beggerking
Golden Member
- Jan 15, 2006
- 1,703
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: beggerking
how about adding extremetech and xbitlib reviews to the chart? both have good reviews.
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: beggerking
how about adding extremetech and xbitlib reviews to the chart? both have good reviews.
I agree, and I still think HardOCP should be added.
I cant belive they could be that bias when lately they have pointed out many negative factors of Nvidia cards.
Once the Rage3D one goes up, you should definately add that too.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: beggerking
how about adding extremetech and xbitlib reviews to the chart? both have good reviews.
I agree, and I still think HardOCP should be added.
I cant belive they could be that bias when lately they have pointed out many negative factors of Nvidia cards.
Once the Rage3D one goes up, you should definately add that too.
HardOCP is very biased, doesn't matter if they mentioned the shimmer issue or not. The facts over the years speak for themselves:
1. Kyle defended nV's cheats while blasting ATi for the "quack" bit.
2. They welcome AEG trolls like Rollo to their forum.
3. When they were reviewing a system I believe that was made by Voodoo that had an ATi chipset in it, the BFG 7800 card was defective yet Kyle was quick to lay the blame on ATi.
4. In their X1900 review, they decided to speculate on an upcoming 32 pipe 7900 which of course we all know was a dream.
5. Their initial denial of the shimmer issue - they were criticized for it so much that they finally had no choice but to acknowledge it.
6. Their 7900 review performance numbers don't line up with everyone else - a lot of them are out of whack.
Don't want to derail Elfear's thread but I'm glad he didn't add in [nV]OCP to the chart.
Originally posted by: Yourself
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: beggerking
how about adding extremetech and xbitlib reviews to the chart? both have good reviews.
I agree, and I still think HardOCP should be added.
I cant belive they could be that bias when lately they have pointed out many negative factors of Nvidia cards.
Once the Rage3D one goes up, you should definately add that too.
HardOCP is very biased, doesn't matter if they mentioned the shimmer issue or not. The facts over the years speak for themselves:
1. Kyle defended nV's cheats while blasting ATi for the "quack" bit.
2. They welcome AEG trolls like Rollo to their forum.
3. When they were reviewing a system I believe that was made by Voodoo that had an ATi chipset in it, the BFG 7800 card was defective yet Kyle was quick to lay the blame on ATi.
4. In their X1900 review, they decided to speculate on an upcoming 32 pipe 7900 which of course we all know was a dream.
5. Their initial denial of the shimmer issue - they were criticized for it so much that they finally had no choice but to acknowledge it.
6. Their 7900 review performance numbers don't line up with everyone else - a lot of them are out of whack.
Don't want to derail Elfear's thread but I'm glad he didn't add in [nV]OCP to the chart.
7. You were banned from there...
Although I do agree that there 7900 review is a bit whacked...
Thanks Elfear for you effort...I am going to slap an Accelero HSF on my 1900xt and take care of one of the few negatives associated with the x1900 line of cards...
I think they even said something like people should be grateful for having AEG members in the forumI was banned from there for calling out Rollo's b.s. Like I said, they welcome AEG trolls with open arms.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
1. Kyle defended nV's cheats while blasting ATi for the "quack" bit.
2. They welcome AEG trolls like Rollo to their forum.
3. When they were reviewing a system I believe that was made by Voodoo that had an ATi chipset in it, the BFG 7800 card was defective yet Kyle was quick to lay the blame on ATi.
4. In their X1900 review, they decided to speculate on an upcoming 32 pipe 7900 which of course we all know was a dream.
5. Their initial denial of the shimmer issue - they were criticized for it so much that they finally had no choice but to acknowledge it.
6. Their 7900 review performance numbers don't line up with everyone else - a lot of them are out of whack.
Don't want to derail Elfear's thread but I'm glad he didn't add in [nV]OCP to the chart.
Originally posted by: Matt2
One thing is undeniable.
