When a "Biden voter" is praising Trump's mental and physical fitness it might be good journalistic practice to see if they are full of shit.
NYT should have a dozen Zoomers on the payroll doing nothing but mining social media to see if the paper's reporters are being too easy of marks.
Nate is a fucking hack in need of an atomic wedgie.
Taking advantage of the fact that Trump is easily provoked seems like a good idea. The more crazy shit he says on film the better for when paid advertising kicks in later this year and the press might actually have to cover some of it in the meantime.
Just start every press conference by drinking a glass of water with 1 handTaking advantage of the fact that Trump is easily provoked seems like a good idea. The more crazy shit he says on film the better for when paid advertising kicks in later this year and the press might actually have to cover some of it in the meantime.
Memory worse than a goldfish > _ <Very smart online leftists: Trump can't be worse than Biden concerning Israel. There is no difference.
Actual Trump:
The idea that we should sabotage Democrats for being insufficiently liberal and therefore elects Republicans is built on confusing logical grounds. They seem to be saying that by working to make all the things they care about dramatically worse that this will eventually lead to something better? Is this an underpants gnome thing?Very smart online leftists: Trump can't be worse than Biden concerning Israel. There is no difference.
Actual Trump:
The idea that we should sabotage Democrats for being insufficiently liberal and therefore elects Republicans is built on confusing logical grounds. They seem to be saying that by working to make all the things they care about dramatically worse that this will eventually lead to something better? Is this an underpants gnome thing?
I would love to understand this. As far as I can tell it is:
1) Make Trump win
2) Things in America get a lot worse
3) ???
4) Democratic Socialists take over the Democratic Party and win power
This seems to neglect that if Trump wins we might never have another free and fair election and even if we did why would the Democrats shift towards DSA? I can tell you that Republicans would LOVE to make this trade, banking huge policy/ending democracy wins now with the idea that maybe in four years you can have this fight again.
I have enjoyed the reports of the Trump campaign reaching out to activists in the SE Michigan Muslim community and supposedly those activists taking them seriously.The idea that we should sabotage Democrats for being insufficiently liberal and therefore elects Republicans is built on confusing logical grounds. They seem to be saying that by working to make all the things they care about dramatically worse that this will eventually lead to something better? Is this an underpants gnome thing?
I would love to understand this. As far as I can tell it is:
1) Make Trump win
2) Things in America get a lot worse
3) ???
4) Democratic Socialists take over the Democratic Party and win power
This seems to neglect that if Trump wins we might never have another free and fair election and even if we did why would the Democrats shift towards DSA? I can tell you that Republicans would LOVE to make this trade, banking huge policy/ending democracy wins now with the idea that maybe in four years you can have this fight again.
The twice impeached, twice successfully sued for defamation resulting from a rape, once successfully sued for fraud approaching a 500 million settlement, and facing 91 felony charges for Jan. 6 and the mishandling and stealing of highly classified government documents, should just roll off the tongue from all Democrat surrogates when referencing the world's threat to democracy.Just calling him a rapist every day would be a decent start.
do you consider this forum social media?Some people on social media should consider therapy instead of making it their personality.
Unless my memory fails me, isn't this essentially what Ralph Nadar said about being accused of playing spoiler in the 2000 election? That Bush or Gore were both bad for America and he was hastening the revolution?The idea that we should sabotage Democrats for being insufficiently liberal and therefore elects Republicans is built on confusing logical grounds. They seem to be saying that by working to make all the things they care about dramatically worse that this will eventually lead to something better? Is this an underpants gnome thing?
I would love to understand this. As far as I can tell it is:
1) Make Trump win
2) Things in America get a lot worse
3) ???
4) Democratic Socialists take over the Democratic Party and win power
This seems to neglect that if Trump wins we might never have another free and fair election and even if we did why would the Democrats shift towards DSA? I can tell you that Republicans would LOVE to make this trade, banking huge policy/ending democracy wins now with the idea that maybe in four years you can have this fight again.
I don't disagree with you, but the GOP's entire electoral strategy is contingent upon Americans voting against their own self-interest. So while they aren't making a specific strategic play here for Muslim Americans in MI, it's not any different than anything else they do to fool 70M rubes every four years.I have enjoyed the reports of the Trump campaign reaching out to activists in the SE Michigan Muslim community and supposedly those activists taking them seriously.
Trumps record as far as supporting Palestinians is horrid beyond belief it’s mind boggling stupid to me for anyone in that community to take him seriously.
Sinema officially out in AZ guaranteeing a Gallego-Lake match.
He said something similar about them both being equally bad, yep! 20 year old me bought it like an idiot too. After 2000 I vowed I would never do that again and I haven't. While I would love our system to change to ranked choice so you could vote for your favorite candidate without helping your least favorite, until it does my choice is clear.Unless my memory fails me, isn't this essentially what Ralph Nadar said about being accused of playing spoiler in the 2000 election? That Bush or Gore were both bad for America and he was hastening the revolution?
Southern Florida has a lot of Cubans, who while identified as Hispanic in demographics, tend to be significantly to the right of the average Hispanic voter.I don't disagree with you, but the GOP's entire electoral strategy is contingent upon Americans voting against their own self-interest. So while they aren't making a specific strategic play here for Muslim Americans in MI, it's not any different than anything else they do to fool 70M rubes every four years.
Besides, it's not even about Trump flipping a Muslim vote, which obviously is ludicrous.* What if a substantial number of Muslim voters in Michigan choose to stay home in November?
* And even if that's ludicrous, the facts show that Trump picked up minorities from 2016 to 2020 (just not enough to offset lost support from whites). He also mopped up in South Florida, which seems pretty wild also. It's a broken record by now, but never underestimate the stupidity of the American voter.
All you have to do is say Democrats are socialists to them.He said something similar about them both being equally bad, yep! 20 year old me bought it like an idiot too. After 2000 I vowed I would never do that again and I haven't. While I would love our system to change to ranked choice so you could vote for your favorite candidate without helping your least favorite, until it does my choice is clear.
Southern Florida has a lot of Cubans, who while identified as Hispanic in demographics, tend to be significantly to the right of the average Hispanic voter.
Why would it not be a form of social media?do you consider this forum social media?
South Florida is old school anti-castro Cubans, they tend to be pretty hard right. Their children are starting to vote differently though.Unless my memory fails me, isn't this essentially what Ralph Nadar said about being accused of playing spoiler in the 2000 election? That Bush or Gore were both bad for America and he was hastening the revolution?
I don't disagree with you, but the GOP's entire electoral strategy is contingent upon Americans voting against their own self-interest. So while they aren't making a specific strategic play here for Muslim Americans in MI, it's not any different than anything else they do to fool 70M rubes every four years.
Besides, it's not even about Trump flipping a Muslim vote, which obviously is ludicrous.* What if a substantial number of Muslim voters in Michigan choose to stay home in November?
* And even if that's ludicrous, the facts show that Trump picked up minorities from 2016 to 2020 (just not enough to offset lost support from whites). He also mopped up in South Florida, which seems pretty wild also. It's a broken record by now, but never underestimate the stupidity of the American voter.
Thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Why would it not be a form of social media?