9/11 consipracy movie

[Canun]

2 plumes, two accounts, and questionable evidence. Yup, you are definitely right you are so much more logical. Whereas I've given more likely scenarios that follow the laws of physics. Yup, I'm not logical.

I'm outta here have a good night.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Canun
2 plumes, two accounts, and questionable evidence. Yup, you are definitely right you are so much more logical. Whereas I've given more likely scenarios that follow the laws of physics. Yup, I'm not logical.

I'm outta here have a good night.

2 plumes? Wtf are you smoking? I just posted 3 screenshots indicating at least 7 ... plus numerous other large plumes in the Loose Change video.

Yeah, go ahead high tail it out of this thread ,.. you have nothing to counter all of the precollapse explosions and corroborating accounts of lower level demolition flashes as reported by fire fighters

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: noto12ious
I guess that means you haven't watched the main film mentioned by the OP.
More plumes?

orange / red flash where the window is:
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem4/1696-01.jpg

more plumes:
http://usera.imagecave.com/BoneZ/911-2.jpg

Notice 2 plumes...the lowest one appears first, the higher one appears later (as seen in LC2E). So much for the air compression theory.
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/demolition.wave.170.jpg

Interesting...more squibs.

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem13/

 

[MikeMike]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Canun
2 plumes, two accounts, and questionable evidence. Yup, you are definitely right you are so much more logical. Whereas I've given more likely scenarios that follow the laws of physics. Yup, I'm not logical.

I'm outta here have a good night.

2 plumes? Wtf are you smoking? I just posted 3 screenshots indicating at least 7 ... plus numerous other large plumes in the Loose Change video.

Yeah, go ahead high tail it out of this thread ,.. you have nothing to counter all of the precollapse explosions and corroborating accounts of lower level demolition flashes as reported by fire fighters

hey, you jackass, hes going to bed, he sure as hell aint high tailing it out of here. you are just becoming a fvcking troll.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Canun
2 plumes, two accounts, and questionable evidence. Yup, you are definitely right you are so much more logical. Whereas I've given more likely scenarios that follow the laws of physics. Yup, I'm not logical.

I'm outta here have a good night.

2 plumes? Wtf are you smoking? I just posted 3 screenshots indicating at least 7 ... plus numerous other large plumes in the Loose Change video.

Yeah, go ahead high tail it out of this thread ,.. you have nothing to counter all of the precollapse explosions and corroborating accounts of lower level demolition flashes as reported by fire fighters

hey, you jackass, hes going to bed, he sure as hell aint high tailing it out of here. you are just becoming a fvcking troll.

How convenient that he signs off after I destroyed all of his arguments "2 plumes" LoL.

Actually, you're the one that's trolling, mikemike. What happened to your bogus claims about me? Remember you started crying about leaving the thread, when you were actually mistaken as to the reasons given? Now you're back. So again, who's trolling?

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

Get help? You're the one trying to argue jetfuel melted steel. haha. Even the government admits jetfuel isn't capable of melting steel.

You spent the entire thread denying explosions ever happened...and eventually you caved and admitted it Thermite is certainly a possibility for the molten steel found smoldering months after 9/11. Other types of explosions and bomb detonations did occur, as corroborated by video, and fire fighters / other witnesses reporting demolition type flashes + booming sounds on the lower levels before any "collapses" initiated.

Sure, the buildings might have something else flammable...so why the demolition flashes on the lower levels seconds before collapse? Why has the government ignored every single piece of testimony regarding pre collapse explosions? Coverup. Only demolition accounts for all of the factors that day

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

Get help? You're the one trying to argue jetfuel melted steel. haha. Even the government admits jetfuel isn't capable of melting steel.

You spent the entire thread denying explosions ever happened...and eventually you caved and admitted it Thermite is certainly a possibility for the molten steel found smoldering months after 9/11. Other types of explosions and bomb detonations did occur, as corroborated by video, and fire fighters / other witnesses reporting demolition type flashes + booming sounds on the lower levels before any "collapses" initiated.

Sure, the buildings might have something else flammable...so why the demolition flashes on the lower levels seconds before collapse? Why has the government ignored every single piece of testimony regarding pre collapse explosions? Coverup. Only demolition accounts for all of the factors that day

Yup, youve convinced me, youre completely right.

There is no other concievable way this couldve occured.

Now that youve won the argmunt, PLEASE PLEASE never post at anandtech again.

(if you dont pick up on the sarcasm... im not even going to finish this sentence)

I have already covered my opinion on the steel, and its far more plausible than anything youve posted.

I meant what i said, please, never post here again. The forums would be better without you, troll.

