Adaptec or Nero

[Phuz]

How can you all vote nero?
It's buggy.

 

[Celstar]

Phuz, using a cryptic app gives us geeks a larger sense of superiority

 

[sd]

I've never had a problem with Nero.....knock on wood

 

[Rand]

I've used them both and while Adaptec isnt bad Nero blows it away hands down. Adaptec is maybe a bit easier to use that's about all. Nero is unquestionably superior in every way IMHO.

 

[hifimaster]

Another vote for nero.

 

[Sir Fredrick]

I have used both, and for the most part they are on par. However, I would definitely have to agree, Nero is superior. It's the only burning software I use now.

 

[billandopus]

Nero buggy? Hardly.

How about some examples? Experiences?

Would it be fair if I said you were ugly? (But of course, that would be untrue - I have never seen you before) Point taken?

 

[Smbu]

Definately go with Nero.

 

[ToBeMe]

Definately Try Both And Make Your OWN Decision! The soon to be released Adaptec offering is a LOT better than previous and I doubt many, above have tried it! :disgust:

 

[Degenerate]

Nero, is good, never looked back

 

[cookj]

Nero,but I haven`t tried the newest Adaptec

 

[Coolie]

I use NERO also.... Does everything I need

 

[airfoil]

Here at AT, you will get one answer to your question: NERO.

 

[6xy]

HI

In my view, Nero is the best- it handles copyrighted discs and overburns much better than Adaptec, which tends to freak out, leaving you with a frisbe!! Cdrwin is also an excellent alternative (demo from GoldenHawk).

6xy

 

[kami]

Nero is buggy, but it's still great software. CDRWin has no bloat whatsoever and I prefer it over anything. Except when making certain copies I have to use CloneCD.

 

[HoopDogg]

no crap
or diskjuggler for dreamcast games

I have 90% of the burning programs, but I stick with nero for 2 reasons:
1) bound to ctrl + alt + n
2) ease of use with the cd wizard makes me laugh every time

Luke

 

[Choralone]

I prefer Nero over the Adaptec software anyday!

 

[radiocore]

nero all the way

 

[thorin]

Another one for Nero

Thorin

 

[SSP]

I use both, but prefer Adaptec most of the time. Its just easier. Oh, and I never made a coaster with EZ... but I did make one with Nero.

 

[sak]

I have uses both EZCD creator and Nero. At first when i did not know a lot about buring i used EZCD it was good. But with time i see that Nero works much better while i burn. Nero interface is not as easy to learn than EZCD but then you would use the help for any questions you would have regarding the problem.

 

[ToBeMe]

I'm not "against" nero.......I just wish I could let some of you "naysayers" try the new version.........it MAY change your mind.........

 

[MangoDude]

There are good reasons for both
Adaptech is best for CD to CD for me
and Nero is better for just data or music\
but thats just my opinion

 

[Flessan]

I've made a full set of coasters with Nero . It wasn't the software that was at fault though... I had to replace the CD Writer.

I prefer Nero over all others (and I've tried a few).

 

[tigger80]

nero is good for ripping CDs, but adaptec i seems more user friendly