Originally posted by: ghost recon88
Originally posted by: Tweakin
Originally posted by: ghost recon88
Stability is relative to the task at hand There is no "absolute" when it comes to what one can define as stable. What might be stable for one thing (benching Futuremark Vantage, or Super Pi 1M) might not be stable for another (video encoding). I say as long as it doesn't BSOD for the task at hand, it's stable enough. Am I ever gonna run Prime95 for 24 hours straight so I can prove to a bunch of people it's "stable". Nope, because as long as it does what I want it to do, as fast as it can, I'm good.
Stability is the ability to throw anything at the system and not crash. This is not to say that the code itself may cause something, we are talking about the hardware as a direct result of changes to the system specs.
If I'm encoding movies, and it can do so perfectly fine @ 4.6GHz, yet it fails P95 at 4.6, why should I slow it down just for it to pass P95 Assuming there are no glitches or errors with the DVD.
Because if something messes up, you cannot have the certainty that it's not your hardware causing the problem, so you cannot blame the software itself. Kind of like having a girlfriend and never being 100% sure she isn't cheating.
Originally posted by: Yoxxy
Just got a 920 D0 that is 1.325 vidded. I think D0 might just be luck of the draw same as C0 stepping. Overclocking requirements are higher than any C0 I have had, although I only tried it a bit last night.
If it boots at stock with that voltage, that's louzy.