 

[K1052]

Folks, you are never going to even introduce the shadow of a doubt in noto12ious that wasn't a deliberate conspiracy by the Jews/Bush admin/Freemasons/Illuminati/Aliens or whoever it is he thinks did this.

If you stop posting to the thread he claims victory. If you continue to post he says he has refuted your arguments (though he never really did) or just ignores you because he has no answer. It is just one big endless cycle.

Reason and logic are this man's enemy and he is pretty good at defeating both of them.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

Get help? You're the one trying to argue jetfuel melted steel. haha. Even the government admits jetfuel isn't capable of melting steel.

You spent the entire thread denying explosions ever happened...and eventually you caved and admitted it Thermite is certainly a possibility for the molten steel found smoldering months after 9/11. Other types of explosions and bomb detonations did occur, as corroborated by video, and fire fighters / other witnesses reporting demolition type flashes + booming sounds on the lower levels before any "collapses" initiated.

Sure, the buildings might have something else flammable...so why the demolition flashes on the lower levels seconds before collapse? Why has the government ignored every single piece of testimony regarding pre collapse explosions? Coverup. Only demolition accounts for all of the factors that day

Yup, youve convinced me, youre completely right.

There is no other concievable way this couldve occured.

Now that youve won the argmunt, PLEASE PLEASE never post at anandtech again.

(if you dont pick up on the sarcasm... im not even going to finish this sentence)

I have already covered my opinion on the steel, and its far more plausible than anything youve posted.

I meant what i said, please, never post here again. The forums would be better without you, troll.

Yeah, it's too bad your "opinion" on steel has been refuted by all scientific data... even the government's NIST admits jetfuel doesn't melt steel. GG.

 

[91TTZ]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Canun
So logic isn't playing any part in your answer. Demolition explotions tend not to start at the bottom of a structure due to the instability it causes in keeping the building where you want it to go. As I said earlier there was a massive amount of force that compressed the air down and out of the building. The central shafts for the elevators would be more than able to convey the energy to the base of the building. Plus if you notice, those explosions look like they happened after the collapse began in your photos.

Once again, logically speaking, which is more plausible?

Edit: Oh, and about the beams in the center? They were large I'll grant you that, but steel becomes extremely flexible at high temperatures, and are unable to handle heavy loads.

Well, let's ask the President of Controlled Demolitions Inc.

"If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure". -- Mark Loizeaux
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.htm

I don't know why you even bother to bring that up, since we already know from the video that the towers began to collapse from the upper floors, not the ground floor.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

Get help? You're the one trying to argue jetfuel melted steel. haha. Even the government admits jetfuel isn't capable of melting steel.

You spent the entire thread denying explosions ever happened...and eventually you caved and admitted it Thermite is certainly a possibility for the molten steel found smoldering months after 9/11. Other types of explosions and bomb detonations did occur, as corroborated by video, and fire fighters / other witnesses reporting demolition type flashes + booming sounds on the lower levels before any "collapses" initiated.

Sure, the buildings might have something else flammable...so why the demolition flashes on the lower levels seconds before collapse? Why has the government ignored every single piece of testimony regarding pre collapse explosions? Coverup. Only demolition accounts for all of the factors that day

Yup, youve convinced me, youre completely right.

There is no other concievable way this couldve occured.

Now that youve won the argmunt, PLEASE PLEASE never post at anandtech again.

(if you dont pick up on the sarcasm... im not even going to finish this sentence)

I have already covered my opinion on the steel, and its far more plausible than anything youve posted.

I meant what i said, please, never post here again. The forums would be better without you, troll.

Yeah, it's too bad your "opinion" on steel has been refuted by all scientific data... even the government's NIST admits jetfuel doesn't melt steel. GG.

We already covered this

I SAID THAT JETFUEL DIDNT MELT THE STEEL THE RUBBLE BURNING FOR A MONTH DID.

You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

Get help? You're the one trying to argue jetfuel melted steel. haha. Even the government admits jetfuel isn't capable of melting steel.

You spent the entire thread denying explosions ever happened...and eventually you caved and admitted it Thermite is certainly a possibility for the molten steel found smoldering months after 9/11. Other types of explosions and bomb detonations did occur, as corroborated by video, and fire fighters / other witnesses reporting demolition type flashes + booming sounds on the lower levels before any "collapses" initiated.

Sure, the buildings might have something else flammable...so why the demolition flashes on the lower levels seconds before collapse? Why has the government ignored every single piece of testimony regarding pre collapse explosions? Coverup. Only demolition accounts for all of the factors that day

Yup, youve convinced me, youre completely right.

There is no other concievable way this couldve occured.

