1=.99999~

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SammyG

Senior member
Jul 22, 2004
275
0
0
Originally posted by: dudeman007
1/3=.333
2/3=size of a alternator
1=10 lbs bulk meat
.999=spider
airplane taking off on treadmill=???

=profit

Wow.



You totally forgot to carry the one. And then integrate.
 

legoman666

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,628
1
0
Originally posted by: dudeman007

airplane taking off on treadmill=???

I dont understand how people can possibly think that the airplane will take off. The only purpose of the wheels on the plane during take off is to hold the weight of the plane until the plane is moving fast enough through the air for the wings to generate enough lift to allow the plane to take off.

So, a plane "moving" on a treadmill will have 0 air speed velocity, and therefore 0 lift. Thus, it will not take off. End of story.
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: dudeman007

airplane taking off on treadmill=???

I dont understand how people can possibly think that the airplane will take off. The only purpose of the wheels on the plane during take off is to hold the weight of the plane until the plane is moving fast enough through the air for the wings to generate enough lift to allow the plane to take off.

So, a plane "moving" on a treadmill will have 0 air speed velocity, and therefore 0 lift. Thus, it will not take off. End of story.

So what you're trying to say is: If a helicopter were parked on a large turntable with the turntable spinning at the same rotational speed and direction as the rotors on the helicopter, the helicopter wouldn?t take off?
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: RichUK
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: dudeman007

airplane taking off on treadmill=???

I dont understand how people can possibly think that the airplane will take off. The only purpose of the wheels on the plane during take off is to hold the weight of the plane until the plane is moving fast enough through the air for the wings to generate enough lift to allow the plane to take off.

So, a plane "moving" on a treadmill will have 0 air speed velocity, and therefore 0 lift. Thus, it will not take off. End of story.

So what you're trying to say is: If a helicopter were parked on a large turntable with the turntable spinning at the same rotational speed and direction as the rotors on the helicopter, the helicopter wouldn?t take off?

I've actually tried that. 4 people died.
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: RichUK
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: dudeman007

airplane taking off on treadmill=???

I dont understand how people can possibly think that the airplane will take off. The only purpose of the wheels on the plane during take off is to hold the weight of the plane until the plane is moving fast enough through the air for the wings to generate enough lift to allow the plane to take off.

So, a plane "moving" on a treadmill will have 0 air speed velocity, and therefore 0 lift. Thus, it will not take off. End of story.

So what you're trying to say is: If a helicopter were parked on a large turntable with the turntable spinning at the same rotational speed and direction as the rotors on the helicopter, the helicopter wouldn?t take off?

I've actually tried that. 4 people died.

I remember that, good thing the cops tackled you before you got anymore shots off.

 

legoman666

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,628
1
0
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What the fuck does a treadmill have to do with the airspeed of a plane? Nothing.

Thanks for trolling!
 

legoman666

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,628
1
0
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What the fuck does a treadmill have to do with the airspeed of a plane? Nothing.

Thanks for trolling!

You are either:
a. a moron
b. a moron

If a plane needs lift generated by the wings moving through the air (or air passing over the wings, like a huge windtunnel could theoretically work for example), how is the plane going to take off from a treadmill if the plane remains stationary? So you are correct; a treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with the airspeed of a plane and therefore a plane cannot take off from a treadmill.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: RichUK
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: dudeman007

airplane taking off on treadmill=???

I dont understand how people can possibly think that the airplane will take off. The only purpose of the wheels on the plane during take off is to hold the weight of the plane until the plane is moving fast enough through the air for the wings to generate enough lift to allow the plane to take off.

So, a plane "moving" on a treadmill will have 0 air speed velocity, and therefore 0 lift. Thus, it will not take off. End of story.

So what you're trying to say is: If a helicopter were parked on a large turntable with the turntable spinning at the same rotational speed and direction as the rotors on the helicopter, the helicopter wouldn?t take off?

I've actually tried that. 4 people died.

ROFLCOPTER
 

Pantoot

Golden Member
Jun 6, 2002
1,764
30
91
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Come back to me after you've completed a master's degree in theological mathematics, n00b.

Are you saying the proof takes faith?
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What about a helicopter made from lego?
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: legoman666
you are correct; a treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with the airspeed of a plane

I'm glad you finally figured it out, you're welcome.
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What the fuck does a treadmill have to do with the airspeed of a plane? Nothing.

Thanks for trolling!

You are either:
a. a moron
b. a moron

If a plane needs lift generated by the wings moving through the air (or air passing over the wings, like a huge windtunnel could theoretically work for example), how is the plane going to take off from a treadmill if the plane remains stationary? So you are correct; a treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with the airspeed of a plane and therefore a plane cannot take off from a treadmill.

Is that your final answer?