If you want a multi-GPU system, there is no other choice but 7900GTX SLI
Originally posted by: Matt2
One thing is undeniable.
If you want a multi-GPU system, there is no other choice but 7900GTX SLI
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: Matt2
One thing is undeniable.
If you want a multi-GPU system, there is no other choice but 7900GTX SLI
Agreed. The 7900GT Sli is a kick ass setup!
Over the 7900GTX or the x1900xt/x I'd pick the x1900xt/x every time.
Originally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: Matt2
One thing is undeniable.
If you want a multi-GPU system, there is no other choice but 7900GTX SLI
Agreed. The 7900GT Sli is a kick ass setup!
Over the 7900GTX or the x1900xt/x I'd pick the x1900xt/x every time.
Not when we're talking about SLI vs. Crossfire.
7900GTX SLI clearly takes the crown X1900XTX by a pretty good margin. I think 7900GT SLI took a test or two from X1900XTX Crossfire.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
I was banned from there for calling out Rollo's b.s. Like I said, they welcome AEG trolls with open arms.
Originally posted by: Ronin
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
I was banned from there for calling out Rollo's b.s. Like I said, they welcome AEG trolls with open arms.
Get over yourself, and this issue. It's over and done with, and yet you continually find stupid ways to bring it up. Same with your fanboism. Jesus, man, give it a rest.
Originally posted by: beggerking
IMO AEG does not automatically associate with "troll" ..yet you called me "troll" and "AEG" in many threads here..
Time to give it a rest, its done and over.
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: Matt2
One thing is undeniable.
If you want a multi-GPU system, there is no other choice but 7900GTX SLI
agreed. Crossfire is just not mature enough.. and the dongle is plain awful..
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
IMO AEG does not automatically associate with "troll" ..yet you called me "troll" and "AEG" in many threads here..
Time to give it a rest, its done and over.
You're not good enough to be in AEG - at least Trollo has some wit and the others in the program can compose a proper sentence.
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
IMO AEG does not automatically associate with "troll" ..yet you called me "troll" and "AEG" in many threads here..
Time to give it a rest, its done and over.
You're not good enough to be in AEG - at least Trollo has some wit and the others in the program can compose a proper sentence.
Are you questioning my skill? the last time I checked, whoever was arguing with me on my programming ability was not replying my PM when I challenged him back.
but any ways, you really are behaving like Rollo for ATI,, perhaps worse than that... At least Rollo doesn't throw senseless flaming like you do.. ( at least lately)
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: nib95
Originally posted by: beggerking
how about adding extremetech and xbitlib reviews to the chart? both have good reviews.
I agree, and I still think HardOCP should be added.
I cant belive they could be that bias when lately they have pointed out many negative factors of Nvidia cards.
Once the Rage3D one goes up, you should definately add that too.
HardOCP is very biased, doesn't matter if they mentioned the shimmer issue or not. The facts over the years speak for themselves:
1. Kyle defended nV's cheats while blasting ATi for the "quack" bit.
2. They welcome AEG trolls like Rollo to their forum.
3. When they were reviewing a system I believe that was made by Voodoo that had an ATi chipset in it, the BFG 7800 card was defective yet Kyle was quick to lay the blame on ATi.
4. In their X1900 review, they decided to speculate on an upcoming 32 pipe 7900 which of course we all know was a dream.
5. Their initial denial of the shimmer issue - they were criticized for it so much that they finally had no choice but to acknowledge it.
6. Their 7900 review performance numbers don't line up with everyone else - a lot of them are out of whack.
Don't want to derail Elfear's thread but I'm glad he didn't add in [nV]OCP to the chart.
Originally posted by: ChiSoxFan
Is the lack of Nvidia HDR+AA something that can be fixed with a driver update or are you SOL with a current gen card? I have a 7800GT and am thinking about going to a 7900 GTX or X1900XT and am hoping to be able to use both with my 480W power supply, but the HDR+AA is something I'd like to have. BTW, nice summary to the original poster. That was very helpful.