Now that youve won the argmunt, PLEASE PLEASE never post at anandtech again.

(if you dont pick up on the sarcasm... im not even going to finish this sentence)

I have already covered my opinion on the steel, and its far more plausible than anything youve posted.

I meant what i said, please, never post here again. The forums would be better without you, troll.

Yeah, it's too bad your "opinion" on steel has been refuted by all scientific data... even the government's NIST admits jetfuel doesn't melt steel. GG.

We already covered this

I SAID THAT JETFUEL DIDNT MELT THE STEEL THE RUBBLE BURNING FOR A MONTH DID.

You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Wow, you troll a thread then start crying to a mod? :laugh:
No government agency has been able to explain the molten steel found months after 9/11.
There's a reason they haven't used your ridiculous "jet fuel and rubble" theory, especially in an oxygen starved enrivonment

 

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: Acanthus
You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Oh my god you're ridiculous. :roll:

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Hes mentally retarded. Stop trying..

LOL at this thread continuing to live.

This coming from Acanthus, who spent days trying to deny pre collapse explosions... then finally admitted there actually were explosions (in his own words: "I'll bite") :laugh:

Funny how he disappeared from the thread.

Pull it up, quote me, and dont cut anything like a one sided retard.

Ill give you credit for one thing, you always manage to make yourself look stupider despite the exponentially greater challenge each time.

Repeat yourself a few more times on the same issues that have been refuted over and over.

Wanna go back to molten steel?

You said everything... 12 times... and its been refuted... you cant be this stupid, no one can.

/shrug... too easy.

"Alright ill bite, since there were EXPLOSIONS, they didnt use THERMITE did they? becuase THERMITE doesnt EXPLODE"

Everything you've tried to come up with has been destroyed...and it's why you disappeared from the thread.
Go here to review since you've obviously forgotten: http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear

lmao....

Dude... get help...

I was using your own evidence to go against your own conclusions, because they are so deluded and couterproductive to each other that they cant even compose a complete scenario.

As for explosions, you think a 100 story skyscraper had nothing flammable? like dozens of massive generators? gas lines? We have mentioned this already, so once again you are going in circles again.

I left the thread because you are mentally retarded, you arent winning anything.

Get help? You're the one trying to argue jetfuel melted steel. haha. Even the government admits jetfuel isn't capable of melting steel.

You spent the entire thread denying explosions ever happened...and eventually you caved and admitted it Thermite is certainly a possibility for the molten steel found smoldering months after 9/11. Other types of explosions and bomb detonations did occur, as corroborated by video, and fire fighters / other witnesses reporting demolition type flashes + booming sounds on the lower levels before any "collapses" initiated.

Sure, the buildings might have something else flammable...so why the demolition flashes on the lower levels seconds before collapse? Why has the government ignored every single piece of testimony regarding pre collapse explosions? Coverup. Only demolition accounts for all of the factors that day

Yup, youve convinced me, youre completely right.

There is no other concievable way this couldve occured.

Now that youve won the argmunt, PLEASE PLEASE never post at anandtech again.

(if you dont pick up on the sarcasm... im not even going to finish this sentence)

I have already covered my opinion on the steel, and its far more plausible than anything youve posted.

I meant what i said, please, never post here again. The forums would be better without you, troll.

Yeah, it's too bad your "opinion" on steel has been refuted by all scientific data... even the government's NIST admits jetfuel doesn't melt steel. GG.

We already covered this

I SAID THAT JETFUEL DIDNT MELT THE STEEL THE RUBBLE BURNING FOR A MONTH DID.

You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Wow, you troll a thread then start crying to a mod? :laugh:
No government agency has been able to explain the molten steel found months after 9/11.
There's a reason they haven't used your ridiculous "jet fuel and rubble" theory, especially in an oxygen starved enrivonment

We already covered that too, you read it.

Liquids flow down , the steel in the basement didnt melt, it melted at the high temperature fire and flowed down. Common sense.

Stop making me repeat myself.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage

Originally posted by: Acanthus
You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Oh my god you're ridiculous. :roll:

Read the whole thread, he is just repeating himself over and over to incite flames.

This guy has pissed off more members with his 400 posts than every lifer here combined, even conjur

Its not that i disagree with him, i disagree with tons of members. This guy doesnt even debate, he just posts random crap over and over and over, and when you squash one point, he moves to another, when you squash that, he goes BACK TO THE FIRST ONE AGAIN. Then plays stupid and makes you repost everything youve already said.

This thread is a damn joke because of him, he cant debate... he cant reason... he cant think.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage

Originally posted by: Acanthus
You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Oh my god you're ridiculous. :roll:

Read the whole thread, he is just repeating himself over and over to incite flames.