 

legoman666

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,628
1
0
Originally posted by: RichUK
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What about a helicopter made from lego?

that is the one exception. A helicopter made from lego generates so much lift by its sheer awesomeness that the blades don't even have to spin to allow the helicopter to take off.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: RichUK
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What about a helicopter made from lego?

that is the one exception. A helicopter made from lego generates so much lift by its sheer awesomeness that the blades don't even have to spin to allow the helicopter to take off.

If it's made from LEGO you can just pick it up.

Duh.
 

Bill Brasky

Diamond Member
May 18, 2006
4,324
1
0
Originally posted by: SammyG
Originally posted by: dudeman007
1/3=.333
2/3=size of a alternator
1=10 lbs bulk meat
.999=spider
airplane taking off on treadmill=???

=profit

Wow.



You totally forgot to carry the one. And then integrate.

And then use the profit to buy bulk socks.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
Am I the only one on the internet who's never heard this before? I was here for the airplane nonsense so I don't understand how I missed it.

1/3 != .333 so I'm not sure I understand how this is even vaguely interesting.

Not to get this started again, but yes, they are equal. Consult your nearest math book.

No, they are not equal.

0.333 != 0.3333 != 0.33333 != 1/3

0.333... = 0.333~ = 1/3

Maybe you should consult your nearest math book.

oh geez :roll: Semantics anyone?

You tried being a smart-ass and got called on it, and now you're bringing up semantics? In mathematics?

I didn't try to be a smart ass. It's very common to leave off the ellipsis for the sake of time :roll: You should know how many people refute the statement that .333 repeated does not equal 1/3, which is what I was commenting about. Dumbass.
For the sake of time? Why not use 0.9... or even 0.9r?
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: BrownTown
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
ban

QFMFT

EDIT: god knows if this thread startes devolving into a 20 page rant i will personally post racist comments on here to get it locked and take one for the team with my own bannage.

You're a brave man. I salute you.

You'd better do so soon...the "airplane won't take off" idiots are showing up.
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What the fuck does a treadmill have to do with the airspeed of a plane? Nothing.

Thanks for trolling!

You are either:
a. a moron
b. a moron

If a plane needs lift generated by the wings moving through the air (or air passing over the wings, like a huge windtunnel could theoretically work for example), how is the plane going to take off from a treadmill if the plane remains stationary? So you are correct; a treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with the airspeed of a plane and therefore a plane cannot take off from a treadmill.

I used to think that too, but then I rethought it.

It pays to have a different view.

Lets say I was on a treadmill, and no matter how fast I ran, the treadmill always matched my speed, and I would not be able to go forward.

No lets imagine, I went on top of my skate board and tied it the the front of the treadmill, and the treadmill went at full speed. No Matter how fast the treadmill goes, I can still walk forward.

You see the distinction?

 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Originally posted by: tenshodo13
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: legoman666
No unless the pad and helicopter were massless (while the blades still have mass) and there was 0 friction between the pad and whatever allows it to rotate (the bearing).

What the hell does that have to do with the airspeed of a plane on a treadmill? Nothing.

Thanks for playing!

What the fuck does a treadmill have to do with the airspeed of a plane? Nothing.

Thanks for trolling!

You are either:
a. a moron
b. a moron

If a plane needs lift generated by the wings moving through the air (or air passing over the wings, like a huge windtunnel could theoretically work for example), how is the plane going to take off from a treadmill if the plane remains stationary? So you are correct; a treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with the airspeed of a plane and therefore a plane cannot take off from a treadmill.

I used to think that too, but then I rethought it.

It pays to have a different view.

Lets say I was on a treadmill, and no matter how fast I ran, the treadmill always matched my speed, and I would not be able to go forward.

No lets imagine, I went on top of my skate board and tied it the the front of the treadmill, and the treadmill went at full speed. No Matter how fast the treadmill goes, I can still walk forward.

You see the distinction?


So the plane will take off?
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: legoman666

If a plane needs lift generated by the wings moving through the air (or air passing over the wings, like a huge windtunnel could theoretically work for example), how is the plane going to take off from a treadmill if the plane remains stationary?
It doesn't remain stationary, jackass. You know why? Because...

Originally posted by: legoman666
...a treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with the airspeed of a plane...

and therefore a plane cannot take off from a treadmill.
The real question YOU need to answer is "how does the plane remain stationary if the treadmill has absolutely nothing to do with its airspeed?"

The answer is that you are either:
a.) a moron
b.) a moron

You do not pass Go. You do not collect $200. You are an embarrassment to your parents, your teachers, and yourself.

 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
19
81
The plane certainly takes off, as does any thread that mentions "plane" and "treadmill."


"I am tired of these motherf--ing planes on this motherf--ing treadmill!!!!!"


Treadmill moves.
Wheels spin really really fast.
Treadmill fails to move plane, as the wheel bearings are assumed massless. So what you have is a treadmill moving really fast, and a plane that's just sitting still relative to the ground below the treadmill.
So, plane on moving treadmill (engines off) = plane sitting on the ground.

Plane's engines come on. They push the plane forward. Air moves over the wings. The plane takes off.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |