Really felt like it should have been a 7900 xt and 7800 xt, with pricing similar pricing had they debuted at 999, and 650 or 700 it would have felt much better. Since we are already seeing price drops or lack of demand at these prices next gen maybe we can see some changes to more reasonable...
Seems there are power consumption issues in some circumstances, guess we will see if this can be corrected in the drivers. Going to have to see if they can get that sorted and what impact it's having on performance, if any.
Seeing these different clock speeds, clocking behavior, power behavior, and it's current issues. I am quite excited to see how this goes in the future, looks like there are a lot of performance, and performance per watt improvements to be had.
Looks like it's what was expected, with some issues which was going to happen with a new design like this. Hopefully they can get it figured out and fix a lot of the issues in the drivers
Now that they have these MCD's, sounds like they can greatly reduce the time and cost of MCD's across generations, and only do a major update on those when it's really needed.
I was a bit disappointed at first look at this, but going over it again today and looking at the competition it actually looks quite good and especially the path into the future. Those memory cache chiplets make a ton of sense for GPU's as unlike the CPU, depending on the GPU they already have a...
For the size, transistors, and power, the disappointment is the RT performance. It really needed 2x RT performance, it's looking like even larger RT vs raster deficit, as raster performance increased more than RT performance.
But it's good to see this new design, I was expecting something...
AMD fell behind around Vega for a few years, then marketing and group think persist the perception. It takes a few generations with competitive products to turn that around.
That latency should be pretty obvious on anything active, sort of like how I used to go for 90+FPS in games even though I only had a 60hz monitor simply because it was more responsive.
Yeah looks like those stock power consumption numbers are just way out there, and looks like we are getting very little out of it.
I do like the new boost behavior, just seems that the stock power limit is higher than it should be.
That doesn't sound like how it boosts, rather it is designed to hit 95c no matter what cooler you have if it can still draw more power. So instead with more standard cooling it would pull less power and run slightly slower.
This CPU runs way different than previous generations, with the way it boosts, it's power targets and how it handles cooling. So with high end cooling and those high power limits, stock it's going to pull a ton of power.
I am wondering if worse cooling will have better efficiency stock as it...
Every time I see more DLSS3.0 info it sounds worse, and depending on the monitor the monitor refresh rate vs FPS it could be even worse. Sounds like it's only there for marketing a high fake framerates.
I can see it now, "DLSS4.0, we take an 8k native path traced image and with the magic of AI, turn it into a blurry artifact ridden mess and render it at 1000fps!"
I assume this is a response to the NVidia launch, and in certain cases getting rid of inventory where it's needed before the RDNA3 launch. Rather than being reflective of where we will see RDNA3 pricing
I had already been looking forward to seeing RDNA3 as I am expecting something quite...
Hopefully with the new packaging for RDNA3, that moving forward they will disrupt in a similar way to Ryzen and we can see some positive change for users
How many frames can DLSS3.0 insert from old data, if it can just keep rendering frames without waiting for the CPU at all, it will be funny seeing 1080p benchmarks with DLSS3.0 on something that's easy to render but is strongly CPU bottlenecked, you could see some stupid high frame rates from...
This is exciting to see the new packaging! Though I don't need a GPU upgrade as I got a reference 6800xt from AMD, I am excited to see what this generation brings, and what it looks like moving forward.
Nice to see tech moving at such a rapid pace again
I am happy to hear this, gives them more room at the higher end, especially if they want to add more cores and high clocks, plus they now have that GPU integrated. I expect most designs won't be max power, but good to have the headroom for top end chips.
start with 4s and reduce it's time by half(50%) what do you get?
start with 4s make it 100% faster what do you get?
Like in AMD's case if it's a 31% reduction in the time it takes, it's 1/.31 faster or 45% faster
Seeing that 5.52Ghz in gaming and not just a simple single thread max, along with any IPC gains, and DDR5, should see a good boost. Though should be interesting compared to 5800x3D. I wonder if we will see v-cache CPU's later on, or will we see that in Zen5.
But as others have said, a lot of it...
Anyone done more testing of FSR2.0's sharpening? To me a lot of these issues look like they are sharpening artifacts with the default sharpening setting.
NVidia knows DLSS will get less adoption moving forward with both Intel and AMD having solutions as well as AMD being in consoles which will have a way higher adoption rate of FSR2.0 as consoles will get the most out of it. Plus since FSR2.0 also works on NVidia GPU's why even bother to...
It's going to be real nice seeing IC in the next generations, as size increases won't be to crucial from where it's starting, also AMD doesn't have to use top end performance vram. Leaving more room and resources for other things
I was just watching this video, quite interesting. It also gives another potential reason why the RTX cards do worse at 1080p and 1440p compared with 4k vs RDNA cards, and is this something NVidia can fix.
Well after some more research, I think I narrowed it down to the B550 PG Velocita, and the x570 PG Velocita. Right now leaning towards the x570, because of the extra SATA slots, wifi and bios flashback
Trying to decide on which motherboard I should pickup for the 5900x I just ordered, looking in the 150-200ish range. Thinking one of those less expensive x570's, any suggestions, anything I should avoid or that are extra good for their price?
I would suggest anyone looking for a CPUs(5900x or 5950x especially) to check AMD.com direct Thursdays between 11:30 and 12 eastern, usually around 11:40.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.