It's not a legit slide deck from AMD until you find embarrassing typos.
seems typo from AMD. it's Verona
Embedded cooling, aka DARPA ICEcool.https://wccftech.com/next-gen-hbm-a...gb-capacity-per-24-hi-stack-embedded-cooling/
Looking at the details for HBM4, the memory aims to offer a data rate of 8 Gbps with a 2048-bit IO, 2.0 TB/s of memory bandwidth per stack, 24 Gb capacity per die for up to 36-48 GB memory capacity, and a per-stack power package of 75W. HBM4 goes with the standard direct-to-chip (D2C) Liquid cooling and employs a custom HBM-based die (HBM-LPDDR).
Interestingly, AMD's Instinct MI400, which launches next year too, takes things up a notch versus Rubin and is aiming to offer 432 GB of HBM4 capacity with memory bandwidth of up to 19.6 TB/s.
View attachment 125570
Lmao no, yearly shader cores in GPGPU (new or derived) await.Surely they can occasionally pull people off the hellscape that is GPGPU.
I don't get this.Ryzen AI with RDNA5?
They aren't.Microsoft claiming their next gaming consoles are basically Windows handhelds
I can explain this. Semicustom parts with high volume vs off the shelf parts with low volume.I don't get this.
On one side we have leakers claiming AMD's mobile APUs will start watering down their iGPUs because the market isn't interesting enough. On the other side we see Microsoft claiming their next gaming consoles are basically Windows handhelds running on present and future mobile APUs from AMD.
Which one is it?
You misunderstand the announcement.I don't get this.
On one side we have leakers claiming AMD's mobile APUs will start watering down their iGPUs because the market isn't interesting enough. On the other side we see Microsoft claiming their next gaming consoles are basically Windows handhelds running on present and future mobile APUs from AMD.
Which one is it?
Can Intel match this?there it is.
yeah, it's 12 stacks of HBM4.
I mean, console wise they already were.AMD and Xbox have become long-term partners
Surface is like a company of its own.Honestly I'm surprised that they aren't more in sync on the Surface side of things.
Both scheduled for H2 next yearI would be shocked if UDNA being implemented in XBox earlier than regular platform APUs.
Xbox Series X was released 10th november.I would be shocked if UDNA being implemented in XBox earlier than regular platform APUs.
Actually that's pretty par for the course.I would be shocked if UDNA being implemented in XBox earlier than regular platform APUs.
Oh ye RDNA5/UDNA/woteva dGPUs will likely launch pretty close to at least one console.Xbox Series X was released 10th november.
6800XT(RDNA2 uarch) - 18th november
So i assume RDNA5/Xbox next gonna be same route
None.Be interesting to see where Valve lands in terms of what semi custom stuff they have next on their roadmap with AMD.
For what reason?None.
Valve got told to pound sand.
Pathetic volumes.For what reason?
Van Gogh was made for that dual screen Surface dingus that got canned.Does Steam Deck not sell well enough to justify the VG production
Steam Deck in terms of volume is sad. Even the pathetic Wii u sold moreFor what reason?
Does Steam Deck not sell well enough to justify the VG production and AMD/TSMC are bitter about this?
Or is Valve delinquent on paying chip royalties?
We will address optimizations for RDNA 4 in future releases, trying to align with the HIP SDK release.
AMD might set a baseline of chip/family of CPU/GPU that allow for native xbox gameplay that lets other OEMs build "Xbox consoles" or something like that