Originally posted by: Gary Key
We are waiting on a BIOS update. The board has a hole from 450~495 FSB right now that will not let you boot with several different CPU choices (some do, some do not). It will boot directly at 500 and so far we are up to 525 stable but there is a little work that needs to be done on memory timings and FSB holes. Overall, the quality is great and stability has been very good, just some BIOS demons to slay.
Originally posted by: Agent11
There is already a beta bios out, and testers at XtremeSystems are already giving input to abit. . So I would not think it will take long for issues to get worked out.
Originally posted by: Fallen Kell
there is a third but it's unstable - beta 4 nextOriginally posted by: Agent11
Actually there are already at least 2 beta versions out and they have been working on a third (or what may be the next rev).
Originally posted by: Loghic
The board looks very impressiv too me. Anyone found an review of it?
Originally posted by: sjwaste
I really dont know where to ask this question, but I'm still on S939 and DDR. Could I ask, how does FSB relate to CPU and Memory clocks on Core2Duo machines? For instance, if you say it can boot at FSB 500, is memory 1:1, using a multiplier/divider (I would think so)? And at something like 500 FSB, would that mean an insanely low multiplier like 6x to get 3 GHz on an E6300?
If I bought some cheaper DDR 533/667 memory, are there boards with multiplier/divider options to make that lower clocked memory work with a high CPU overclock?
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Well, my IN9 showed up today . . . unfortunately, the rest of my parts aren't due to arrive until friday. So all I can do is ogle the beauty of this board until then.