent.com
As a warmongering nation you'd be terrifying if only you were not so absolutely incompetent.In case you all needed another reminder on which country has the best defense industry in the world, the NATO head himself is telling you it’s Russia.
It is next level delusion (or lying) that Russia, unable to defeat a country half as wealthy as Connecticut, thinks now it can take on the most powerful military in human history.In a conventional conflict, NATO would tap dance all over what's left of the hollowed out carcass of Russia in about 48hrs. Max.
The point is US is not going to risk war with Russia over a attack on Finland or Sweden or any other EU country.
And why would they? They just got their asses handed to them by the Houthi’s:
🫵😂
If you want to talk about aircraft carriers should we talk about the Admiral Kuznetsov?
The Real Truth About the Russian Carrier Kuznetsov
He is not.Orban of all people calling out Russia's military as a piece of shit.
The point is US is not going to risk war with Russia over a attack on Finland or Sweden or any other EU country.
And why would they? They just got their asses handed to them by the Houthi’s:
🫵😂
Unrelated but the Kuz made an appearance in the new mission impossible movie and the rear admiral in charge of the US carrier group pretended to be very afraid of it. I almost burst out laughing. Sorta novel to see it underway though and not looking like an erupting volcano.
Uno!I forgot how many aircraft carriers does Russia have?
How many boats did Russia loose in a land war with Ukraine?
Damn AI special effects are really coming along.Unrelated but the Kuz made an appearance in the new mission impossible movie and the rear admiral in charge of the US carrier group pretended to be very afraid of it. I almost burst out laughing. Sorta novel to see it underway though and not looking like an erupting volcano.
1-Why would Russia risk a nuclear war over Finland and Sweden?
2-What does Russia gain out of doing nuclear strikes on Finland and Sweden?
Air Operations on a aircraft carrier are not easy. Yes sometimes s$%t happens and things go overboard.
If you want to talk about aircraft carriers should we talk about the Admiral Kuznetsov?
The Real Truth About the Russian Carrier Kuznetsov
Holy shit that thing just floats around the sea pumping a massive black soot flag into the atmosphere, letting everyone as far away as Montana know exactly where is big bad soviet aircraft carrier?
I mean, if it could float, I guess.
how fucking pathetic
The Kuz lost, badly, a battle against its own dry dock.
got me thinking.
why doesn't Ukraine modify their drones to just drop bottles of Ukrainian vodka on the orcs rather than bombs? Imagine how much more damage Russians are capable of doing to themselves than they ever are to anyone else?
I think the true reason is it would be such an overmatch that nukes would be Russia's only means of staying in the fight. Russia can't keep the fight conventional since they can't compete so escalation would be needed.Regardless, you're right that the US doesn't want to fight Russia but that's because you aren't worth the time or effort. We would much prefer you simply stop invading your neighbors and attend to your country's problems.
The point is US is not going to risk war with Russia over a attack on Finland or Sweden or any other EU country.
And why would they? They just got their asses handed to them by the Houthi’s:
🫵😂
@Young Grasshopper will suffer after that new.If anyone here really believes Russia can “produce 1500 tanks this year”…well, hate to rain on that tank parade.
Maybe, maybe, if they borrow North Korean labor and steel and factories to build those tanks, but let’s see how reliable those are. My guess is they’ll do about as well as that new NK destroyer they launched and sunk in 2.5 seconds.
Armada Sunset: Soviet and Russian tanks suitable for restoration and repair will run out in 2025
The number of tanks at Russian storage bases by the end of 2024 had decreased by half since the start of the war in Ukraine, from approximately 7,300 to 3,500. However, this does not mean that all the remaining tanks are suitable for restoration and repair: newer and better-conditioned vehicles...re-russia.net
That too, yes. That being said I don’t view Russia using nukes as a very likely thing absent an actual invasion that looks like it will succeed.I think the true reason is it would be such an overmatch that nukes would be Russia's only means so staying in the fight. Russia can't keep the fight conventional since they can't compete so escalation would be needed.