Actually though, where are the leaks or sources that alledge or confirm that it will be Raptor Cove on Intel 7, I have seen nothing in that regard. Can anyone tie this together ? Maybe there is still hope for RWC and a newer node if this is ever going to be customer facing, which I doubt.I think Bartlet Lake would have been more interesting on Intel3 with Redwood cove cores instead of raptor cove on 7. While RWC is by no means a huge upgrade, it has already been implemented on Intel3 (and would have been far enough along during Bartlett lake development to have been used). As we see on Arrow Lake U, it clocks high enough for good ST performance, but would have shined with all 12 cores fully loaded and the process advantage could show itself.
I think it was leaked somewhere but Bartlett is on Intel 7 using Raptor Cove cause Bartlett lake process family processor has been launched on ark.Actually though, where are the leaks or sources that alledge or confirm that it will be Raptor Cove on Intel 7, I have seen nothing in that regard. Can anyone tie this together ? Maybe there is still hope for RWC and a newer node if this is ever going to be customer facing, which I doubt.
This is for the Embedded market lol not for general also it has SR-IOV on an iGPU damm 😍.View attachment 124861
At least based on that PDF, it could be Raptor Cove, unless they have made a new die compatible with LGA1700.
It's also funny that they say long life availability but then refuse to commit. Which one is it, Intel? Are you implying here that in 10 years, you may not have any fabs to provide these CPUs?
I seriously doubt 12P cores on Intel's last gen architecture and node is going to beat 9800x3D. And if you need more cores, there is 9950x3D. I know it is not on one CCD, but I think AMDs more efficient and modern core design, along with the vcache will more than cancel out the latency penalty of dual CCDs. I'm not even sure it will beat 14900K. It all depends on what sort of frequencies they are able to get at a manageable power usage. If they have to sacrifice clockspeed to get power and temps under control, I dont hold out much hope for significant improvement over 14900k.
Probably not. Best hope is that it boots. That's it. Microsoft won't let AMD validate newer CPUs for Win10. Especially after the support period ends.I just hope it has WIN10 drivers and works fine with WIN10.
I think Bartlet Lake would have been more interesting on Intel3 with Redwood cove cores instead of raptor cove on 7. While RWC is by no means a huge upgrade, it has already been implemented on Intel3 (and would have been far enough along during Bartlett lake development to have been used). As we see on Arrow Lake U, it clocks high enough for good ST performance, but would have shined with all 12 cores fully loaded and the process advantage could show itself.
Probably not. Best hope is that it boots. That's it. Microsoft won't let AMD validate newer CPUs for Win10. Especially after the support period ends.
I think even with HT off, 12 P-cores would perform well enough. Critical game threads shouldn't exceed 10.
Definitely coming for NEX/OEMAnd can anyone read the report clearly and understand what it means? Is this still more a rumor or is it confirmed that this 12 P core Bartlett Lake chip is indeed coming?
Or is it coming for sure its just a matter of whether it will have a consumer variant unlocked, but definitely coming for NEX OEMs??
Definitely coming for NEX/OEM
Probably i don't know that but I haven't heard it for general release.If it just for NEX and OEM would hat mean it is for sure locked for RAM and ring and CPU core overclocking?
Probably i don't know that but I haven't heard it for general release.
Some large customers must have specifically asked for this otherwise why would they go to the trouble of creating a separate die and doing all the extensive validation and whatnot. And if it comes with AVX-512, they either need to unlock RAM overclocking or release it as part of a quad channel HEDT chipset because AVX-512 needs a lot of bandwidth to be worthwhile.just new die with 4 e-core clusters of 4 e-cores swapped for 4 P cores as a 4-core e-core cluster takes similar die space to 1 P core.
But if its to come at all I hope within a month in like July.
No AVX-512 afaik maybe they will enable itSome large customers must have specifically asked for this otherwise why would they go to the trouble of creating a separate die and doing all the extensive validation and whatnot. And if it comes with AVX-512, they either need to unlock RAM overclocking or release it as part of a quad channel HEDT chipset because AVX-512 needs a lot of bandwidth to be worthwhile.
Recent software support developments strengthen this speculation, with diagnostic utility AIDA64 explicitly adding "improved support for Intel Bartlett Lake-S CPU" in its 7.65.7404 beta release notes from April 13, 2025. This update precedes any consumer launch announcement, suggesting possible platform expansion. MSI-affiliated overclocker Toppc amplified these rumors by highlighting the AIDA64 changelog while referencing undisclosed developments under NDA, a pattern historically preceding consumer product launches.
Intel "Bartlett Lake-S" Gaming CPU is Possible, More Hints Appear for a 12 P-Core SKU
Intel's "Bartlett Lake-S" architecture, previously only offered for edge and networking deployment, may spawn a 12 P-core variant for gamers that eliminates efficiency cores entirely. This hopeful configuration would specifically target applications that benefit from consistent single-threaded...www.techpowerup.com
Some large customers must have specifically asked for this otherwise why would they go to the trouble of creating a separate die and doing all the extensive validation and whatnot. And if it comes with AVX-512, they either need to unlock RAM overclocking or release it as part of a quad channel HEDT chipset because AVX-512 needs a lot of bandwidth to be worthwhile.
Replace 4 E-core clusters with 4 P cores.
Lorem Ipsum-S when???I don't think AMD can compete with the SKUs @igor_kavinski would you buy such a SKU?
First time you hear about it? It is already widely available since Tiger Lake. I'm using it on Linux QEMU with a 12600K. Software support is behind though, it took a while to get a combination between Linux Kernel version, custom Intel i915 Driver, OVMF UEFI Firmware and VM Windows Intel GPU Drivers that actually worked.This is for the Embedded market lol not for general also it has SR-IOV on an iGPU damm 😍.
and comes with a longer warrantyRaptor Cove supports 256GB.
With RnG for killing itself 🙂and comes with a longer warranty