This guy has pissed more members with his 400 posts than every lifer here combined, even conjur

I don't post anything to incite flames. I post factual evidence and I back it all up

It seems that you have a problem with those facts, and you're making it personal.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage

Originally posted by: Acanthus
You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Oh my god you're ridiculous. :roll:

Read the whole thread, he is just repeating himself over and over to incite flames.

This guy has pissed more members with his 400 posts than every lifer here combined, even conjur

I don't post anything to incite flames. I post factual evidence and I back it all up

It seems that you have a problem with those facts, and you're making it personal.

Read my edit. Youre doing it on purpose. You dont back up a damn thing, you just move on to something else.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: K1052
Folks, you are never going to even introduce the shadow of a doubt in noto12ious that wasn't a deliberate conspiracy by the Jews/Bush admin/Freemasons/Illuminati/Aliens or whoever it is he thinks did this.

If you stop posting to the thread he claims victory. If you continue to post he says he has refuted your arguments (though he never really did) or just ignores you because he has no answer. It is just one big endless cycle.

Reason and logic are this man's enemy and he is pretty good at defeating both of them.

thank you.

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage

Originally posted by: Acanthus
You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Oh my god you're ridiculous. :roll:

Read the whole thread, he is just repeating himself over and over to incite flames.

This guy has pissed more members with his 400 posts than every lifer here combined, even conjur

I don't post anything to incite flames. I post factual evidence and I back it all up

It seems that you have a problem with those facts, and you're making it personal.

Read my edit. Youre doing it on purpose. You dont back up a damn thing, you just move on to something else.

Since when? Everything I've posted is factual...backed up by corroborating eyewitness accounts (regarding pre collapse explosions). That's not even debatable...yet you spent days trying to pretend explosions never happened?

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: noto12ious

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage

Originally posted by: Acanthus
You are flat out trolling now... mod pm.

Oh my god you're ridiculous. :roll:

Read the whole thread, he is just repeating himself over and over to incite flames.

This guy has pissed more members with his 400 posts than every lifer here combined, even conjur

I don't post anything to incite flames. I post factual evidence and I back it all up

It seems that you have a problem with those facts, and you're making it personal.

Read my edit. Youre doing it on purpose. You dont back up a damn thing, you just move on to something else.

Since when? Everything I've posted is factual...backed up by corroborating eyewitness accounts (regarding pre collapse explosions). That's not even debatable...yet you spent days trying to pretend explosions never happened?

You are the most aggrevating person ive ever experienced, that says a lot.

Here we go, ill repeat myself fvcking again...

I never said there werent any explosions, i said the explosions could be things other than your retarded theory.

They could have been:
1. The internal structure of the buildling failing before the extrenal structure. (the most reasonable scenario)
2. Anything else flammable in the building exploding.
3. generators in the basement exploding.

Now once again we can talk about what it likely isnt:
1. Thermite (thermite doesnt explode)
2. controlled demolition charges (explosions 20 minutes apart arent controlled demolitions, period, it doesnt even make sense)

Now that we have out of the way, time to switch gears again and put your tail between your legs, troll.

 

[BrokenVisage]

Oh come on... you can't put him ahead of the P&N overload conjur! Even people on YAGT.com hate 'em! :laugh:

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Oh come on... you can't put him ahead of the P&N overload conjur! Even people on YAGT.com hate 'em! :laugh:

at least conjur reaches his conclusions through rational thought.

 

[myusername]

What horse are you riding Acanthus?
You have put far more energy into trying to shut noto12ious down than would be worth spending on trying to talk someone out of their UFO abduction story, the ghosts they saw in their grandmother's attic, or their notion that there was a shooter on the grassy knoll.
Why so interested?

 

[noto12ious]

Originally posted by: Acanthus

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Oh come on... you can't put him ahead of the P&N overload conjur! Even people on YAGT.com hate 'em! :laugh:

at least conjur reaches his conclusions through rational thought.

"Liquids flow down , the steel in the basement didnt melt, it melted at the high temperature fire and flowed down. Common sense"


Speaking of rational thought, go find ANY official government report indicating high temperature fires MELTED STEEL at the World Trade Center

I never said there werent any explosions, i said the explosions could be things other than your retarded theory

Oops my mistake...you tried brushing off the explosions as "structural failure" LoL. Too bad that automatically contradicts the official story, since there were no significant structural failures before the official collapses began. The "retarded theory" is actually that of the firefighters (i.e. Louie Cacchioli, Paul Isaac Jr.). You're basically calling them liars. All of your other points have already been addressed here:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=1&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear